Biotechnology smart control over stem cell fate commitment at nanoscale
Highlights
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
- 80 Downloads
Download
to read the full article text
References
- 1.Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Oreffo ROC. Harnessing nanotopography and integrin–matrix interactions to influence stem cell fate. Nat Mater, 2014, 13: 558–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Chen CS. Geometric control of cell life and death. Science, 1997, 276: 1425–1428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.McMurray RJ, Gadegaard N, Tsimbouri PM, et al. Nanoscale surfaces for the long-term maintenance of mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multipotency. Nat Mater, 2011, 10: 637–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Das RK, Gocheva V, Hammink R, et al. Stress-stiffening-mediated stem-cell commitment switch in soft responsive hydrogels. Nat Mater, 2016, 15: 318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Chaudhuri O, Gu L, Klumpers D, et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat Mater, 2016, 15: 326–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Wei Y, Mo X, Zhang P, et al. Directing stem cell differentiation via electrochemical reversible switching between nanotubes and nanotips of polypyrrole array. ACS Nano, 2017, 11: 5915–5924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Gandhi MR, Murray P, Spinks GM, et al. Mechanism of electromechanical actuation in polypyrrole. Synth Met, 1995, 73: 247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Smela E. Conjugated polymer actuators for biomedical applications. Adv Mater, 2003, 15: 481–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Science China Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017