Advertisement

Economia Politica

, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 533–564 | Cite as

The impact of immigration on output and its components: a sectoral analysis for Italy at regional level

  • Ivan EtzoEmail author
  • Carla Massidda
  • Paolo Mattana
  • Romano Piras
Article

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of immigrant workers on Italian sectors. The analysis is based on the channel output decomposition approach, by means of which the effect of immigration is measured with respect to per capita value added and its components. The empirical investigation is carried out at sector level during the period 2008–2011. The results show that immigrants exert a positive impact on total output which is mainly driven by the effect on total factor productivity. The main finding is that not all sectors benefit from the productivity gains. The sectors that mostly take advantage of immigrant workers are those featured by the predominance of manual tasks not requiring high communication skills.

Keywords

Channel output decomposition approach Immigrant workers Italy Sectors Regions 

JEL Classification

F22 F62 J61 

References

  1. Accetturo, A., Bugamelli, M., & Lamorgese, A. (2012). Welcome to the machine: Firms’ reaction to low-skilled immigration (p. 846). Temi di discussione N: Banca d’Italia.Google Scholar
  2. Aleksynska, M., & Tritah, A. (2015). The heterogeneity of immigrants, host countries’ income and productivity: A channel accounting approach. Economic Inquiry, 53, 150–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., Harnoss, J., & Rapoport, H. (2016). Birthplace diversity and economic prosperity. Journal of Economic Growth, 21, 101–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Altonji, J. G., & Card, D. (1991). The effects of immigration on labor market outcomes of less-skilled natives. In J. Abowd & R. Freeman (Eds.), Immigration, trade, and labor markets (pp. 201–234). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Bank of Italy. (2006, 2007). Indagine sul turismo internazionale dell’Italia. Retrieved in September 2016, from Bank of Italy web site. http://www.bancaditalia.it/statistiche/rapp_estero/turismo-int.
  6. Bettin, G., Lo, Turco A., & Maggioni, D. (2014). A firm-level perspective on migration. The role of extra-EU workers in Italian manufacturing. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 42, 305–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blankenou, W. F., & Cassou, S. P. (2011). Industry estimates of the elasticity of substitution and the rate of biased technological change between skilled and unskilled labour. Applied Economics, 43, 3129–3142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borjas, G. J. (2014). Immigration economics. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borjas, G. J., Grogger, J., & Hanson, G. H. (2012). Comment: On estimating elasticities of substitution. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Card, D. (2001). Immigrant inflows, native outflows, and the local market impacts of higher immigration. Journal of Labor Economics, 19, 22–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciccone, A., & Peri, G. (2005). Long-run substitutability between more and less educated workers: Evidence from US states, 1950–1990. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 652–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cortes, P. (2008). The effect of low-skilled immigration on US prices: Evidence from CPI data. Journal of Political Economy, 116, 381–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Arcangelis, G., Di Porto, E., & Santoni, G. (2015a). Immigration and manufacturing in Italy. Evidence from the 2000s. Economia e Politica Industriale, 42, 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Arcangelis, G., Di Porto, E., & Santoni, G. (2015b). Migration, labor tasks and production structure. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 53, 156–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dustmann, C., Schönberg, U., & Stuhler, J. (2016). The impact of immigration: Why do studies reach such different results? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30, 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Etzo, I., Massidda, C., & Piras, R. (2015). The impact of immigrants settlements’ on Italian firms. Paper presented to Italian Economic Association, 56th Annual Conference, Naples (Italy) 22–24 October 2015.Google Scholar
  17. Falzoni, A. M., Venturini, A., & Villosio, C. (2011). Skilled and unskilled wage dynamics in Italy in the 1990s: Changes in individual characteristics, institutions, trade and technology. International Review of Applied Economics, 25, 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gonzales, L., & Ortega, F. (2013). Immigration and housing booms: Evidence from Spain. Journal of Regional Science, 53, 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hall, R. E., & Jones, C. I. (1999). Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 83–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hunt, J. (2011). Which immigrants are most innovative and entrepreneurial? Distinctions by entry visa. Journal of Labor Economics, 29, 417–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kerr, W. R., & Lincoln, W. F. (2010). The supply side of innovation: H-1b visa reforms and US ethnic invention. NBER working paper N. 15768.Google Scholar
  22. Kleibergen, F., & Paap, R. (2006). Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition. Journal of Econometrics, 133, 97–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewis, E. G. (2011). Immigration, skill mix, and capital skill complementarity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1029–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lewis, E. G., & Peri, G. (2015). Immigration and the economy of cities and regions. In G. Duranton, V. J. Henderson, & W. C. Strange (Eds.), Handbook of regional and urban economics (Vol. 5, pp. 625–685). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  25. Marrocu, E., & Paci, R. (2010). The effects of public capital on the productivity of the Italian regions. Applied Economics, 42, 989–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mazzolari, F., & Neumark, D. (2012). Immigration and productivity diversity. Journal of Population Economics, 25, 1107–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mocetti, S., & Porello, C. (2010). How does immigration affect native internal mobility? New evidence from Italy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40, 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moressa, Fondazione. (2016). Rapporto annuale sull’economia dell’immigrazione. Il Mulino, Bologna: L’impatto fiscale del’immigrazione.Google Scholar
  29. Murat, M., & Paba, S. (2004). International migration, outsourcing, and Italian industrial districts. Materiali di discussione. Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia.Google Scholar
  30. Olney, W. (2013). Immigration and firms expansion. Journal of Regional Science, 53, 142–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ortega, F., & Peri, G. (2009). The causes and effects of international migration: Evidence from OECD countries 1980–2005. NBER Working Papers N. 14833.Google Scholar
  32. Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Peri, G. (2006). Rethinking the gains from immigration. Theory and evidence from USA. FEEM Working Paper N. 52.Google Scholar
  33. Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Peri, G. (2008). Immigration and national wages: Clarifying the theory and the empirics. NBER Working Papers N. 14188.Google Scholar
  34. Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Peri, G. (2012). Rethinking the effect of immigration on wages. Journal of the European Economic Association, 10, 152–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ottaviano, G. I. P., & Peri, G. (2013). New frontiers of immigration research: Cities and firms. Journal of Regional Science, 53, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peri, G. (2012). The effect of immigration on productivity: Evidence from US States. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 94, 348–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peri, G., & Sparber, C. (2009). Task specialization, immigration, and wages. American Economic Journal Applied Economics, 1, 135–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Romiti, A. (2011). Immigrants-natives complementarities in production: Evidence from Italy. CERP Working Paper N. 105.Google Scholar
  39. Staffolani, S., & Valentini, E. (2010). Does immigration raise blue and white collar wages of natives? The case of Italy. Labour, 24, 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stock, J. H., & Yogo, M. (2005). Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. In D. W. K. Andrews & J. H. Stock (Eds.), Identification and inference for econometric models: Essays in honor of Thomas Rothenberg (pp. 80–108). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Unioncamere. (2014). Audizione dell’Unioncamere—Comitato parlamentare di controllo sull’attuazione dell’accordo di Schengen, di vigilanza sull’attività di Europol, di controllo e vigilanza in materia di immigrazione, 20 March 2014.Google Scholar
  42. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ivan Etzo
    • 1
    Email author
  • Carla Massidda
    • 1
  • Paolo Mattana
    • 1
  • Romano Piras
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Economics and BusinessUniversity of CagliariCagliariItaly
  2. 2.Department of Social Sciences and InstitutionsUniversity of CagliariCagliariItaly

Personalised recommendations