Advertisement

A software framework for robotic mediators in smart environments

  • Young-Ho Suh
  • Kang-Woo Lee
  • Eun-Sun Cho
Original Article

Abstract

The experience of full automation without explicit user direction may induce anxiety among smart space users. The use of explicit mediators between users and fully automated systems may help to mitigate users’ anxiety. While robots mediators are one possible solution, several issues remain, including high complexity and limited collaboration between robots and smart space platforms, reducing overall system reliability. This paper proposes the Integrated Control Architecture for Robotic mediator in Smart environments (ICARS) as a solution to improve the integration and reliability of robot mediators within automated smart spaces. Assuming relatively thin network robots as robotic mediators to enable a wide distribution with less cost, ICARS provides a well-organized software framework consisting of three layers to integrate robots and smart spaces: a flexible communication/device model, an adaptive service model for the integrated robot control architecture, and a behavior-based high-level collaboration model. In this paper, we also present details of the design, implementation, and an application scenario conducted with ICARS. The results show that ICARS enables flexible integration of the diverse devices associated with robots and environments, adaptive service provision for collaborative services, and easier development of high-level collaborative applications with decent performance.

Keywords

Smart environment Robotic mediator Collaboration Behavior Control architecture 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2015R1D1A1A09061480).

References

  1. 1.
    Weiser M (1991) The computer for the 21st century. Sci Am 265(3):94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Carolis B, Cozzolongo G (2009) Interpretation of user’s feedback in human-robot interaction. J Phys Agents 3(2):686–695Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ishii H (2008) Tangible bits: beyond pixels. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM international conference on tangible and embedded interactionGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee D, Yamazaki T, Helal S (2009) Robotic companions for smart space interactions. IEEE Pervasive Comput 8(2):78–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Linder N, Maes P (2010) LuminAR: portable robotic augmented reality interface design and prototype. In: Adjunct proceedings of the 23nd annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technologyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bien ZZ et al (2008) Intelligent interaction for human-friendly service robot in smart house environment. Int J Comput Intell Syst 1(1):77–93MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coradeschi S, Saffiotti A (2006) Symbiotic robotic systems: Humans, robots, and smart environments. IEEE Intell Syst 21(3):82–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cozzolongo G, De Carolis B, Pizzutilo S (2007) Social robots as mediators between users and smart environments. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM international conference on intelligent user interfacesGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mohamed N, Al-Jaroodi J, Jawhar I (2009) A review of middleware for networked robots. Int J Comput Sci Netw Secur 9(5):139–148Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siegel J (1998) OMG overview: CORBA and the OMA in enterprise computing. Commun ACM 41(10):37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ahn SC et al (2005) UPnP approach for robot middleware. In robotics and automation, 2005. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on ICRAGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim BK et al (2005) Web services based robot control platform for ubiquitous functions. In: Robotics and automation, in proceedings of the IEEE international conference on ICRAGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Suh Y-H, Lee K-W, Cho E-S (2012) A communication framework for the robotic mediator collaborating with smart environments. J Inst Electron Eng Korea CI 49(2):75–82Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Suh Y-H et al (2012) ICARS: integrated control architecture for the robotic mediator in smart environments: a software framework for the robotic mediator collaborating with smart environments. In: Proceedings of high performance computing and communication and 2012 IEEE 9th international conference on embedded software and systems (HPCC-ICESS)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suh Y-H, Lee K-W, Cho E-S (2013) A device abstraction framework for the robotic mediator collaborating with smart environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE 16th international conference on computational science and engineeringGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ando N et al (2005) RT-middleware: distributed component middleware for RT (robot technology). In: Intelligent robots and systems, in proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systemsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cote C et al (2006) Robotic software integration using MARIE. Int J Adv Robot Syst 3(1):55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmidt DC (1994) ASX: an object-oriented framework for developing distributed applications. In: C++ conferenceGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruyninckx H (2001) Open robot control software: the OROCOS project. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on robotics and automationGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brooks A et al (2007) Orca: a component model and repository. Software engineering for experimental robotics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg pp 231–251Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henning M, Spruiell M (2003) Distributed programming with ice. ZeroC Inc., JupiterGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Utz H et al (2002) Miro-middleware for mobile robot applications. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 18(4):493–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Quigley M et al (2009) ROS: an open-source robot operating system. In: Proceedings of ICRA workshop on open source softwareGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gerkey B, Vaughan RT, Howard A (2003) The player/stage project: tools for multi-robot and distributed sensor systems. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on advanced roboticsGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Calmant T et al (2012) A dynamic sca-based system for smart homes and offices. In: Proceedings of international conference on service-oriented computingGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alliance O (2003) Osgi service platform, release 3. IOS Press Inc, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ahn SC et al (2006) Requirements to UPnP for robot middleware. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systemsGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yu W et al (2009) Design and implementation of a ubiquitous robotic space. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng 6(4):633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Saffiotti A, Broxvall M (2005) PEIS ecologies: ambient intelligence meets autonomous robotics. In: Proceedings of the 2005 joint conference on Smart objects and ambient intelligence: innovative context-aware services: usages and technologiesGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Saffiotti A et al (2008) The PEIS-ecology project: vision and results. In: Proceedings of 2008 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systemsGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    What is AWS IoT?—AWS IoT. http://docs.aws.amazon.com/iot/latest/developerguide/what-is-aws-iot.html. Accessed Apr 5 2018
  32. 32.
    Google Brillo. https://developers.google.com/brillo/. Accessed Apr 5 2018
  33. 33.
    Allseen alliance. https://allseenalliance.org/. Accessed Apr 5 2018
  34. 34.
    Eclipse SmartHome—a flexible framework for the smart home. http://www.eclipse.org/smarthome/. Accessed Apr 5 2018
  35. 35.
    AWS Robotics. https://github.com/awslabs/simplerobotservice. Accessed Apr 5 2018
  36. 36.
    Cho E-S (2017) Toward more reliable intelligent environments. In: Proceedings of 6th workshop on the reliability of intelligent environments (WoRIE)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rodriguez-Dominguez C, Ruiz-Lopez T, Benghazi K, Noguera M, Luis GJ (2013) In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on, intelligent environments (IE)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Spatial Information Research SectionElectronics and Telecommunication Research Institute (ETRI)DaejeonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringChungnam National UniversityDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations