Acoustics Australia

, Volume 45, Issue 2, pp 389–401 | Cite as

A Case Study of the Influence of Urban Morphology on Aircraft Noise

Original Paper


Aircraft noise is a very important environmental problem that has been addressed in many ways over the years. Many strategies have been developed to mitigate aircraft noise exposure. To help identify the problem, computer simulations with mathematical models for aircraft noise have been developed. However, those models do not consider urban morphology effects on aircraft noise propagation. Urban morphology contains a set of features that modify noise, and it is necessary to be aware of its effects as it can be a factor that can potentially increase sound pressure levels to which the general population is exposed. This paper evaluates different aspects of urban morphology and determines the impact of street topologies, line of sight angles of buildings, façade positions, façade heights, and the combination of street topologies and LOS angles on aircraft noise. Measurements in front of the façade and in free field conditions were performed around buildings that make up educational facilities near Madrid Adolfo Suárez Barajas and Pisa Galileo Galilei airports. With the experimental work, it was demonstrated that front façades, U topologies, and greater LOS angles result in higher levels on façade as all these factors contribute to the transmission of noise in an urban environment. Correction factors for measurements made in façades with and without direct transmission with similar surroundings to the ones measured in this study and within a 95% confidence level were proposed for extrapolating the levels of aircraft noise events in free field conditions.


Aircraft noise Urban morphology LOS Façade 


  1. 1.
    Netjasov, F.: Contemporary measures for noise reduction in airport surroundings. Appl. Acoust. 73(10), 1076–1085 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ICAO. Guidance on the balanced approach to Aircraft Noise Management (Doc 9829) (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Girvin, R.: Aircraft noise-abatement and mitigation strategies. J. Air Transp. Manag. 15(1), 14–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ahearn, M., Boeker, E., Gorshkov, S., Hansen, A., Hwang, S., Koopmann, J., ... Solman, G. B.: Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) Technical Manual Version 2b Service Pack 3 (No. DOT-VNTSC-FAA-16-11) (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Krebs, W., Thomann, G., Bütikofer, R.: FLULA2. Ein Verfahren zur Berechnung und Darstellung der Fluglärmbelastung [Estimation and illustration of aircraft noise exposure] (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zaporozhets, O., Tokarev, K., Attenborough, K.: Aircraft Noise: Assessment, Prediction and Control, 1st edn. Spon Press, Boca Raton (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moudon, A.V.: Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphol. 1(1), 3–10 (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ariza-Villaverde, A.B., Jiménez-Hornero, F.J., De Ravé, E.: GInfluence of urban morphology on total noise pollution: multifractal description. Sci. Total Environ. 472, 1–8 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oliveira, M. I. F., & Silva, L. T.: How urban noise can be influenced by the urban form. 8th WSEAS international conference on environment, ecosystems and development (EED’10), pp 31–36 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silva, L.T., Oliveira, M., Silva, J.F.: Urban form indicators as proxy on the noise exposure of buildings. Appl. Acoust. 76, 366–376 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guedes, I.C.M., Bertoli, S.R., Zannin, P.H.T.: Influence of urban shapes on environmental noise: a case study in Aracaju—Brazil. Sci. Total Environ. 412–413, 66–76 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.10.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wang, B., Kang, J.: Effects of urban morphology on the traffic noise distribution through noise mapping: a comparative study between UK and China. Applied Acoust. 72(8), 556–568 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pande, L., Lyon, R.H.: Model study of aircraft noise reverberation in a city street. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52(1A), 169–169 (1972). doi: 10.1121/1.1982033
  14. 14.
    Donavan, P. R. : Model study of the propagation of sound from V/STOL aircraft into urban environs (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (1973)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lugten, M., Steemers, K., Kang, J.: An experimental study on the shielding performance of buildings exposed to aircraft noise comparing measurements near front and rear facades. Internoise 2016, Hamburg, Germany. 7180 (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ISO. 20906:2009, Unattended Monitoring of Aircraft Sound in the Vicinity of Airports. Genève: ISO (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    ISO. 1996-2:2009, Standard, Acoustics—Description, Measurement and Assessment of Environmental Noise—Part 2 U.S.C. (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ismail, M.R., Oldham, D.J.: The effect of the urban street canyon on the noise from low flying aircraft. Build. Acoust. 9(3), 233–251 (2002). doi: 10.1260/135101002320815693 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kang, J.: Sound propagation in street canyons: comparison between diffusely and geometrically reflecting boundaries. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107(3), 1394–1404 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lamancusa, J.: Noise Control: Outdoor Sound Propagation. Penn State University Lecture,<CHECK>State College</CHECK> (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hao, Y., Kang, J.: Influence of mesoscale urban morphology on the spatial noise attenuation of flyover aircrafts. Appl. Acoust. 84, 73–82 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2013.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Licitra, G., Gagliardi, P., Fredianelli, L., Simonetti, D.: Noise mitigation action plan of pisa civil and military airport and its effects on people exposure. Appl. Acoust. 84, 25–36 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2014.02.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Asensio, C., Pavón, I., Recuero, M., Ausejo, M.: Airport noise insulation programs. Noise Vib. Worldw. 43(2), 8-1 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Acoustical Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instrumentation and Applied Acoustics Research Group (I2A2)Technical University of Madrid Edificio ETSI Topografía, CtraMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsUniversity of SienaSienaItaly
  3. 3.ARPAT - Environmental Regional Agency of Tuscany, Department of LuccaLuccaItaly
  4. 4.IPCF-CNR UosPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations