Advertisement

Near-infrared absorbing 2D/3D ZnIn2S4/N-doped graphene photocatalyst for highly efficient CO2 capture and photocatalytic reduction

  • Yang Xia (夏阳)
  • Bei Cheng (程蓓)
  • Jiajie Fan (范佳杰)
  • Jiaguo Yu (余家国)Email author
  • Gang Liu (刘刚)Email author
Articles
  • 44 Downloads

Abstract

Hierarchical heterostructure photocatalysts with broad spectrum solar light utilization, particularly in the near-infrared (NIR) region, are emerging classes of advanced photocatalytic materials for solar-driven CO2 conversion into value-added chemical feedstocks. Herein, a novel two-demensional/three-demensional (2D/3D) hierarchical composite is hydrothermally synthesized by assembling vertically-aligned ZnIn2S4 (ZIS) nanowall arrays on nitrogen-doped graphene foams (NGF). The prepared ZIS/NGF composite shows enhancement in photothermal conversion ability and selective CO2 capture as well as solar-driven CO2 photoreduction. At 273 K and 1 atm, the ZIS/NGF composite with 1.0 wt% NGF achieves a comparably high CO2-to-N2 selectivity of 30.1, with an isosteric heat of CO2 adsorption of 48.2 kJ mol−1. And in the absence of cocatalysts and sacrificial agents, the ZIS/NGF composite with cyclability converts CO2 into CH4, CO and CH3OH under simulated solar light illumination, with the respective evolution rates about 9.1, 3.5, and 5.9 times higher than that of the pristine ZIS. In-depth analysis using in-situ irradiated X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (ISI-XPS) in conjunction with Kelvin probe measurements reveals the underlying charge transfer pathway and process from ZIS to NGF.

Keywords

near-infrared light nitrogen-doped graphene foams ZnIn2S4 nanowalls selective CO2 capture CO2 photocatalytic reduction 

具有近红外吸收的二维/三维ZnIn2S4/氮掺杂石墨烯光催化剂的制备及其高效 CO2 捕获和光催化还原性能

摘要

具有宽光谱太阳能利用的分等级异质结光催化剂, 正成为一种新兴的先进光催化材料, 被应用于太阳能驱动二氧化碳转化为高附加值的化学原料. 本工作通过水热法使二维硫化铟锌纳米墙垂直生长于三维氮掺杂石墨烯泡沫上, 形成分等级异质结光催化剂. 该催化剂展现出优异的光热转换效率、选择性捕获CO2和光催化还原CO2的能力. 在273 K和1个大气压条件下, 负载1 wt% 氮掺杂石墨烯泡沫的复合催化剂表现出最优异的性能, 其中对CO2和N2的吸附选择性为30.1, 并且对CO2的等量吸附热为48.2 kJ mol−1. 在无助催化剂和牺牲剂的条件下, 负载1 wt% 氮掺杂石墨烯泡沫的复合催化剂, 其光催化转化CO2为CH4、 CO和 CH3OH的效率分别是纯的硫化铟锌的9.1、 3.5和5.9倍. 该增强效应得益于三维石墨烯泡沫高度开放的网状结构, 良好的CO2吸附能力和两种组份之间的强相互作用. 此外, 利用原位照射X射线光电子能谱仪和开尔文探针技术分析了电荷转移的方向, 本工作为设计高效太阳能转化分等级异质结光催化剂开辟了新的思路.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51961135303, 51932007, 21871217 and U1705251), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFB1502001) and Innovative Research Funds of SKLWUT (2017-ZD-4).

Author contributions

Yu J, Liu G and Xia Y conceived and designed the experiments. Xia Y carried out the synthesis of the materials and photocatalytic test. Xia Y, Fan J and Cheng B performed the material characterizations. Xia Y, Yu J and Liu G contributed to data analysis. Yu J, Liu G and Cheng B supervised the project. Yu J, Liu G and Xia Y wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Supplementary material

40843_2019_1234_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (6.3 mb)
Near-infrared absorbing 2D/3D ZnIn2S4/N-doped graphene photocatalyst for highly efficient CO2 capture and photocatalytic reduction

References

  1. 1.
    Li X, Yu J, Jaroniec M, et al. Cocatalysts for selective photo-reduction of CO2 into solar fuels. Chem Rev, 2019, 119: 3962–4179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ran J, Jaroniec M, Qiao SZ. Cocatalysts in semiconductor-based photocatalytic CO2 reduction: achievements, challenges, and opportunities. Adv Mater, 2018, 30: 1704649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Han C, Li J, Ma Z, et al. Black phosphorus quantum dot/g-C3N4 composites for enhanced CO2 photoreduction to CO. Sci China Mater, 2018, 61: 1159–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Low J, Dai B, Tong T, et al. In situ irradiated X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy investigation on a direct Z-scheme TiO2/CdS composite film photocatalyst. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 1802981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cao S, Shen B, Tong T, et al. 2D/2D heterojunction of ultrathin MXene/Bi2WO6 nanosheets for improved photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Adv Funct Mater, 2018, 28: 1800136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Di T, Xu Q, Ho WK, et al. Review on metal sulphide-based Z-scheme photocatalysts. ChemCatChem, 2019, 11: 1394–1411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zhang N, Long R, Gao C, et al. Recent progress on advanced design for photoelectrochemical reduction of CO2 to fuels. Sci China Mater, 2018, 61: 771–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li P, Hou C, Zhang X, et al. Ethylenediamine-functionalized CdS/tetra(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin iron(III) chloride hybrid system for enhanced CO2 photoreduction. Appl Surf Sci, 2018, 459: 292–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou M, Wang S, Yang P, et al. Layered heterostructures of ultrathin polymeric carbon nitride and ZnIn2S4 nanosheets for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Chem Eur J, 2018, 24: 18529–18534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meng A, Zhang L, Cheng B, et al. TiO2−MnOx−Pt hybrid multi-heterojunction film photocatalyst with enhanced photocatalytic CO2-reduction activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11: 5581–5589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crake A, Christoforidis KC, Gregg A, et al. The effect of materials architecture in TiO2/MOF composites on CO2 photoreduction and charge transfer. Small, 2019, 15: 1805473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu S, Wilson AJ, Heo J, et al. Plasmonic control of multi-electron transfer and C-C coupling in visible-light-driven CO2 reduction on Au nanoparticles. Nano Lett, 2018, 18: 2189–2194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhou L, Xu YF, Chen BX, et al. Synthesis and photocatalytic application of stable lead-free Cs2AgBiBr6 perovskite nanocrystals. Small, 2018, 14: 1703762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Low J, Zhang L, Zhu B, et al. TiO2 photonic crystals with localized surface photothermal effect and enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction activity. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2018, 6: 15653–15661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Li X, Wen J, Low J, et al. Design and fabrication of semiconductor photocatalyst for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to solar fuel. Sci China Mater, 2014, 57: 70–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fu J, Zhu B, Jiang C, et al. Hierarchical porous O-doped g-C3N4 with enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction activity. Small, 2017, 13: 1603938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Low J, Zhang L, Tong T, et al. TiO2/MXene Ti3C2 composite with excellent photocatalytic CO2 reduction activity. J Catal, 2018, 361: 255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Di T, Zhang J, Cheng B, et al. Hierarchically nanostructured porous TiO2(B) with superior photocatalytic CO2 reduction activity. Sci China Chem, 2018, 61: 344–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang S, Xu M, Peng T, et al. Porous hypercrosslinked polymer-TiO2-graphene composite photocatalysts for visible-light-driven CO2 conversion. Nat Commun, 2019, 10: 676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pang R, Teramura K, Asakura H, et al. Highly selective photo-catalytic conversion of CO2 by water over Ag-loaded SrNb2O6 nanorods. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2017, 218: 770–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Raziq F, Sun L, Wang Y, et al. Synthesis of large surface-area g-C3N4 comodified with MnOx and Au-TiO2 as efficient visible-light photocatalysts for fuel production. Adv Energy Mater, 2018, 8: 1701580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thanh Truc NT, Hanh NT, Nguyen MV, et al. Novel direct Z-scheme Cu2V2O7/g-C3N4 for visible light photocatalytic conversion of CO2 into valuable fuels. Appl Surf Sci, 2018, 457: 968–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang S, Guan BY, Lou XWD. Construction of ZnIn2S4-In2O3 hierarchical tubular heterostructures for efficient CO2 photo-reduction. J Am Chem Soc, 2018, 140: 5037–5040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xu F, Zhu B, Cheng B, et al. 1D/2D TiO2/MoS2 hybrid nanostructures for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Adv Opt Mater, 2018, 6: 1800911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li H, Gao Y, Zhou Y, et al. Construction and nanoscale detection of interfacial charge transfer of elegant Z-scheme WO3/Au/In2S3 nanowire arrays. Nano Lett, 2016, 16: 5547–5552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    She H, Zhou H, Li L, et al. Construction of a two-dimensional composite derived from TiO2 and SnS2 for enhanced photocatalytic reduction of CO2 into CH4. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2018, 7: 650–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cho KM, Kim KH, Park K, et al. Amine-functionalized graphene/CdS composite for photocatalytic reduction of CO2. ACS Catal, 2017, 7: 7064–7069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhu Z, Han Y, Chen C, et al. Reduced graphene oxide-cadmium sulfide nanorods decorated with silver nanoparticles for efficient photocatalytic reduction carbon dioxide under visible light. ChemCatChem, 2018, 10: 1627–1634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fu ZC, Xu RC, Moore JT, et al. Highly efficient photocatalytic system constructed from CoP/carbon nanotubes or graphene for visible-light-driven CO2 reduction. Chem Eur J, 2018, 24: 4273–4278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang Y, Cai Q, Yao M, et al. Easy synthesis of ordered mesoporous carbon-carbon nanotube nanocomposite as a promising support for CO2 photoreduction. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2018, 6: 2529–2534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Li M, Wang M, Zhu L, et al. Facile microwave assisted synthesis of N-rich carbon quantum dots/dual-phase TiO2 heterostructured nanocomposites with high activity in CO2 photoreduction. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2018, 231: 269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kulandaivalu T, Abdul Rashid S, Sabli N, et al. Visible light assisted photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to ethane using CQDs/Cu2O nanocomposite photocatalyst. Diamond Related Mater, 2019, 91: 64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ye S, Feng J, Wu P. Deposition of three-dimensional graphene aerogel on nickel foam as a binder-free supercapacitor electrode. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2013, 5: 7122–7129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ren L, Hui KS, Hui KN. Self-assembled free-standing three-dimensional nickel nanoparticle/graphene aerogel for direct ethanol fuel cells. J Mater Chem A, 2013, 1: 5689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chen Z, Li H, Tian R, et al. Three dimensional graphene aerogels as binder-less, freestanding, elastic and high-performance electrodes for lithium-ion batteries. Sci Rep, 2016, 6: 27365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    He K, Chen G, Zeng G, et al. Three-dimensional graphene supported catalysts for organic dyes degradation. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2018, 228: 19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fan Y, Ma W, Han D, et al. Convenient recycling of 3D AgX/graphene aerogels (X = Br, Cl) for efficient photocatalytic degradation of water pollutants. Adv Mater, 2015, 27: 3767–3773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wan W, Lin Y, Prakash A, et al. Three-dimensional carbon-based architectures for oil remediation: from synthesis and modification to functionalization. J Mater Chem A, 2016, 4: 18687–18705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Hasani A, Sharifi Dehsari H, Amiri Zarandi A, et al. Visible light-assisted photoreduction of graphene oxide using CdS nanoparticles and gas sensing properties. J Nanomaterials, 2015, 2015: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Li L, He S, Liu M, et al. Three-dimensional mesoporous graphene aerogel-supported SnO2 nanocrystals for high-performance NO2 gas sensing at low temperature. Anal Chem, 2015, 87: 1638–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Song Z, Wei Z, Wang B, et al. Sensitive room-temperature H2S gas sensors employing SnO2 quantum wire/reduced graphene oxide nanocomposites. Chem Mater, 2016, 28: 1205–1212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Xia Y, Cui W, Zhang H, et al. Synthesis of three-dimensional graphene aerogel encapsulated n-octadecane for enhancing phase-change behavior and thermal conductivity. J Mater Chem A, 2017, 5: 15191–15199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Han W, Zang C, Huang Z, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic activities of three-dimensional graphene-based aerogel embedding TiO2 nanoparticles and loading MoS2 nanosheets as co-catalyst. Int J Hydrogen Energy, 2014, 39: 19502–19512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tong Z, Yang D, Shi J, et al. Three-dimensional porous aerogel constructed by g-C3N4 and graphene oxide nanosheets with excellent visible-light photocatalytic performance. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2015, 7: 25693–25701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Song X, Lin L, Rong M, et al. Mussel-inspired, ultralight, multi-functional 3D nitrogen-doped graphene aerogel. Carbon, 2014, 80: 174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhao Y, Xie X, Zhang J, et al. MoS2 nanosheets supported on 3D graphene aerogel as a highly efficient catalyst for hydrogen evolution. Chem Eur J, 2015, 21: 15908–15913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ding Y, Gao Y, Li Z. Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) and Co(dmgH)2PyCl synergistically promote photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over hexagonal ZnIn2S4. Appl Surf Sci, 2018, 462: 255–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ma J, Wang M, Lei G, et al. Polyaniline derived N-doped carbon-coated cobalt phosphide nanoparticles deposited on N-doped graphene as an efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction. Small, 2018, 14: 1702895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Liu B, Ren X, Chen L, et al. High efficient adsorption and storage of iodine on S, N co-doped graphene aerogel. J Hazard Mater, 2019, 373: 705–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Duan J, Chen S, Dai S, et al. Shape control of Mn3O4 nanoparticles on nitrogen-doped graphene for enhanced oxygen reduction activity. Adv Funct Mater, 2014, 24: 2072–2078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Zhao X, Wang Z, Xie Y, et al. Photocatalytic reduction of graphene oxide-TiO2 nanocomposites for improving resistive-switching memory behaviors. Small, 2018, 14: 1801325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Xia Y, Li Q, Lv K, et al. Heterojunction construction between TiO2 hollowsphere and ZnIn2S4 flower for photocatalysis application. Appl Surf Sci, 2017, 398: 81–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ye H, Wang H, Zhang B, et al. Tremella-like ZnIn2S4/graphene composite based photoelectrochemical sensor for sensitive detection of dopamine. Talanta, 2018, 186: 459–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kale SB, Kalubarme RS, Mahadadalkar MA, et al. Hierarchical 3D ZnIn2S4/graphene nano-heterostructures: their in situ fabrication with dual functionality in solar hydrogen production and as anodes for lithium ion batteries. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2015, 17: 31850–31861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Zou H, He B, Kuang P, et al. NixSy nanowalls/nitrogen-doped graphene foam is an efficient trifunctional catalyst for unassisted artificial photosynthesis. Adv Funct Mater, 2018, 28: 1706917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Xu D, Cheng B, Wang W, et al. Ag2CrO4/g-C3N4/graphene oxide ternary nanocomposite Z-scheme photocatalyst with enhanced CO2 reduction activity. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2018, 231: 368–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bin Z, Hui L. Three-dimensional porous graphene-Co3O4 nano-composites for high performance photocatalysts. Appl Surf Sci, 2015, 357: 439–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Jia L, Wang DH, Huang YX, et al. Highly durable N-doped graphene/CdS nanocomposites with enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution from water under visible light irradiation. J Phys Chem C, 2011, 115: 11466–11473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Chen D, Huang S, Huang R, et al. Electron beam-induced microstructural evolution of SnS2 quantum dots assembled on N-doped graphene nanosheets with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Adv Mater Interfaces, 2019, 6: 1801759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Qin W, Han L, Bi H, et al. Hydrogen storage in a chemical bond stabilized Co9S8-graphene layered structure. Nanoscale, 2015, 7: 20180–20187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Song Y, Bai S, Zhu L, et al. Tuning pseudocapacitance via C-S bonding in WS2 nanorods anchored on N,S codoped graphene for high-power lithium batteries. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2018, 10: 13606–13613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Wei D, Liu Y, Wang Y, et al. Synthesis of N-doped graphene by chemical vapor deposition and its electrical properties. Nano Lett, 2009, 9: 1752–1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Liu X, Dong G, Li S, et al. Direct observation of charge separation on anatase TiO2 crystals with selectively etched {001} facets. J Am Chem Soc, 2016, 138: 2917–2920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Xu F, Meng K, Cheng B, et al. Enhanced photocatalytic activity and selectivity for CO2 reduction over a TiO2 nanofibre mat using Ag and MgO as Bi-cocatalyst. ChemCatChem, 2019, 11: 465–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Luo C, Zhao J, Li Y, et al. Photocatalytic CO2 reduction over SrTiO3: Correlation between surface structure and activity. Appl Surf Sci, 2018, 447: 627–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zhou S, Shang L, Zhao Y, et al. Pd single-atom catalysts on nitrogen-doped graphene for the highly selective photothermal hydrogenation of acetylene to ethylene. Adv Mater, 2019, 31: 1900509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Choi HS, Jeon HJ, Choi JH, et al. Tailoring open metal sites for selective capture of CO2 in isostructural metalloporphyrin porous organic networks. Nanoscale, 2015, 7: 18923–18927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Zhao Z, Li Z, Lin YS. Adsorption and diffusion of carbon dioxide on metal-organic framework (MOF-5). Ind Eng Chem Res, 2009, 48: 10015–10020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wang J, Senkovska I, Oschatz M, et al. Imine-linked polymer-derived nitrogen-doped microporous carbons with excellent CO2 capture properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2013, 5: 3160–3167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    An L, Liu S, Wang L, et al. Novel nitrogen-doped porous carbons derived from graphene for effective CO2 capture. Ind Eng Chem Res, 2019, 58: 3349–3358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Chen J, Yang J, Hu G, et al. Enhanced CO2 capture capacity of nitrogen-doped biomass-derived porous carbons. ACS Sustain Chem Eng, 2016, 4: 1439–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Chandra V, Yu SU, Kim SH, et al. Highly selective CO2 capture on N-doped carbon produced by chemical activation of polypyrrole functionalized graphene sheets. Chem Commun, 2012, 48: 735–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Di T, Zhu B, Cheng B, et al. A direct Z-scheme g-C3N4/SnS2 photocatalyst with superior visible-light CO2 reduction performance. J Catal, 2017, 352: 532–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Meng A, Wu S, Cheng B, et al. Hierarchical TiO2/Ni(OH)2 composite fibers with enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction performance. J Mater Chem A, 2018, 6: 4729–4736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Xu F, Zhang J, Zhu B, et al. CuInS2 sensitized TiO2 hybrid nano-fibers for improved photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2018, 230: 194–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Liu J, Fang W, Wei Z, et al. Efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution on N-deficient g-C3N4 achieved by a molten salt post-treatment approach. Appl Catal B-Environ, 2018, 238: 465–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Jurca B, Bucur C, Primo A, et al. N-doped defective graphene from biomass as catalyst for CO2 hydrogenation to methane. Chem-CatChem, 2018, 3: cctc.201801984Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Xia (夏阳)
    • 1
  • Bei Cheng (程蓓)
    • 1
  • Jiajie Fan (范佳杰)
    • 2
  • Jiaguo Yu (余家国)
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Gang Liu (刘刚)
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Advanced Technology for Materials Synthesis and ProcessingWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.School of Materials Science and EngineeringZhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
  3. 3.CAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in NanoscienceNational Center for Nanoscience and TechnologyBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations