Effect of Inclusions on the Tensile Properties Inside a LPPM A356 Casting
- 63 Downloads
Abstract
Contrary to metallurgical properties such as dendrite fineness or microporosity, the level of inclusions in a casting is difficult if not impossible to assess accurately. Consequently, it is not easy to quantify the detrimental effect of inclusions on tensile properties. In the present work, this has been attempted on an aluminum A356 step casting, the geometry of which offers a wide range of solidifying conditions. It was poured in low pressure permanent mold, a process which minimizes the variability of mold filling. The interaction between the melt gas content and inclusions in producing microporosity was highlighted by analyzing reduced pressure test samples. Radiographic analyses and die penetrant checks were performed to detect microshrinkage and inclusions in the castings. The effect of inclusions on tensile properties was assessed by separating tensile samples in which inclusions were observed in the fracture surface from those with a flawless fracture surface. It was thus possible to compare tensile properties with and without inclusions in the same casting. This procedure eliminated the variability introduced by the numerous additional factors bearing on the tensile properties such as the chemical composition, melt preparation and heat treatment. This distinguishes the present study from those previously carried out on the influence of inclusions on tensile properties.
Keywords
aluminum inclusions tensile propertiesNotes
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada for funding the Chair on the Transformation of Aluminum at Centre de Métallurgie du Québec. This study would not have been possible without the close collaboration of Jeremy Carignan. Finally, the authors must recognize the valuable contribution of Olivier Jacob, an intern student from Université Laval (Québec City) for the laboratory work.
References
- 1.D. Doutre, B. Gariépy, J.P. Martin, G. Dubé, Aluminum cleanliness: methods and applications in process development and quality control, in Light Metal (1985), pp. 1179–1195Google Scholar
- 2.L. Liu, F.H. Samuel, Assessment of melt cleanliness in A356.2 aluminum casting alloy using the porous disc filtration apparatus technique. J. Mater. Sci. 32, 5927–5944 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.A. Simard, F. Dallaire, J. Proulx, P. Rochette, Cleanliness measurement benchmarks of aluminum alloys obtained directly at-line using the PREFIL-Footprinter Instrument, in Light Metal 2000 (The Mineral, Metals and Materials Society, 2000), pp. 739–744Google Scholar
- 4.D.P.K. Singh, D.J. Mitchell, Analysis of metal quality in a low pressure permanent mold foundry. AFS Trans. 109, 333–345 (2001)Google Scholar
- 5.
- 6.G. Laslaz, P. Laty, Gas porosity and metal cleanliness in aluminum casting alloys. AFS Trans. 99, 83–90 (1991)Google Scholar
- 7.J. Campbell, The Bifilm concept: prospect of defect-free castings, in Proceedings of the 68th World Foundry Congress (2007), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
- 8.M. Stucky, Elimination of oxides in aluminium alloys: dream or reality? Fond. Mag. 26, 15–26 (2012)Google Scholar
- 9.B. Eisaabadi et al., Effect of oxide films, inclusions and fe on reproducibility of tensile properties in cast Al–Si–Mg alloys: statistical and image analysis. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 558, 134–143 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.T. Ludvig, M. Di Sabatino, L. Arnberg, Influence of oxide additions on the porosity development and mechanical properties of A356 aluminium alloy castings. IJMC 6(2), 41–50 (2012)Google Scholar
- 11.J. Cheng, N. Hort, K.U. Kainer, S. Kwak, Effects of Defects on Tensile Properties of A356 Casting Alloys. http://www.metal2014.com/files/proceedings/12/reports/1805.pdf. (2013)
- 12.M. Drouzy, S. Jacob, M. Richard, Interpretation of tensile results by means of quality index and probable yield strength. Int. J. Cast Metal. Res. 5(2), 43–50 (1980)Google Scholar