Advertisement

Sustainable Water Resources Management

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 1665–1676 | Cite as

Four decades of water and sediment discharge records in Subarnarekha and Burhabalang basins: an approach towards trend analysis and abrupt change detection

  • Sumit DasEmail author
Original Article
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

The outcomes of trend analyses, abrupt change detection of discharge, sediment load data of Subarnarekha River for the last four decades are presented in this paper and possible causes of these changes are discussed. Bivariate linear regression, Mann–Kendall non-parametric test, Pettitt test have been implemented on the daily discharge and sediment concentration data provided by Water Resources Information System of India (India-WRIS). A statistically significant decreasing trend of discharge is found in the Subarnarekha upstream, whereas other stations in downstream show an insignificant increasing trend during the past four decades. Sediment load shows a decreasing trend in the entire study area where the change is significant in downstream regions since last four decades. An abrupt downward shift on the discharge is found only in case of Muri station from the year 2000, located in the upstream of Subarnarekha main river. Abrupt changes on the sediment load were found in the downstream after the period of construction of dams on Subarnarekha River. More precisely, sediment load had started declining progressively from 1998 in the Subarnarekha River and since 2010 in its adjacent river, Burhabalang.

Keywords

Water discharge Sediment load Mann–Kendall test Trend analysis Pettitt test Subarnarekha India 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank all the faculty members in Department of Geography, Savitribai Phule Pune University, for providing necessary facilities to carry out this study. The author acknowledges Central Water Commission (CWC), New Delhi, and National Remote Sensing Center (NRSC) for their joint project of India Water Resource Information System (WRIS) which made easier to collect Hydrological and Sediment data. Critical and constructive comments from four anonymous reviewers improved the content of this manuscript significantly.

References

  1. Agarwal A, Chak A (1991) Floods, flood plains and environmental myths. State of India’s environment—a citizens report. Centre for Science and Environment, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnaud-Fassetta G (2003) River channel changes in the Rhone Delta (France) since the end of the Little Ice Age: geomorphological adjustment to hydroclimatic change and natural resource management. Catena 51:141–172Google Scholar
  3. Asselman NEM (2000) Fitting and interpretation of sediment rating curve. J Hydrol 234:228–248Google Scholar
  4. Chakrapani GJ (2005) Factors controlling variations in river sediment loads. Curr Sci 88:569–575Google Scholar
  5. Chatterjee S, Krishna AP, Sharma AP (2014) Geospatial assessment of soil erosion vulnerability at watershed level in some sections of the Upper Subarnarekha river basin, Jharkhand, India. Environ Earth Sci 71:357–374Google Scholar
  6. Collins B, Dunne T (1990) Fluvial geomorphology and river-gravel mining: a guide for planners, case studies included. Special publication, vol. 98. Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  7. Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The “Anthropocene”. IGBP Newsletter 41:17–18Google Scholar
  8. Cruz RV, Harasawa H, Lal M, Wu S, Anokhin Y, Punsalmaa B, Honda Y, Jafari M, Li C, Huu Ninh N (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Das S (2018) Geomorphic characteristics of a bedrock river inferred from drainage quantification, longitudinal profile, knickzone identification and concavity analysis: a DEM-based study. Arab J Geosci 11(21):680Google Scholar
  10. Das S (2019) Comparison among influencing factor, frequency ratio, and analytical hierarchy process techniques for groundwater potential zonation in Vaitarna basin, Maharashtra, India. Groundw Sustain Dev 8:617–629Google Scholar
  11. Das S, Pardeshi SD (2018a) Morphometric analysis if Vaitarna and Ulhas river basins, Maharashtra, India: using geospatial techniques. Appl Water Sci 8(6):158Google Scholar
  12. Das S, Pardeshi SD (2018b) Integration of difference influencing factors in GIS to delineate groundwater potential areas using IF and FR techniques: a study of Pravara basin, Maharashtra, India. Appl Water Sci 8(7):197Google Scholar
  13. Doke A, Pardeshi SD, Pardeshi SS, Das S (2018) Identification of morphogenetic regions and respective geomorphic processes: a GIS approach. Arab J Geosci 11:20.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-017-3358-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gamage N, Smakhtin V (2009) Do river deltas in east India retreat? A case of the Krishna Delta. Geomorphology 103:533–540Google Scholar
  15. Ghaffari G, Keesstra S, Ghodousi J, Ahmadi H (2009) SWAT-simulated hydrological impact of land-use change in the Zanjanrood Basin, Northwest Iran. Hydrol Process 24(7):892–903.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guha S, Patel PP (2017) Evidence if topographic disequilibrium in the Subarnarekha river basin, India: a digital elevation model based analysis. J Earth Syst Sci 126:106Google Scholar
  17. Guhathakurta P, Rajeevan M (2008) Trends in the rainfall pattern over India. Int J Climatol 28:1453–1469Google Scholar
  18. Gupta H, Chakrapani GJ (2005) Temporal and spatial variations in water flow and sediment load in Narmada River. Current Sci 92:679–684Google Scholar
  19. He H, Zhou J, Zhang W (2008) Modelling the impacts of environmental changes on hydrological regimes in the Hei River Watershed, China. Glob Planet Change 61(3–4):175–193Google Scholar
  20. Hovius N (1998) Controls on sediment supply by large rivers. In: Shanley KW, McCabe PJ (eds) Relative role of eustasy, climate and tectonism in continental rocks. SEPM special publication no. 59. Tulsa, OK, pp. 4–15.  https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.98.59.0002 Google Scholar
  21. India-WRIS (2012) River basin atlas of India. RRSC-West, NRSC, ISRO, JodhpurGoogle Scholar
  22. Kale VS (2002) Fluvial geomorphology of Indian rivers, an overview. Prog Phys Geogr 26:400–433Google Scholar
  23. Kendall MG (1975) Rank correlation methods. Griffin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Kondolf GM (1997) Environmental management—hungry water: effects of dams and gravel mining on river channels. Environ Manag 21:533–551Google Scholar
  25. Kumar V, Jain SK (2011) Trends in rainfall amount and number of rainy days in river basins of India (1951–2004). Hydrol Res 42(4):290–306Google Scholar
  26. Kundzewicz ZW (2004) Searching for change in hydrological data. Hydrol Sci J 49:3–6Google Scholar
  27. Li Z, Liu W, Zhang X, Zheng F (2009) Impacts of land use change and climate variability on hydrology in an agricultural catchment on the Loess Plateau of China. J Hydrol 377(1–2):35–42Google Scholar
  28. Malini BH, Rao KN (2004) Coastal erosion and habitat loss along the Godavari delta front—a fall out of dam construction (?). Curr Sci 87:1232–1236Google Scholar
  29. Mann HB (1945) Nonparametric tests against trend. Econometrica 13:245–259Google Scholar
  30. Memarian H, Balasundram SK, Talib JB, Sood AM, Abbaspour KC (2012) Trend analysis of water discharge and sediment load during the past three decades of development in the Langat basin, Malaysia. Hydrol Sci J 57(6):1207–1222Google Scholar
  31. Meybeck M (2001) River basin under Anthropocene conditions. In: Von Bodungen B, Turner K (eds) Science and integrated basin management. Dahlem University Press, Berlin, pp 275–294Google Scholar
  32. Milliman JD, Meade RH (1983) Worldwide delivery of river sediment to the oceans. J Geology 101:295–303Google Scholar
  33. Millman JD, Syvitski PM (1992) Geomorphic/tectonic control of sediment discharge to the ocean: the importance of small mountainous rivers. J Geol 100:525–544Google Scholar
  34. Nearing MA, Jatten V, Baffaul C, Cerdan O, Couturier A, Hernandez M, Bissonnais YL, Nichols MH, Nunes JP, Renschler CS, Souchere V, Oost KV (2005) Modeling response of soil erosion and runoff to changes in precipitation and cover. Catena 61(2–3):131–154Google Scholar
  35. Oguchi T, Saito K, Kadomura H, Grossman M (2001) Fluvial geomorphology and paleohydrology in Japan. Geomorphology 39:3–19Google Scholar
  36. Ohmori H (1983) Characteristics of the erosion rate in the Japanese mountain from the viewpoint if climatic geomorphology. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphologie Neue Folge Supplementary 46:1–14Google Scholar
  37. Ouyang W, Skidmore AK, Hao F, Wang T (2010) Soil erosion dynamics response to landscape pattern. Sci Total Environ 408(6):1358–1366Google Scholar
  38. Panda DK, Kumar A, Mohanty A (2011) Recent trends in sediment load of the tropical (Peninsular) river basins of India. Glob Planet Change 75:108–118Google Scholar
  39. Petit F, Poinsart D, Bravard JP (1996) Channel incision, gravel mining and bedload transport in the Rhone river upstream of Lyon, France. Catena 26:209–226Google Scholar
  40. Pettitt AN (1979) A non-parametric approach to the change-point problem. Appl Stat 28:126–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rajeevan M, Bhate J, Kale JD, Lal B (2006) High resolution daily gridded rainfall data for the Indian region: analysis of break and active monsoon spells. Curr Sci 91(3):296–306Google Scholar
  42. Rao KN, Subraelu P, Rao TV, Malini BH, Ratheesh R, Bhattacharya S, Rajawat AS (2008) Sea-level rise and coastal vulnerability: an assessment of Andhra Pradesh coast, India through remote sensing and GIS. J Coast Conserv 12:195–207Google Scholar
  43. Syvitski JPM, Vorosmarty CJ, Kettner AJ, Green P (2005) Impact if humans in the flux of terrestrial sediment to the global coastal ocean. Science 208:376–380Google Scholar
  44. Tandon SK, Sinha R (2007) Geology of large river systems. In: Gupta A (ed) Large rivers: geomorphology and management. Wiley, New York, pp 7–28Google Scholar
  45. Unnikrishnan AS, Shankar D (2007) Are sea-level-rise trends along the coasts of the north Indian Ocean consistent with global estimates? Glob Planet Change 57:301–307Google Scholar
  46. Varis O, Vakkilainen P (2001) China’s 8 challenges to water resources management in the first quarter of the 21st century. Geomorphology 41:93–104Google Scholar
  47. Walling DE (1997) The response of sediment yields to environmental change. Human Impact on Erosion and Sedimentation (Proc. Rabat Symposium). IAHS Publication, vol 245. IAHS Press, Wallingford, pp 77–89Google Scholar
  48. Walling DE, Fang D (2003) Recent trends in the suspended sediment loads of the world’s rivers. Glob Planet Change 39:111–126Google Scholar
  49. Wang H, Saito Y, Zhang Y, Bi N, Sun X, Yang Z (2011) Recent changes of sediment flux to the western Pacific Ocean from major rivers in East and Southeast Asia. Earth Sci Reviews 108:80–100Google Scholar
  50. Wolfe DA, Schechtman E (1984) Nonparametric statistical procedures for the change point problem. J Stat Plan Inferences 9(3):389–396Google Scholar
  51. Wyżga BA (1997) Methods for studying the response of flood flows to channel change. J Hydrol 198:271–288Google Scholar
  52. Yang SL, Belkin IM, Belkina AI, Zhao QY, Zhu J, Ding PX (2003) Delta response to decline in sediment supply from the Yangtze River: evidence of the recent four decades and expectations for the next half-century. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 57(4):689–699Google Scholar
  53. Yang Z, Wang H, Saito Y, Milliman JD, Xu K, Qiao S, Shi G (2006) Dam impacts on the Changjiang (Yangtze) River sediment discharge to the sea: the past 55 years and after the Three Gorges Dam. Water Resour Res 42:W04407.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003970 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yoshikawa T (1974) Denudation and tectonic movement in contemporary Japan. Bull Dep Geogr Univ Tokyo 6:1–14Google Scholar
  55. Zhang S, Lu XX, Higgitt DL, Chen CA, Han J, Sun H (2008) Recent changes of water discharge and sediment load in the Zhujiang (Pearl River) basin, China. Glob Planet Change 60(3–4):365–380Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeographySavitribai Phule Pune UniversityPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations