Advertisement

Acoustics Australia

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 329–338 | Cite as

Empirical Study of Room Acoustic Conditions and Neurophysiologic Strain in Staff Working in Special Open-Plan Bank Offices

  • Masoud Shafiee Motlagh
  • Rostam GolmohammadiEmail author
  • Mohsen Aliabadi
  • Javad Faradmal
  • Akram Ranjbar
Original Paper
  • 80 Downloads

Abstract

Noise in open-plan offices induces psychological stress and fatigue in staff. Focusing on workstations and noise exposure, this study investigated acoustic conditions in special open-plan offices and their relationship with neurophysiologic strain. Twenty banks and 104 participants were randomly selected. Acoustic properties of banks and workstation partitions were assessed using the ISO criteria and speech transmission index (STI). Equivalent noise level (LAeq) of the staff was measured in three 30-min intervals, and skin conductance level (SCL) and respiratory rate (RR) of staff were assessed in three 5-min intervals at the beginning, in the middle, and at the end of the work hours. The intelligibility of speech between staff workstations (SW) was better than that between staff and clients (S&C). The observed condition should be reversed to ensure speech privacy for the staff and speech intelligibility between the staff and clients. The findings indicated that with increasing LAeq of the staff, the SCL and RR, i.e., the stress of staff increased too. Yet, the staff with more work experience showed a lower increase in SCL. The correlation between STI and staff strain was not statistically significant; however, with increasing STI between SW and with decreasing STI between S&C, the staff strain increased. With increasing noise exposure, psychological stress of the staff increased too. Because of the acoustic condition and partitions used in the banks, the acoustic comfort of staff was not desirable. Since many other banks use such partitions, any improvement in partitions between workstations can enhance acoustic comfort in the banks.

Keywords

Acoustic properties Open-plan office Bank Neurophysiologic strains Workstation partitions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Hamadan University of Medical Sciences for the financial support (Grant Number: 9511267308). Additionally, the authors thank the administrative and staff of Bank Melli Iran for their contribution. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Research in Hamadan University of Medical Sciences.

References

  1. 1.
    Pierrette, M., Parizet, E., Chevret, P., Chatillon, J.: Noise effect on comfort in open-space offices: development of an assessment questionnaire. Ergonomics 58(1), 96–106 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brookes, M.J., Kaplan, A.: The office environment: space planning and affective behavior. Hum. Factors 14(5), 373–391 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Golmohammadi, R., Aliabadi, M., Nezami, T.: An experimental study of acoustic comfort in open space banks based on speech intelligibility and noise annoyance measures. Arch. Acoust. 42(2), 333–345 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hedge, A.: The open-plan office: a systematic investigation of employee reactions to their work environment. Environ. Behav. 14(5), 519–542 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sundstrom, E., Burt, R.E., Kamp, D.: Privacy at work: architectural correlates of job satisfaction and job performance. Acad. Manag. J. 23(1), 101–117 (1980)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Babisch, W.: Stress hormones in the research on cardiovascular effects of noise. Noise Health 5(18), 1 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee, P.J., Lee, B.K., Jeon, J.Y., Zhang, M., Kang, J.: Impact of noise on self-rated job satisfaction and health in open-plan offices: a structural equation modelling approach. Ergonomics 59(2), 222–234 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith, A.: A review of the non-auditory effects of noise on health. Work Stress 5(1), 49–62 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sundstrom, E., Town, J.P., Rice, R.W., Osborn, D.P., Brill, M.: Office noise, satisfaction, and performance. Environ. Behav. 26(2), 195–222 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Darvishi, E., Maleki, A., Giahi, O., Akbarzadeh, A.: Subjective mental workload and its correlation with musculoskeletal disorders in bank staff. J. Manip. Physiol. Ther. 39(6), 420–426 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    IEC 60268-16:2011. Sound system equipment—part 16: objective rating of speech intelligibility by speech transmission indexGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Notbohm, G., Schmook, R., Schwarze, S., Angerer, P.: Patterns of physiological and affective responses to vehicle pass-by noises. Noise Health 15(66), 355 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Galbrun, L., Kitapci, K.: Accuracy of speech transmission index predictions based on the reverberation time and signal-to-noise ratio. Appl. Acoust. 81, 1–14 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haapakangas, A., Hongisto, V., Hyönä, J., Kokko, J., Keränen, J.: Effects of unattended speech on performance and subjective distraction: the role of acoustic design in open-plan offices. Appl. Acoust. 86, 1–16 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keränen, J., Hongisto, V.: Prediction of the spatial decay of speech in open-plan offices. Appl. Acoust. 74(12), 1315–1325 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Passero, C.R.M., Zannin, P.H.T.: Acoustic evaluation and adjustment of an open-plan office through architectural design and noise control. Appl. Ergon. 43(6), 1066–1071 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Evans, G.W., Johnson, D.: Stress and open-office noise. J. Appl. Psychol. 85(5), 779 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Storm, H., Myre, K., Rostrup, M., Stokland, O., Lien, M., Raeder, J.: Skin conductance correlates with perioperative stress. Acta Anaesth. Scand. 46(7), 887–895 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sequeira, H., Hot, P., Silvert, L., Delplanque, S.: Electrical autonomic correlates of emotion. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 71(1), 50–56 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Critchley, H.D.: Electrodermal responses: what happens in the brain. Neuroscientist 8(2), 132–142 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Timmons, B.H., Ley, R.: Behavioral and Psychological Approaches to Breathing Disorders. Springer, Berlin (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bailón, R., Sornmo, L., Laguna, P.: A robust method for ECG-based estimation of the respiratory frequency during stress testing. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53(7), 1273–1285 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Günther, A.: Skin conductance variability and stressful exposures in critical care. PhD Thesis. Stockholm University (2016)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Holube, I., Haeder, K., Imbery, C., Weber, R.: Subjective listening effort and electrodermal activity in listening situations with reverberation and noise. Trends Hear. 20, 1–15 (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mackersie, C.L., Calderon-Moultrie, N.: Autonomic nervous system reactivity during speech repetition tasks: heart rate variability and skin conductance. Ear Hear. 37, 118S–125S (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Masaoka, Y., Homma, I.: Anxiety and respiratory patterns: their relationship during mental stress and physical load. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 27(2), 153–159 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Aliabadi, M., Golmohammadi, R., Ohadi, A., Mansoorizadeh, M., Khotanlou, H., Sarrafzadeh, M.S.: Development of an empirical acoustic model for predicting reverberation time in typical industrial workrooms using artificial neural networks. Acta Acust. United Acust. 100(6), 1090–1097 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Passero, C.R.M., Zannin, P.H.T.: Statistical comparison of reverberation times measured by the integrated impulse response and interrupted noise methods, computationally simulated with ODEON software, and calculated by Sabine, Eyring and Arau-Puchades’ formulas. Appl. Acoust. 71(12), 1204–1210 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    ISO 3382-3:2012. Acoustics—measurement of room acoustic parameters—part 3: open plan officesGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cabrera, D., Lee, D., Leembruggen, G., Jimenez, D.: Increasing robustness in the calculation of the speech transmission index from impulse responses. Build. Acoust. 21(3), 181–198 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cabrera, D., Yadav, M., Protheroe, D.: Critical methodological assessment of the distraction distance used for evaluating room acoustic quality of open-plan offices. Appl. Acoust. 140, 132–142 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    NF S31-199: 2016. Acoustics—acoustic performance of open office spaces. In. FrenchGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pawlaczyk-łuszczyńska, M., Dudarewicz, A., Waszkowska, M., Szymczak, W., Kameduła, M., Śliwińska-Kowalska, M.: Does low frequency noise at modarate levels influence human mental performance? J Low Freq Noise Vib Active Control 24(1), 25–42 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Edmonds, W.A., Tenenbaum, G.: Case Studies in Applied Psychophysiology: Neurofeedback and Biofeedback Treatments for Advances in Human Performance. Wiley, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Potter, R.F., Bolls, P.: Psychophysiological Measurement and Meaning: Cognitive and Emotional Processing of Media. Routledge, Abingdon (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sokhadze, E.M.: Effects of music on the recovery of autonomic and electrocortical activity after stress induced by aversive visual stimuli. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 32(1), 31–50 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gholami, T., Piran Veyseh, P., Aliabadi, M., Farhadian, M.: Evaluation of noise pollution and its effects on subjective fatigue of staffs in the governmental banks of Hamadan city. IOH 11(5), 65–73 (2014)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ebissou, A., Parizet, E., Chevret, P.: Use of the speech transmission index for the assessment of sound annoyance in open-plan offices. Appl. Acoust. 88, 90–95 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Weinzierl, S., Vorländer, M.: Room acoustical parameters as predictors of room acoustical impression: what do we know and what would we like to know? Acoust. Aust. 43(1), 41–48 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Seddigh, A., Berntson, E., Jönsson, F., Danielson, C.B., Westerlund, H.: The effect of noise absorption variation in open-plan offices: a field study with a cross-over design. J. Environ. Psychol. 44, 34–44 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Acoustical Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masoud Shafiee Motlagh
    • 1
  • Rostam Golmohammadi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohsen Aliabadi
    • 2
  • Javad Faradmal
    • 3
  • Akram Ranjbar
    • 4
  1. 1.Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, School of Public Health and Research Center for Health SciencesHamadan University of Medical SciencesHamadanIran
  2. 2.Center of Excellence for Occupational Health, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public HealthHamadan University of Medical SciencesHamadanIran
  3. 3.Modeling of Noncommunicable Diseases Research Center & Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public HealthHamadan University of Medical SciencesHamadanIran
  4. 4.Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of PharmacyHamadan University of Medical SciencesHamadanIran

Personalised recommendations