Advertisement

The Roles of Mn and Ni Additions to Fe-Contaminated Al in Neutralizing Fe and Stabilizing the Cellular α-Al Microstructure

  • Ricardo Oliveira
  • Rafael Kakitani
  • Lucas R. Ramos
  • Danilo L. Gonçalves
  • Amauri Garcia
  • Noé CheungEmail author
Research Article
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

The development of new Al-based alloys has included the addition of transition alloying elements in order to produce phases that are stable at high temperatures. Elements such as Mn, Cr, and V, can lead to supersaturated solid solutions in Al, and elements with low solubility and formers of eutectic systems (e.g., Ni, Fe, Ce) induce mechanical strengthening by the formation of higher fractions of intermetallics. Since Fe is the major impurity in commercial Al and an undesired element in its recycling, another positive effect of both Ni and Mn addition into Al alloys is related to the neutralization of Fe-compounds, known to be harmful to mechanical properties. Both Mn and Ni fulfill the requirements for high-temperature applications, but there is a lack of studies in the literature reporting the relation between microstructure and mechanical properties of Al–Mn–Ni alloys in the as-cast condition. In the present study, Al–1 wt% Mn–(1 wt% Ni) alloys are prepared using Fe-containing Al, which are subjected to directional solidification experiments with a view to producing castings under quite different solidification cooling rates (\({\dot{{T}}}\)) along their lengths. The effects of \({\dot{{T}}}\) on the morphology of the Al-rich matrix; its characteristic length scale; and composition of the IMCs formed are analyzed. The Al–1 wt% Ni alloy has an Al-rich matrix characterized by a dendritic morphology. However, it is shown that the addition of 1 wt% Mn induces the Al-rich matrix to assume the cellular morphology for \({\dot{{T}}}\) > 2.3 °C/s. The stabilization of cells for high cooling rates seems to be related to the crystalline structure of the alloying element. Power function experimental equations relating the cellular spacing (λC) of both Al–1 wt% Mn and Al–1 wt% Mn–1 wt% Ni alloys castings are derived, in which the ternary alloy is shown to have λC values about 30% lower than those of the binary alloy. A Hall–Petch-type equation is proposed relating the Vickers microhardness (HV) to λC for the ternary alloy. Moreover, the additions of Mn and Ni to the Fe-containing Al used in the preparation of the alloys seem to be beneficial in neutralizing Fe by forming the Al9(Mn,Fe)Ni IMC, in which Mn is replaced with Fe.

Keywords

Fe-contaminated Al Al–Mn–(Ni) alloys Solidification Cellular microstructure Intermetallics Microhardness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) and Student Support Service of UNICAMP (SAE) for their financial support.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conflicts of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu K, Chen XG (2015) Development of Al-Mn-Mg 3004 alloy for applications at elevated temperature via dispersoid strengthening. Mater Des 84:340–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fan Y, Huang K, Makhlouf MM (2015) Precipitation strengthening in Al-Ni-Mn alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 46:5830–5841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zolotorevsky VS, Belov NA, Glazoff MV (2007) Casting aluminum alloys, 1st edn. Elsevier Ltd, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dündar M, Günyüz M, Işiksaçan C, Pastirmaci A (2013) Effect of Zn content and process parameters on corrosion behaviour of twin-roll cast aluminum brazing alloys. In: Sadler BA (ed) Light metals 2013. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 361–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jaradeh MMR, Carlberg T (2011) Solidification studies of 3003 aluminium alloys with Cu and Zr additions. J Mater Sci Technol 27:615–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huang L, Huang G, Cao L, Wu X, Jia Z, Xia M, Liu Q (2017) Influence of pre-recovery on the subsequent recrystallization and mechanical properties of a twin-roll cast Al-Mn alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 682:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jia Z, Hu G, Forbord B, Solberg JK (2008) Enhancement of recrystallization resistance of Al-Zr-Mn by two-step precipitation annealing. Mater Sci Eng A 483–484:195–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mraied H, Cai W (2017) The effects of Mn concentration on the tribocorrosion resistance of Al-Mn alloys. Wear 380–381:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shaha SK, Czerwinski F, Kasprzak W, Friedman J, Chen DL (2016) Effect of Mn and heat treatment on improvements in static strength and low-cycle fatigue life of an Al-Si-Cu-Mg alloy. Mater Sci Eng A 657:441–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nam SW, Lee DH (2000) The effect of Mn on the mechanical behavior of Al alloys. Met Mater 6:13–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brunelli K, Peruzzo L, Dabalà M (2015) The effect of prolonged heat treatments on the microstructural evolution of Al/Ni intermetallic compounds in multi layered composites. Mater Chem Phys 149–150:350–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jackson KA, Hunt JD (1966) Lamellar and rod eutectic growth. Trans Metall Soc AIME 236:1129–1142Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Araujo IJC, Silva BL, Spinelli JE, Garcia A (2011) Evolution of eutectic spacing during unidirectional solidification of Al-Ni alloys. Mater Res 14:268–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Canté MV, Spinelli JE, Ferreira IL, Cheung N, Garcia A (2008) Microstructural development in Al-Ni alloys directionally solidified under unsteady-state conditions. Metall Mater Trans A 39:1712–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Karakulak E, Koç FG, Yamanoglu R, Zeren M (2016) Mechanical properties of hypoeutectic Al-Ni alloys with Al3Ni intermetallics. Mater Test 58:117–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Silva BL, Araujo IJC, Silva WS, Goulart PR, Garcia A, Spinelli JE (2011) Correlation between dendrite arm spacing and microhardness during unsteady-state directional solidification of Al-Ni alloys. Phil Mag Lett 91:337–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li M, Du S, Hou Y, Geng H, Jia P, Zhao D (2015) Study on liquid structure feature of Al100-xNix alloy with resistivity and rapid solidification method. J Non Cryst Solids 411:26–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang L, Gao J, Nana L, Damoah W, Robertson DG (2012) Removal of iron from aluminum: a review. Min Proc Extr Met Rev 33:99–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Puncreobutr C, Lee PD, Kareh KM, Connolley T, Fife JL, Phillion AB (2014) Influence of Fe-rich intermetallics on solidification defects in Al–Si–Cu alloys. Acta Mater 68:42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wu X, Zhang H, Ma Z, Tao T, Gui J, Song W, Yang B, Zhang H (2019) Interactions between Fe-rich intermetallics and Mg-Si phase in Al-7Si-xMg alloys. J Alloys Compd 786:205–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mohamed AMA, Samuel AM, Samuel FH, Doty HW (2009) Influence of additives on the microstructure and tensile properties of near-eutectic Al-10.8%Si cast alloy. Mater Des 30:3943–3957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Canté MV, Brito C, Spinelli JE, Garcia A (2013) Interrelation of cell spacing, intermetallic compounds and hardness on a directionally solidified Al-1.0Fe-1.0Ni alloy. Mater Des 51:342–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shabestari SG (2004) The effect of iron and manganese on the formation of intermetallic compounds in aluminum-silicon alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 383:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hwang JY, Doty HW, Kaufman MJ (2008) The effects of Mn additions on the microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-Si-Cu casting alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 488:496–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liu K, Chen XG (2017) Evolution of microstructure and elevated-temperature properties with Mn addition in Al-Mn-Mg alloys. J Mater Res 32:2585–2593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gaustad G, Olivetti E, Kirchain R (2012) Improving aluminum recycling: a survey of sorting and impurity removal technologies. Resour Conserv Recycl 58:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Böyük U, Engin S, Kaya H, Maraşlı N (2010) Effect of solidification parameters on the microstructure of Sn-3.7Ag-0.9Zn solder. Mater Charact 61:1260–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Acer E, Çardili E, Erol H, Kaya H, Gündüz M (2017) Effects of growth rates and compositions on dendrite arm spacings in directionally solidified Al-Zn alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 48:5911–5923CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Teng J, Liu S, Trivedi R (2009) Onset of sidewise instability and cell-dendrite transition in directional solidification. Acta Mater 57:3497–3508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Fu JW, Yang YS, Guo JJ, Tong WH (2008) Effect of cooling rate on solidification microstructures in AISI 304 stainless steel. Mater Sci Technol 24:941–944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brito C, Reinhart G, Nguyen-Thi H, Mangelinck-Noël N, Cheung N, Spinelli JE, Garcia A (2015) High cooling rate cells, dendrites, microstructural spacings and microhardness in a directionally solidified Al-Mg-Si alloy. J Alloys Compd 636:145–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Canté MV, Spinelli JE, Cheung N, Garcia A (2010) The correlation between dendritic microstructure and mechanical properties of directionally solidified hypoeutectic Al-Ni alloys. Met Mater Int 16:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Meza ES, Bertelli F, Goulart PR, Cheung N, Garcia A (2013) The effect of the growth rate on microsegregation: experimental investigation in hypoeutectic Al-Fe and Al-Cu alloys directionally solidified. J Alloys Compd 561:193–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Srivastava N, Chaudhari GP, Qian M (2017) Grain refinement of binary Al-Si, Al-Cu and Al-Ni alloys by ultrasonication. J Mater Process Technol 249:367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Duarte RN, Faria JD, Brito C, Veríssimo NC, Cheung N, Garcia A (2016) Length scale of the dendritic microstructure affecting tensile properties of Al-(Ag)-(Cu) alloys. Int J Mod Phys B 30:1550261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brito C, Costa TA, Vida TA, Bertelli F, Cheung N, Spinelli JE, Garcia A (2015) Characterization of dendritic microstructure, intermetallic phases, and hardness of directionally solidified Al-Mg and Al-Mg-Si alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 46:3342–3355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen Z, Wang E, Hao X (2016) Microstructure and orientation evolution in unidirectional solidified Al-Zn alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 667:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wang Z, Li J, Wang J (2011) Predicting growth direction of tilted dendritic arrays during directional solidification. J Cryst Growth 328:108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mao X, Li J, Fu H (1994) Effect of local solidification time on the dendrite-to-cell at high growth rates. Mater Sci Eng A 183:233–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Rocha OL, Siqueira CA, Garcia A (2003) Heat flow parameters affecting dendrite spacings during unsteady-state solidification of Sn-Pb and Al-Cu alloys. Metall Mater Trans A 34:995–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Pinto MA, Cheung N, Ierardi MCF, Garcia A (2003) Microstructural and hardness investigation of an aluminum-copper alloy processed by laser surface melting. Mater Charact 50:249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Spinelli JE, Cheung N, Garcia A (2011) On arrays models theoretical predictions versus measurements for the growth of cells and dendrites in the transient solidification of binary alloys. Phil Mag 91:1705–1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Chen X, Kiu H, Zhan Y, Tang H (2016) Microstructure optimization and mechanical properties of lightweight Al–Mg2Si in-situ composite. Int J Mater Res 107:842–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kakitani R, Cruz CB, Lima TS, Brito C, Garcia A, Cheung N (2019) Transient directional solidification of a eutectic Al–Si–Ni alloy: macrostructure, microstructure, dendritic growth and hardness. Materialia 7:100358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Khvan AV, Cheverikin VV, Dinsdale AT, Watson A, Levchenko VV, Zolotorevskiy VS (2015) Formation of metastable phases during solidification of Al-3.2 wt% Mn. J Alloys Compd 622:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Grushko B, Pavlyuchkov D, Mi SB, Balanetskyy S (2016) Ternary phases forming adjacent to Al3Mn-Al4Mn in Al-Mn-TM (TM = Fe Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Pd). J Alloys Compd 677:148–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Balanetskyy S, Meisterernst G, Feuerbacher M (2011) The Al-rich region of the Al-Mn-Ni alloy system. Part I: ternary phases at 750–950 °C. J Alloys Compd 509:3787–3794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Yu W, Hao Q, Fan L, Li J (2016) Eutectic solidification microstructure of an Al-4Ni-2Mn alloy. J Alloys Compd 688:798–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Balanetskyy S, Meisterernst G, Grushko B, Feuerbacher M (2011) The Al-rich region of the Al-Mn-Ni alloy system. Part II: phase equilibria at 620–1000°C. J Alloys Compd 509:3795–3805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Canté MV, Lima TS, Brito C, Garcia A, Cheung N, Spinelli JE (2018) An alternative to the recycling of Fe-contaminated Al. J Sustain Metall 4:412–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Silva BL, Garcia A, Spinelli JE (2012) The effects of microstructure and intermetallic phases of directionally solidified Al-Fe alloys on microhardness. Mater Lett 89:291–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Manufacturing and Materials EngineeringUniversity of Campinas - UNICAMPCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations