Functional Evaluation and Physicochemical Characterization of a Lipopeptide Biosurfactant Produced by the Stenotrophomonas sp. IE-93

  • Hamid Reza Karbalaei-HeidariEmail author
  • Ladan Taghavi
  • Parvin Hasanizadeh
Research paper
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Biology


In the present work, biosurfactant production of the bacterial strain Stenotrophomonas sp. IE-93 was surveyed and quantified through four conventional screening methods. The biosurfactant produced by the strain IE-93 could reduce the surface tension to 24 mN m−1 and showed 100% emulsification activity when equal volume of n-hexane and fermentation medium was applied. Effects of culture conditions on productivity of the strain revealed that olive oil and ammonium sulfate were the best carbon and nitrogen sources, respectively. The crude produced biosurfactant showed a good stability during exposure to high temperatures (up to 120 °C), high salinity (up to 20% NaCl) and a wide range of pHs (2.0–12.0). Purification of the biosurfactant was performed using ethyl acetate, and crude extract was separated on silica gel column chromatography. The chemical characterization of the purified biosurfactant by FTIR spectroscopy revealed that it has a lipopeptide nature. Moreover, ultraviolet mutation of Stenotrophomonas sp. IE-93 yielded a stable mutant that produced over 1.7-fold more of the biosurfactant than the parent strain. Overall, the results suggest that Stenotrophomonas sp. IE-93 could be suitable candidate to use in various industrial processes needing emulsifier, especially in oil industry which needs a stable surfactant in high temperature and salinity conditions.


Biosurfactant Stenotrophomonas Surface activity Stability UV mutagenesis 



We would like to thank the research affairs of Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. This work was supported in part by a grant for Scientific Research from the Iran National Science foundation (INSF) under Contract Number of 93035486.

Supplementary material

40995_2018_656_MOESM1_ESM.docx (144 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 143 kb)


  1. Abu-Ruwaida A, Banat I, Haditirto S, Khamis A (1991) Nutritional requirements and growth characteristics of a biosurfactant-producingRhodococcus bacterium. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 7:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amiriyan A, Assadi MM, Saggadian V, Noohi A (2004) Bioemulsan production by Iranian oil reservoirs microorganisms. J Environ Health Sci Eng 1:28–35Google Scholar
  3. Andrade Silva NR, Luna MA, Santiago AL, Franco LO, Silva GK, de Souza PM, Okada K, Albuquerque CD, Silva CA, Campos-Takaki GM (2014) Biosurfactant-and-bioemulsifier produced by a promising Cunninghamella echinulata isolated from caatinga soil in the northeast of Brazil. Int J Mol Sci 15:15377–15395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banat IM (1995) Biosurfactants production and possible uses in microbial enhanced oil recovery and oil pollution remediation: a review. Biores Technol 51:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bezza FA, Chirwa EMN (2015) Production and applications of lipopeptide biosurfactant for bioremediation and oil recovery by Bacillus subtilis CN2. Biochem Eng J 101:168–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouassida M, Ghazala I, Ellouze-Chaabouni S, Ghribi D (2018) Improved biosurfactant production by Bacillus subtilis SPB1 mutant obtained by random mutagenesis and its application in enhanced oil recovery in a sand system. J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:95–104Google Scholar
  7. Bustamante M, Durán N, Diez M (2012) Biosurfactants are useful tools for the bioremediation of contaminated soil: a review. J Soil Sci Plant Nut 12:667–687Google Scholar
  8. Dadrasnia A, Ismail S (2015) Biosurfactant production by Bacillus salmalaya for lubricating oil solubilization and biodegradation. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12:9848–9863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deleu M, Razafindralambo H, Popineau Y, Jacques P, Thonart P, Paquot M (1999) Interfacial and emulsifying properties of lipopeptides from Bacillus subtilis. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 152:3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Desai JD, Banat IM (1997) Microbial production of surfactants and their commercial potential. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:47–64Google Scholar
  11. Joshi S, Bharucha C, Desai AJ (2008) Production of biosurfactant and antifungal compound by fermented food isolate Bacillus subtilis 20B. Biores Technol 99:4603–4608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Karanth N, Deo P, Veenanadig N (1999) Microbial production of biosurfactants and their importance. Curr Sci 77:116–126Google Scholar
  13. Khairuddin NF, Mulok TETZ, Khalil KA, Omar WSAW, Saleh SH (2016) Screening of medium with different range of waste frying oil (WFO), sodium nitrate (NaNO3) and sodium chloride (NaCl) for biosurfactant production by thermophilic Anoxybacillus sp. using fractional factorial design (FFD). In: CIEC 2015. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khopade A, Biao R, Liu X, Mahadik K, Zhang L, Kokare C (2012) Production and stability studies of the biosurfactant isolated from marine Nocardiopsis sp. B4. Desalination 285:198–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim SH, Lim EJ, Lee SO, Lee JD, Lee TH (2000) Purification and characterization of biosurfactants from Nocardia sp. L-417. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 31:249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kitamoto D, Isoda H, Nakahara T (2002) Functions and potential applications of glycolipid biosurfactants—from energy-saving materials to gene delivery carriers. J Biosci Bioeng 94:187–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Makkar RS, Cameotra SS, Banat IM (2011) Advances in utilization of renewable substrates for biosurfactant production. AMB Express 1:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mukherjee A (2007) Potential application of cyclic lipopeptide biosurfactants produced by Bacillus subtilis strains in laundry detergent formulations. Lett Appl Microbiol 45:330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mulligan CN, Chow TY-K, Gibbs BF (1989) Enhanced biosurfactant production by a mutant Bacillus subtilis strain. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 31:486–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nitschke M, Pastore GM (2006) Production and properties of a surfactant obtained from Bacillus subtilis grown on cassava wastewater. Biores Technol 97:336–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rahman PK, Gakpe E (2008) Production, characterisation and applications of biosurfactants-review. Biotechnology 7:360–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ruggeri C, Franzetti A, Bestetti G, Caredda P, La Colla P, Pintus M, Sergi S, Tamburini E (2009) Isolation and characterisation of surface active compound-producing bacteria from hydrocarbon-contaminated environments. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 63:936–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Santos DK, Brandão YB, Rufino RD, Luna JM, Salgueiro AA, Santos VA, Sarubbo LA (2014) Optimization of cultural conditions for biosurfactant production from Candida lipolytica. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 3:48–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Seghal Kiran G, Anto Thomas T, Selvin J, Sabarathnam B, Lipton AP (2010) Optimization and characterization of a new lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by marine Brevibacterium aureum MSA13 in solid state culture. Biores Technol 101:2389–2396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sekhon KK, Khanna S, Cameotra SS (2012) Biosurfactant production and potential correlation with esterase activity. J Pet Environ Biotechnol 3:1–10Google Scholar
  26. Sharma D, Singh Saharan B (2014) Simultaneous production of biosurfactants and bacteriocins by probiotic Lactobacillus casei MRTL3. Int J Microbiol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sriram MI, Kalishwaralal K, Deepak V, Gracerosepat R, Srisakthi K, Gurunathan S (2011) Biofilm inhibition and antimicrobial action of lipopeptide biosurfactant produced by heavy metal tolerant strain Bacillus cereus NK1. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 85:174–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Walter V, Syldatk C, Hausmann R (2010) Screening concepts for the isolation of biosurfactant producing microorganisms. Biosurfactants. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  29. Zhu Y, J-J Gan, G-l Zhang, Yao B, W-j Zhu, Meng Q (2007) Reuse of waste frying oil for production of rhamnolipids using Pseudomonas aeruginosa zju. u1M. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 8:1514–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biology, Faculty of ScienceShiraz UniversityShirazIran

Personalised recommendations