Advertisement

International Journal of Metalcasting

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 164–181 | Cite as

Minimizing Phosphorus Pickup During Melting and Casting of Lightweight Fe–Mn–Al–C Steels

  • L. N. Bartlett
  • R. Rahman
  • A. Torres
Article

Abstract

High manganese and aluminum austenitic steels continue to be of great interest as lightweight alternatives to quenched and tempered martensitic steels for high energy absorbing applications in the military and automotive industries. However, the presence of phosphorus in levels greater than about 0.006 wt%P increases the kinetics of κ-carbide precipitation and reduces both ductility and notch toughness. Previous studies have shown that phosphorus pickup of up to 0.02 wt%P is possible even when high purity charge materials are used, suggesting that commonly used refractories may be a source of fugitive phosphorus. The current study investigates the interaction between two commercially available refractories and a high manganese and aluminum steel during melting and casting. Two commercially produced revert samples of chemistry Fe-30Mn-9Al-1.6Si-0.9C-0.5Mo (0.002%P) were melted under protective atmosphere in high purity alumina crucibles lined with phosphate- and silicate-bonded refractories, respectively. Phosphorus pickup in the steel melted on the phosphate-bonded refractory was more than 0.14 wt%P with heavy phosphorus segregation and κ-carbide precipitation on grain boundaries. The steel melted in contact with the silicate-bonded refractory showed no phosphorus pickup, less carbide precipitation on grain boundaries, and no evidence of any phosphide eutectic. The effect of melt residence time during casting was also studied as a function of refractory choice. Results showed that when the phosphate refractory was used to coat the ladles, this resulted in only a slight increase in phosphorus; however, Si increased from 0.74 to 0.97 wt%Si. A small increase in hardening was observed for castings poured from phosphate-bonded ladles. Notch toughness was highest for the specimens poured from the phosphate-bonded refractory ladles, and this is attributed to an increased amount of carbon in solid solution. Aging for 10 h at 530 °C sharply reduced the breaking energy from an average of 150 to <5 J. The results show that phosphorous pickup can be significant when phosphate-bonded refractories are used, especially during melting when the steel is in contact with these refractories for extended periods of time. Therefore, phosphate-bonded refractories should be avoided when melting and casting Fe–Mn–Al–C steels.

Keywords

advanced high strength steel high manganese and aluminum steel refractory interactions phosphorus segregation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the Association for Iron and Steel Technology and the Texas Chapter of the American Foundry Society for funding this study. We are also very grateful to Dr. David Van Aken of Missouri University of Science and Technology and Waukesha Foundry for providing the revert castings.

References

  1. 1.
    G. Frommeyer, U. Brux, Microstructures and mechanical properties of high-strength Fe–Mn–Al–C light-weight TRIPLEX steels. Steel Res. Int. 77, 627–633 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. Sutou, N. Kamiya, R. Umino, I. Ohnuma, K. Ishida, High-strength Fe-20Mn–Al–C based alloys with low density. ISIJ Int. 50, 893–899 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    L. Bartlett, A. Dash, D.C. Van Aken, V.L. Richards, K.D. Peaslee, Dynamic fracture toughness of high strength cast steels. IJMC 7, 17–33 (2013)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    I. Kalashnikov, O. Acselrad, A. Shalkevich, L. Chumokova, L. Pereira, Heat treatment and thermal stability of FeMnAlC alloys. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 136, 72–79 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Kimura, K. Handa, K. Hayashi, Y. Mishima, Microstructure and ductility improvement of the two-phase γ-Fe/κ-(fe, Mn)3AlC alloys in the Fe–Mn–Al–C system. Intermetallics 12, 607–617 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Howell, T. Weerasooriya, D. Van Aken, Tensile, high strain rate compression and microstructural evaluation of lightweight age hardenable cast Fe-30Mn-9Al-XSi-0.9C-0.5Mo steel. IJMC 4(1), 7–18 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Bartlett, D.C. Van Aken, High manganese and aluminum steels for the military and automotive industry. JOM 66(1), 1770 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L.N. Bartlett, R. Howell, D.C. Van Aken, K.D. Peaslee, Effect of phosphorus and silicon on the precipitation of κ-carbides in Fe-30%Mn-9%Al-X%Si-0.9%C-0.5%Mo alloys. Trans. Am. Foundry Soc. 118, 413–424 (2010). (paper no. 10-069) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.A. Howell, J.M. Montgomery, D.C. Van Aken, J. AIST 6, 168–176 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.A. Howell, D.C. Van Aken, Microstructural and fracture behavior of phosphorus containing Fe-30Mn-9Al-1Si0.9C-0.5Mo alloy steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 46, 3309–3316 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N.I. Medvedeva, R.A. Howell, D.C. Van Aken, J.E. Medvedeva, Phys. Rev. B 81, 012105 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Schulte, S. Lekakh, D. Van Aken, and V. Richards, Phosphorus Mitigation in Cast Lightweight Fe-Mn-Al-C Steel, 114 th Metalcasting Congress, March 19–23, 2010, Orlando, FLGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    L.N. Bartlett, D.C. Van Aken, S. Lekakh, K.D. Peaslee, Mechanical properties of cerium treated Fe–Mn–Al–C steel castings. AFS Trans. 119, 545–560 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Suk, S. Jo, S. Kim, K. Lee, J. Park, X-Ray observation of phosphorus vaporization from steelmaking slag and suppression method of phosphorus reversion in liquid iron. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 37B, 99–107 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.F. Elliott, M. Gleiser, V. Ramakrishna, Thermochemistry for Steelmaking, vol. II (Addison-Wesley, London, 1963), pp. 160–165Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    E.T. Turkdogan, J. Pearson, J. Iron Steel Inst. 175, 393–401 (1953)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Yamamoto, K. Yamada, L.L. Meshkov, E. Kato, Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. 22, 262–268 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    E.T. Turkdogan, Physical Chemistry of High Temperature Technology (Academic Press, New York, 1980)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    C.S. Mahlami, X. Pan, An Overview on High Manganese Steel Casting, in Proceedings of the 71st World Foundry Congress, May 19–20 Bilbao, Spain (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Kuyucak, R. Zavadil, On the heat-treatment of hadfields austenitic manganese steels part VI: impact toughness microstructure, macro and microsegregation in large wedge block castings. AFS Trans. 111, 1135–1148 (2003)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Shulik, L. Kamarash, Y. Vilchko, P. Dzugas, Phosphide eutectic in a hadfield steel structure. Translated from Metallovedenie I Termicheskaya Obrabotka Metallov 2, 2–3 (1992)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. Kuyucak, R. Zavadil, On the heat-treatment of hadfields austenitic manganese steels part II: metallographic studies. AFS Trans. 108, 21–55 (2000)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    L. Bartlett, D. Van Aken, J. Medvedeva, D. Isheim, N. Medvedeva, K. Song, An atom probe study of kappa carbide precipitation and the effect of silicon addition. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 45A, 2421–2435 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R.A. Howell, S.N. Lekakh, D.C. Van Aken, V.L. Richards, The effect of silicon content on the fluidity and microstructure of Fe–Mn–Al–C alloys. AFS Trans. 116, 867–878 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    L.N. Bartlett, Van Aken, Effect of aluminum and carbon on the dynamic fracture toughness of Fe–Mn–Al–C steels. AFS Trans. 118, 511–533 (2013)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Y. Dastur, W. Leslie, Mechanism of work hardening in hadfield manganese steel. Metall. Trans. A 12, 749–759 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    O. Bouaziz, N. Guelton, Modelling of TWIP effect on work-hardening. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 319–321, 246–249 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    K. Park, K. Jin, S. Han, S. Hwang, K. Choi, C. Lee, Stacking fault energy and plastic deformation of fully austenitic high manganese steels: effect of Al addition. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527, 3651–3661 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    N.I. Medvedeva, M.S. Park, D.C. Van Aken, J.E. Medvedeva, First-principles study of the Mn, Al and C distribution and their effect on the stacking fault energies in austenite, arXiv:1208.0310v1 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci], (2012)
  30. 30.
    O. Acselrad, J. Dille, L.C. Pereira, J. Delplancke, Room temperature cleavage fracture of FeMnAlC steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35A, 3863–3866 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© American Foundry Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Metallurgical Engineering, Materials Science and Engineering DepartmentMissouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA
  2. 2.Texas State UniversitySan MarcosUSA

Personalised recommendations