Advertisement

The Impact of Missing Risk Factor Data on Semiparametric Group-Based Trajectory Models

  • James V. Ray
  • Christopher J. Sullivan
  • Thomas A. Loughran
  • Shayne E. Jones
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate how missing data (Missing Completely at Random [MCAR] vs. Missing Not at Random [MNAR]) on risk factors can impact trajectory solutions (i.e., latent class probabilities) and coefficient estimates capturing the relationship between covariates and trajectory group solutions using a semiparametric group-based trajectory modeling (GBTM) approach.

Methods

To address this issue, we conducted a systematic investigation using Monte Carlo simulation. Data were generated from a population with known growth parameters and risk factors. Observations for risk factors were then systematically deleted in a way that reflects key missing data assumptions (MCAR and MNAR). Models were then estimated to test the sensitivity of the estimates to each missing data scenario.

Results

Two key findings emerged: (1) trajectory solutions were largely unaffected by missing data on risk factors; and, (2) there was some degree of bias in estimating relationships between risk factors and trajectory group membership when data were missing on those risk factors.

Conclusions

GBTM may be useful for testing etiological explanations of long-term patterns of offending. Missing data on risk factors poses a threat to this approach, however.

Keywords

Offending trajectories Missing data Monte Carlo Longitudinal data Risk factors 

References

  1. 1.
    Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barker, E. D., Seguin, J. R., White, H. R., Bates, M. E., Lacourse, E., Carbonneau, R., & Tremblay, R. E. (2007). Developmental trajectories of male physical violence and theft: relations to neurocognitive performance. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 592–599.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.5.592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chung, I. J., Hill, K. G., Hawkins, J. D., Gilchrist, L. D., & Nagin, D. S. (2002). Childhood predictors of offense trajectories. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39, 60–90.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002242780203900103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fergusson, D. M., Horwood, L., & Nagin, D. S. (2000). Offending trajectories in a New Zealand birth cohort. Criminology, 38, 525–552.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2000.tb00898.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wiesner, M., & Capaldi, D. M. (2003). Relations of childhood and adolescent factors to offending trajectories of young men. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 231–262.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427803253802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nagin, D. (2005). Group-based modeling of development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones, B. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2007). Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and an SAS procedure for estimating them. Sociological Methods & Research, 35, 542–571.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124106292364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roeder, K., Lynch, K. G., & Nagin, D. S. (1999). Modeling uncertainty in latent class membership: a case study in criminology. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 766–776.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Piquero, A. R., Gonzalez, J. M. R., & Jennings, W. G. (2015). Developmental trajectories and antisocial behavior over the life-course. In J. Morizot & L. Kazemian (Eds.), The development of criminal and antisocial behavior (pp. 75–88). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eggleston, E. P., Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2004). Methodological sensitivities to latent class analysis of long-term criminal trajectories. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 20, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOQC.0000016696.02763.ce.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Piquero, A. R., Blumstein, A., Brame, R., Haapanen, R., Mulvey, E. P., & Nagin, D. S. (2001). Assessing the impact of exposure time and incapacitation on longitudinal trajectories of criminal offending. Journal of Adolescent Research, 16, 54–74.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558401161005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jennings, W. G., & Reingle, J. M. (2012). On the number and shape of developmental/life-course violence, aggression, and delinquency trajectories: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40, 472–489.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2012.07.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nagin, D. S., & Land, K. C. (1993). Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology, 31, 327–362.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1993.tb01133.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nagin, D. S. (2016). What we've got here is failure to communicate. Criminology & Public Policy, 15(3), 753–765.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tucker, J. S., Ellickson, P. L., Orlando, M., Martino, S. C., & Klein, D. J. (2005). Substance use trajectories from early adolescence to emerging adulthood: a comparison of smoking, binge drinking, and marijuana use. Journal of Drug Issues, 35, 307–332.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002204260503500205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Goldbaum, S., Craig, W. M., Pepler, D., & Connolly, J. (2003). Developmental trajectories of victimization: identifying risk and protective factors. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 139–156.  https://doi.org/10.1300/J008v19n02_09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Burt, C. H., Sweeten, G., & Simons, R. L. (2014). Self-control through emerging adulthood: instability, multidimensionality, and criminological significance. Criminology, 52, 450–487.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fontaine, N. M., Rijsdijk, F. V., McCrory, E. J., & Viding, E. (2010). Etiology of different developmental trajectories of callous-unemotional traits. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 656–664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2010.03.014.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muthén, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345–368). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus Web Notes, 21(2), 1–22.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clark, S. L., & Muthén, B. (2009). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. Working Paper. Accessed at http://www.statmodel.com/papers.shtml
  23. 23.
    Nagin, D. S. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4, 139–157.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.2.139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18, 450–469.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bersani, B. E., Laub, J. H., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2009). Marriage and desistance from crime in the Netherlands: do gender and socio-historical context matter? Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 3–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-008-9056-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bongers, I. L., Koot, H. M., Van Der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2004). Developmental trajectories of externalizing behaviors in childhood and adolescence. Child Development, 75, 1523–1537.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00755.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carrasco, M., Barker, E. D., Tremblay, R. E., & Vitaro, F. (2006). Eysenck’s personality dimensions as predictors of male adolescent trajectories of physical aggression, theft and vandalism. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1309–1320.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jennings, W. G., Maldonado-Molina, M. M., & Komro, K. A. (2010). Sex similarities/differences in trajectories of delinquency among urban Chicago youth: the role of delinquent peers. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 35, 56–75.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-009-9066-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lacourse, E., Nagin, D., Tremblay, R. E., Vitaro, F., & Claes, M. (2003). Developmental trajectories of boys’ delinquent group membership and facilitation of violent behaviors during adolescence. Development and Psychopathology, 15, 183–197.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579403000105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Odgers, C. L., Moffitt, T. E., Broadbent, J. M., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., Harrington, H., Poulton, R., Sears, M. R., Thomson, W. M., & Caspi, A. (2008). Female and male antisocial trajectories: from childhood origins to adult outcomes. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 673–716.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Reingle, J. M., Jennings, W. G., & Maldonado-Molina, M. M. (2012). Risk and protective factors for trajectories of violent delinquency among a nationally representative sample of early adolescents. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10, 261–277.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204011431589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2003). Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology, 41, 555–592.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb00997.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wiesner, M., & Windle, M. (2004). Assessing covariates of adolescent delinquency trajectories: a latent growth mixture modeling approach. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 431–442.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579404040118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wiesner, M., Capaldi, D. M., & Kim, H. K. (2012). General versus specific predictors of male arrest trajectories: a test of the Moffitt and Patterson theories. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 217–228.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9683-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Costello, D. M., Dierker, L. C., Jones, B. L., & Rose, J. S. (2008a). Trajectories of smoking from adolescence to early adulthood and their psychosocial risk factors. Health Psychology, 27, 811–818.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.6.811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Costello, D. M., Swendsen, J., Rose, J. S., & Dierker, L. C. (2008b). Risk and protective factors associated with trajectories of depressed mood from adolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76, 173–183.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schaeffer, C. M., Petras, H., Ialongo, N., Poduska, J., & Kellam, S. (2003). Modeling growth in boys’ aggressive behavior across elementary school: links to later criminal involvement, conduct disorder, and antisocial personality disorder. Developmental Psychology, 39, 1020–1035.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.39.6.1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hedström, P. (2005). Dissecting the social: on the principles of analytical sociology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wikström, P.-O. (2007). In search of causes and explanations of crime. In R. King & E. Wincup (Eds.), Doing research on crime and justice (2nd ed., pp. 117–139). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Brame, R., Turner, M. G., & Paternoster, R. (2010). Missing data problems in criminological research. In A. R. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 273–288). New York: Springer New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nagin, D. S., & Odgers, C. L. (2010). Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 109–138.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63, 581–592.  https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/63.3.581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rubin, D. B., & Little, R. J. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R. D. (1997). Application of random-effects pattern-mixture models for missing data in longitudinal studies. Psychological Methods, 2, 64–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2014). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data: quantitative applications in the social sciences. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 55, 193–196.  https://doi.org/10.1348/000711002159653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Konishi, S., & Kitagawa, G. (2008). Information criteria and statistical modeling. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Watkins, A. M., & Melde, C. (2007). The effect of self-control on unit and item nonresponse in an adolescent sample. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 44, 267–294.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427807301675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Roth, P. L. (1994). Missing data: a conceptual review for applied psychologists. Personnel Psychology, 47, 537–560.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01736.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Sterba, S. K. (2014). Handling missing covariates in conditional mixture models under missing at random assumptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 49, 614–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Burton, A., Altman, D. G., Royston, P., & Holder, R. L. (2006). The design of simulation studies in medical statistics. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 4279–4292.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Paxton, P., Curran, P. J., Bollen, K. A., Kirby, J., & Chen, F. (2001). Monte Carlo experiments: design and implementation. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 287–312.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0802_7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Raudenbush, S. W., & Liu, X. F. (2001). Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. Psychological Methods, 6, 387–401.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jones, B. L., & Nagin, D. S. (2013). A note on a Stata plugin for estimating group-based trajectory models. Sociological Methods & Research, 42, 608–613.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124113503141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Little, R. J. (1992). Regression with missing X’s: a review. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 1227–1237.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1992.10476282.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Enders, C.K. (2001). The performance of the full information maximum likelihood estimator in multiple regression models with missing data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(5), 713–740.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (2005). Seductions of method: rejoinder to Nagin and Tremblay’s developments trajectory groups: fact or fiction. Criminology, 43, 905–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data (Vol. 136). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Rubin, D. B. (1987). Comment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82(398), 543–546.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Nakai, M., & Ke, W. (2011). Review of the methods for handling missing data in longitudinal data analysis. International Journal of Mathematical Analysis, 5, 1–13.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1198–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rubin, D. B. (2008). For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis. Ann. Appl. Stat., 2, 808–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.6.4.330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Berk, R. A. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Sociological Review, 48, 386–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Cheung, M. W. L. (2007). Comparison of methods of handling missing time-invariant covariates in latent growth models under the assumption of missing completely at random. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 609–634.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106295499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Erosheva, E. A., Matsueda, R. L., & Telesca, D. (2014). Breaking bad: two decades of life-course data analysis in criminology, developmental psychology, and beyond. Annual Review of Statistical Applications, 1, 301–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Raudenbush, S. W. (2005). How do we study “what happens next”? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 602(1), 131–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Skardhamar, T. (2010). Distinguishing facts and artifacts in group-based modeling. Criminology, 48, 295–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • James V. Ray
    • 1
  • Christopher J. Sullivan
    • 2
  • Thomas A. Loughran
    • 3
  • Shayne E. Jones
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeUniversity of Central FloridaOrlandoUSA
  2. 2.School of Criminal JusticeUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA
  3. 3.Department of Sociology and CriminologyPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  4. 4.Department of Criminal JusticeTexas State UniversitySan MarcosUSA

Personalised recommendations