Advertisement

Passenger Car Equivalency Factors Under Platooning Conditions

  • P. S. Praveen
  • R. AshalathaEmail author
Original Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Heterogeneous traffic existing in developing countries such as in India is characterized by vehicles with very diverse static and dynamic characteristics. The various types of vehicles, other than cars in the heterogeneous traffic stream can be converted into equivalent passenger cars so as to express the heterogeneous traffic volume in terms of corresponding passenger car units (PCU). The subject of PCU has been studied on intercity, urban roads and at intersections controlled by traffic signals quite extensively. But studies on PCU values of vehicles on the downstream of signalized intersections have not been explored so far. The arterial links existing at downstream of traffic signals are designed to progress traffic with varying acceleration and deceleration. Vehicular interactions which take place within platoons and between platoons along such arterials are the predominant factors affecting vehicular progression. Hence there is a need to derive PCU values of vehicles along signalized corridors. The present study analyzes traffic flow data collected at the downstream of a signalized urban arterial to determine PCU values for various types of vehicles based on three methods. One method is the homogenisation coefficient method whereas the other one is the speed-area ratio method. The third one is a new method based on speed differential and area ratio is proposed in this paper which considers the effect of speed variation of vehicles for estimating PCU values. In this study, PCU values estimated based on speed differential-area ratio concept are found to be more logical compared to other methods as this method could incorporate the considerable variation in static and dynamic characteristics of various vehicles which progress along the downstream of intersections.

Keywords

Traffic signal Platoon Heterogeneous Arterial Passenger car unit 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the opportunity provided by the 4th Conference of the Transportation Research Group of India (4th CTRG) held at IIT Bombay, Mumbai, India between 17th December, 2017 and 20th December, 2017 to present the work that forms the basis of this manuscript. The authors acknowledge the support provided by the Centre for Engineering Research and Development (CERD) and the Transportation Engineering Research Centre (TRC), Government of Kerala, India.

References

  1. 1.
    Dhamaniya A, Chandra S (2017) Influence of operating speed on capacity of urban arterial midblock sections. Int J Civ Eng.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0206-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Aerde M, Yagar S (1984) Capacity, speed and platooning vehicle equivalent for two-lane rural highways. J Transp Res Record 971:58–67Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krammes RA, Crowley KW (1986) Passenger car equivalents for trucks on level freeway segments. J Transp Res Record 1091:10–17Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Elefteriadou L, Torbic D, Webster N (1997) Development of PCE for freeways, two-lane highways and arterials. J. Transp. Res. Record 1572:51–58.  https://doi.org/10.3141/1572-07 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Webster N, Elefteriadou L (1999) A simulation study of truck passenger car equivalents (PCE) on basic freeway sections. J Transp Res Part B 33:323–336Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mallikarjuna C, Rao KR (2006) Modelling of passenger car equivalency under heterogeneous traffic conditions. In: 22nd Aust. Road. Res. Board Conference, Canberra, Australia, pp 1–13Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chandra S, Kumar U (2003) Effect of lane width on capacity under mixed traffic conditions in India. J Transp Eng ASCE 129:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Kaisy AF, Hall FL, Reisman ES (2002) Developing passenger car equivalents for heavy vehicles on freeways during queue discharge flow. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 36(8):725–742Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chandra S, Sikdar PK (2000) Factors affecting PCU in mixed traffic on urban roads. Road Transp Res 9(3):40–50Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Al-Kaisy AF, Younghan J, Rakha H (2005) Developing passenger car equivalency factors for heavy vehicles during congestion. J Transp Eng ASCE 131:514–523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rongviriyapanich T, Suppattrakul C (2005) Effects of motorcycles on traffic operations on arterial streets. J East Asia Soc Transp Stud 6:137–146Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arasan VT, Krishnamurthy K (2008) Effect of traffic volume on PCU of vehicles under heterogeneous traffic conditions. J. Road Transp. Res. Aust. Road. Res. Board 17(1): 32–49Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arasan VT, Arkatkar SS (2010) Microsimulation study of effect of volume and road width on PCU of vehicles under heterogeneous traffic. J Transp Eng ASCE 136(12):1110–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arkatkar SS, Arasan VT (2010) Effect of gradient and its length on performance of vehicles under heterogeneous traffic conditions. J Transp Eng ASCE 136(12):1120–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Praveen PS, Arasan VT (2013) Influence of traffic mix on PCU value of vehicles under heterogeneous traffic conditions. Int J Traffic Trans Eng 3(3):302–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mithun M, Chandra S (2016) Three methods of PCU estimation at unsignalized intersections. Transp Lett Int J Transp Res 1:1.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2016.1190883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee C (2015) Developing passenger-car equivalents for heavy vehicles in entry flow at roundabouts. J Transp Eng 141(8):04015013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sonu M, Dhamaniya A, Arkatkar S, Joshi GJ (2016) Time occupancy as measure of PCU at four legged roundabouts. Transp Lett Int J Transp Res 1:1.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2016.1154685 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nokandeh MM, Ghosh I, Chandra S (2016) Determination of passenger-car units on two-lane intercity highways under heterogeneous traffic conditions. J Transp Eng ASCE 142(2):04015040Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kumar P, Arkatkar SS, Joshi G (2018) New approach for estimating passenger car units on multilane urban roads with heterogeneous traffic conditions. J Transp Eng Part A Syst 144(3):04018002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mehar A, Chandra S, Velmurugan S (2014) Passenger car units at different levels of service for capacity analysis of multilane interurban highways in India. J Transp Eng ASCE 140:81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Biswas S, Chandra S, Ghosh I (2017) Estimation of vehicular speed and passenger car equivalent under mixed traffic condition using artificial neural network. Arab J Sci Eng 42:4099–4110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Biswas S, Chakraborty S, Chandra S, Ghosh I (2017) Kriging-based approach for estimation of vehicular speed and passenger car units on an urban arterial. J Transp Eng Part A Syst 143(3):04016013Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guidelines for design of at-grade intersections in rural and urban areas (1994) IRC special publication, No. 41, The Indian Roads Congress, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kanakabandi S, Brind K (2014) Estimation of the passenger car equivalent: a review. Int J Emerg Tech Adv Eng 4(6):97–102Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Metkari M, Budhkar AK, Maurya AK (2012) Review of passenger car equivalence studies in Indian context. Int J Comp App 5:19–23Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Swamy CAR, Munigety CR, Anjaneyulu MVLR (2016) Passenger car unit based on influence area. In: Abstracts of the 12th conference on transportation planning and implementation methodologies for developing countries, MumbaiGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Praveen PS, Ashalatha R (2018) Identification of platoon dispersion pattern under heterogeneous traffic conditions. Case Stud Trans Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2018.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Paul B, Maitra B, Sudeshna Mitra S (2016) Simulation of Vehicle Progression i.e. A Macroscopic Traffic Behaviour using a Microscopic Model, In Abstracts of the 12th conference Transportation Planning and Implementation Methodologies for Developing Countries, Mumbai, 19–21 DecemberGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mathew TV, Radhakrishnan P (2010) Calibration of microsimulation models for nonlane-based heterogeneous traffic at signalized intersections. J Urban Plan Dev 136(1):59–66.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2010)136:1(59) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siddharth SMP, Ramadurai G (2013) Calibration of VISSIM for Indian heterogeneous traffic conditions. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104. Elsevier, Agra, pp 380–389Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kenneth DL, Ronald KK (1982) Advances in business and management forecasting. Emerald Books, BingleyGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringCollege of Engineering TrivandrumThiruvananthapuramIndia

Personalised recommendations