Advertisement

Study on enzyme inhibition in biodiesel synthesis: effect of stepwise addition of methanol and removal of glycerol

  • Fahad Al BasirEmail author
  • Priti Kumar Roy
Original Article

Abstract

Enzymatic transesterification is known as the most favourable and suitable method for biodiesel synthesis from vegetable oil or animal fat. Deactivation of enzyme during biodiesel synthesis remains a large barrier. Stepwise addition of alcohol and removal of glycerol (continuous or stepwise) have been adopted for minimizing the inhibition. In this article, a mathematical model is derived and inhibition of enzyme has been studied in biodiesel synthesis from Jatropha curcas oil. Sensitivity analysis of the model parameters has also been carried out to determine the most sensitive parameters which have a major role in the system functioning. Simulation results provide the validity of the proposed model. It has been shown that the proposed method minimizes the deactivation and enables enzyme reuse.

Keywords

Transesterification Enzyme inhibition Mathematical model Impulsive differential equation Sensitivity analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Fahad Al Basir acknowledges University Grants Commission, Government of India, for Dr. D.S. Kothari Postdoctoral Fellowship, File No.: MA/2016-17/0029. Priti Kumar Roy acknowledges Indo-Russian Joint Research Project, F No.: INT/RUS/RFBR/306 organized by DST-RFBR 2018, Government of India and Government of Russian Federation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Al Basir FA, Roy PK (2014) Production of biodiesel using enzymatic transesterification of Jatropha curcas oil: a mathematical study. Math Eng Sci Aerosp 5(2):175–184Google Scholar
  2. Al Basir F, Datta S, Roy PK (2015) Studies on biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas oil using chemical and biochemical methods. A mathematical approach. Fuel 158:503–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al Basir F, Venturino E, Roy PK (2017) Effects of awareness program for controlling mosaic disease in Jatropha curcas plantations. Math Methods Appl Sci 40(7):2441–53MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Al Basir F, Cao X, Kumar S, Roy PK (2017) Effect of glycerol kinetics and mass transfer during enzymatic biodiesel production from Jatropha Oil. Ind Math Complex Syst 305–317Google Scholar
  5. Al Basir F, Roy PK (2015) Effects of temperature and stirring on mass transfer to maximize biodiesel production from Jatropha curcas oil: a mathematical study. Int J Eng Math 2015 Article ID 278275Google Scholar
  6. Andrade TA, Massimiliano E, Knud VC (2017) Influence of the reaction conditions on the enzyme catalyzed transesterification of castor oil: a possible step in biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 243:366–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azo L, Navia R, Beroiz L, Jeison D, Ciudad G (2014) Enzymatic biodiesel production kinetics using co-solvent and an anhydrous medium: a strategy to improve lipase performance in a semi-continuous reactor. New Biotechnol 31(5)Google Scholar
  8. Bainov DD, Simeonov PS (1995) Impulsive differential equations: asymptotic properties of the solutions. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Ballinger G, Liu X (1997) Permanence of population growth models with impulsive effects. Math Comput Model 26(12):59–72MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Bambase ME, Nakamura N, Tanaka J, Matsumura M (2007) Kinetics of hydroxide-catalyze methanolysis of crude sunflower oil for the production of fuel-grade methyl ester. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 82:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Belafi-Bako K, Kovacs F, Gubicza L, Hancsok J (2002) Enzymatic biodiesel production from sunflower oil by Candida antarctica lipase in a solvent-free system. Biocatal Biotransform 20(6):437–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Belafi-Bako K, Kovacs F, Gubicza L, Hancsok J (2002) Enzymatic biodiesel production from sunflower oil by Candida antarctica lipase in a solvent-free system. Biocatal Biotransform 20(6):437–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berchmans HJ, Morishta K, Takarada T (2013) Kinetic study of hydroxide-catalyze methanolysis of Jatropha curcas waste food oil mixture for biodiesel production. Fuel 104:46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheirsilpa B, H-Kittikuna A, Limkatanyub S (2008) Impact of transesterification mechanisms on the kinetic modeling of biodiesel production by immobilized lipase. Biochem Eng J 42:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen Y, Xiao B, Chang J, Fu Y, Lv P, Wang X (2009) Synthesis of biodiesel from waste cooking oil using immobilized lipase in fixed bed reactor. Energy Convers Manag 50(3):668–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Christopher LP, Kumar H, Zambare VP (2014) Enzymatic biodiesel: challenges and opportunities. Appl Energy 119:497–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Christopher LP, Kumar H, Zambare VP (2014) Enzymatic biodiesel: challenges and opportunities. Appl Energy 119:497–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dossat V, Combes D, Marty A (1999) Continuous enzymatic transesterification of high oleic sunflower oil in a packed bed reactor: influence of the glycerol production. Enzyme Microb Technol 25(3–5):194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Georgescu P, Morosanu G (2008) Impulsive perturbations of three-trophic prey-dependent food chain system. Math Comput Model 48:975–997MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Guldhe A, Singh B, Mutanda T, Permaul K, Bux F (2015) Advances in synthesis of biodiesel via enzyme catalysis: novel and sustainable approaches. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:1447–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Halim SFA, Kamaruddin AH (2008) Catalytic studies of lipase on FAME production from waste cooking palm oil in a tert-butanol system. Process Biochem 43:1436–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hong WP, Park JY, Min K, Ko MJ, Park K, Yoo YJ (2011) Kinetics of glycerol effect on biodiesel production for optimal feeding of methanol. Korean J Chem Eng 28(9):1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ko C-H, Yeh K-W, Wang Y-N, Chien-Hou W, Chang F-C, Cheng M-H, Liou C-S (2012) Impact of methanol addition strategy on enzymatic transesterification of Jatropha oil for biodiesel processing. Energy 48:375–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lakshmikantham V, Bainov DD, Simeonov PS (1989) Theory of impulsive differential equations. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lakshmikantham V, Simeonov PS (1989) Theory of impulsive differential equations. World Scientific 6Google Scholar
  26. Li Y, Du W, Dai L, Liu D (2015) Kinetic study on free lipase NS81006-catalyzed biodiesel production from soybean oil. J Mol Catal B Enzym 121:22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Liu S, Nie K, Zhang X, Wang M, Deng L, Ye Z, Wang F, Tan T (2014) Kinetic study on lipase-catalyzed biodiesel production from waste cooking oil. J Mol Catal B Enzym 99:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lotti M, JJürgen P, Francisco V, Pau F (2015) Effects of methanol on lipases: molecular, kinetic and process issues in the production of biodiesel. Biotechnol J 10(1):22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lotti M, JJürgen P, Francisco V, Pau F (2018) Enzymatic production of biodiesel: strategies to overcome methanol inactivation. Biotechnol J 13(5)Google Scholar
  30. Lukovic N, Jugovic ZK, Bezbradica D (2011) Biodiesel fuel production by enzymatic transesterification of oils: recent trends, challenges and future perspectives. Altern Fuel 3:47–72Google Scholar
  31. Maceiras R, Vega M, Costa C, Ramos P, Márquez MC (2009) Effect of methanol content on enzymatic production of biodiesel from waste frying oil. Fuel 88(11):2130–2134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merza F, Fawzy A, AlNashef I, Al-Zuhair S, Hanifa T (2018) Effectiveness of using deep eutectic solvents as an alternative to conventional solvents in enzymatic biodiesel production from waste oils. Energy Rep 4:77–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Norjannah B, Ong HC, Masjuki HH (2017) Effects of methanol and enzyme pretreatment to Ceiba pentandra biodiesel production. Energy Sources Part A Recov Util Environ Effects 39(14):1548–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Poppe JK, Fernandez-Lafuente R, Rodrigues RC, Ayub MA (2015) Enzymatic reactors for biodiesel synthesis: present status and future prospects. Biotechnol Adv 33(5):511–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Poppe JK, Fernandez-Lafuente R, Rodrigues RC, Ayub MA (2015) Enzymatic reactors for biodiesel synthesis: present status and future prospects. Biotechnol Adv 33(5):511–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roy PK, Datta S, Nandi S, Al Basir F (2014) Effect of mass transfer kinetics for maximum production of biodiesel from Jatropha curcas oil: a mathematical approach. Fuel 134:39–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Saltelli A, Scott M (1997) Guest editorial: the role of sensitivity analysis in the corroboration of models and its link to model structural and parametric uncertainty. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 57(1):1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Chan KS (1999) A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics 41(1):39–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sbihi HM, Nehdi IA, Blidi LE, Rashid U, Al-Resayes IS (2015) Lipase/enzyme catalyzed biodiesel production from Prunus mahaleb: a comparative study with base catalyzed biodiesel production. King Ind Crops Prod 76:1049–1054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taher H, Al-Zuhair S (2017) The use of alternative solvents in enzymatic biodiesel production: a review. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 11(1):168–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vembanur RS, Narasimhan SL, Muthukumar K (2008) An overview of enzymatic production of biodiesel. Bioresour Technol 99(10):3975–3981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang Z, Wong HH, Albertson PL, Harrison MD, Doherty WOS, OHara IM (2015) Effects of glycerol on enzymatic hydrolysis and ethanol production using sugarcane bagasse pretreated by acidified glycerol solution. Bioresour Technol 192:367–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhou Y, Liu H (2003) Stability of periodic solutions of an SIS model with pulse vaccination. Math Comput Model 38:299–308MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Joint Center on Global Change and Earth System Science of the University of Maryland and Beijing Normal University 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyVisva-Bharati UniversityBolpurIndia

Personalised recommendations