A Comparative Study of Alternative Approaches to Estimate Productivity
- 7 Downloads
Theoretically, for single output-single input, annual productivity are expected to be identical across index, non-parametric programming and parametric statistical approaches. The following models within each approach is considered—index (Tornqvist-Theil and Ideal Fisher), the non-parametric programming (Malmquist input, output and graph; Malmquist total factor productivity) and parametric (Input and Output; total factor productivity) regression. Empirically, for single output-single input, this research show differences in annual productivity and productivity growth rate between and within each of the three approaches using Nebraska agriculture data from 1936 to 2004. The annual productivity growth rate from 1936 to 2004 was identical across non-parametric Malmquist output, input, graph and Malmquist total factor productivity, and parametric Malmquist total factor productivity. However annual productivity estimated by parametric Malmquist total factor productivity is identical to Ideal Fisher productivity.
KeywordsAnnual productivity and productivity growth rate Tornqvist-Theil and Ideal fisher index Non-parametric programming Malmquist input, output and graph measures Parametric solow residuals Nebraska agriculture sector data, 1936–2004
JEL ClassificationO3 C6 Q1
- Boles, J.N. 1966. Efficiency Squared—Efficient Computation of Efficiency Indexes. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (Western Farm Economics Association), Vol. 39, August 15–17 1966, ppGoogle Scholar
- Bressler, R.G. 1966. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (Western Farm Economics Association), Vol. 39, August 15–17 1966, pp 129–136Google Scholar
- Capalbo, S.M., and J.M. Antle. 1988. Agricultural Productivity: Measurement and Explanation. Washington: Resource for the Future.Google Scholar
- Caves, D.W., L.R. Christensen, and W.E. Diewert. 1982. The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input. Output and Productivity, Econometrica 50: 1393–1414.Google Scholar
- Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, and C.A.K. Lovell. 1994. Production Frontiers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Griliches, Z. 1996. The Discovery of the Residual: A Historical Note. Journal of Economic Literature 34 (3): 1324–1330.Google Scholar
- Shaik, S. 1998. Environmentally Adjusted Productivity [EAP] Measures for Nebraska Agriculture Sector, Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI9908485/. Accessed 28 July 2018.
- Seitz, W.D. 1966. Efficiency Measures for Steam-Electric Generating Plants. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (Western Farm Economics Association), Vol. 39, August 15–17 1966, pp. 143–151.Google Scholar
- Shephard, R.W. 1953. Cost and Production Functions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Sitorus, B.L. 1966. Productive Efficiency and Redundant Factors of Production in Traditional Agricultural of Underdeveloped Countries: A Note on Measurement, In Proceedings Western Farm Economic Association.Google Scholar