Advertisement

Amoxicillin-Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles of Less than 100 nm: Design, Preparation and Antimicrobial Activity Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

  • Mahnaz HadizadehEmail author
  • Asma Toraji
Research Paper

Abstract

Amoxicillin is commonly used to treat a wide range of infections, but its use is limited by a relatively short biological half-life. This study developed a controlled-release amoxicillin nanoformulation and evaluated its antibacterial activity. The nanoparticles were synthesized by ionic gelation method assisted by sonication and characterized by Fourier transformed infrared, scanning electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering. The antibacterial effect was studied using micro-dilution method to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of nanoparticles. Inhibition zone diameters of nanoformulation were also compared to those of the free amoxicillin. Sonication reduced the average size of nanoparticles by 70%. The encapsulation efficiency was 95 ± 2%. In vitro release studies showed the initial burst release in the first 10 h and continuous slow release up to the end. The antimicrobial results indicated that the amoxicillin-loaded chitosan nanoparticles were more effective than free amoxicillin against methicillin-susceptible- and methicillin-resistant forms of Staphylococcus aureus. The results highlight that the chitosan and sodium tripolyphosphate concentration and the sonication has a significant influence on nanoparticle size. The optimized chitosan nanoparticles with proper size and controlled release of β-lactam antibiotics may be a good candidate for treating antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Keywords

Drug delivery Amoxicillin Nanoparticles Chitosan Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Financial assistance from Iran National Science Foundation (INSF), Grant no. 94014310 is gratefully acknowledged. The authors sincerely thank Mrs. Zahra Zahedi for help with the DLS experiments.

Author Contributions

MH contributed in conception of the work, study design, conducting the study, manuscript preparation, revising the draft, approval of the final version of the manuscript, and agreed for all aspects of the work. AT contributed in conception of the work, conducting the study, data analysis, revising the draft, approval of the final version of the manuscript, and agreed for all aspects of the work.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arora S, Gupta S, Narang RK, Budhiraja RD (2011) Amoxicillin loaded chitosan–alginate polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles as mucopenetrating delivery system for H. pylori. Sci Pharm 79:673–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Athar M, Das AJ (2014) Therapeutic nanoparticles: state-of-the-art of nanomedicine. Adv Mater Rev 1:25–37Google Scholar
  3. Aydin R, Pulat M (2012) 5-Fluorouracil encapsulated chitosan nanoparticles for pH-stimulated drug delivery: evaluation of controlled release kinetics. J Nanomater 2012:42–52Google Scholar
  4. Belal F, El-Kerdawy M, El-Ashry S, El-Wasseef D (2000) Kinetic spectrophotometric determination of ampicillin and amoxicillin in dosage forms. Farmaco 55:680–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Calvo P, Remunan-Lopez C, Vila-Jato J, Alonso M (1997) Novel hydrophilic chitosan-polyethylene oxide nanoparticles as protein carriers. J Appl Polym Sci 63:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chattopadhyay D, Inamdar M (2012) Studies on synthesis, characterization and viscosity behaviour of nano chitosan. Res J Eng Sci 1:9–15Google Scholar
  7. Cho H, Uehara T, Bernhardt TG (2014) Beta-lactam antibiotics induce a lethal malfunctioning of the bacterial cell wall synthesis machinery. Cell 159:1300–1311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costelloe C, Metcalfe C, Lovering A, Mant D, Hay AD (2010) Effect of antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in individual patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 340:c2096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dai T, Tanaka M, Huang YY, Hamblin MR (2011) Chitosan preparations for wounds and burns: antimicrobial and wound-healing effects. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 9:857–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. David MZ, Daum RS (2010) Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev 23:616–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elzoghby AO, Samy WM, Elgindy NA (2012) Albumin-based nanoparticles as potential controlled release drug delivery systems. J Control Rel 157:168–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Esmaeilzadeh-Gharedaghi E, Faramarzi MA, Amini MA, Rouholamini Najafabadi A, Rezayat SM, Amani A (2012) Effects of processing parameters on particle size of ultrasound prepared chitosan nanoparticles: an Artificial Neural Networks Study. Pharm Dev Technol 17:638–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farokhzad OC, Langer R (2009) Impact of nanotechnology on drug delivery. ACS Nano 3:16–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Floris A, Meloni MC, Lai F, Marongiu F, Maccioni AM, Sinico C (2013) Cavitation effect on chitosan nanoparticle size: a possible approach to protect drugs from ultrasonic stress. Carbohydr Polym 94:619–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao P, Nie X, Zou M, Shi Y, Cheng G (2011) Recent advances in materials for extended-release antibiotic delivery system. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 64:625–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibot L, Chabaud S, Bouhout S, Bolduc S, Auger FA, Moulin VJ (2015) Anticancer properties of chitosan on human melanoma are cell line dependent. Int J Biol Macromol 72:370–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gresser U (2001) Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid therapy may be associated with severe side effects-review of the literature. Eur J Med 6:139–149Google Scholar
  18. He C, Hu Y, Yin L, Tang C, Yin C (2010) Effects of particle size and surface charge on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles. Biomaterials 31:3657–3666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Höltje JV (1995) From growth to autolysis: the murein hydrolases in Escherichia coli. Arch Microbiol 164:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jayakumar R, Menon D, Manzoor K, Nair S, Tamura H (2010) Biomedical applications of chitin and chitosan based nanomaterials—a short review. Carbohydr Polym 82:227–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ji J, Hao S, Wu D, Huang R, Xu Y (2011) Preparation, characterization and in vitro release of chitosan nanoparticles loaded with gentamicin and salicylic acid. Carbohydr Polym 85:803–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein E (2007) Hospitalizations and deaths caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, United States, 1999–2005. Emerg Infect Dis 13:1840–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kulkarni SA, Feng SS (2013) Effects of particle size and surface modification on cellular uptake and biodistribution of polymeric nanoparticles for drug delivery. Pharm Res 30:2512–2522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kumar MNR (2000) A review of chitin and chitosan applications. React Funct Polym 46:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar D, Dharmendra S, Jhansee M, Shrikant N, Pandey SP (2011) Development and characterization of chitosan nanoparticles loaded with amoxicillin. Int Res J Phar 2:145–511Google Scholar
  26. Kumari A, Yadav SK, Yadav SC (2010) Biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles based drug delivery systems. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 75:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pandey R, Zahoor A, Sharma S, Khuller G (2003) Nanoparticle encapsulated antitubercular drugs as a potential oral drug delivery system against murine tuberculosis. Tuberculosis 83:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Portero A, Remunan-Lopez C, Criado M, Alonso M (2002) Reacetylated chitosan microspheres for controlled delivery of anti-microbial agents to the gastric mucosa. J Microencapsul 19:797–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Qi L, Xu Z, Jiang X, Hu C, Zou X (2004) Preparation and antibacterial activity of chitosan nanoparticles. Carbohydr Res 339:2693–2700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rinaudo M (2006) Chitin and chitosan: properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci 31:603–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sarwar A, Katas H, Zin NM (2014) Antibacterial effects of chitosan–tripolyphosphate nanoparticles: impact of particle size molecular weight. J Nanopart Res 16:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tavares W (2000) Problem Gram-positive bacteria: resistance in staphylococci, enterococci, and pneumococci to antimicrobial drugs. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 33:281–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tiyaboonchai W (2003) Chitosan nanoparticles: a promising system for drug delivery. Naresuan Univ J 11:51–66Google Scholar
  34. Yen MT, Yang JH, Mau JL (2008) Antioxidant properties of chitosan from crab shells. Carbohydr Polym 74:840–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Younes I, Rinaudo M (2015) Chitin and chitosan preparation from marine sources. Structure properties and applications. Mar Drugs 13:1133–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zagari RM, Bianchi-Porro G, Fiocca R, Gasbarrini G, Roda E, Bazzoli F (2007) Comparison of 1 and 2 weeks of omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication: the HYPER Study. Gut 56:475–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shiraz University 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyIranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST)TehranIran
  2. 2.Pharmaceutical Sciences Branch, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Advanced Sciences and TechnologyIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran

Personalised recommendations