Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Economics

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 913–935 | Cite as

Analysing Changes in Gender Difference in Learning in Rural India over Time

  • Chandan JainEmail author
Original Article
  • 34 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper we use data from three rounds (2009, 2012 and 2014) of the ASER survey in order to analyse the changes in gender differences in learning outcomes over time for children belonging to rural India. Despite the existing literature on gender differences, this study is the first to analyse such changes over time for the Indian context. We find that gender differences in learning continue to exist and that these differences have increased over time in favour of boys. Decomposition analysis suggests that only a small percentage of the gender difference in performance can be explained by the differences in the observed characteristics across the two groups. We also find that our results are heterogeneous across different levels of mother’s education and regions. Our findings highlight upon the failure of the recent interventions by the Indian Government in reducing existing gender differences and a move away from the stated objective of achieving gender equality in learning outcomes as under the Dakar Framework for Action. Besides, an increase in the gender difference in learning might further substantiate the existing gender difference in related education and labour market outcomes.

Keywords

Gender differences Learning outcomes Female disadvantage Rural India 

JEL classification

I2 J24 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Abhiroop Mukhopadhyay, S. Chandrasekhar, Soham Sahoo, Shampa Bhattacharjee, Ashokankur Datta, Gitanjali Sen, participants at the Public Policy Conference at IIM-B and anonymous reviewers for their detailed comments and suggestions on an earlier draft of the paper. The data used in the paper was shared by the ASER Centre as a part of the ASER Call for Paper 2015.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exists.

References

  1. Afridi, F. 2010. Women’s empowerment and the goal of parity between the sexes in schooling in India. Population Studies 64 (2): 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alcott, B., and P. Rose. 2015. Schools and learning in rural India and Pakistan: Who goes where, and how much are they learning? Prospects 45 (3): 345–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcott, B., and P. Rose. 2017. Learning in India’s primary schools: how do disparities widen across the grades? International Journal of Educational Development 56: 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold, F., S. Kishor, and T. Roy. 2002. Sex-selective abortions in india. Population and Development Review 28 (4): 759–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. ASER Centre. 2014. Annual status of education report: Trends over time. New Delhi: ASER Centre.Google Scholar
  6. Azam, M., and G.G. Kingdon. 2013. Are girls the fairer sex in India? Revisiting intra-household allocation of education expenditure. World Development 42: 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, M., and K. Milligan. 2016. Boy-girl differences in parental time investments: Evidence from three countries. Journal of Human Capital 10 (4): 399–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berman, E., K. Lang, and E. Siniver. 2003. Language-skill complementarity: returns to immigrant language acquisition. Labour Economics 10 (3): 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bleakley, H., and A. Chin. 2008. What holds back the second generation? the intergenerational transmission of language human capital among immigrants. Journal of Human Resources 43 (2): 267–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borooah, V.K. 2012. Social identity and educational attainment: the role of caste and religion in explaining differences between children in India. Journal of Development Studies 48 (7): 887–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borooah, V.K., and S. Iyer. 2005. Vidya, veda, and varna: The influence of religion and caste on education in rural India. The Journal of Development Studies 41 (8): 1369–1404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chee, K.H., N.W. Pino, and W.L. Smith. 2005. Gender differences in the academic ethic and academic achievement. College Student Journal 39 (3): 606.Google Scholar
  13. Davison, K.K., and E.J. Susman. 2001. Are hormone levels and cognitive ability related during early adolescence? International Journal of Behavioural Development 25 (5): 416–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dercon, S., and A. Singh. 2013. From nutrition to aspirations and self-efficacy: gender bias over time among children in four countries. World Development 45: 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dickerson, A., S. McIntosh, and C. Valente. 2015. Do the maths: An analysis of the gender gap in mathematics in Africa. Economics of Education Review 46: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Else-Quest, N.M., J.S. Hyde, and M.C. Linn. 2010. Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 136 (1): 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. French, R. and G. Kingdon. 2010. The relative effectiveness of private and government schools in rural india: Evidence from aser data. DoQSS Working Papers 10-03, Department of Quantitative Social Science - UCL Institute of Education, University College London.Google Scholar
  18. Ghazvini, S.D., and M. Khajehpour. 2011. Gender differences in factors affecting academic performance of high school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 15: 1040–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guiso, L., F. Monte, P. Sapienza, and L. Zingales. 2008. Culture, gender, and math. Science 320 (5880): 1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gur, R.C., B.I. Turetsky, M. Matsui, M. Yan, W. Bilker, P. Hughett, and R.E. Gur. 1999. Sex differences in brain gray and white matter in healthy young adults: correlations with cognitive performance. Journal of Neuroscience 19 (10): 4065–4072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanushek, E.A., and L. Woessmann. 2008. The role of cognitive skills in economic development. Journal of Economic Literature 46 (3): 607–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kambhampati, U.S., and R. Rajan. 2008. The ‘nowhere’children: Patriarchy and the role of girls in India’s rural economy. The Journal of Development Studies 44 (9): 1309–1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kingdon, G.G. 2005. Where has all the bias gone? Detecting gender bias in the intra-household allocation of educational expenditure. Economic Development and Cultural Change 53 (2): 409–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klasen, S. 2002. Low schooling for girls, slower growth for all? Cross-country evidence on the effect of gender inequality in education on economic development. The World Bank Economic Review 16 (3): 345–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klasen, S., and F. Lamanna. 2008. The impact of gender inequality in education and employment on economic growth in developing countries: Updates and extensions. Discussion papers, Ibero America Institute for Economic Research: Technical report.Google Scholar
  26. Klaus, D., and A. Tipandjan. 2014. Son preference in India: Shedding light on the north-south gradient. Comparative Population Studies.  https://doi.org/10.12765/CPoS-2014-18en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lippmann, Q., and C. Senik. 2018. Math, girls and socialism. Journal of Comparative Economics 46 (3): 874–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maitra, P., S. Pal, and A. Sharma. 2016. Absence of altruism? Female disadvantage in private school enrolment in India. World Development 85: 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MHRD. 2016. Educational Statistics at a Glance, 2016. Government of India, Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD), New Delhi. www.mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/statistics/ESG2016_0.pdf.Google Scholar
  30. Muralidharan, K., and K. Sheth. 2016. Bridging education gender gaps in developing countries: The role of female teachers. Journal of Human Resources 51 (2): 269–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nakajima, M., Y. Kijima, and K. Otsuka. 2018. Is the learning crisis responsible for school dropout? A longitudinal study of Andhra Pradesh, India. International Journal of Educational Development 62: 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Niederle, M., and L. Vesterlund. 2010. Explaining the gender gap in math test scores: The role of competition. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Niaz Asadullah, M., U. Kambhampati, and F. Lopez Boo. 2013. Social divisions in school participation and attainment in India: 1983–2004. Cambridge Journal of Economics 38 (4): 869–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nollenberger, N., N. Rodriguez-Planas, and A. Sevilla. 2016. The math gender gap: The role of culture. American Economic Review 106 (5): 257–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pal, S. 2004. How much of the gender difference in child school enrolment can be explained? Evidence from rural India. Bulletin of Economic Research 56 (2): 133–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pope, D.G., and J.R. Sydnor. 2010. Geographic variation in the gender differences in test scores. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (2): 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sacerdote, B. 2011. Nature and Nurture Effects on Children’s Outcomes: What Have We Learned from Studies of Twins and Adoptees?. in Handbook of Social Economics (Vol. 1, pp. 1-30). North-Holland.Google Scholar
  38. Sahoo, S. 2017. Intra-household gender disparity in school choice: Evidence from private schooling in India. The Journal of Development Studies 53 (10): 1714–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. UNESCO. 2000. The Dakar Framework for Action: Education for All: Meeting Our Collective Commitments: Including Six Regional Frameworks for Action. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Source: unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001211/121147e.pdf.Google Scholar
  40. UNESCO. 2008. Education for all by 2015: will we make it? EFA global monitoring report. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Source: unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001548/154820e.pdf.Google Scholar
  41. UNESCO. 2017. Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Source: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0025/002534/253479E.pdf.
  42. White, G., M. Ruther, and J. Kahn. 2016. Educational inequality in india: An analysis of gender differences in reading and mathematics. Working Paper 2016-2, India Human Development Survey.Google Scholar
  43. Zimmermann, L. 2012. Reconsidering gender bias in intra-household allocation in India. Journal of Development Studies 48 (1): 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Econometric Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsShiv Nadar UniversityGreater NoidaIndia

Personalised recommendations