Advertisement

Enhanced effective thickness model for buckling of LG beams with different boundary conditions

  • 14 Accesses

Abstract

Because of their characteristic high slenderness ratios, laminated glass elements are frequently subjected to buckling phenomena. Here, simple analytical formulae for the evaluation of the effective thickness for the compressive buckling verification of laminated glass beams are proposed, based on the Enhanced Effective Thickness model, widely used for the design of laminated glass. The model applies also to multilaminates. Tables for the calculation of the relevant coefficients in the most common cases have been added for ease of reference and to facilitate the practical use. Comparison with numerical results, performed by considered paradigmatic cases, confirm the accuracy of the proposed formulae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 199

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Notes

  1. 1.

    As discussed in Galuppi and Royer-Carfagni (2012a), at the monolithic limit, the cross-sectional inertia equals that of the cross sections of the composing glass layers, properly spaced of the interlayer gaps.

  2. 2.

    As it is well known, the Euler’s critical load \(P_{cr}\) represents the theoretical upper limit for compressive loading in the elastic range. Indeed, a geometrically imperfect beam/column not suddenly buckle; it bends after a small axial load is applied, and the deflection grows as the load increases and tends to infinity when the load approaches the \(P_{cr}\). However, the evaluation of the Euler critical load is necessary for the buckling verification of real elements, accounting for the initial imperfection (see, for example, Amadio and Bedon 2013).

  3. 3.

    In such a quite wide element, Poisson’s effects can develop. This may be accounted for by considering the EET model for plates Galuppi and Royer-Carfagni (2012b). However, due to the considered boundary and loading condition, the out-of-plane displacement may be assumed to be dependent only on the longitudinal coordinate (as in a beam element), and this effect can be neglected.

References

  1. ABAQUS. Analysis users manual, version 6.12. Simulia, (2012)

  2. Amadio, C., Bedon, C.: Buckling verification of laminated glass elements in compression. J Civ Eng Sci 1(3), 90–101 (2012)

  3. Amadio, C., Bedon, C.: A buckling verification approach for monolithic and laminated glass elements under combined in-plane compression and bending. Eng Struct 52, 220–229 (2013)

  4. ASTM E-1300: Standard practice for determining load resistance of glass in buildings. Technical report, (2012)

  5. Calderone, I., Davies, P.S., Bennison, S.J., Xiaokun, H., Gang, L.: Effective laminate thickness for the design of laminated glass. In : Proceedings of Glass Performance Days, Tampere (FIN), pp. 12–15, (2009)

  6. CEN/TC 250. prCEN/TS xxxx:2018 - Structural glass— Design and construction rules. (2018)

  7. Galuppi, L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: Effective thickness of laminated glass beams: new expression via a variational approach. Eng Struct 38, 53–67 (2012)

  8. Galuppi, L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: The effective thickness of laminated glass plates. J Mech Mater Struct 7(4), 375–400 (2012)

  9. Galuppi, Laura, Royer-Carfagni, Gianni: The effective thickness of laminated glass: inconsistency of the formulation in a proposal of en-standards. Compos. Part B: Eng 55, 109–118 (2013)

  10. Galuppi, L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: Buckling of three-layered composite beams with viscoelastic interaction. Compos Struct 107, 512–521 (2014)

  11. Galuppi, L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: Enhanced effective thickness of multi-layered laminated glass. Compos Part B-Eng 64, 202–213 (2014)

  12. Galuppi, L., Manara, G., Royer-Carfagni, G.: Practical expressions for the design of laminated glass. Compos Part B-Eng 45, 1677–1688 (2013)

  13. López-Aenlle, M., Pelayo, F., Ismael, G., Prieto, M.A.G., Rodríguez, A.M., Fernández-Canteli, A.: Buckling of laminated-glass beams using the effective-thickness concept. Compos Struct 137, 44–55 (2016)

  14. National Research Council (Italy). CNR-DT 210: Guide for the Design, Construction and Control of Buildings with Structural Glass Elements. (2013)

  15. Norville, H.S., King, K.W., Swofford, J.L.: Behavior and strength of laminated glass. J Eng Mech-ASCE 124(1), 46–53 (1998)

  16. Nunziante, L., Gambarotta, L., Tralli, A.: Scienza delle costruzioni. McGraw-Hill, New York (2008)

  17. prEN 16612: Glass in building—determination of the lateral load resistance of glass panes by calculation. Standard, CEN/TC 129, (2016)

  18. Wölfel, E.: Nachgiebiger verbund - eine näherungslösung und deren anwendungsmöglichkeiten. Stahlbau 6, 173–180 (1987)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the support of the Italian Dipartimento della Protezione Civile under project ReLUIS-DPC 2018-2020.

Author information

Correspondence to Laura Galuppi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Ambrosio, G., Galuppi, L. Enhanced effective thickness model for buckling of LG beams with different boundary conditions. Glass Struct Eng (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40940-019-00116-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Laminated glass
  • Buckling verification
  • Effective thickness