Advertisement

Adolescent Research Review

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 369–381 | Cite as

Youth Anti-Racist Engagement: Conceptualization, Development, and Validation of an Anti-Racism Action Scale

  • Adriana AldanaEmail author
  • Josefina Bañales
  • Katie Richards-Schuster
Quantitative Review

Abstract

Scholarship on youth engagement indicates that adolescents address social issues of public concern, but it is not clear how youth challenge racism. This gap in the literature stems from indirect conceptualizations and a lack of quantitative measurement of adolescents’ acts to oppose racism. Correspondingly, this study presents the validation of a measure of youth anti-racism action. Study 1 describes the youth participatory approach used in the development of the Anti-Racism Action Scale and presents the results from an exploratory factor analysis that examined the measure’s initial factor structure and reliability. The factor structure of the 22-item measure was explored with a diverse sample of adolescents (Mage = 16.00, SD = 1.18; 61.7% girls, Black/African American [29.3%], Asian/South Asian [21.1%], White/European American [24.4%], Arab/Middle-Eastern [17.5%], Latino/Hispanic [4.5%], and Multiracial [3.3%]) enrolled in a race dialogue program (n = 249). The results indicated the measure consisted of three subscales: Interpersonal Action, Communal Action, and Political Change Action. In Study 2, a confirmatory factor analysis was conducted with an independent, nationally representative sample of youth (n = 384) from diverse backgrounds (Mage = 17.00, SD = 1.29, 51.0% girls, White/European American [26.1%], Black/African American [25.6%], Latino/Hispanic [19.3%], Asian/Pacific Islander [13.6%], Multiracial [9.9%], Native American [5.2%] and “other” [0.3%]). The results confirmed a three-factor model that resulted in a 16-item measure. Furthermore, tests of convergent validity tests were pursued between the Anti-Racism Action Scale and the Critical Consciousness Scale, a widely used measure of youths’ awareness of the structural causes of various forms of oppression, sense of sociopolitical agency, and social action. This study suggests that youth engagement in anti-racism is multidimensional and that notion of adolescent social action are more diverse than represented in the literature.

Keywords

Sociopolitical development Social action Critical consciousness Anti-racism Scale development 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Matthew A. Diemer for his thoughtful feedback on an early draft of the manuscript.

Authors’ Contributions

AA conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript; JB participated in the study design, conducted the statistical analysis, interpreted the data, and drafted the manuscript; KRS lead the measurement development, participated in the study design, and provided feedback on manuscript drafts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors report none.

References

  1. Aldana, A., Rowley, S. J., Checkoway, B., & Richards-Schuster, K. (2012). Raising ethnic-racial consciousness: The relationship between intergroup dialogues and adolescents’ ethnic-racial identity and racism awareness. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(1), 120–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balsano, A. B. (2005). Youth civic engagement in the United States: Understanding and addressing the impact of social impediments on positive youth and community development. Applied Development Science, 9, 188–201.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532480xads0904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bañales, J., Marchand, A. D., Skinner, O. D., Anyiwo, N., Rowley, S. J., & Kurtz-Costes, B. (2019). Black adolescents’ critical reflection development: Parents’ racial socialization and attributions about race achievement gaps. Journal of Research on Adolescence. Advance online publication.​  https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12485.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bañales, J., Mathews, C. J., Hayat, N., Anyiwo, A., & Diemer, M. A. (2019). Latinx and Black young adults’ pathways to civic/political engagement. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000271.
  5. Berman, G., & Paradies, Y. (2010). Racism, disadvantage and multiculturalism: Towards effective anti-racist praxis. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 33, 214–232.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870802302272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cabrera, N. L., Meza, E. L., Romero, A. J., & Rodríguez, R. C. (2013). If there is no struggle, there is no progress: Transformative youth activism and the School of Ethnic Studies. The Urban Review, 45, 7–22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-012-0220-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cammarota, J., & Aguilera, M. (2012). “By the time I get to Arizona”: Race, language, and education in America’s racist state. Race Ethnicity and Education, 15, 485–500.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.674025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cammarota, J., & Fine, M. (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Checkoway, B. (1998). Involving young people in neighborhood development. Children and Youth Services Review, 20, 765–795.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0190-7409(98)00044-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Checkoway, B., & Aldana, A. (2013). Four forms of youth civic engagement for diverse democracy. Children and Youth Services Review, 35(11), 1894–1899.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christens, B. D. (2012). Toward relational empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 50, 114–128.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-011-9483-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309–319.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dei, G. J. S., & McDermott, M. (2014). Politics of anti-racism education: In search of strategies for transformative learning. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeVellis, R. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications. New York: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Diemer, M. A., & Li, C. (2011). Critical consciousness development and political participation among marginalized youth. Child Development, 82, 1815–1833.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01650.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Diemer, M. A., McWhirter, E. H., Ozer, E. J., & Rapa, L. J. (2015). Advances in the conceptualization and measurement of critical consciousness. Urban Review, 47, 809–823.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0336-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Diemer, M. A., Rapa, L. J., Park, C. J., & Perry, J. C. (2017). Development and validation of the critical consciousness scale. Youth and Society, 49, 461–483.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X14538289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Diemer, M. A., Rapa, L. J., Voight, A. M., & McWhirter, E. H. (2016). Critical consciousness: A developmental approach to addressing marginalization and oppression. Child Development Perspectives, 10, 216–221.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dolan, T., Lin, C., & Christens, B. D. (2005). Combining youth organizing and youth participatory action research to strengthen student voice in education reform. National Society for the Study of Education, 114, 153–170.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9491-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duncan-Andrade, J. (2007). Gangstas, wankstas, and ridas: Defining, developing, and supporting effective teachers in urban schools. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20, 617–638.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390701630767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher, R., & Checkoway, B. (2011). Intergroup dialogue facilitation for youth empowerment and community change. In K. E. Maxwell, B. Nagda, & M. Thompson (Eds.), Facilitating intergroup dialogues: Bridging differences, catalyzing change (pp. 133–146). Sterling, VA: Stylus.Google Scholar
  22. Flanagan, C. A., Syvertsen, A. K., & Stout, M. D. (2007). Civic measurement models: Tapping adolescents’ civic engagement. CIRCLE Working Paper 55, 1–40.Google Scholar
  23. Flores, S. K. (2008). Youth participatory evaluation: Strategies for engaging young people. Hoboken: Wiley Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Fox, M., Mediratta, K., Ruglis, J., Stoudt, B., Shah, S., & Fine, M. (2010). Critical youth engagement: Participatory action research and organizing. In L. R. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta & C. A. Flanagan (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 621–649). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed (Rev. edn.). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  26. Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2013). Psychometrics: An introduction (2nd edn.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  27. García Coll, C., Lamberty, G., Jenkins, R., Mcadoo, H. P., Coll, C. G., Jenkins, R., & Mcadoo, H. P. (1996). An integrative model for the study of developmental competencies in minority children. Child Development, 67, 1891–1914.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1131600.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ginwright, S. (2011). Hope, healing, and care. Liberal Education, 97, 34–39.Google Scholar
  29. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Gonzalez, J., & Trickett, E. J. (2014). Collaborative measurement development as a tool in CBPR: Measurement development and adaptation within the cultures of communities. American journal of community psychology, 54, 112–124.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-014-9655-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Hope, E. C., Skoog, A. B., & Jagers, R. J. (2014). “It’ll never be the White kids, it’ll always be us”: Black high school students’ evolving critical analysis of racial discrimination and inequity in schools. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 83–112.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558414550688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes, J. M., & Bigler, R. S. (2011). Predictors of African American and European American adolescents’ endorsement of race-conscious social policies. Developmental Psychology, 47, 479–492.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Hughes, J. M., Bigler, R. S., & Levy, S. R. (2007). Consequences of learning about historical racism among European American and African American children. Child Development, 78, 1689–1705.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01096.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. Armonk: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
  36. Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Methodology in the social sciences (3rd edn.). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kornbluh, M., Ozer, E. J., Allen, C. D., & Kirshner, B. (2015). Youth participatory action research as an approach to sociopolitical development and the new academic standards: Considerations for educators. Urban Review, 47, 868–992.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leff, S. S., Crick, N. R., Angelucci, J., Haye, K., Jawad, A. F., Grossman, M., & Power, T. J. (2006). Social cognition in context: Validating a cartoon-based attributional measure for urban girls. Child Development, 77, 1351–1358.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00939.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Lentin, A. (2016). Racism in public or public racism: doing anti-racism in ‘post-racial’ times. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 39, 33–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2016.1096409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McWhirter, E. H., & McWhirter, B. T. (2016). Critical consciousness and vocational development among Latina/o high school youth: Initial development and testing of a measure. Journal of Career Assessment, 24, 543–558.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072715599535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, J., & Garran, A. M. (2017). Racism in the United States: Implications for the helping professions (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2017). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
  43. Nagda, B. R. A., & Gurin, P. (2007). Intergroup dialogue: A critical-dialogic approach to learning about difference, inequality, and social justice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2007, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Noguera, P., Cammarota, J., & Ginwright, S. (2006). Beyond resistance! Youth activism and community change: New democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Rapa, L. J. (2016). Fostering marginalized youths’ academic achievement and critical consciousness through a values-affirmation intervention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Special Education. East Lansing: Michigan State University.Google Scholar
  46. Rapa, L. J., Diemer, M. A., & Bañales, J. (2018). Critical action as a pathway to social mobility among marginalized youth. Developmental Psychology, 51, 127–137.  https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Richards-Schuster, K., & Aldana, A. (2013). Learning to speak out about racism: Youths’ insights on participation in an intergroup dialogues program. Social Work With Groups, 36(4), 332–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rozas, L. W., & Miller, J. (2009). Discourses for social justice education: The web of racism and the web of resistance. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 18, 24–39.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15313200902874953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Seider, S., Kelly, L., Clark, S., Jennett, P., El-Amin, A., Graves, D., et al. (2018). Fostering the sociopolitical development of African American and Latinx adolescents to analyze and challenge racial and economic inequality. Youth and Society.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X18767783(Online Release).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shin, R. Q., Ezeofor, I., Smith, L. C., Welch, J. C., & Goodrich, K. M. (2016). The development and validation of the contemporary critical consciousness measure. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 63, 210–223.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000137.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (2001). Improving intergroup relations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Stoudt, B. G. (2009). The role of language & discourse in the investigation of privilege: Using participatory action research to discuss theory, develop methodology, & interrupt power. Urban Review, 41, 7–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-008-0093-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stovall, D. (2006). From hunger strike to high school: Youth development, social justice and school formation. In S. Ginwright, P. Noguera & J. Cammarota (Eds.), Beyond resistance! youth resistance and community change: New democratic possibilities for practice and policy for America’s youth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Sweifach, J. (2009). Cross-cultural group work practice with African American and Jewish adolescents: JCC/READY. Social Work with Groups, 32, 109–124.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01609510802290941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tanner, S. J. (2016). Accounting for whiteness through collaborative fiction. Research in Drama Education, 21, 183–195.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2016.1155404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Teixeira, S. (2015). It seems like no one cares”: Participatory photo mapping to understand youth perspectives on property vacancy. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30, 390–414.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558414547098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thomas, A. J., Barrie, R., Brunner, J., Clawson, A., Hewitt, A., Jeremie-Brink, G., & Rowe-Johnson, M. (2014). Assessing critical consciousness in youth and young adults. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24, 485–496.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Torre, M. E. (2009). Participatory action research and Critical Race Theory: Fueling spaces for nos-otras to research. Urban Review, 41, 106–120.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-008-0097-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Watts, R. J., Diemer, M. A., & Voight, A. M. (2011). Critical consciousness: Current status and future directions. In C. A. Flanagan & B. D. Christens (Eds.), Youth civic development: Work at the cutting edge (pp. 43–57). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  60. Watts, R. J., & Flanagan, C. (2007). Pushing the envelope on youth civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 779–792.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Watts, R. J., Griffith, D. M., & Abdul-Adil, J. (1999). Sociopolitical development as an antidote for oppression—Theory and action. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 255–271.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022839818873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Watts, R. J., & Hipolito-Delgado, C. P. (2015). Thinking ourselves to liberation?: Advancing sociopolitical action in critical consciousness. Urban Review, 47, 847–867.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-015-0341-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Watts, R. J., Williams, N. C., & Jagers, R. J. (2003). Sociopolitical development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 185–194.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023091024140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Worthington, R., & Whittaker, T. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 806–838.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social WorkCalifornia State University Dominguez HillCarsonUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  3. 3.School of Social WorkUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations