Advertisement

Finite element modeling of 3D-printed part with cellular internal structure using homogenized properties

  • Sunil BhandariEmail author
  • Roberto Lopez-Anido
Full Research Article
  • 27 Downloads

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to create a homogenized linearly elastic continuum finite element model of a 3D-printed cellular structure. This article attempts to answer the following research question: can the homogenization technique based on using virtual experiments, commonly employed in micromechanics solid modeling, be used for homogenization of 3D-printed cellular structure to generate orthotropic material properties? Virtual experiments were carried out for homogenization of cellular structure. These virtual experiments generated homogenized material properties for the continuum finite element model. Physical experimentation was carried out to validate the accuracy of results obtained from the continuum finite element model. Results show that the outlined procedure can be used to generate a fast, yet reasonably accurate, continuum finite element model for predicting the linearly elastic structural response of 3D-printed cellular structure. This study extends the micromechanics homogenization approach to homogenize the 3D-printed partial infill cellular structure to create input material properties for a continuum finite element model. The outlined procedure would enable faster iterative design of 3D-printed cellular parts. The continuum model generated is valid only for a linearly elastic structural response. This framework, however, has potential for extending the analysis to the inelastic range.

Keywords

3D printing Fused deposition modeling Partial infill Lattice structure Homogenization Finite element analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was made possible in part by a Grant from NIST Advanced Manufacturing Technology Consortia (AMTech) program, titled “Consortium for Manufacturing Innovation in Structural Thermoplastics (CMIST), Award no. 70NANB15 H075”. The research was also supported in part by the Correll Fellowship (2014–2015) awarded by the College of Engineering, the Graduate Trustee Tuition Scholarship (2015–2016) awarded by the Graduate School, and the Malcolm G. Long’32 Professorship in Civil Engineering at the University of Maine.

References

  1. 1.
    Casavola C et al (2016) Orthotropic mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts described by classical laminate theory. Mater Des 90:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Somireddy MC, Aleksander (2017) Mechanical characterization of additively manufactured parts by FE modeling of mesostructure. J Manuf Mater Process 1(2):18Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guessasma S et al (2016) Anisotropic damage inferred to 3D printed polymers using fused deposition modelling and subject to severe compression. Eur Polym J 85:324–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karamooz Ravari MR et al (2014) Numerical investigation on mechanical properties of cellular lattice structures fabricated by fused deposition modeling. Int J Mech Sci 88:154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karamooz Ravari MR, Kadkhodaei M (2014) A computationally efficient modeling approach for predicting mechanical behavior of cellular lattice structures. J Mater Eng Perform 24(1):245–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhandari S, Lopez-Anido R (2018) Finite element analysis of thermoplastic polymer extrusion 3D printed material for mechanical property prediction. Addit Manuf 22:187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gopsill JA, Shindler J, Hicks BJ (2017) Using finite element analysis to influence the infill design of fused deposition modelled parts. Progress Addit ManufGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Suard M et al (2015) Mechanical equivalent diameter of single struts for the stiffness prediction of lattice structures produced by electron beam melting. Addit Manuf 8:124–131MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Campoli G et al (2013) Mechanical properties of open-cell metallic biomaterials manufactured using additive manufacturing. Mater Des 49:957–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gibson LJ, Ashby MF (1999) Cellular solids: structure and properties. Cambridge University Press, CambridgezbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hedayati R et al (2017) Analytical relationships for the mechanical properties of additively manufactured porous biomaterials based on octahedral unit cells. Appl Math Model 46:408–422MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sun CT, Vaidya RS (1996) Prediction of composite properties from a representative volume element. Compos Sci Technol 56(2):171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davids WG, Landis EN, Vasic S (2003) Lattice models for the prediction of load-induced failure and damage in wood. Wood Fiber Sci 2003:120–134Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pindera M-J et al (2009) Micromechanics of spatially uniform heterogeneous media: a critical review and emerging approaches. Compos Part B Eng 40(5):349–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roters F et al (2010) Overview of constitutive laws, kinematics, homogenization and multiscale methods in crystal plasticity finite-element modeling: theory, experiments, applications. Acta Mater 58(4):1152–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Iii T, C.L. and Liang E (1999) Stiffness predictions for unidirectional short-fiber composites: review and evaluation. Compos Sci Technol 59(5):655–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Warren WE, Kraynik AM (1997) Linear elastic behavior of a low-density kelvin foam with open cells. J Appl Mech 64(4):787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sun Y et al (2015) Modeling and simulation of the quasi-static compressive behavior of Al/Cu hybrid open-cell foams. Int J Solids Struct 54:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chen Y, Das R, Battley M (2015) Effects of cell size and cell wall thickness variations on the stiffness of closed-cell foams. Int J Solids Struct 52:150–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang D et al (2015) Multi-axial brittle failure criterion using Weibull stress for open Kelvin cell foams. Int J Solids Struct 75–76:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Guessasma S (2008) Young’s modulus of 2D cellular structures under periodic boundary conditions and subject to structural effects. Comput Mater Sci 44(2):552–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Guessasma S, Valle GD (2009) Generation of anisotropic cellular solid model and related elasticity parameters: finite element simulation. J Cell Plast 45(2):119–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu X, Shapiro V (2016) Homogenization of material properties in additively manufactured structures. Comput Aided Des 78:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Park S-I et al (2014) Effective mechanical properties of lattice material fabricated by material extrusion additive manufacturing. Addit Manuf 1–4:12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    ASTM (2015) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing-general principles-terminology. ASTM, West ConshohockenGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bhandari S, Lopez-Anido R (2016) Feasibility of using 3D printed thermoplastic molds for stamp forming of thermoplastic composites, in CAMX conference proceedings. CAMX, AnaheimGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bhandari S (2017) Feasibility of using 3D printed molds for thermoforming thermoplastic composites. Electron Theses and Dissertations, p 2655Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Heinrich C et al (2012) The influence of the representative volume element (RVE) size on the homogenized response of cured fiber composites. Modell Simul Mater Sci Eng 20(7):075007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peel LD (2007) Exploration of high and negative Poisson’s ratio elastomer-matrix laminates. Phys Status Solidi (b) 244(3):988–1003MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Liu G-R, Quek SS (2013) The finite element method: a practical course. Butterworth-Heinemann, OxfordzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Advanced Structures and Composites CenterUniversity of MaineOronoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations