Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Economics

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 121–151 | Cite as

Gender Wage Gap: Some Recent Evidences from India

  • Somasree PoddarEmail author
  • Ishita Mukhopadhyay
Original Article
  • 79 Downloads

Abstract

Gender wage inequality is a chronic socioeconomic malice in developed as well as in developing countries. This paper describes the outcomes of our study on the estimation of gender wage gap in the Indian labour market, using the 68th Round NSSO employment–unemployment data. The study uses Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition technique and Heckman two-step methodology, for removal of selectivity bias in the sample data, to measure the components of total gender wage gap, viz. (1) occupational segregation (explained by economic rationale) and (2) direct discrimination (not explained by economic rationale). The analysis indicates that the maximum direct discrimination is for job-related factors, such as industry type which are controlled by employers. The majority of the Indian employers today are men, which may be the reason for the insensitivity to the chronic direct discrimination against women in workplaces. The study also indicates that most of the explained gender wage gap is due to lower skill and experience amongst women. The findings suggest that besides labour law reforms for ensuring gender neutrality in workplaces, focused government policies for promoting women entrepreneurship and skill development of women are urgently required for reducing the gender wage gap in India.

Keywords

Gender wage gap Discrimination Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition India 

JEL Classification

C13 J16 J31 

References

  1. Agrwal, T. 2014. Gender and caste-based wage discrimination in India: some recent evidence. Journal for Labour Market Research 47: 329–340.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12651-013-0152-zwal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal, M. 2017. Chapter 5, Navigating the Labyrinth: Perspectives on India’s Higher Education by Devesh Kapur and Pratap Bhanu Mehta, Orient Blackswan.Google Scholar
  3. Anker, R. 1997. Theories of occupational segregation by sex: an Overview’. International Labour Review 136 (3): 315–325.Google Scholar
  4. Averitt, R. 1968. The Dual Economy: The Dynamics of American Industry Structure. : New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Biltagy, M. 2014. Paper presented to the 34th annual MEEA meeting in conjunction with the Allied Social Science Association (ASSA), Philadelphia, January 3–6, 2014.Google Scholar
  6. Blau, F.D., and L.M. Kahn. 1994. Rising Wage Inequality and the U.S. Gender Gap. American Economic Review 84 (2): 23–28.Google Scholar
  7. Blinder, Alan S. 1973. Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimations. Journal of Human Resource 8: 436–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chakraborty, I. and A. Chakraborty. 2009. Female work Participation and gender differential in earning in West Bengal. Occasional Paper 18.Google Scholar
  9. Chakraborty, N. and A. Majumder. 2016. Occupational Segregation and wage differential between males and females in India. Sarvekshna, 100 the issue.Google Scholar
  10. Cotton, J. 1988. On the decomposition of wage differentials. Review of Economics and Statistics 70 (2): 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duraisamy and P. Duraisamy. 2016. Gender wage gap across the wage distribution in different segments of the Indian labour market, 1983–2012 exploring the glass ceiling or sticky floor phenomenon’1466-4283 (Online) Journal homepage: http:Applied Economics.Google Scholar
  12. Elder, E., and et al. 2010. Unexplained Gaps and Oaxaca–Blinder Decompositions. Labour Economics 17: 284–290.Google Scholar
  13. Elson, D., and Pearson. 1981. Nimble fingers make cheap workers: An analysis of women’s employment in Third world Export Manufacturing. Feminist Review (7): 87–107.Google Scholar
  14. Goldin, C. 1990. Understanding the Gender Gap: an economic history of American women. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Haas, S. 2006. Economic Development and the Gender Wage Gap. The Park place Economist, volume XIV. 49–55.Google Scholar
  16. Heckman, J. 1976. The Common Structure of Statistical Models of Truncation, Sample Selection and Limited Dependent Variables and a Simple Estimator for Such Models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement 5 (4): 475–492.Google Scholar
  17. Heckman, J. 1979. Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error. Econometrica 47: 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jann, B. 2008. The Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition for linear regression models. Stata Journal 8 (4): 453–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, F.L., and J. Kelley. 1984. Decomposing Differences between Groups. Sociological Methods & Research 12 (3): 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kiausiene and others. 2011. On Gender Stereotyping and Employment Assimetries. Economics and Sociology 4(2): 84–97.Google Scholar
  21. Kingdon, G.G., and J. Unni. 2001. Education and Women’s Labour Market Outcomes in India. Education Economics 9 (2): 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leidner, R. 2009. Serving Hamburgers and selling Insurance: Gender, work, and Identity in interactive Service jobs. Gender and Society 5 (2): 154–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Madheswaran, S. 2010. Labour market discrimination in India: methodological developments and empirical evidence. Indian Journal of Labour Economics 53 (3): 457–480.Google Scholar
  24. Madheswaran, S., and P. Attewell. 2007. Caste discrimination in the Indian urban labour market: evidence from the national sample survey. Economic and Political Weekly 42 (41): 4146–4153.Google Scholar
  25. Madheswaran, S. and B. Guhakhasnobis. 2007. Decomposition of Gender wage Gap in India: An Econometric Analysis.Google Scholar
  26. Mincer, J. 1974. Schooling, Experience and Earnings. New York: National.Google Scholar
  27. Neuman, S. and R. Oaxaca. 2003. Estimating Labour Market Discrimination with selectivity-Corrected Wage Equations: Methodological Considerations and Illustration for Israel. Discussion Paper No.2-2003.Google Scholar
  28. Neumark, D. 1988. Employers’ discrimatory bahaviour and the estimation of wage discrimination. Journal of Human Resources 23: 279–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. NSSO 68th Round employment unemployment report (2014).Google Scholar
  30. Oaxaca, R.L. 1973. Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labour Markets. International Economic Review 14 (3): 693–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olfert, M.R. 2006. The Spatial Economy of gender based Occupational segregation. The Review of Regional Studies 1: 44–62.Google Scholar
  32. Reimer, D., and J. Schroder. 2006. Tracing the gender wage gap: Income differences between male and female University graduates in Germany. Journal for Labour market Research of Institute of Employment Reserch 39 (iss2): 235–253.Google Scholar
  33. Reimers, C.W. 1983. Labor market discrimination against Hispanic and Black men. Review of Economics and Statistics 65 (4): 570–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richard, S. 2007. Wage determination and Gender Discrimination InUganda. Economic Policy research Centre (EPRC).Google Scholar
  35. Sengupta, A., and P. Das. 2014. Gender Wage Discrimination across Social and Religious Groups in India: Estimates with Unit Level Data. Economic and Political Weekly 49: 71–76.Google Scholar
  36. Shen, J. 2014. Recent Trends in Gender Wage Inequality in the United States. Journal of Sociological Research 5 (1): 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, J.P., and Ward M.P. 1984. Women’s wages and work in the 20th century. Rand Report Number R-3119-NICHD, Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  38. Sophie, P., and Dominique, M. 2005. The Gender Wage Gap in Europe: Women, Men and the Public Sector, Working Paper Series of the Department of Consumer Prices, Resources and living conditions of households, France. Google Scholar
  39. Suh, J. 2010. Decomposition of the change in the Gender Wage Gap. Research in Business and Economic Journal. 1–18.Google Scholar
  40. Watson, I. 2010. Decomposing the Gender Pay Gap in the Australian Managerial Labour Market’. Australian Journal of Labour economics 13 (1): 49–79.Google Scholar
  41. Zajkowska, O. 2013. Gender pay Gap in Poland-Blinder -Oaxaca Decomposition. Quantitative Methods in Economics XIV 2: 272–278.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Econometric Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsLady Brabourne CollegeKolkataIndia
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations