Advertisement

Effect of Fermentation Broth of Endophytic Fungi on Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Tomato Seedling Under Calcium Nitrate Stress

  • Shi-wei Niu
  • Na Wang
  • Muhammad Irfan
  • Jia-yi Xu
  • Yan-jun Zhang
  • Guang-xing Cai
Research paper
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

In this research, the fermentation broth produced from seven strains of endophytic fungi was sprayed on tomato plants at seedling stage. This process was carried out under Ca(NO3)2 stress, with comparison to the commercial microbial fertilizer to study the physiological and biochemical characteristics of tomato seedling. The results showed that most of the fermentation broths have no phytotoxicity and could improve salt resistance of tomato. The fermentation broth of strain Schizophyllum sp. DL12 displayed the best effects which increased the chlorophyll content (0.244 mg g−1 FW), soluble protein (31.48 µg g−1 FW), proline content (305.6 µg g−1 FW), peroxidase (21.78 µg g−1 FW min−1) and catalase (0.345 µg g−1 FW min−1) activities in leaves significantly as compared with control (CK) and commercial microbial fertilizer. These findings indicated that fermentation broth of Schizophyllum sp. DL12 has bright prospects of applications.

Keywords

Endophytic fungi Fermentation broth Tomato Physiology and biochemistry 

References

  1. Abei H (1984) Catalase in vitro. Methods Enzymol 105:121–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Roles of glycine betaine and proline in improving plant abiotic stress resistance. Environ Exp Bot 59(2):206–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Deng Z, Cao L (2017) Fungal endophytes and their interactions with plants in phytoremediation: a review. Chemosphere 168:1100–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dorais M, Ehret DL, Papadopoulos AP (2008) Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) health components: from the seed to the consumer. Phytochem Rev 7(2):231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Foolad MR (2007) Current status of breeding tomatoes for salt and drought tolerance. In: Advances in molecular breeding toward drought and salt tolerant crops. Springer, Netherlands, pp 669–700.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5578-2_27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gulen H, Turhan E, Eris A (2006) Changes in peroxidase activities and soluble proteins in strawberry varieties under salt-stress. Acta Physiol Plant 28(2):109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hernández JA, Jiménez A, Mullineaux P (2000) Tolerance of pea (Pisum sativum L.) to long-term salt stress is associated with induction of antioxidant defenses. Plant Cell Environ 23(8):853–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jithesh MN, Prashanth SR, Sivaprakash KR (2006) Antioxidative response mechanisms in halophytes: their role in stress defense. J Genet 85(3):237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Khurshid S, Shoaib A, Javaid A (2014) In vitro toxicity evaluation of culture filtrates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici on growth and physiology of tomato under chromium(VI) stress. J Anim Plant Sci 24(4):1241–1245Google Scholar
  10. Li J, Yi Y, Cheng X, Zhang D, Irfan M (2015) Study on the effect of magnetic field treatment of newly isolated Paenibacillus sp. Bot Stud 56:2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Manaa A, Ahmed HB, Smiti S (2011) Salt-stress induced physiological and proteomic changes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) seedlings. Omics J Integr Biol 15(11):801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nakano Y (1980) Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol 22(5):867–880Google Scholar
  13. Panda SK, Upadhyay RK (2004) Salt stress injury induces oxidative alterations and antioxidative defense in the roots of Lemna minor. Biol Plant 48(2):249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Santoyo G, Moreno-Hagelsieb G, Del COM (2016) Plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes. Microbiol Res 183:92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sushanto G, Gitishree D, Sen SK (2016) Endophytes: a treasure house of bioactive compounds of medicinal importance. Front Microbiol 7(148):1538Google Scholar
  16. Tamas L, Dudikova J, Durcekova K, Halugkova L (2008) Alterations of the gene expression, lipid peroxidation, proline and thiol content along the barley root exposed to cadmium. J Plant Physiol 165(11):1193–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tiwari JK, Munshi AD, Kumar R (2010) Effect of salt stress on cucumber: Na+–K+, ratio, osmolyte concentration, phenols and chlorophyll content. Acta Physiol Plant 32(1):103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wang H, Zhao X, Liu C, Liu L, Yu S, Liang C, Irfan M, Zhao K, Guan T (2015) Effects of the biocontrol agent Aspergillus flavipes on the soil microflora and soil enzymes in the rooting zone of pepper plants infected with Phytophthora capsici. J Phytopathol 163:513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wellbum AR (1994) The spectral determination of chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution. J Plant Physiol 144(3):307–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu Z, Shou W, Huang K (2000) The current situation and trend of tomato cultivation in China. Acta Physiol Plant 22(3):379–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shi-wei Niu
    • 1
  • Na Wang
    • 1
  • Muhammad Irfan
    • 2
  • Jia-yi Xu
    • 1
  • Yan-jun Zhang
    • 1
  • Guang-xing Cai
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Plant Nutrients and Environmental ResourcesLiaoning Academy of Agricultural SciencesShenyangChina
  2. 2.Department of BiotechnologyUniversity of SargodhaSargodhaPakistan

Personalised recommendations