Advertisement

Journal of Religious Education

, Volume 66, Issue 3, pp 213–223 | Cite as

Teaching Scripture: moving towards a hermeneutical model for religious education in Australian Catholic Schools

  • Margaret Carswell
Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

In 2006 the Catholic Education Commission, Victoria, Australia, entered into an agreement with the Centre for Academic Teacher Training of the Faculty of Theology of the Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium, to conduct research which would frame the identity structure of Victorian Catholic schools (Pollefeyt and Bouwens in Int Stud Cathol Educ 2(2):193–211, 2010). As this agreement has now been extended to other dioceses in Australia, there is widespread interest in the project and in how to respond to its findings. Indeed, the finding that a disproportionate number of students are demonstrating strong fundamentalist belief has brought into sharp focus the very way that religious education is taught in Australia. Calls for a new, hermeneutical, model of religious education are loud and persuasive. But while dioceses search for religious education that emphasises dialogue, embraces religious pluralism and promotes active enquiry, this paper contends that they are overlooking a major impediment in the development of post-critical belief; theme or topic-based religious education curriculum programmes. This paper proposes two weaknesses inherent in this design model. First, in reducing Scripture to the role of validating or proving the predetermined theme Scripture is used in a manner that is a priori, an approach that, of itself, invites a literalist reading. Second, as the theme or topic is known by students at the outset of learning any interpretation by them is rendered unnecessary; passages mean what the theme teaches that they mean. These two realities, it will be argued, make theme or topic-based curriculum design incompatible with a hermeneutical approach to religious education. It is to be noted that this paper does not attempt to argue the existence of the practices described. This has been done elsewhere (Carswell in Rymarz and Belmonte (eds.) Religious education in Australian Catholic schools. Exploring the landscape, Garratt, Mulgrave, 2017, Br J Relig Educ 40(3): 288–297,  https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1493271, 2018). Rather, it offers only a summary of the problems associated with the placement of Scripture in theme-based curricula deliberately framed around Pollefeyt and Bouwens (Identity in dialogue. Assessing and enhancing the Catholic school identity. Research methodology and research results in Catholic schools in Victoria, Lit-Verlag, Hamburg, 2014) own concerns. It is hoped that, in responding to ECSI, dioceses in Australia will consider their use of theme-based religious education. This paper will conclude by outlining a new direction for religious education, one that allows Scripture to speak for itself.

Keywords

Religious education Literalism Scripture Catholic identity Catholic schools 

References

  1. Australian Episcopal Conference. (1970). The renewal of the education of faith: A translation of the original document from the Italian Episcopal Conference. Sydney: E.J. Dwyer.Google Scholar
  2. Bowie, R. A. (2017). Interpreting texts more wisely: A review of research and the case for change in English Religious Education. In J. Shortt & R. Stuart-Buttle (Eds.), Christian faith, formation and education (pp. 211–228). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Bowie, R. A., & Coles, R. (2018). ‘We reap what we sew: Perpetuating biblical illiteracy in new English Religious Studies exams and the proof text binary question. British Journal of Religious Education, 40(3), 277–287.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1493270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brisbane Catholic Education Office. (2018). Retrieved November 7, 2018, from https://curriculum.bne.catholic.edu.au/Curriculum/LearningArea?learningAreaName=Religious%20Education.
  5. Carswell, M. (1995). Educating into discipleship. Unpublished masters thesis, Australian Catholic University, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Carswell, M. F. (2006). Biblical metaphors for God in the primary Level of the Education Series ‘To Know Worship and Love’. Unpublished PhD thesis, Australian Catholic University, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  7. Carswell, M. F. (2017). Between desire and reality: The presentation of Scripture in religious education. In R. Rymarz & A. Belmonte (Eds.), Religious education in Australian catholic schools. Exploring the landscape. Mulgrave: Garratt.Google Scholar
  8. Carswell, M. F. (2018). Promoting fundamentalist belief? How Scripture is presented in three religious education programmes in Catholic primary schools in Australia and England and Wales. British Journal of Religious Education, 40(3), 288–297.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1493271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Duriez, B., Dezutter, J., Neyrinck, B., & Hutsebaut, D. (2007). An introduction to the Post-Critical Belief scale: Internal structure and external relationships. Psyke and Logos, 28, 767–793.Google Scholar
  10. Erdozain, L. (1983). The evolution of catechetics: A survey of six international study weeks on catechetics. In M. Warren (Ed.), Book for modern catechetics. Winona: Christian Brothers Press.Google Scholar
  11. Grace, M. J. (2003). The use of Scripture in the teaching of religious education in Victorian Catholic secondary schools. Unpublished PhD thesis, Australian Catholic University, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  12. Holm, J. (1983). Teaching religion in school. A practical approach. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Madgen, D. (1993). The use of the Bible in Australian Catholic primary school: A critical examination of approaches to teaching the Bible in curriculum documents used in Australian Catholic primary schools. Unpublished MEd thesis, University of South Australia.Google Scholar
  14. Pollefeyt, D., & Bieringer, R. (2005). The role of the Bible in Religious Education Reconsidered. Risks and challenges in teaching the Bible. International Journal of Practical Theology, 9, 117–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pollefeyt, D., Bouwens, J. (2009). The post-critical belief scale for dummies. Centre of Academic Teacher Training, Faculty of Theology, K.U. Leuven. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from http://www.schoolidentity.net/docs/The%20Post-Critical%20Belief%20Scale%20for%20dummies%20(EN)%20v1.2.pdf.
  16. Pollefeyt, D., & Bouwens, J. (2010). Framing the identity of Catholic Schools: Empirical methodology for quantitative research on the Catholic identity of and education institute. International Studies in Catholic Education, 2(2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pollefeyt, D., & Bouwens, J. (2014). Identity in Dialogue. Assessing and enhancing the Catholic school identity. Research methodology and research results in Catholic schools in Victoria. Hamburg: Lit-Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Pontifical Biblical Commission. (1993). The Interpretation of the Bible in the Church. Address of His Holiness John Paul II and Document of the Pontifical Biblical Commission. Rome: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.Google Scholar
  19. Stead, B. (1996). the influence of critical biblical study on the teaching and use of Scripture in Catholic schools in Victoria. Unpublished PhD thesis, La Trobe University, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  20. Wulff, D. M. (1991). Psychology and religion. Classic and contemporary views. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Australian Catholic University 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Catholic UniversityBallaratAustralia

Personalised recommendations