Abstract
Background
Endometrial hyperplasia is of paramount clinical implication as it is usually seen to precede endometrioid adenocarcinoma. However, clinicians and pathologists have always been uncertain about the distinction between innocuous hyperplasia from their sinister counterparts. This has serious implications, for the latter lesion has a greater propensity for progressing into adenocarcinoma and needs deft clinical intervention in the form of adequate progestational exposure or surgery.
Methods
Thirty cases diagnosed as endometrial hyperplasia on endometrial biopsies were retrieved from the archives and reclassified as per the EIN criteria. Thirty cases each of proliferative endometrium and endometrioid carcinoma were also included. Immunohistochemistry with antibodies against PAX2 and PTEN was performed, and the extent of loss of expression was scored.
Results
A total of ten cases of EIN were identified, all of whom were initially diagnosed as complex hyperplasia with atypia. All cases of proliferative endometrium showed retained expression of PAX2 and PTEN. In contrast, all cases of endometrioid carcinoma showed complete loss of PAX2 and PTEN. The EIN cases showed partial loss of both PAX2 and PTEN expression. Loss of PAX2 expression in EIN showed a specificity and positive predictive value of 90% and 83.33%, respectively.
Conclusion
The advent of the EIN criteria has made identification of clinically significant endometrial precancerous lesion more acceptable and reproducible. However, in cases of ambiguity, the use of antibodies against certain protein molecules which reflect the genes involved in the stepwise carcinogenesis would be of great utility in the hands of the pathologist. In comparison with PTEN, the use of PAX2, which gives a crisp nuclear positivity and has a lower percentage of loss of expression in normal endometrium, can be used as part of the algorithm in accurately identifying the precancerous endometrium.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kurman RJ. Blaustein's pathology of the female genital tract. Berlin: Springer; 2013.
Jarboe EA, Mutter GL. Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. In: Wick MR, editor. Seminars in diagnostic pathology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2010
Owings RA, Quick CM. Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(4):484–91.
Yang HP, et al. PTEN expression in benign human endometrial tissue and cancer in relation to endometrial cancer risk factors. Cancer Causes Control. 2015;26(12):1729–36.
Maxwell GL, et al. Mutation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene in endometrial hyperplasias. Can Res. 1998;58(12):2500–3.
Mutter GL, et al. Altered PTEN expression as a diagnostic marker for the earliest endometrial precancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92(11):924–30.
Monte NM, et al. Joint loss of PAX2 and PTEN expression in endometrial precancers and cancer. Can Res. 2010;70(15):6225–322.
Mutter GL. Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN): will it bring order to chaos? Gynecol Oncol. 2000;76(3):287–90.
Brinton LA, et al. Serum estrogens and estrogen metabolites and endometrial cancer risk among postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Prev Biomark. 2016;25(7):1081–9.
Wu H, et al. Hypomethylation-linked activation of PAX2 mediates tamoxifen-stimulated endometrial carcinogenesis. Nature. 2005;438(7070):981.
Allison KH, et al. PAX2 loss by immunohistochemistry occurs early and often in endometrial hyperplasia. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2012;31(2):151.
Jemal A, et al. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(2):71–96.
Balasubramaniam G, et al. Hospital-based study of endometrial cancer survival in Mumbai, India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(2):977–80.
Kurman RJ, Kaminski PF, Norris HJ. The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of “untreated” hyperplasia in 170 patients. Cancer. 1985;56(2):403–12.
Morice P, et al. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2016;387(10023):1094–108.
Montgomery BE, Daum GS, Dunton CJ. Endometrial hyperplasia: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2004;59(5):368–78.
Rouzbahman M. Biopsy interpretation of the uterine cervix and corpus. London: BMJ Publishing Group; 2015.
Amant F, et al. Endometrial cancer. Lancet. 2005;366(9484):491–505.
Emons G, et al. New WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasias. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015;75(02):135–6.
Wong J, et al. Molecular pathogenesis of endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia: precursor to endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;141:69–70.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the efforts of the technical staff at the Department of Pathology, AFMC in exceution of the project. The authors also acknowledge the grant extended by the Armed Forced Medical Research Committee for conducting the research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Madakshira, M.G., Ranjan, P. Expression of PAX2 and PTEN in Oestrogen-Driven Endometrial Hyperplasia and Neoplasia. Indian J Gynecol Oncolog 17, 73 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-019-0316-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40944-019-0316-z