Benefit sharing mechanisms for agricultural genetic diversity use and on-farm conservation
- 15 Downloads
The agricultural genetic diversity is reducing at an accelerating pace. Benefit sharing mechanisms are well-known instruments to incentivize local genetic resource providers to maintain on-farm diversity and to avoid free-riding behaviour by multinational bioprospecting firms. We explore the role of these mechanisms in a setting where the output of bioprospecting activities (i.e. a modern seeds variety) competes, through an indirect channel (the release of a new modern crop variety), with traditional agriculture, but the latter is, in turn, necessary to conserve the genetic pool from which multinational firms could have access to adapted genetic traits for developing new modern varieties in the future. The on-farm diversity is fundamental to increase the option value of conservation. While gene banks guarantee the access to a large genetic pool, the preservation and selection of varieties in ecological niches by farmers ensures an evolutionary process of genetic adaptation from which extracting new useful traits in the future. Thus, we adopt a multistage game where a multinational firm anticipates the impact of its bioprospecting investments and price setting decisions on a local farmer incentives to conserve on-farm genetic diversity. We focus our attention on two benefit sharing mechanisms, namely profits sharing and technology transfers, and compare them with a benchmark featuring free genetic resources access. Our main conclusions suggest that incentives to conservation are the strongest under profit sharing, while a technology transfer produces a genetic erosion that is even higher than under free access. These results shed new light on policy design, especially in developing countries where agricultural genetic diversity is a strategic natural asset.
KeywordsBioprospecting Genetic diversity Modern varieties adoption Monetary benefit sharing Technology transfer
JEL ClassificationQ15 Q56 Q58
- Bellon, M. R., & van Etten, J. (2014). Climate change and on-farm conservation of crop landraces in centres of diversity. In M. Jackson, B. Ford-Lloyd, & M. Parry (Eds.), Plant genetic resources and climate change (pp. 137–150). Wallingford and Boston: CABI International.Google Scholar
- Cabrera, J., Perron-Welch, F., & Phillips, F. K. (2014). Overview of National and Regional Measures on Access and Benefit Sharing: Challenges and Opportunities in Implementing the Nagoya Protocol, CISDL, Montreal, Canada. Centre for International Sustainable Development Law, Montreal. www.cisdl.org/aichilex/files/Global%20Overview%20of%20ABS%20Measures_FINAL_SBSTTA18.pdf.
- FAO. (2015). The second report on the state of the world’s animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. In B. D. Scherf & D. Pilling (Ed.), FAO commission on genetic resources for food and agriculture assessments. Rome. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i4787e/index.htm.
- Galluzzi, G., Noriega, I.L., Halewood, M. (2014). Non-monetary benefit sharing mechanisms within the projects funded by the Benefit Sharing Fund. http://www.bioversityinternational.org/e-library/publications/detail/non-monetary-benefit-sharing-mechanisms-within-the-projects-funded-by-the-benefit-sharing-fund/. Accessed 28 Nov 2016.
- Kohli, K., & Bhutani, S. (2015). Access to India’s biodiversity and sharing Its benefits. Economic & Political Weekly, 50, 19–22.Google Scholar
- Lipper, L., & Cooper, D. (2009). Managing plant genetic resources for sustainable use in food and agriculture: balancing the benefits in the field. In A. Kontoleon, U. Pascual, & M. Smale (Eds.), Agro-biodiversity conservation and economic development (pp. 27–39). London and NewYork: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Markandya, A., & Nunes, P. L. D. (2012). Is the value of bioprospecting contracts too low? International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics, 26, 83–100.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2011). Future prospects for industrial biotechnology. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Onofri, L., & Ding, H. (2012). An economic model for bioprospecting contracts. International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics, 26, 48–66.Google Scholar
- Rubenstein, K. D., Heisey, P., Shoemaker, R., Sullivan, J., & Frisvold, G. (2005). Crop Genetic Resources. A report from the economic research service. An economic appraisal. In Information Bulletin (Vol. 2, p. 18). United States Department of Agriculture Economic.Google Scholar
- Shand, H. (2012). The big six: a profile of corporate power in seeds, agrochemicals and biotech. The Heritage Farm Companion (Summer) (pp. 10–15).Google Scholar
- Täuber, S., Holm-Müller, K., Jacob, T., & Feit, U. (2011). An economic analysis of new instruments for Access and Benefit-Sharing under the CBD - standardisation options for ABS transaction. Bundesamt für Naturschutz: Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar