Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 189–198 | Cite as

User expectations in intelligent environments

Issues and opportunities in the interaction of intelligent users and intelligent environments
  • Fulvio CornoEmail author
Original Article


The definition of intelligent environments (IEs) (Augusto et al. in Hum Comput Inf Sci 3(1):12, 2013) has always been focused around their users, aiming at helping them in a smart and transparent way, and avoiding bothering them or acting against their will. The complexity of IEs, whose technologies range from sensors to machine learning, from distributed architectures to tangible interfaces, from communication protocols to data analysis, challenges researchers from various fields to contribute innovative and effective solutions. In this quest for technical solutions to the myriad requirements of an IEs, user expectations are often left behind, and while researchers tend to focus on niche technical aspects, they risk of losing the big picture of an IE “helping users in their daily life”. This paper analyzes the recent literature of the IEs’ research community, aiming at highlighting to which extent users are taken into account, or are involved, into the reported research works. Evidence shows that, while most papers refer to users in their description, only a small minority actually involve them in the design, testing or experimentation phases.


Usability User expectations User modeling Interaction 

Mathematics Subject Classification

68U35 68M14 


  1. 1.
    Augusto J, Callaghan V, Cook D, Kameas A, Satoh I (2013) Intelligent environments: a manifesto. Hum Comput Inf Sci 3(1):12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Augusto J, Kramer D, Alegre U, Covaci A, Santokhee A (2018) The user-centred intelligent environments development process as a guide to co-create smart technology for people with special needs. Univ Access Inf Soc 17(1):115–130. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Augusto JC (2014) User-centric software development process. In: 2014 international conference on intelligent environments 252–255.
  4. 4.
    Bonino D, Corno F (2011) What would you ask to your home if it were intelligent? Exploring user expectations about next-generation homes. J Ambient Intel Smart Environ 3(2):111–126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cook D, Das S (2004) Smart environments: technology, protocols and applications, vol 43. Wiley, USAGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corno F (2018) User expectations in intelligent environments—issues and opportunities in the interaction of intelligent users and intelligent environments. In: Chatzigiannakis I, Tobe Y, Novais P, Amft O (eds) Intelligent environments 2018, Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, vol 23. IOS Press, pp 542–543.
  7. 7.
    Corno F, Guercio E, De Russis L, Gargiulo E (2015) Designing for user confidence in intelligent environments. J Reliab Intell Environ 1(1):11–21. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coskun A, Kaner G, Bostan I (2018) Is smart home a necessity or a fantasy for the mainstream user? A study on users expectations of smart household appliances. Int J Des 12(1): 7–20.
  9. 9.
    Ducatel K, Bogdanowicz M, Scapolo F, Leijten J, Burgelma J (2001) Scenarios for ambient intelligence in 2010 (ISTAG 2001 final report). Tech. rep., ISTAGGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaasinen E, Kymäläinen T, Niemelä M, Olsson T, Kanerva M, Ikonen V (2012) A user-centric view of intelligent environments: User expectations, user experience and user role in building intelligent environments. Computers 2(1):1–33. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Le Guilly T, Nielsen M, Pedersen T, Skou A, Kjeldskov J, Skov M (2016) User constraints for reliable user-defined smart home scenarios. J Reliab Intel Environ 2(2):75–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Röcker C, Janse M.D, Portolan N, Streitz N (2005) User requirements for intelligent home environments: a scenario-driven approach and empirical cross-cultural study. In: Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on smart objects and ambient intelligence: innovative context-aware services: usages and technologies, sOc-EUSAI ’05. ACM, New York, pp 111–116.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Automatica e InformaticaPolitecnico di TorinoTorinoItaly

Personalised recommendations