Effect of miniaturization and surface roughness on the mechanical properties of the electron beam melted superalloy Inconel®718

  • D. KotzemEmail author
  • P. Dumke
  • P. Sepehri
  • J. Tenkamp
  • F. Walther
Full Research Article


In this work, the Ni-based super alloy Inconel 718 manufactured via electron beam melting is investigated. Typical microstructure of Inconel 718, which was processed by electron beam melting, consists of columnar oriented dendritic structure with strong texture along building direction in hatch region, whereas microstructure differs in contour region, which is supposed to influence mechanical properties in the as-built state. As highly complex geometries are possible to manufacture with additive manufacturing techniques, the influence of miniaturization and surface roughness on microstructural and mechanical properties has to be understood in detail. Therefore, samples were processed with different initial sizes and subsequently tested in as-built and polished condition. Before performing mechanical tests, process-induced microstructure was determined by scanning electron microscope as well as distribution of defects and geometrical deviations by microfocused computed tomography. To characterize the mechanical properties, different testing methods, both tensile and fatigue tests, were carried out. Present investigations show almost similar microstructures in large-scale and small-scale Inconel 718 volumes. However, small-scale volumes show higher number of defects in the form of surface and near-surface defects. Furthermore, as-built specimens show geometrical deviations when compared to initial CAD diameter, which makes the implementation of an average equivalent diameter mandatory. It can be demonstrated that small-scale as-built volumes have reduced mechanical properties, whereby ultimate tensile strength is reduced by 60% and fatigue strength is reduced by 75%, showing that increased defect density and as-built surface roughness have a higher impact on fatigue properties and are the dominating reason for early failure in the as-built state due to multiple crack initiation.


Additive manufacturing Electron beam melting Ni-based superalloy Fatigue behavior Fatigue life estimation 



The authors would like to thank Thomas Niendorf and Tizian Arold (University of Kassel) for providing the investigated material. Further on, the authors thank the German Research Foundation (DFG, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) for its financial support within the research project “Damage tolerance evaluation of electron beam melted cellular structures by advanced characterization techniques” (NI 1327/13-1, WA 1672/32-1).


  1. 1.
    Herzog D, Seyda V, Wycisk E, Emmelmann C (2016) Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater 117:371–392. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Körner C (2016) Additive manufacturing of metallic components by selective electron beam melting—a review. Int Mater Rev 61:361–377. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sochalski-Kolbus LM, Payzant EA, Cornwell PA, Watkins TR, Babu SS, Dehoff RR, Lorenz M, Ovchinnikova O, Duty C (2015) Comparison of residual stresses in Inconel 718 simple parts made by electron beam melting and direct laser metal sintering. Metall Mater Trans A 46:1419–1432. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dehmas M, Lacaze J, Niang A, Viguier B (2011) TEM Study of high-temperature precipitation of delta phase in Inconel 718 alloy. Adv Mater Sci Eng. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deng D, Moverare J, Peng RL, Söderberg H (2017) Microstructure and anisotropic mechanical properties of EBM manufactured Inconel 718 and effects of post heat treatments. Mater Sci Eng 693:151–163. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Azadian S, Wei L-Y, Warren R (2004) Delta phase precipitation in Inconel 718. Mater Charact 53:7–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kuo C-M, Yang Y-T, Bor H-Y, Wei C-N, Tai C-C (2009) Aging effects on the microstructure and creep behavior of Inconel 718 superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A 510–511:289–294. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balachandramurthi AR, Moverare J, Mahade S, Pederson R (2018) Additive manufacturing of alloy 718 via electron beam melting: effect of post-treatment on the microstructure and the mechanical properties. Materials (Basel). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kirka MM, Greeley DA, Hawkins C, Dehoff RR (2017) Effect of anisotropy and texture on the low cycle fatigue behavior of Inconel 718 processed via electron beam melting. Int J Fatigue 105:235–243. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Al-Juboori LA, Niendorf T, Brenne F (2018) On the tensile properties of Inconel 718 fabricated by EBM for as-built and heat-treated components. Metall Mater Trans B 49:2969–2974. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith CJ, Derguti F, Hernandez Nava E, Thomas M, Tammas-Williams S, Gulizia S, Fraser D, Todd I (2016) Dimensional accuracy of electron beam melting (EBM) additive manufacture with regard to weight optimized truss structures. J Mater Process Technol 229:128–138. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strondl A, Fischer R, Frommeyer G, Schneider A (2008) Investigations of MX and γ′/γ″ precipitates in the nickel-based superalloy 718 produced by electron beam melting. Mater Sci Eng A 480:138–147. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tammas-Williams S, Zhao H, Léonard F, Derguti F, Todd I, Prangnell PB (2015) XCT analysis of the influence of melt strategies on defect population in Ti–6Al–4 V components manufactured by selective electron beam melting. Mater Charact 102:47–61. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chan KS (2015) Characterization and analysis of surface notches on Ti-alloy plates fabricated by additive manufacturing techniques. Surf Topogr 3:44006. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suard M, Martin G, Lhuissier P, Dendievel R, Vignat F, Blandin J-J, Villeneuve F (2015) Mechanical equivalent diameter of single struts for the stiffness prediction of lattice structures produced by electron beam melting. Addit Manuf 8:124–131. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Persenot T, Buffiere J-Y, Maire E, Dendievel R, Martin G (2017) Fatigue properties of EBM as-built and chemically etched thin parts. Procedia Struct Integr 7:158–165. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lhuissier P, de Formanoir C, Martin G, Dendievel R, Godet S (2016) Geometrical control of lattice structures produced by EBM through chemical etching: investigations at the scale of individual struts. Mater Des 110:485–493. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Edwards P, Ramulu M (2014) Fatigue performance evaluation of selective laser melted Ti–6Al–4 V. Mater Sci Eng A 598:327–337. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Masuo H, Tanaka Y, Morokoshi S, Yagura H, Uchida T, Yamamoto Y, Murakami Y (2018) Influence of defects, surface roughness and HIP on the fatigue strength of Ti-6Al-4 V manufactured by additive manufacturing. Int J Fatigue 117:163–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Algardh JK, Horn T, West H, Aman R, Snis A, Engqvist H, Lausmaa J, Harrysson O (2016) Thickness dependency of mechanical properties for thin-walled titanium parts manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM) ®. Addit Manuf 12:45–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Galarraga H, Lados DA, Dehoff RR, Kirka MM, Nandwana P (2016) Effects of the microstructure and porosity on properties of Ti-6Al-4 V ELI alloy fabricated by electron beam melting (EBM). Addit Manuf 10:47–57. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Townsend A, Senin N, Blunt L, Leach RK, Taylor JS (2016) Surface texture metrology for metal additive manufacturing: a review. Precis Eng 46:34–47. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Persenot T, Martin G, Dendievel R, Buffiére J-Y, Maire E (2018) Enhancing the tensile properties of EBM as-built thin parts: effect of HIP and chemical etching. Mater Charact 143:82–93. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sames WJ (2015) Additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 using electron beam melting: processing, post-processing, and mechanical properties. DissGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tillmann W, Schaak C, Nellesen J, Schaper M, Aydinöz ME, Hoyer K-P (2017) Hot isostatic pressing of IN718 components manufactured by selective laser melting. Addit Manuf 13:93–102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Balachandramurthi AR, Moverare J, Dixit N, Pederson R (2018) Influence of defects and as-built surface roughness on fatigue properties of additively manufactured alloy 718. Mater Sci Eng A 735:463–474. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Persenot T, Burr A, Martin G, Buffiere J-Y, Dendievel R, Maire E (2019) Effect of build orientation on the fatigue properties of as-built electron beam melted Ti-6Al-4 V alloy. Int J Fatigue 118:65–76. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang D, Niu W, Cao X, Liu Z (2015) Effect of standard heat treatment on the microstructure and mechanical properties of selective laser melting manufactured Inconel 718 superalloy. Mater Sci Eng A 644:32–40. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sun S-H, Koizumi Y, Saito T, Yamanaka K, Li Y-P, Cui Y, Chiba A (2018) Electron beam additive manufacturing of Inconel 718 alloy rods: impact of build direction on microstructure and high-temperature tensile properties. Addit Manuf 23:457–470. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Basquin OH (1910) The exponential law of endurance tests. Proceedings ASTM 10:625–630Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kahlin M, Ansell H, Moverare JJ (2017) Fatigue behaviour of notched additive manufactured Ti6Al4V with as-built surfaces. Int J Fatigue 101:51–60. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Materials Test Engineering (WPT)TU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany

Personalised recommendations