Advertisement

Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 258–267 | Cite as

Dynamic Characterization of Textile Composites Part I: Uniaxial Tension

  • B. Justusson
  • A. Waas
  • M. Pankow
Article

Abstract

This two part series of papers will investigate the uniaxial and multiaxial response of textile composite materials subjected to high rates of loading. In this first paper, the uniaxial high rate tensile response of fiber tows commonly used in textile composites is studied. The rate dependent material response of IM7/SC-15 and S2 Glass/SC-15 are investigated in this work. The material is tested from quasi-static to dynamic rates using both a servo-hydraulic load frame and a split Hopkinson bar technique. Cross-ply laminates were investigated to determine the response due to the difficulty of preventing the splitting mode of failure for uni-composites. Stress–strain curves are generated and a discussion of the validity of results is framed by using DIC strain fields to examine the mechanics in the static and elevated rate regimes.

Keywords

Composite Dynamic Hopkinson bar Rate dependent 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Army Research Laboratories, Aberdeen proving ground, for their continued financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Jacob G, Starbuck J, Fellers J, Simunovic S, Boeman R (2004) Strain rate effects on the mechanical properties of polymer composite materials. J Appl Polym Sci 94(1):296–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davies RG (1977) The effect of strain rate upon the bending behavior of materials. J Eng Mater Technol 99(1):47–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armenkas AE, Sciammarella CA (1973) Response of glass-fiber-reinforced epoxy specimens to high rates of tensile loading. Exp Mech 13(10):433–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Staab G, Gilat A (1993) High strain rate characterization of angle-ply glass/epoxy laminates. In: Proceedings of the ninth international conference on composite materials: ICCM-9: Metal Matrix Composites, vol 1. McGraw Hill ProfessionalGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Staab G, Gilat A (1995) High strain rate response of angle-ply glass/epoxy laminates. J Compos Mater 29(10):1308–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Van Hayes S, Adams D (1982) Rate sensitive tensile impact properties of fully and partially loaded unidirectional composites. J Test Eval 10:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kawata K, Hashimoto S, Takeda N (1982) In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on composite materials, ICCM IV, Tokyo, pp. 829836Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Groves SE, Sanchez RJ, Lyon RE, Brown AE (1993) Composite materials: testing and design, ASTM STP 1206. American Society of Testingand Materials, Philadelphia, p 162176Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tzeng JT, Abrahamian AS (1998) An experimental method for compressive properties of laminated composites at high rates of loading. J Thermoplast Compos Mater 11:133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cazeneuve C, Maile JC (1985) TUDE DU COMPORTEMENT DE COMPOSITES FIBRES DE CARBONE SOUS DIFFRENTES VITESSES DE DFORMATION. J Phys Colloque 46(C5):551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daniel IM, Liber T (1978) In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on composite materials, ICCM II, Toronto, Canada, pp. 10031018Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chamis CC, Smith GT (1984) Environmental and high strain rate effects on composites for engine applications. AIAA J 22:128–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daniel IM, Liber T (1976) Strain rate effects on the mechanical properties of fiber composites; report NASA CR-135087, Part 3Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harding J, Welsh LM (1810) A tensile testing technique for fibre-reinforced composites at impact rates of strain. J Mater Sci 1983:18Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eskandari H, Nemes J (2000) Dynamic testing of composite laminates with a tensile split hopkinson bar. J Compos Mater 34(4):260–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gilat A, Goldberg R, Roberts G (2002) Experimental study of strain-rate-dependent behavior of carbon/epoxy composite. Compos Sci Technol 62(10):1469–1476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Staab G, Gilat A (1991) A direct-tension split Hopkinson bar for high strain rate testing. Exp Mech 31(3):232–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhou Y, Pervin F, Biswas M, Rangari V, Jeelani S (2006) Fabrication and characterization of montmorillonite clay-filled SC-15 epoxy. Mater Lett 60(7):869–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Justusson B (2015) Response of textile composites subjected to elevated rates of loading. PhD Dissertation, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pankow M, Justusson B, Waas AM (2010) Three-dimensional digital image correlation technique using single high-speed camera for measuring large out-of-plane displacements at high framing rates. Appl Opt 49(17):3418–3427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yazici M (2008) Loading rate sensitivity of high strength fibers and fiber/matrix interfaces. J Reinf Plast Compos 28(15):1869–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations