Performance evaluation of different advanced processes for treating chloro-pesticide intermediate industrial wastewater
- 31 Downloads
Wastewater treatment has become an essential part of industrial operations. Pesticide production is one of the major supportive parts of the agriculture field, as India is an agriculture-based economy. The pesticide industry wastewater (PIW) is considered as hazardous since it contains chlorinated toxic pollutants. Treatment of such type of wastewater using conventional treatment methods might have their limitations due to the presence of toxic compounds, time consumption and complexity of the treatment process. In the past few years, the electrochemical methods [electrocoagulation (EC)/electrooxidation (EO) and Fenton process] became more attractive to remove recalcitrant pollutants from the wastewater streams. In this study, the treatment of chloro-pesticide intermediate processing industrial wastewater has been carried out using different advanced processes [electrochemical methods (EC/EO) and Fenton process]. The maximum % removal of COD and chloride was found to be 52 and 30% by electrocoagulation and 16 and 26% by electrooxidation processes, respectively, with a reaction time of 20 min at pH 7. The maximum % removal of COD achieved by Fenton followed by coagulation at pH 7 was observed to be 89%.
KeywordsIndustry wastewater Electrochemical method Chemical oxygen demand Fenton process
The authors would like to thank the Department of Science and Technology (DST-WTI), Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India/Bharat Sarkar, for providing us with the required fund and encouragement to carry out the present research work (Order no. DST/TM/WTI/2K16/220). One of the authors Dr. D Bhagawan would like to thank the University Grants Commission (UGC), Government of India/Bharat Sarkar, for providing the required fund and encouragement to carry out the research work(Order no. F./31-1/2017/PDFSS-2017-18-TEL-14164).
- Bazafshan E, Mahvim AH, Nasseri S, Mesdaghinia AR, Vaezi F, Nazmara SH (2006) Removal of cadmium from industrial effluents by electrocoagulation process using iron electrodes, Iran. J Environ Health Sci Eng 3:261–266Google Scholar
- Bhagawan D, Poodari S, Tulasiram Pothuraj D, Srinivasulu D, Shankaraiah G, Rani MY, Himabindu V, Vidyavathi S (2014b) Effect of operational parameters on heavy metal removal by electrocoagulation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:14166–14173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3331-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bhagawan D, Saritha P, Shankaraiah G, Elander M, Himabindu V (2016) Remediation of contaminated ground water using sonication: case study of an industrial area of Hyderabad. India. Int J Chem Chem Eng 5(1):143–159Google Scholar
- Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Crittenden John, Trussell Rhodes, Hand David, Howe Kerry, George Tchobanoglous (2005) Water treatment principles and design, vol 2. Wiley, New Jersey. ISBN 0-471-11018-3Google Scholar
- Inaya and Kraishan, Eshidiya wastewater treatment, Al-balqa’ Applied University, 2008, Supervisor: Dr. Sadeq EmeishGoogle Scholar
- Jotin R, Ibrahim S, Halimoon N (2012) Electro coagulation for removal of chemical oxygen demand in sanitary landfill leachate. Int J Environ Sci 3(921–930):2Google Scholar
- Pangarkar BL, Deshmukh SK, Thorat PV (2014) Pesticide wastewater pollution and treatment methods: review. Chem Sci Rev Lett 3(11):374–380Google Scholar