Advertisement

Systematic Significance of Pollen Morphology of the Genus Acmella Rich. (Heliantheae: Asteraceae)

  • G R Reshmi
  • R Rajalakshmi
Research paper
  • 14 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biology

Abstract

Pollen pattern plays an important role in discriminate and definite infraspecific as well as interspecific diversity for species recognition. In this study, we analyzed pollen morphology of the 86 accessions under nine currently recognized taxa of Acmella to estimate our current understanding of the phylogeny of this genus. Species relationship can be evaluated on the basis of pollen characteristics. The study shows the significance of palynological characteristics such as aperture type, spine length and nature, stature of basal cushion and sculpturing pattern in the delimitation of taxa in the interspecific levels. Pollen grains of these species are isopolar, zonocolporate pollen and are radially symmetric. Shape is more or less circular in polar view, with the colpi slightly intruding, from circular to slightly elliptical in equatorial view. But the number of colpus and ora varies. Acmella calva, A. uliginosa and A. uliginosa Var. pentamera have 3-zonocolporate pollen, A. ciliata, A. ghoshinis, A. radicans and A. tetralobata have 2, 3, 4 zonocolporate pollen and A. vazhachalensis and A. paniculata have 2, 3, 4, 5 zonocolporate pollen. Pollen shape varied from oblate spheroidal to prolate spheroidal. Exine is thick, 2.1–5.2 µm normally. Ornamentation is spinate; 1.16–5.46 µm long, spine apex shape varies in each species. Scanning electron microscopic studies showed differences in the spine length, spine structure and attachment. We used statistical analysis to explore variations in pollen grain size and shape among Acmella species, and to compare systematic groupings of Acmella based on pollen characters.

Keywords

Acmella Phylogeny Statistics Tooth ache 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The first author thanks Kerala State Council for Science, Technology and Environment (KSCSTE), Government of Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram, India for its financial support to carry out the research programme.

References

  1. Agwu COC, Osibe EE (1992) Airborne palynomorphs of Nsukka during the months of February–April 1990. Niger J Bot 5:177–185Google Scholar
  2. Carlquist S (1976) Tribal interrelationships and phylogeny of the Asteraceae. Aliso 8:465–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cronquist A (1981) An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Dimon MT (1971) General problems raised by pollen of Mediterranean composites. Nat Monspel Ser Bot 22:129–144Google Scholar
  5. Edeoga RO, Ogbebor NO, Amayo AO (1996) Pollen morphology of some Nigerian species of Aneilema R. Br. and Ludwigia L. New Bot 23:223–231Google Scholar
  6. Erdtman G (1952) Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. Almqvist & Wiksell, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  7. Erdtman G (1960) The acetolysis method. Sven Bot Tidskr 54:561–564Google Scholar
  8. Erdtman G (1966) Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy. Angiosperms. An introduction to palynology I. Hafner Publishing Co., New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Horner HT Jr, Pearson CB (1978) Pollen wall and aperture development in Helianthus annuus (Compositae: Heliantheae). Am J Bot 65(3):293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jansen RK (1985) The systematics of Acmella (Asteraceae-Heliantheae). Syst Bot Monogr 8:1–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones SB (1981) Synoptic classification and pollen morphology of “Vernonia” (Compositae: Vernonieae) in the old world. Rhodora 83(833):59–75Google Scholar
  12. Mbagwu FN, Edeoga HO (2006) Palynological studies on some Nigerian species of Vigna savi. J Biol Sci 6(6):1122–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meo AA, Khan MA (2006) Pollen morphology as an aid to the identification of Chrysanthemum species (Compositae-Anthemideae) from Pakistan. Pak J Bot 38(1):29Google Scholar
  14. Moore PD, Webb JA, Collinson ME (1991) Pollen analysis. Blackwell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Nair PKK (1965) Trends in the morphological evolution of pollen and spores. J Indian Bot Soc 44:468–478Google Scholar
  16. Nair PKK (1966) Essentials of palynology. Asia Publishing House, BombayGoogle Scholar
  17. Punt W, Hoen PP, Blackmore S, Nilsson S, Le Thomas A (2007) Glossary of pollen and spore terminology. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 143(1):1–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reshmi GR, Rajalakshmi R (2016) Three new combinations in Acmella (Asteraceae: Heliantheae). Trop Plant Res Int J 3(1):67–69Google Scholar
  19. Sachdeva SK, Malik CP (1986) Experimental plant taxonomy. Kalyani Publications, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  20. Sheela D, Avita S (2010) Palynological studies on Spilanthes Jacq (Heliantheae-Compositae) from India. Phytomorphology 60(4):119–121Google Scholar
  21. Skvarla JJ, Turner BL (1966) Systematic implications from electron microscopic studies of Compositae—a review. Ann Mo Bot Gard 53:220–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Skvarla JJ, Raven PH, Chissoe WF, Sharp M (1978) An ultrastructural study of viscin threads of Onagraceae pollen. Pollen Spores 20:5–143Google Scholar
  23. Sporne KR (1972) Some observations on the evolution of pollen types in dicotyledons. New Phytol 71:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van CM (1976) Pattern of pollen morphological variation within taxa. In: Ferguson IK, Muller J (eds) The evolutionary significance of the exine. Academic Press, New York, pp 163–183Google Scholar
  25. Vishnu M (1964) Contemporary thought in palynology. Phytomorphology 14:135–147Google Scholar
  26. Wagenitz G (1976) Systematics and phylogeny of the Compositae (Asteraceae). Plant Syst Evol 125:29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Walker JW (1976) Evolutionary significance of the exine in the pollen of primitive angiosperms. In: Ferguson IK, Muller J (eds) The evolutionary significance of exine. Academic press, London, pp 251–308Google Scholar
  28. Walker JW, Doyle JA (1975) The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: palynology. Ann Mo Bot Gard 62:664–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wodehouse RP (1930) Pollen grains in identification and classification of plant V. haplopappus and other Asteraceae: the origin of their furrow configuration. Bull Torrey Bot Club 57:21–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wortley AH, Blackmore S, Chissoe WF, Skvarla JJ (2012) Recent advances in Compositae (Asteraceae) palynology, with emphasis on previously unstudied and unplaced taxa. Grana 51(2):158–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of KeralaThiruvananthapuramIndia

Personalised recommendations