Advertisement

Mesophilic bioleaching performance of copper, cobalt and nickel with emphasis on complex orebodies of the Democratic Republic of Congo: a review of dynamic interactions between solids loading, microbiota activity and growth

  • David Lukumu BampoleEmail author
  • Antoine-F Mulaba-Bafubiandi
Review Paper

Abstract

The copper, cobalt and nickel ores are still currently mined in the world. Its complex mineralogy creates extraction challenges by means of conventional metallurgical methods. Meanwhile, dealing with mesophilic strains in leaching process requires a compromise between solid loading and microbiota activity and growth. That is why, the influence of solid loading with fine or coarse particulates, the cell disturbance during the metal–microbes interactions depending upon the influence of gangue nature as well as metallic ions concentration on bacterial tolerance and the chemical and biological pathways involved in bioleaching mechanism of complex ores are summarised in detail in this paper. The current trends in mechanism research and diverse discovered set of microbiota and bacterial population coupled with bacterial adaptation methods contribute to optimise and improve the metals leaching performance and knowledge. In addition, the different existing complex mineralogical structures elaborate a main indirect mechanism with two different transitory mechanisms, before metal is converted into metal sulphate as wealthily explained in this comprehensive review. More data for cost analysis concomitant with extraction efficiency of metals using mesophilic bioleaching process are needed. However, it does not mean that other options are excluded in order to set a bio-hydrometallurgical chain. In fact, to consider also the concentration and purification of the pregnant leaching solution via phase separation and solvent extraction will be helpful. This obeys to the idea of option trees, where possible options are then systematically gaged with respect to critical criteria.

Keywords

Mesophilic bioleaching Microbiota Copper Cobalt Nickel Sustainability Environment 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge and extend their gratitude to the University of Johannesburg for providing the means and facilities for research—not excluding the Mineral Processing and Technology Research Centre and the Metallurgy Department.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The first author discloses that this work does not have any conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

40974_2019_142_MOESM1_ESM.docx (692 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 691 kb)

References

  1. Abdollahi H, Shaefaei S-Z, Noaparast M, Anafi Z, Aslan N (2013) Bio-dissolution of Cu, Mo and Re from molybdenite concentrate using a mix mesophilic microorganism in shake flask. Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 23(1):219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmadi A, Schaffie M, Manafi Z, Ranjbar M (2010) Electrochemical bioleaching of high-grade chalcopyrite flotation concentrates in a stirred bioreactor. Hydrometallurgy 104(1):99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albert RA, Archambault J, Rossello-Mora R, Tindall BJ, Matheny M (2005) Bacillus acidicola sp. Nov., A novel mesophilic acidophilic species isolated from acidic Sphagnum peat bogs in Wisconsin. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:2125–2130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azabou S, Mechichi T, Sayadi S (2007) Zinc precipitation by heavy-metal tolerant sulfate reducing bacteria enriched on phosphogypsum as sulfate source. Miner Eng 2(20):173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker BJ, Banfield JF (2003) Microbial communities in acid mine drainage. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 44:139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballerstedt H, Pakostova E, Johnson DB, Schippers A (2017) Approaches for eliminating Bacteria introduced during in situ bioleaching of Fractured Sulfidic Ores in deep subsurface. Solid State Phenom 262:70–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bampole D-L, Mulaba-Bafubiandi A-F (2018a) Comparative study of simultaneous removal performance of silica and solid colloidal particles from chalcopyrite bioleachate solution by washing and coagulation methods. J Sustain Metall 4(4):470–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bampole D-L, Mulaba-Bafubiandi A-F (2018b) Removal performance of silica and solid colloidal particles from chalcopyrite bioleaching solution: Effect of coagulant (Magnafloc set #1597) for predicting an effective solvent extraction. Eng J 22(5):123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bampole D-L, Mulaba-Bafubiandi A-F (2019) Bioleaching of chalcopyrite and pyritic chalcocite using indigenous mesophilic bacteria. M-tech Thesis, University of Johannesburg. Johannesburg, South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  10. Bampole D-L, Mulamba E-L (2017) Mathematical modelling for enhancement heap leaching Of D.M.S. tailings for the recovering copper and cobalt: using the Taguchi method and analysis of variance. Int Organ Sci Res J IORS 5(10):50–57Google Scholar
  11. Bampole D-L, Luis P, Mulamba E-L (2017) Effect of Substrates during the adaptation of indigenous bacteria in bioleaching of sulphide ores. Am Sci Res J Eng Technol Sci ASRJETS 32(1):200–214Google Scholar
  12. Bampole D-L, Luis P, Mulaba-Bafubiandi A-F (2019) Sustainable copper extraction from mixed chalcopyrite-chalcocite using biomass. Trans Nonferr Met 29(10):2170–2182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Battaglia-Brunet F, Joulian C, Garrido F, Dictor M-C, Morin D, Coupland K, Johnson D-B, Hallberg K-B, Baranger P (2002) An arsenic (III)-oxidizing bacterial population: selection, characterization, and performance in reactors. J Appl Microbiol 93:656–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Batumike M-J, Cailteux J-L, Kampunzu A-B (2007) Lithostratigraphy, basin development, base metal deposits, and regional correlations of the Neoproterozoic Nguba and Kundelungu rock successions, central African copperbelt. Gondwana Res 11(3):432–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Behera S-K, Mulaba-Bafubiandi A-F (2015) Advances in microbial leaching processes for nickel extraction from lateritic minerals—a review. Korean J Chem Eng 32:1447–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Behera S-K, Manjaiah M, Sekar S, Panda K, Mavumengwana V, Mulaba-Bafubiandi A-F (2017) Optimization of microbial leaching of base metals from a South African sulfidic nickel ore concentrate by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Geomicrobiol J 35(6):1–13Google Scholar
  17. Bobadilla-Fazzini Roberto A (2017) Mineralogical dynamics of primary copper sulfides mediated by acidophilic biofilm formation. Solid State Phenom 262:325–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bond P-L, Druschel G-K, Banfield J-F (2000a) Comparison of acid mine drainage microbial communities in physically and geochemically distinct ecosystems. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66(11):4962–4971Google Scholar
  19. Bond P-L, Smriga S-P, Banfield J-F (2000b) Phylogeny of microorganisms populating a thick, subaerial, predominantly lithotrophic biofilm at an extreme acid mine drainage site. Appl Environ Microbiol 66(9):3842–3849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bomberg M, Mäkinen J, Salo M, Arnold M, Koukkari P (2017) Rare earth elements recovery and sulphate removal from phosphogypsum waste waters with sulphate reducing bacteria. In: 22nd International biohydrometallurgy symposium solid state phenomena, vol 262, pp 573–576Google Scholar
  21. Brierley C-L (2008) How will bio-mining be applied in future? Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 18(6):1302–1310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bulatovic S-M (2007) In: Handbook of flotation reagents: chemistry, theory and practice – Flotation of sulfide ores, vol 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, pp 5–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chandra C-S, Srichandan H, Kim D-J, Akcil A (2012) Biohydrometallurgy and bio-mineral processing technology: a review on its past, present and future. Res J Recent Sci 1(10):85–99Google Scholar
  24. Clark D-W, Newell A-J-H, Chilman G-F, Capps P-G (2000) Improving flotation recovery of copper sulphides by nitrogen gas and sulphidisation conditioning. Miner Eng 13(12):1197–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Crundwell FK (2003) How do bacteria interact with minerals? Hydrometallurgy 71(1–2):75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Denef V-J, Mueller R-S, Banfield J-F (2010) AMD biofilms: using model communities to study microbial evolution and ecological complexity in nature. Int Soc Microbial Ecol 4:599–610Google Scholar
  27. Deveci H, Akcil A, Alp I (2004) Bioleaching of complex zinc sulphides using mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria: comparative importance of pH and iron. Hydrometallurgy 73(3–4):293–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dopson M, Johnson D-B (2012) Biodiversity, metabolism and applications of acidophilic sulfur-metabolizing microorganisms. Environ Microbiol 14:2620–2631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dreisinger D (2006) Copper leaching from primary sulphides: options for biological and chemical extraction of copper. Hydrometallurgy 83(1–4):10–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Edwards K-J, Gihring T-M, Banfield J-F (1999) Seasonal variations in microbial populations and environmental conditions in an extreme acid mine drainage environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3627–3632Google Scholar
  31. Escobar B, Lazo D (2003) Activation of bacteria in agglomerated ores by changing the composition of the leaching solution. Hydrometallurgy 71:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. François A (1974) Stratigraphie, tectonique et minéralisations dans l’arc cuprifère du Shaba (République du Zaïre). In: Bartholomé P (ed) Gisements Stratiformes et Provinces Cuprifères. La Société Géologique de Belgique, Liège, pp 79–101Google Scholar
  33. Fu K-B, Lin H, Wang H, Wen H-W, Wen Z-L (2012) Comparative study on the passivation layers of copper sulphide minerals during bioleaching. Int J Miner Metall Mater 19(10):886–892CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gericke M, Govender Y (2011) Bioleaching strategies for the treatment of nickel-copper sulphide concentrates. Miner Eng 24(11):1106–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Golightly J-P (1981) Nickeliferous laterite deposits. Economic geology 75th anniversary. Econ Geol 75:710–735Google Scholar
  36. Golyshina O-V, Pivovarova T-A, Karavaiko G-I, Kondrat- T-F, Moore E-R-B, Abraham W-R, Lundsorf H, Timmis K-N, Yakimov M-M, Golyshin P-N (2000) Ferroplasma acidiphilum gen. nov., sp. nov., an acidophilic, autotrophic, ferrous-iron oxidizing, cell wall-lacking, mesophilic member of the Ferroplasmaceae fam. nov., comprising a distinct lineage of the archaea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:997–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Golyshina O-V, Lünsdorf H, Kublanov Goldenstein N-I, Hinrichs K-U, Golyshin P-N (2016) The novel extremely acidophilic, cell-walldeficient archaeon Cuniculiplasma divulgatum gen. nov., sp. nov. Represents a new family, Cuniculiplasmataceae fam. nov., of the order thermoplasmatales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:332–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gomez C, Blazquez M-L, Ballester A (1999) Bioleaching of a Spanish complex sulphide ore-bulk concentrate. Miner Eng 12(1):93–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hallberg KB, Johnson DB (2003) Novel acidophiles isolated from moderately acidic mine drainage waters. Hydrometallurgy 71:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hallberg K-B, Hedrich S, Johnson D-B (2011) Acidiferrobacter thiooxydans, gen. nov. sp. nov.; an acidophilic, thermo-tolerant, facultatively anaerobic iron- and sulfur-oxidizer of the family Ectothiorhodospiraceae. Extremophiles 15:271–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harrison STL, Sissing A (2003) Thermophile mineral bioleaching performance: a compromise between maximising mineral loading and maximising microbial growth and activity. SAIMM J 103(1–4):139–142Google Scholar
  42. Hippe H (2000) Leptospirillum gen. nov. (Ex Markosyan (1972), nom. rev., including Leptospirillum ferrooxidans sp. nov. (Ex Markosyan 1972), nom. rev, and Leptospirillum thermoferrooxidans sp. nov. (Golovacheva et al. (1992). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:501–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ikumapayi F, Makitalo M, Johansson B, Rao KH (2012) Recycling process water in sulfide flotation. Part A: effect of calcium and sulfate on sphalerite recovery. Miner Metall Process 29(4):183–191Google Scholar
  44. Imamura H, Nhat K-P-H, Togawa H, Saito K, Iino R, Kato Y, Nagai T, Noji H (2009) Visualization of ATP levels inside single living cells with fluorescence resonance energy transfer based genetically encoded indicators. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:15651–15656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jennings P-H, Mcandrew R-T, Stratigakos E-S (1968) A hydrometallurgical method for recovering selenium and tellurium from copper refinery slimes TMS paper selection, A 68-9Google Scholar
  46. Johnson DB, Hallberg K-B (2005) Acid mine drainage remediation options: a review. Sci Total Environ 338(1–2):3–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Johnson DB, Hallberg KB (2009) Carbon, iron and sulfur metabolism in acidophilic microorganisms. In: Poole RK (ed) Principles of the magnetic methods in Geophysics. Academic Press, pp 201–255Google Scholar
  48. Johnson D-B, Okibe N, Wakeman K, Liu Y (2008) Effect of temperature on the bioleaching of chalcopyrite concentrates containing different concentrations of Silver. Hydrometallurgy 94(1–4):42–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Johnson S-S, Chevrette M-G, Ehlmann B-L, Benison K-C (2015) Insights from the metagenome of an acid Salt Lake: the role of biology in an extreme depositional environment. PLoS ONE 10(4):1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kamimura K, Sharmin S, Yoshino E, Tokuhisa M, Kanao T (2018) Draft genome sequence of Acidithiobacillus sp. strain SH, a marine acidophilic sulphur-oxidizing bacterium. Microbiol Resour Announc 6(6):1–2Google Scholar
  51. Kampunzu A-B et al (2005) Geochemical characterisation, provenance, source and depositional environment of ‘Roches Argilotalqueuses’ (RAT) and Mines Subgroups sedimentary rocks in the Neoproterozoic Katangan Belt (Congo): lithostratigraphic implications. J Afr Earth Sc 42(1–5):119–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kampunzu A-B, Jourdan F, Bertrand H, Schaerer U, Blichert-Toft J, Feraud G (2007) Major and trace element and Sr, Nd, Hf, and Pb isotope compositions of the Karoo large igneous province, Botswana-Zimbabwe: lithosphere vs. mantle plume contribution. J Petrol 48:1043–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kefeni K-K, Msagati T-M, Mamba B-B (2017) Acid mine drainage: prevention, treatment options, and resource recovery: a review. J Clean Prod 151:475–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kelly D-P, Wood A-P (2000a) Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated genera Acidithiobacillus gen.nov., Halothiobacillus gen. nov and Thermithiobacillus gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:511–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kelly DP, Wood AP (2000b) Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated genera of Acidithiobacillus gen. nov., Halothiobacillus gen. nov. and Thermithiobacillus gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50:511–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kitobo W-S, Gaydardzhiev S, Frenay J, Ndala I (2009). Valorization and depollution of the rejections of Ancient Concentrator of Kipushi to Katanga in D.R. Congo. PhD Thesis, University of liege, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  57. Kock D, Schippers A (2006) Geomicrobiological investigation of two different mine waste tailings generating acid mine drainage. Hydrometallurgy 83(1–4):167–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kock D, Schippers A (2008) Quantitative microbial community analysis of three different sulfidic mine tailing dumps generating acid mine drainage. Appl Environ Microbiol 74(16):5211–5219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kongolo K, Mwema MD, Banza AN, Gock E (2003) Cobalt and zinc recovery from copper sulphate solution by solvent extraction. Miner Eng 16(12):1371–1374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. König H (1988) Archaebacterial cell envelopes. Can J Microbiol 34:395–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kordosky G (2007) The copperbelt Africa—a renaissance in copper hydrometallurgy. In: IV, international copper hydrometallurgy workshop (Hydrocopper, 2007), 16–18 May, Vina del Mar, Chile, pp 1–54Google Scholar
  62. Küsel K-T, Dorsch G, Acker Stackebrandt E (1999) Microbial reduction of Fe(III) in acidic sediments: isolation of Acidiphilium cryptum JF-5 capable of coupling the reduction of Fe(III) to the oxidation of glucose. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:3633–3640Google Scholar
  63. Liu Y-G, Zhou M, Zeng G-M, Li X, Xu W-H, Fan T (2006) Effect of solids concentration on removal of heavy metals from mine tailings via bioleaching. J Hazard Mater 141(1):202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lizama H-M, Suzuki I (1989) Bacterial leaching of a sulphide ore by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and Thiobacillus thiooxidans part II: column leaching studies. Hydrometallurgy 22(3):301–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Loi G, Trois P, Rossi G (1995) Biorotor®: a new development for biohydrometallurgical processing, vol 1. In: Vargas T, Jerez CA, Wiertz JV, Toledo H (eds) Biohydrometallurgical processing. University of Chile, Santiago, pp 263–271Google Scholar
  66. Loi G, Rossi G, Trois P (2006) “Reattore a tamburo rotante per idrometallurgia, bioidrometallurgia e trattamento delle acque di rifiuto per esercizio continuo” (Revolving barrel reactor for continuous operation for hydrometallurgy, biohydrometallurgy and water treatment), Italian Patent No. 0001329859; November 21Google Scholar
  67. Martani F, Berterame N-M, Branduardi P (2017) Microbial stress: from molecules to systems. New Biotechnol 35:30–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mehrabani J-V, Shafaei S-Z, Noaparast M, Mousavi S-M (2016) Bioleaching of a low grade sphalerite concentrate produced from tailings flotation. Int J Min Geo-Eng 50(2):169–173Google Scholar
  69. Monroy MG (1993) Bioleaching—refractory gold bearing sulphide ore cyanidation in devices of percolation: Behavior of the populations of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and influence on mineralogy and operating conditions. University of Nancy 1, FranceGoogle Scholar
  70. Moreira D, Amils R (1997) Phylogeny of Thiobacillus cuprinus and other mixotrophic thiobacilli: proposal for Thiomonas gen. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47(2):522–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Morin D, Lips A, Pinches T, Huisman J, Frias C, Norberg A, Forssberg E (2006) BioMinE – Integrated project for the development of biotechnology for metal-bearing materials in Europe. Hydrometallurgy 83:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Mulaba-Bafubiandi A-F, Bell DT (2005) Some aspects of laboratory flotation of Co–Cu minerals from mixed oxide ores. In: Third Southern African conference on base metals, south african institute of mining and metallurgy, vol 3, pp 191–199Google Scholar
  73. Nkulu N-G, Gaydardzhiev S, Mutamba M-E (2012) Bioleaching of the carrolite—applications at sulphide ores polymetallic of the Cupriferous Arc of Katanga in Republic Democratic of Congo (DRC). University of Liege, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  74. Nkulu G, Gaydardzhiev S, Mwema E (2013) Statistical analysis of bioleaching copper, cobalt and nickel from polymetalic concentrate originating from Kamoya deposit in the Democratic Republic of Congo. Miner Eng 48(1):77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nordbrand S, Bolme P (2007) Powering the mobile world: cobalt production for batteries in the DR Congo and Zambia, Report by Swed Watch as part of “Ma keITfair Campaign”: European-wide project on consumer electronics, with the financial assistance of the EU. SwedWatch 3:1–79Google Scholar
  76. Oguz H, Brehm A, Deckwer W-D (1987) Gas/liquid mass transfer in sparged agitated slurries. Chem Eng Sci 42(7):1815–1822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Parker H (2016) Kamoa-Kakula project – Kakula 2016 Preliminary Economic Assessment. Internal report from Orewin IMC to Ivanhoe Mines, Janvier 2017Google Scholar
  78. Pinches A, Chapman J-T, Riele T, Van Staden M (1988) The performance of bacterial leach reactors for the pre-oxidation of refractory gold bearing sulphide concentrates. In: Norris PR, Kelly DP (eds) Bio-hydrometallurgical proceedings, Science and Technology Letters. International Symposium Warwick 329-44, Kew, SurveyGoogle Scholar
  79. Plamen G, Marina N, Irena S, Lazarova A, Groudev S (2017) Leaching of valuable metals from copper slag by means of chemolithotrophic archaea and bacteria. J Min Geol Sci 60(2):127–130Google Scholar
  80. Rawlings D-E (2005) Characteristics and adaptability of iron- and sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms used for the recovery of metals from minerals and their concentrates. Microbial Cell Factories 4:3–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rawlings D-E, Dew D, Du Plessis C (2003) Bio-mineralization of metal-containing ores and concentrates. Trends Biotechnol 21:38–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rea SM, McSweeney NJ, Degens BP, Morris C, Siebert HM, Kaksonen AH (2015) Salt-tolerant microorganisms potentially useful for bioleaching operations where fresh water is scarce. Miner Eng 75:126–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Robb L (2005a) Copper bottomed: understanding the Central African Copperbelt. Mater World 1:24–26Google Scholar
  84. Robb L (2005b) Recent advances in the geology and mineralization of the Central African Copperbelt. J Afr Earth Sc 42(1–5):1–214Google Scholar
  85. Ross TJ (2011) Fuzzy logic with engineering applications, 3rd edn. Wiley, pp 100–116. ISBN: 97 8-0-470-74376-8Google Scholar
  86. Ruan R, Zhou E, Liu X, Wu B, Zhou G, Wen J (2010) Comparison on the leaching kinetics of chalcopyrite and pyrite with or without bacteria. Rare Met 29(6):552–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Sabrina M, Mauricio A, Pedro G, Clement C, Hannes S, Cecilia D (2017) Is the growth of microorganisms limited by carbon availability during chalcopyrite bioleaching? Hydrometallurgy 168:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sampson M-I, Phillips C-V, Blake R-C (2000) Influence of the attachment of acidophilic bacteria during the oxidation of mineral sulphides. Miner Eng 13:373–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Santos L-G, Barbosa A-F, Souza A-D, Lea V-A (2006) Bioleaching of a complex nickel–iron concentrate by mesophilic bacteria. Miner Eng 19:1251–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Sasaki K, Nakamuta Y, Hirajima T, Tuovinen O-H (2009) Raman characterization of secondary minerals formed during chalcopyrite leaching with Acidithiobacillus Ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy 95(1–2):153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Schippers A (2004). Biogeochemistry of metal sulphide oxidation in mining environments, sediments and soils. In: Amend JP, Edwards KJ, Lyons TW (eds) Sulphur biogeochemistry—past and present. Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America, Special paper, 379, 49–62Google Scholar
  92. Schippers A, Sand W (1999) Bacterial leaching of metal sulphide proceeds by two indirect mechanisms via thiosulfate or via polysulfides and sulphur. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(1):310–321Google Scholar
  93. Schloen J-H, Elkin E-M (1954) The treatment of electrolytic copper refinery slimes. In: Butts A (ed) Copper: the science and technology of the metal, its alloys and compounds. Reinhold, New York, pp 205–289Google Scholar
  94. Schmandt D (2013) The Kamoa Copper Deposit, Democratic Republic of Congo: Stratigraphy, diagenetic and hydrothermal alteration, and mineralization. MSc-Thesis. Colorado School of Mines. University of Colorado, Colorado. USACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Scholtz N-J, Pandit A-B, Harrison S-T-L (1997) Effect of solids suspension on microbial cell disruption. In: Nienow A (ed) Bioreactor and bioprocess fluid dynamics, pp 199–215Google Scholar
  96. Shaligram N-S, Bule M, Bhambure R, Sudheer S, Sing K, Szkacs G, Pandey A (2009) Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using aqueous extract from the compact in producing fungal strain. Process Biochem 44(8):939–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Shiers D-W, Collinson D-M, Watling H-R (2016) Life in heaps: a review of microbial responses to variable acidity in sulfide mineral bioleaching heaps for metal extraction. Res Microbiol 167(7):576–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Spolaore P, Joulian C, Gouin J, Morin D, d’Hugues P (2011) Relationship between bioleaching performance, bacterial community structure and mineralogy in the bioleaching of a copper concentrate in stirred-tank reactors. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 89(2):441–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Third K-A, Cord-Ruwisch R, Watling H-R (2000) The role of iron-oxidizing bacteria in stimulation or inhibition of chalcopyrite bioleaching. Hydrometallurgy 57(3):225–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Torma A-E, Walden C-C, Duncan D-W, Branion R-M-R (1972) The effect of carbon dioxide and particle surface area on the microbiological leaching of a zinc sulphide concentrate. Biotechnol Bioeng 14(5):777–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Tsekova K, Kaimaktchiev A, Tzekova A (1998) Bioaccumulation of heavy metals by microorganisms. Biotechnol Equip 12:94–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Uryga A, Sadowsky Z, Grotowski A (2004) Bioleaching of cobalt from mineral products. Physicochem Probl Miner Process 38:291–299Google Scholar
  103. Vakylabad AB (2011) A comparison of bioleaching ability of mesophilic and moderately thermophilic culture on copper bioleaching from flotation concentrate and smelter dust. Int J Miner Process 101:94–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Visagie C-M, Hirooka Y, Tanney J-B et al (2014) Aspergillus, Penicillium and Talaromyces isolated from house dust samples collected around the world. Study Mycol 78:63–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wang Y, Su L, Zeng W, Qiu G, Wan L, Chen X, Zhou H (2014) Optimization of copper extraction for bioleaching of complex Cu-polymetallic concentrate by moderate thermophiles. Trans Nonferr Met Soc China 24(4):1161–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Watling H-R (2008) The bioleaching of nickel-copper sulphides. Hydrometallurgy 91(1–4):70–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Watling HR, Collinson D-M, Li J, Mutch L-A, Perrot F-A, Rea S-M, Reith F, Watkin E-L-J (2014) Bioleaching of a low-grade copper ore, linking leach chemistry and microbiology. Miner Eng 56:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Xia L-X, Dai S-L, Yin C, Liu J-S, Hu Y, Qiu G-Z (2009) Comparison of bioleaching behaviors of different compositional sphalerite using Leptospirillum ferriphilum, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus caldus. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36(6):845–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Xue L, Jian K, Wen B, Biao W, Shuang L (2015) Magnesium rich gangue dissolution in column bioleaching of chalcopyrite. Rare Metals 34(5):366–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Yahya A, Johnson D-B (2002) Bioleaching of pyrite at low pH and low redox potentials by novel mesophilic Gram-positive bacteria. Hydrometallurgy 63(2):181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Yang CR, Qin WQ, Lai SS (2011) Bioleaching of a low grade nickel–copper–cobalt sulfide ore. Hydrometallurgy 106(1–2):32–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Yin Shenghua, Wang Leiming, Kabwe Eugie, Chen Xun, Yan Rongfu, An Kai, Zhang Lei, Aixiang Wu (2018) Copper Bioleaching in China: review and prospect. Minerals 8(32):2–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Joint Center on Global Change and Earth System Science of the University of Maryland and Beijing Normal University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Lukumu Bampole
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Antoine-F Mulaba-Bafubiandi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Metallurgy, Mineral Processing and Technology Research Centre, Faculty of Engineering and the Built EnvironmentUniversity of JohannesburgDoornfonteinSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Industrial Chemistry, Faculty of PolytechnicUniversité de LikasiLikasiDemocratic Republic of Congo

Personalised recommendations