Advertisement

Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 823–828 | Cite as

Effects of the Addition Points of Reducing Agents on the Extraction of Copper and Cobalt from Oxidized Copper–Cobalt Ores

  • Steev Yav Tshipeng
  • Arthur TshamalaKaniki
  • Méschac-Bill KimeEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

One of the key issues facing cobalt producers is to effectively use reducing agents to maximize cobalt extraction while minimizing operating costs. In addition to reducing cobalt(III), reducing agents like sodium metabisulfite (SMBS) and sulfur dioxide may also react with previously dissolved elements such as copper and magnesium that precipitate. The amount of reducing agents could be optimized and the parasitic reactions reduced if the most suitable points of addition of the reducing agents during leaching are determined. In this study, leaching tests on oxidized copper–cobalt ore were performed in order to determine the effects of SMBS addition points on the extraction behaviors of copper and cobalt. SMBS was added to various aqueous solutions at time t = 0 and t = 3 h. Regardless of the addition period, results showed that the addition of SMBS significantly improved cobalt extraction. However, a little amount of loss of copper by precipitation was observed when SBMS was added at t = 3 h than at t = 0 h.

Keywords

Sodium metabisulfite Reducing agent Addition points Parasitic reactions Precipitation Copper Cobalt 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Tenke Fungurume mines for supplying the ore sample which was used in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Mwema MD, Mpoyo M, Kafumbila K (2002) Use of sulphur dioxide as reducing agent in cobalt leaching at Shituru hydrometallurgical plant. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 102(1):1–4Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kime MB, Makgoale D (2016) Characterization of copper–cobalt ores and quantification of Cu2+, Co2+, Co3+, and Fe3+ in aqueous leachates using UV–Visible spectrophotometry. Chem Eng Commun 203(12):1648–1655.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2016.1230102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ntakamutshi PT, Kime MB, Mwema ME, Ngenda BR, Kaniki TA (2017) Agitation and column leaching studies of oxidised copper–cobalt ores under reducing conditions. Miner Eng J 111:47–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2017.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferron CJ (2008) Sulfur dioxide: a versatile reagent for the processing of cobaltic oxide minerals. JOM 60(10):50–54.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-008-0136-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Seo SY, Choi WS, Kim MJ, Tran T (2012) Leaching of a Cu–Co ore from Congo using sulphuric acid—hydrogen peroxide leachants. J Min Metall Sect B 49(1):1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stuurman S, Ndlovu S, Sibanda V (2014) Comparing the extent of the dissolution of copper–cobalt ores from the DRC Region. J South Afr Inst Min Metall 114(4):347–353Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Das GK, de Lange JAB (2011) Reductive atmospheric acid leaching of West Australian smectitic nickel laterite in the presence of sulphur dioxide and copper(II). Hydrometallurgy 105(3–4):264–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Senanayake G, Childs J, Akerstrom BD, Pugaev D (2011) Reductive acid leaching of laterite and metal oxides—a review with new data for Fe(Ni, Co)OOH and a limonitic ore. Hydrometallurgy 110(1–4):13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Senanayake G, Das GK, de Lange A, Li J, Robinson DJ (2015) Reductive atmospheric acid leaching of lateritic smectite/nontronite ores in H2SO4/Cu(II)/SO2 solutions. Hydrometallurgy 152:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gorichev IG, Kipriyanow NA (1984) Regular kinetic features of the dissolution of metal oxides in acidic media. Russ Chem Rev 53(11):1039–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Senanayake G, Das GK (2004) A comparative study of leaching kinetics of limonitic laterite and synthetic iron oxides in sulfuric acid containing sulfur dioxide. Hydrometallurgy 72:59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringUniversity of LubumbashiLubumbashiDemocratic Republic of Congo
  2. 2.SGS Minerals RDC SPRLLubumbashiDemocratic Republic of Congo
  3. 3.Department of MetallurgyUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations