Advertisement

Impact of Road Infrastructure Land Use and Traffic Operational Characteristics on Pedestrian Fatality Risk: A Case Study of Kolkata, India

  • Dipanjan MukherjeeEmail author
  • Sudeshna Mitra
Original Article
  • 25 Downloads

Abstract

Pedestrian safety in urban India is an issue of growing concern. While an extensive body of literature is available on the identification of elements related to the pedestrian’s risk, the studies are mainly conducted in urban areas of developed countries, where the condition of infrastructure, built environment, road user’s behavior and perception are very different from Indian cities. As a result, findings from these studies may only be partially applicable to the cities of developing countries such as India. The present study makes an attempt to fill the gap by analyzing historical crash records obtained from Kolkata police and identifies the hazardous corridors and network locations posing the highest risk to the pedestrian. Subsequently, the binary logistic regression models are developed to identify the risk factors associated with road infrastructure, land use, and traffic operational characteristics. Based on the statistical assessment carried out in this study, there is evidence that factors such as road width, land use type, the absence of designated bus stop facility, inadequate sight distance, average daily traffic and pedestrian volume, and pedestrian–vehicular interaction considerably affect pedestrian safety at the intersections. On the other hand, road width, land use type, inadequate sight distance, the absence of designated bus stop facilities significantly influence pedestrian safety at midblock road segments. The knowledge of the risk factors specific to a location on the road network is helpful for incorporation and/or modification of the particular planning and design elements to reduce risk.

Keywords

Pedestrian fatality Risk factors Road infrastructure Land use Traffic operational characteristics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the opportunity provided by the 4th Conference of the Transportation Research Group of India (4th CTRG) held at IIT Bombay, Mumbai, India, between December 17, 2017, and December 20, 2017, to present the work that forms the basis of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization Pedestrian safety (2013): a road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. 2013Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bhalla K, Khurana N, Bose D, Navaratne KV, Tiwari G, Mohan D (2016) Official government statistics of road traffic deaths in India under-represent pedestrians and motorised two wheeler riders. Inj PrevGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Naci H, Chisholm D, Baker TD (2013) Distribution of road traffic deaths by road user group: a global comparison. Inj Prev 15:55–59.  https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2008.018721 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chakraborty Sandip, Roy Sudip K (2005) Traffic accident characteristics of Kolkata. Trans Commun Bull Asia Pac 74:75–86Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Singh SK, Misra A (2004) Road accident analysis: a case study of Patna City. Urban Transp J 2(2):60–75Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghosh A, Paul S (2013) Road accident scenario in Kolkata: a spatio-temporal study. Eur J Appl Eng Sci Res 2(1):47–57. (http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html)
  7. 7.
    Pathak A, Desania NL, Verma R (2008) Profile of road traffic accidents and head injury in Jaipur (Rajasthan). J Indian Acad Forensic Med 30(1):6–9Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singh YN, Bairagi KK, Das KC (2005) An epidemiological study of road traffic accident victims in medicolegal autopsiesGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohan D, Tsimhoni O, Sivak M, Flannagan MJ (2009) Road safety in India: challenges and opportunities. University of Michigan, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dandona R, Mishra A (2004) Deaths due to road traffic crashes in Hyderabad city in India: need for strengthening surveillance. Natl Med J India 17:74–79Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mohan D, Tiwari G, Mukherjee S (2016) Urban traffic safety assessment: a case study of six Indian cities. IATSS Res 39(2):95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Urban transport working group, NTDPC (2012); NTDPC, volume 3 (http://planningcommission.nic.in/sectors/NTDPC/voulme3_p2/urban_v3_p2.pdf)
  13. 13.
    Yasmin S, Eluru N, Ukkusuri SV (2014) Alternative ordered response frameworks for examining pedestrian injury severity in New York City. J Trans Saf Secur 6(4):275–300Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mohamed MG, Saunier N, Miranda-Moreno LF, Ukkusuri S (2013) V A clustering regression approach: a comprehensive injury severity analysis of pedestrian–vehicle crashes in New York, US and Montreal, Canada. Saf Sci 54:27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ukkusuri S, Miranda-Moreno LF, Ramadurai G, Isa-Tavarez J (2012) The role of built environment on pedestrian crash frequency. Saf Sci 50(4):1141–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    deLavalette BC, Tijus C, Poitrenaud S, Leproux C, Bergeron J, Thouez JP (2009) Pedestrian crossing decision-making: a situational and behavioral approach. Saf Sci 47(9):1248–1253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Loukaitou-Sideris A, Liggett R, Sung H (2007) Death on the crosswalk: a study of pedestrian–automobile collisions in los angeles. J Planning Education and Research 26:338–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang H, Zegeer C, Nassi R (2000) Innovative treatments at unsignalized pedestrian crossing locations. Proc., ITE 2000 annual meeting (CD-ROM). ITE, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nitzburg, M., and R. L. Knoblauch. An Evaluation of High-Visibility Crosswalk Treatments—Clearwater, Florida. FHWA-RD-00-105. Final report, 2001. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/ safety/00105/00105.pdf. Accessed July 29, 2011
  20. 20.
    Schuurman N, Cinnamon J, Crooks VA, Hameed SM (2009) Pedestrian injury and the built environment: an environmental scan of hotspots. BMC public health 9(1):233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harwood, D.W., Torbic, D.J., Gilmore, D.K., Bokenkoger, C.D., Dunn, J.M., Zegeer, C.V., Srinivasan, S., Carter, D., Raborn, C., Lyon, C., Persaud, B (2008) Pedestrian Safety Prediction Methodology. NCHRP web document 129, Phase III. Project 17–26. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). Transportation Research Board, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morency P, Cloutier MS (2006) From targeted “black spots” to area-wide pedestrian safety. Injury Prevention 12(6):360–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ekman, L (1996) On the Treatment of Flow in Traffic Safety Analysis: A Non-Parametric Approach Applied on Vulnerable Road Users. Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, University of Lund, Bulletin 136, Lund, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Keall MD (1995) Pedestrian exposure to risk of road accident in New Zealand. Accid Anal Prev 27(5):729–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baltes M, Chu X (2002) Pedestrian level of service for midblock street crossings. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1818:125–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cho G, Rodríguez DA, Khattak AJ (2009) The role of the built environment in explaining relationships between perceived and actual pedestrian and bicyclist safety. Accid Anal Prev 41(4):692–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zegeer CV, Bushell M (2012) Pedestrian crash trends and potential countermeasures from around the world. Accid Anal Prev 44(1):3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rankavat S, Tiwari G (2015) Association between Built Environment and Pedestrian Fatal Crash Risk in Delhi, India. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2519:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Khatoon M, Tiwari G, Chatterjee N (2013) Impact of grade separator on pedestrian risk taking behavior. Accid Anal Prev 50:861–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gupta U, Tiwari G, Chatterjee N, Fazio J (2010) Case study of pedestrian risk behavior and survival analysis. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 8:2123–2139Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tiwari G, Bangdiwala S, Saraswat A, Gaurav S (2007) Survival analysis: pedestrian risk exposure at signalized intersections. Transp Res Part F 10:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mohan D (2002) Road safety in less-motorized environments: future concerns. Int J Epidemiol 31(3):527–532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kadali, B. R., & Vedagiri, P (2016) Review of pedestrian level of service: Perspective in developing countries. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2581), pp 2016, pp 37-47Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mitra, S., Mukherjee, D., & Subudhi, T. (2016) Development of a Methodological Framework of Road Safety Management for Indian Metro Cities.http://www.civil.iitb.ac.in/tpmdc/PAPERS/292
  35. 35.
    Clifton KJ, Kreamer-Fults K (2007) An examination of the environmental attributes associated with pedestrian–vehicular crashes near public schools. Accid Anal Prev 39(4):708–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zegeer CV, Bushell M (2012) Pedestrian crash trends and potential countermeasures from around the world. Accid Anal Prev 44(1):3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gårder PE (2004) The impact of speed and other variables on pedestrian safety in Maine. Accid Anal Prev 36(4):533–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lee J, Mannering F (1999) Analysis of roadside accident frequency and severity and roadside safety management. Washington State Department of Transportation, OlympiaGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Raford, N., & Ragland, D. R. (2005) Pedestrian volume modeling for traffic safety and exposure analysis. Safe Transportation Research & Education Center Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Robertson HD (1977) Pedestrian preferences for symbolic symbol display. ITEJ. 47:38–42Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen, Y., Meng, H., Wang, Z (2009). Safety improvement practice for vulnerable road users in Beijing intersections. In: TRB 88th Annual Meeting Compendium of Papers DVD, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Elvik R, Hoye A, Vaa T, Sorensen M (2009) The Handbook of Road Safety Measures, 2nd edn. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, BingleyCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Jacobsen PL (2003) Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling. Injury prevention 9(3):205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wong SC, Sze NN, Li YC (2007) Contributory factors to traffic crashes at signalized intersections in Hong Kong. Accid Anal Prev 39(6):1107–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Abdel-Aty M, Chundi SS, Lee C (2007) Geo-spatial and log-linear analysis of pedestrian and bicyclist crashes involving school-aged children. Journal of safety research 38(5):571–579CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Sabey BE, Taylor H (1980) The known risks we run: the highway. Societal risk assessment, 1980. Springer, US, pp 43–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringIndian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations