Tropical Plant Pathology

, Volume 44, Issue 2, pp 192–196 | Cite as

Silicon-mediated maize resistance to macrospora leaf spot

  • Caroline Hawerroth
  • Leonardo Araujo
  • Maria B. Bermúdez-Cardona
  • Patrícia R. Silveira
  • João A. Wordell Filho
  • Fabrício A. RodriguesEmail author
Short Communication


This study investigated the effect of silicon (Si) on maize resistance against macrospora leaf spot (MLS) caused by the fungus Stenocarpella macrospora. Maize plants susceptible to MLS were grown in a Si-deficient soilless potting mix and irrigated daily with either potassium silicate solution or potassium chloride solution. The amount of potassium was equilibrated between the solutions. The severity of MLS was evaluated at 48, 72, 96, 120 and 168 h after inoculation and data were used to calculate the area under MLS progress curve (AUMLSPC). The foliar Si concentration in Si-supplied plants (2.8 dag/kg) significantly increased in comparison to non-supplied ones (0.6 dag/kg). The AUMLSPC was significantly reduced by 42% in Si-supplied plants (368.3) when compared with non-supplied ones (635.0). Fungal hyphae grew abundantly in the leaf tissue of non-supplied in comparison to Si-supplied plants based on light and scanning electron microscopy observations. Cell walls in the leaf tissue of Si-supplied plants were rarely degraded, and fungal hyphae were surrounded by phenolic compounds. In conclusion, marked differences in the infection process of S. macrospora were noticed between Si-supplied and non-supplied plants. The role of Si acting as a physical barrier and potentiating the phenylpropanoid pathway in maize was of great importance for resistance to MLS.


Stenocarpella macrospora Host defense response Phenolics Plant nutrition Phenylpropanoid pathway 



Prof. F. A. Rodrigues thanks the CNPq for his research fellowship. The authors thank the Núcleo de Microscopia e Microanálise of the Universidade Federal de Viçosa for the use of their equipment. This study was supported by grants from CAPES, CNPq, and FAPEMIG to Prof. F. A. Rodrigues.


  1. Araujo L, Bispo WMS, Cacique IS, Moreira WR, Rodrigues FA (2014) Resistance in mango against infection by Ceratocystis fimbriata. Phytopathology 104:820–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Araujo L, Paschoalino RS, Rodrigues FA (2016) Microscopic aspects of silicon-mediated rice resistance to leaf scald. Phytopathology 106:132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bampi D, Casa RT, Bogo A, Sangoi L, Sachs C, Bolzan JM, Piletti G (2012) Fungicide performance on the control of macrospora leaf spot in corn. Summa Phytopathologica 38:319–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bélanger RR, Benhamou N, Menzies JG (2003) Cytological evidence of an active role of silicon in wheat resistance to powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici). Phytopathology 93:402–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bensch MJ, Van Staden J, Rijkenberg FHJ (1992) Time and site inoculation of maize for optimum infection of ears by Stenocarpella maydis. Journal of Phytopathology 136:265–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bermudez-Cardona MB, Cruz MFA, Rodrigues FA (2016) Microscopic study of the Stenocarpella macrospora infection process on maize leaves. Tropical Plant Pathology 41:115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley CA, Pedersen DK, Zhang GR, Pataky NR (2010) Occurrences of diplodia leaf streak caused by Stenocarpella macrospora on corn (Zea mays) in Illinois. Plant Disease 94:1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casa RT, Reis EM, Zambolim L (2003) Decomposição dos restos culturais do milho e sobrevivência saprofítica de Stenocarpella macrospora e Stenocarpella maydis. Fitopatologia Brasileira 28:355–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casa RT, Reis EM, Zambolim L (2004) Dispersão vertical e horizontal de conídios de Stenocarpella macrospora e Stenocarpella maydis. Fitopatologia Brasileira 29:141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Casa RT, Reis EM, Zambolim L (2006) Doenças do milho causadas por fungos do gênero Stenocarpella. Fitopatologia Brasileira 31:427–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Debona D, Rodrigues FA, Datnoff LE (2017) Silicon’s role in abiotic and biotic plant stresses. Annual Review of Phytopathology 55:85–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Domiciano GP, Rodrigues FA, Vale FXR, Xavier-Filha MS, Moreira WR, Andrade CCL, Pereira SC (2010) Wheat resistance to spot blotch potentiated by silicon. Journal of Phytopathology 158:334–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fortunato AA, Silva WL, Rodrigues FA (2014) Phenylpropanoid pathway is potentiated by silicon in the roots of banana plants during the infection process of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. Phytopathology 104:597–603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fortunato AA, Araujo A, Rodrigues FA (2017) Association of the production of phenylpropanoid compounds at the infection sites of Corynespora cassiicola with soybean resistance against target spot. Journal of Phytopathology 165:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hayasaka T, Fujii H, Ishiguro K (2008) The role of silicon in preventing appressorial penetration by the rice blast fungus. Phytopathology 98:1038–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim SG, Kim KW, Park EW, Choi D (2002) Silicon-induced cell wall fortification of rice leaves: a possible cellular mechanism of enhanced host resistance to blast. Phytopathology 92:1095–1103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Latterell FM, Rossi AE (1983) Stenocarpella macrospora (= Diplodia macrospora) and S. maydis (= D. maydis) compared as pathogens of corn. Plant Disease 67:725–729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moore KJ, Dixon PM (2015) Analysis of combined experiments revisited. Agronomy Journal 107:763–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Piletti GJ, Casa RT, Bampi D, Piletti LMMS, Stoltz JC, Sangoi L, Michelutti D (2014) Resistance of corn hybrids to macrospora leaf spot. Summa Phytopathologica 40:24–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodrigues FA, Benhamou N, Datnoff LE, Jones JB, Belanger RR (2003) Ultrastructural and cytochemical aspects of silicon-mediated rice blast resistance. Phytopathology 93:535–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rodrigues FA, Mcnally DJ, Datnoff LE, Jones JB, Labbé C, Benhamou N, Menzies JG, Bélanger RR (2004) Silicon enhances the accumulation of diterpenoid phytoalexins in rice: a potential mechanism for blast resistance. Phytopathology 94:177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rodrigues FA, Dallagnol LJ, Duarte HSS, Datnoff LE (2015) Silicon control of foliar diseases in monocots and dicots. In: Rodrigues FA, Datnoff LE (eds) Silicon and Plant Diseases. Springer International Publishing AG, Switzerland, pp 67–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shaner G, Finney RE (1977) The effect of nitrogen fertilization on the expression of slow-mildewing resistance in Knox wheat. Phytopathology 67:1051–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vale FXR, Fernandes-Filho EIF, Liberato JR (2003) QUANT – a software for plant disease severity assessment. In: International Congress of Plant Pathology. Chriatchurch, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  25. Weete ER (1980) Lipid biochemistry of Fungi and other organisms. Plenum Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de FitopatologiaUniversidade Federal de ViçosaViçosaBrazil
  2. 2.Laboratorio de FitopatologíaUniversidad del TolimaTolimaColombia
  3. 3.Laboratório de FitopatologiaEPAGRISão JoaquimBrazil
  4. 4.Laboratório de FitossanidadeEPAGRI/CEPAFChapecóBrazil

Personalised recommendations