Advertisement

Diversification of the Ironmaking Process Toward the Long-Term Global Goal for Carbon Dioxide Mitigation

  • Tatsuro AriyamaEmail author
  • Koichi Takahashi
  • Yuki Kawashiri
  • Taihei Nouchi
Thematic Section: Sustainable Iron and Steelmaking
  • 87 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Sustainable Iron and Steelmaking

Abstract

The Paris Agreement declares to hold the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2 °C above pre-industrial levels and to pursue efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels in 2050. The agreement includes the commitment to deliver long-term low-carbon development strategies. Accordingly, global warming has been regarded as a crucial issue in every industry. Since the long-term target was set on the basis of the Paris Agreement, innovative technologies to realize CO2 mitigation in 2050 are desired, including in the steel industry. Until now, many various technology developments have been carried out in the ironmaking area; however, more advanced progress beyond the past progressive developments is required in order to attain the long-term target in 2050. In addition to modification of the current blast furnace process, the ironmaking process will be diversified, and new concepts such as CCU (CO2 Capture and Utilization) process in collaboration with chemical industry and hydrogen-based ironmaking utilizing CO2-free renewable energy aiming at CDA (Carbon Direct Avoidance) will be pursued in order to intensify CO2 mitigation. This review focuses on the evaluation of the current technology development to date and the design of an ambitious ironmaking process for the future.

Keywords

Ironmaking Carbon dioxide mitigation Blast furnace CO2 capture and utilization Hydrogen-based ironmaking 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to express our appreciation to the persons from the following projects for the permission to reprint figures of the project materials: Carbon2Chem, EUROFER, ULCOS, HYBRIT, H2FUTURE, LanzaTech, and SALCOS.

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    World Steel Association (2018) Word Steel in Figures 2018Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schenk J, Lüngen HB (2016) Evaluation of the capabilities of direct and smelting reduction processes to enhance the energy efficiency and to reduce the CO2 emission of the steel production in Europe. In: 7th European coke and ironmaking congress—ECIC 2016, Sept 12–14, 2016, Linz, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Millner R, Ofner H, Boehm C, Ripke SJ, Metius M (2017) Future of direct reduction in Europe-Medium and long-term perspective. In: European steel technology and application days 2017—3rd ESTAD 2017, June 26–29, 2017, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buergler T, Kofler I (2016) Direct reduction technology as a flexible tool to reduce the CO2 intensity of iron and steelmaking. In: 7th European Coke and Ironmaking Congress—ECIC 2016, Sept 12–14, 2016, Linz, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van der Stel J, Meijer K, Teehuis C, Zeijlstra C, Keilman G, Ouwehand M (2013) Update to the development of HIsarna—an ULCOS alternative ironmaking process. In: IEAGHG/IETS iron and steel industry CCUS and process integration workshop. Nov 4–7, 2013, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yi SH (2016) Updates on the FINEX, A commercially proven alternative ironmaking process. In: 7th European coke and ironmaking congress—ECIC 2016, Sept12–14, 2016, Linz, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Voestalpine AG, Primetals Technologies (2017) Opening of the HBI plant in Texan marks start of a new era at Voestalpine, MPT International, Feb, pp 30–32Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pauluzzi D, Martinis A, Martinez J (2016) High-carbon DRI the feeding material to improve performances and decrease CO2 emission in both BF and EAF. In: 7th European Coke and Ironmaking Congress—ECIC 2016, Sept.12–14, 2016, Linz, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jahanshahi S, Mathieson JG, Michael Somerville MA, Haque N, Norgate TE, Deev A, Pan Y, Xie D, Ridgeway P, Zulli P (2015) Development of low-emission integrated steelworks. J Sustain Metall 1:94–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ariyama T (2009) Future perspective on low carbon and decarbonizing in ironmaking process. Bull Iron Steel Int Jpn 14:781–789Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamamoto T, Sato T, Fujimoto H, Anyashiki T, Fukada K, Sato M, Takeda K, Ariyama T (2011) Reaction behavior of ferro coke and its evaluation in blast furnace. Tetsu-to-Hagané 97:501–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yatsuzuka T, Nakayama K, Ohmori K, Hara Y, Iguchi M (1972) Injection of reducing gas into blast furnace (FTG Process). Tetsu-to-Hagané 58:624–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nishio H, Miyashita T (1973) On the top gas recycled reforming processes and the injected gas distributions. Tetsu-to-Hagané 59:1506–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee MS (2013) CCU technology development in RIST. In: IEAGHG/IETS iron and steel industry CCUS and process integration workshop, Nov 4–7, 2013, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miyashita T, Nishio H, Shimotsuma T, Yamada T, Ohotsuki M (1972) Reducing gas injection into furnace stack in an experimental furnace. Tetsu-to-Hagané 58:608–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Birat JP, Lorrain JO, de Lassat Y (2009) The CO2 tool–CO2 emissions & energy consumption of existing & breakthrough steelmaking route. La Revue de Métallurgie CIT Sept, pp 325–335Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    van der Stel J, Louwerse G, Sert D, Hirsch A, Eklund N, Pettersson M (2013) Top gas recycling blast furnace developments for green and sustainable ironmaking. Ironmak Steelmak 40:483–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hirsch A, Korthas B, Hülstrung J, Grant M, Berthelemot A, Sert D, Hanrot F, Harp G, Adam J, van der Stel J, Hattink M, Jak H, Veerman A, Ansseau O, Danloy G, Küttner W, Eklund N, Pettersson M, Zuo G, Sköld BE, Sundqvist L, Simoes JP, Dimastromatteo V, Zagaria M, Babich A, Lin R, Feiterna A, Smith A, Bürgler T, Habemann A, Feilmayr C, Hitchinson C, Ritz V (2013) European Commission, research fund for coal and steel-new blast furnace process (ULCOS), 2013Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    van der Stel J, Hattink M, Zeilstra C, Louwersem G, Hirsch A, Janhsen U, Sert D, Grant M, Delebecque A, Diez-Brea P ,Adam J, Ansseau O, Feiterna A, Lin R, Zagaria AM, Küttner W, Schott R,Eklund N, Pettersson M, Boden A, Sköld BE, Sundqvist L, Simoes JP, Edberg N, Lövgren J, Bürgler T, Feilmayr C, Sihvonen M, Kerkkonen O, Babich A, Born S (2014) European Commission, research fund for coal and steel-ULCOS top gas recycling blast furnace process-final report, 2014Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fink F (1986) The floss furnace-A new concept to smelt iron in blast furnace. In: Proc European ironmaking conf VDEh, Düsseldorf, vol 3, pp 55–56Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Qin M, Yang N (1986) A blast furnace process with pulverized coal oxygen and gas circulation for reduction. Scan J Metall 15:138–142Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lu WK, Kumar RV (1984) The feasibility of nitrogen-free blast furnace operation. Trans Iron Steel Soc AIME 5:25–31Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ohno Y, Hotta K, Matsuura M, Mitsufuji H, Saito H (1989) Development of oxygen blast furnace process with pre-heated gas injection into upper shaft. Tetsu-to-Hagané 75:1278–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ohno Y, Matsuura M (1990) Heating-up and reduction characteristics of burdens in oxygen blast furnace process. Tetsu-to-Hagané 76:1262–1269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ohno Y, Matsuura M, Mitsufuji H, Furukawa T (1992) Process characteristics of a commercial-scale oxygen blast furnace process with shaft gas injection. ISIJ Int 32(1992):838–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Takahashi K, Nouchi T, Sato M, Ariyama T (2015) Perspective on progressive development of oxygen blast furnace for energy saving. ISIJ Int 55:1866–1875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sato M, Takahashi K, Nouchi T, Ariyama T (2015) Prediction of next-generation ironmaking process based on oxygen blast furnace suitable for CO2 mitigation and energy saving. ISIJ Int 55:2101–2114Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ariyama T, Sato M, Nouchi T, Takahashi K (2016) Evolution of blast furnace process toward reductant flexibility and carbon dioxide mitigation in steel works. ISIJ Int 56:1681–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    The European Steel Association EUROFER (2013) A steel roadmap for a low carbon Europe 2050Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    The Boston Consulting Group, The Steel Institute VDEh (2013) Steel’s contribution to a low carbon Europe 2050—technical and economic analysis of the sector’s abatement potential.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Achatz R, Oles M (2015) Chemische Verwertung von Hütten gasen. In: Aachen Stahlkolloqiom 2015, Sept 3–4, 2015, Aachen, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
    Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft: Press Information, Projektstart Carbon2Chem, June 27, 2016Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Max-Planck Institute für Chemische Energie Konversion: Pressemitteilung, June 27, 2016Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schmöle P (2016) The blast furnace-fit for the future? In: 7th European coke and ironmaking congress—ECIC 2016, Sept 12–14, 2016, Linz, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    DNV KEMA Energy & Sustainability (2013) Final report—systems analyses power to gas, Groningen 20, June 2013Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    van der Werf W (2014) Advanced fuels & chemicals from waste—waste in a circular economy joint workshop: AMF-IEA bioenergy infrastructure compatible fuels, May 20, 2014. Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Fleischanderl A, Plattenr T, Puschitz (2015) The circular economy: carbon recycling and the steel industry. European steel technology and application days 2015, METEC & 2nd ESTAD 2015, June 15–19, 2015, Düsseldorf, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Plattner T, Fleischnderl A, Haselgruebler M, de Mare C, van der Stricht W, Nair P, Wolf C (2017) Carbon recycling at its best utilization of by-products from process-gas fermentation. In: European steel technology and application days 2017, 3rd ESTAD 2017, June 26–29, 2017, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Fleischanderl A, Plattner T, Nair P, Schultz M (2016) Carbon recycling from metallurgical waste gases into bio-fuel and chemical. SCANMET V, June 5–6, 2016, Luleå, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    LanzaTech http ://www.lanzatech.com/ Accessed Sept. 16, 2018
  42. 42.
    Steelanol https://www.steelanol.eu/en/ Accessed Sept. 16 2018
  43. 43.
    Karsberg V, Lindblad E, Kryssare M SSAB, LKAB and Vattenfall to build a globally-unique pilot plant for fossil-free steel. HYBRIT press release, Feb 1, 2018Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tottie M (2016) HYBRIT-Iron ore to steel based on hydrogen. US Sweden Sustainable Agenda, Oct 14, 2016, Luleå, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    SSAB, LKAB, Vattenfall (2017) HYBRIT Fossil-free steel, Summary of findings from HYBRIT pre-feasibility study 2016-2017Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Verbund, Voestalpine, Siemmens (2017) European commission fund H2FUTURE project-Voestalpine, Siemens and Verbund are building a pilot facility for a green hydrogen at the Linz location. Press release, Feb 7, 2017, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zauner R (2017) Innovative use of clean hydrogen in an industrial application. In: The H2FUTURE project and the role of utilities Verbund AG presentation Apr 27, 2017Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    H2FUTURE https://www.h2future-project.eu/ Accessed Sept 16, 2018
  49. 49.
    Hille V (2017) Dekarbonisierung der Stahlproduktion durch siginifikanten Einsatz von Wassestoff-das Project SALCOS. VJK-Jahrestagung, Nov 21, 2017, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatsuro Ariyama
    • 1
    Email author
  • Koichi Takahashi
    • 2
  • Yuki Kawashiri
    • 2
  • Taihei Nouchi
    • 2
  1. 1.Tohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.Steel Research LaboratoryJFE Steel CorporationChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations