Post-breakage in-plane stiffness of laminated glass: an engineering approach
- 70 Downloads
In the post-breakage phase, laminated glass (LG) can maintain a residual load-bearing capacity due to the tension stiffening of the polymer through the adhesion with the shards, but the determination of the overall post-breakage stiffness presents formidable difficulties. A simple model is here proposed for the in-plane response of broken thermally treated LG, characterized by a fine cracking pattern. A simple formula for the effective post-breakage stiffness under in-plane loading is provided, which depends upon interlayer modulus and amount of delamination. Comparisons with numerical experiments confirm its accuracy for interpreting the response of representative portions of broken LG, composed by a large number of glass fragments, for different shapes of the glass shards and for different amount of delamination. The proposed model may represent an useful practical tool for evaluating the post-critical response of LG under in-plane loading, in particular under shear. This may be of crucial importance in view of possible applications of LG-based elements as structural shear-resistant transparent diaphragms for the seismic retrofitting of historical monuments. Glass-based bracings shall be designed to remain sound under moderate earthquakes; they can possibly break under the most severe seismic events, but always in a ductile manner while dissipating energy, thanks to the hysteretic response of broken LG consequent to progressive delamination.
KeywordsLaminated glass Post-glass-breakage response In-plane loading Effective stiffness Seismic retrofitting
The authors acknowledge the support of the Italian Dipartimento della Protezione Civile under Project ReLUIS-DPC 2019–2021 and the support of the Italian Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Universita’ e della Ricerca under Grant MIUR-PRIN voce COAN 5.50.16.01 code 2015JW9NJT.
This study was funded by Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri—Italy and Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Universita’ e della Ricerca—Italy (MIUR-PRIN voce COAN 5.50.16.01 code 2015JW9NJT).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- ABAQUS. Analysis users manual, version 6.10. Simulia (2010)Google Scholar
- Ambartsumyan, S.A.: Elasticity Theory of Different Moduli (Trans. RF Wu and YZ Zhang). China Railway, Beijing (1986)Google Scholar
- Barou, L., Oikonomopoulou, F., Bristogianni, T., Veer, F., Nijsse, R.: Structural glass: a new remedial tool for the consolidation of historic structures. Heron 63(1–2), 159–197 (2018)Google Scholar
- Butchart, C., Overend, M.: Delamination in fractured laminated glass. In: Proceedings of Engineered Transparency International Conference at Glasstec, Düsseldorf (Germany), pp. 249–257 (2012)Google Scholar
- CEN/TC 250. prCEN/TS xxxx:2018—structural glass—design and construction rules (2018)Google Scholar
- Cerezo Miguel, J., Núñez Díaz, M.A., Lauret Aguirregabiria, B.: Different behaviors in laminated glass beams with perpendicular directions of laminated. In: Proceedings of Glass Performance Days, Tampere (Finland), pp. 226–228 (2013)Google Scholar
- Cruz, P.J.S., Pequeno, J., Lebet, J.-P.: Mocibob, D: Mechanical modelling of in-plane loaded glass panes. In: Challenging Glass Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 309–318 (2016)Google Scholar
- D’Ambrosio, G., Galuppi, L., Royer-Carfagni, G.: A simple model for the post-breakage response of laminated glass under in-plane loading. Comp Struct, under review (2019) Google Scholar
- Englhardt, O., Luible, A., Mocibob, D., Reich, S., Bedon, C., Belis, J.: Stability of glass elements—TG12 final report. pp. 661–669 (2014)Google Scholar
- Feldman, M., Kasper, R., Abeln, B., Gessler, A., Langoshc, K., Beyer, J., Schneider, J., Schula, S., Siebert, G., Haese, A., et al.: JRC Scientific and Policy Report. Guidance for European Structural Design of Glass Components. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2014)Google Scholar
- Ferretti, D., Rossi, M., Royer-Carfagni, G.: Through cracked tensile delamination tests with photoelastic measurements. In: Proceedings of Challenging Glass 3, Delft (Netherlands), pp. 641–652 (2012)Google Scholar
- Huveners, E.: Circumferentially adhesive bonded glass panes for bracing steel frames in façades. Ph.D. thesis, TU Eindhoven (NL) (2009)Google Scholar
- Keller, U., Mortelmans, H.: Adhesion in laminated safety glass–what makes it work. In: Proceedings of Glass Processing Days, Tampere (Finland), pp. 13–16 (1999)Google Scholar
- Look, D.W., Wong, T., Augustus, S.R.: The Seismic Retrofit of Historic Buildings Keeping Preservation in the Forefront. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington (1997)Google Scholar
- Louter, C., Belis, J., Bos, F., Veer, F.: Reinforced glass beams composed of annealed, heat-strengthened and fully tempered glass. In: Challenging Glass 3: Conference on Architectural and Structural Applications of Glass, CGC 2012, pp. 691–702 (2012a)Google Scholar
- Mocibob, D.: Glass panel under shear loading—use of glass envelopes in building stabilization. Ph.D. thesis, EPFL, Lausanne (CH) (2008)Google Scholar
- National Research Council (Italy): Advisory Committee on Technical Recommendations for Construction. CNR-DT 210: Guide for the Design, Construction and Control of Buildings with Structural Glass Elements (2013)Google Scholar
- Nhamoinesu, S., Overend, M.: Simple models for predicting the post-fracture behaviour of laminated glass. In: Proceedings of the XXV A.T.I.V 2010 International Conference, Parma (Italy), pp. 249–257 (2012)Google Scholar
- Stepinac, M., Rajčić, V., Žarnić, R.: Timber-structural glass composite systems in earthquake environment. Gradjevinar 68, 211–219 (2016)Google Scholar