Advertisement

A Study on the Effect of Ultrasound Irradiation as Pretreatment Method on Flotation of Sedimentary Phosphate Rock with Carbonate–Silicate Gangue

  • Fatemeh Hassani
  • Mohammad NoaparastEmail author
  • Sied Ziaedin Shafaei Tonkaboni
Research Paper
  • 39 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Chemistry

Abstract

This research aims to explore the effect of ultrasound irradiation as a pretreatment method on the reverse flotation of phosphates. Ultrasonic treatment was used prior to flotation at various ultrasound intensities. The feed sample containing 10.34% P2O5 and 48.01% CaO was obtained from Lar mountain located in southwest of Iran. Flotation experiments were performed using two approaches: (1) a 2-level fractional factorial design with six variables and (2) try and error method. The results of experimental design showed that depressant type and pH were the effective parameters. The collected data from try and error experiments indicated that the conditioning time was the most effective parameter on the recovery. (By reducing the conditioning time from 11 to 6 min, the recovery was increased from 65.93 to 87.88%.) Furthermore, surface cleaning of phosphate minerals treated by ultrasound waves was proved by kinetic analysis, semiquantitative analysis by XRD and SEM–EDX. It was concluded that efficiency of phosphate flotation using ultrasound irradiation due to the cavitation bubbles that led to clean surface of particles is higher compared to the conventional flotation. After a cleaner step, the final grade and recovery of P2O5 reached 21.31% and 77.18%, respectively.

Keywords

Ultrasound irradiation Reverse flotation Sedimentary phosphate Pretreatment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the mineral processing laboratory at the University of Tehran for the supply of reagents and equipment.

References

  1. Aldrich C, Feng D (1999) Effect of ultrasonic preconditioning of pulp on the flotation of sulphide ores. Miner Eng 12(6):701–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antti B-M, Forssberg E (1989) Pulp chemistry in industrial mineral flotation. Studies of surface complex on calcite and apatite surfaces using FTIR spectroscopy. Miner Eng 2(2):217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao Q et al (2017) Surface cleaning and oxidative effects of ultra sonication on the flotation of oxidized pyrite. Powder Technol 311:390–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cilek EC, Ozgen S (2009) Effect of ultrasound on separation selectivity and efficiency of flotation. Miner Eng 22(14):1209–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feng D, Aldrich C (2005) Effect of preconditioning on the flotation of coal. Chem Eng Commun 192:972–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Filippov LO et al (2012) The effect of the ultrasonic treatment of the air-pulp upon the flotation. In: International mineral processing congress (IMPC) proceedings/New Delhi, India, 24–28 SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghadyani A, Noaparast M, Tonkaboni SZS (2017) A study on the effects of ultrasonic irradiation as pretreatment method on high-ash coal flotation and kinetics. Int J Coal Prep Util 38:1–18Google Scholar
  8. Gungoren C, Ozkan SG, Ozdemir O (2017a) Different approaches in the use of ultrasonic treatments in flotation. AKU J Sci Eng 17:727–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gungoren C, Ozdemir O, Ozkan SG (2017b) Effects of temperature during ultrasonic conditioning in quartz-amine flotation. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 53:687–698Google Scholar
  10. Haghi H et al (2016) A new experimental approach to improve the quality of low grade silica. The combination of indirect ultrasound irradiation with reverse flotation and magnetic separation. Minerals 6(4):121MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kopparthi P, Balamurugan S, Mukherjee AK (2017) Effect of ultrasonic pre-treatment time on coal flotation. Int J Coal Prep Utili.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2017.1417268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kou J, Tao D, Xu G (2010) Fatty acid collectors for phosphate flotation and their adsorption behavior using QCM-D. Int J Miner Process 95(1):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kursun H, Ulusoy U (2015) Zinc recovery from a lead–zinc–copper ore by ultrasonically assisted column flotation. Part Sci Technol 33(4):349–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Maoming F et al (2010a) Nanobubble generation and its applications in froth flotation(part III): specially designed laboratory scale column flotation of phosphate. Min Sci Technol 20(3):317–338Google Scholar
  15. Maoming F et al (2010b) Nanobubble generation and its applications in froth flotation (part II): fundamental study and theoretical analysis. Min Sci Technol (China) 20(2):159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mohammadkhani M et al (2011) Double reverse flotation of a very low grade sedimentary phosphate rock, rich in carbonate and silicate. Int J Miner Process 100(3):157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ozkan SG (2002) Beneficiation of magnesite slimes with ultrasonic treatment. Miner Eng 15(1):99–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ozkan SG (2012) Effects of simultaneous ultrasonic treatment on flotation of hard coal slimes. Fuel 93:576–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ozkan SG (2017) Further investigations on simultaneous ultrasonic coal flotation. Minerals 7(77):1–9Google Scholar
  20. Ozkan SG, Gungoren C (2012) Enhancement of colemanite flotation by ultrasonic pre-treatment. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 48(2):455–462Google Scholar
  21. Özkan ŞG, Kuyumcu HZ (2007) Design of a flotation cell equipped with ultrasound transducers to enhance coal flotation. Ultrason Sonochem 14(5):639–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ramadi A (2014) Beneficiation of sedimentary phosphate ore from Lar Mountain. M.Sc thesis, Tehran UniversityGoogle Scholar
  23. Shafaei Tonkaboni SZ (2001) Phosphate extraction from slim. Miner Process Res Cent Iran 1:2Google Scholar
  24. Shariati S, Ramadi A, Salsani A (2015) Beneficiation of low-grade phosphate deposits by a combination of calcination and shaking tables: Southwest Iran. Minerals 5(3):367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sonmez E et al (2004) Beneficiation of colemanite concentrates from fine wastes by using ultrasound waves. Miner Eng 17(2):359–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vasseghian Y, Ahmadi M, Joshaghani M (2016) Ultrasound assisted ash and sulphur removal from bitumen using column flotation technique: experimental, RSM and ANN methods in modeling and optimization of process. Iran J Sci Technol Trans A, Sci, pp 1–15Google Scholar
  27. Videla A et al (2016) Ultrasound treatment on tailings to enhance copper flotation recovery. Miner Eng 99:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wencheng X, Jianguo Y, Chuan L (2013) A short review of improvement in flotation of low rank/oxidized coals by pretreatments. Powder Technol 237:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang P et al (2004) Improving phosphate flotation with new chemistry, smart flowsheet and novel equipment. SME annual meeting. PreprintsGoogle Scholar
  30. Zhang HX et al (2012a) Enhanced desulfurizing flotation of different size fractions of high sulfur coal using sonoelectrochemical method. Fuel Process Technol 97:9–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zhang HX et al (2012b) Enhanced desulfurizing flotation of high sulfur coal by sonoelectrochemical method. Fuel Process Technol 93(1):13–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhou Z et al (2009) On the role of cavitation in particle collection in flotation: a critical review. II. Miner Eng 22(5):419–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatemeh Hassani
    • 1
  • Mohammad Noaparast
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sied Ziaedin Shafaei Tonkaboni
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Mining Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversity of TehranTehranIran

Personalised recommendations