Shape Memory and Superelasticity

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 467–475 | Cite as

Stress- and Magnetic Field-Induced Martensitic Transformation at Cryogenic Temperatures in Fe–Mn–Al–Ni Shape Memory Alloys

  • Ji Xia
  • Xiao Xu
  • Atsushi Miyake
  • Yuta Kimura
  • Toshihiro Omori
  • Masashi Tokunaga
  • Ryosuke KainumaEmail author
Special Issue: ICFSMA 2016, Invited Paper


Stress-induced and magnetic-field-induced martensitic transformation behaviors at low temperatures were investigated for Fe–Mn–Al–Ni alloys. The magnetic-field-induced reverse martensitic transformation was directly observed by in situ optical microscopy. Magnetization measurements under pulsed magnetic fields up to 50 T were carried out at temperatures between 4.2 and 125 K on a single-crystal sample; full magnetic-field-induced reverse martensitic transformation was confirmed at all tested temperatures. Compression tests from 10 to 100 K were conducted on a single-crystal sample; full shape recovery was obtained at all tested temperatures. It was found that the temperature dependence of both the critical stress and critical magnetic field is small and that the transformation hysteresis is less sensitive to temperature even at cryogenic temperatures. The temperature dependence of entropy change during martensitic transformation up to 100 K was then derived using the Clausius–Clapeyron relation with critical stresses and magnetic fields.


Fe–Mn–Al–Ni Magnetic-field-induced transformation Stress-induced transformation Entropy change Clausius–Clapeyron relation In situ microstructure observation 



This study was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 15H05766) from the Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) and by a Grant for Excellent Graduate Schools, Tohoku University, MEXT, Japan. JX gratefully acknowledges the support of the Interdepartmental Doctoral Degree Program for Multi-dimensional Materials Science Leaders of Tohoku University.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (MOV 2156 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (MOV 1483 kb)

Supplementary material 3 (MOV 1786 kb)


  1. 1.
    Mohd Jani J, Leary M, Subic A, Gibson MA (2014) A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Mater Des 56:1078–1113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ando K, Omori T, Ohnuma I, Kainuma R, Ishida K (2009) Ferromagnetic to weak-magnetic transition accompanied by bcc to fcc transformation in Fe–Mn–Al alloy. Appl Phys Lett 95:212504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Omori T, Nagasako M, Okano M, Endo K, Kainuma R (2012) Microstructure and martensitic transformation in the Fe–Mn–Al–Ni shape memory alloy with B2-type coherent fine particles. Appl Phys Lett 101:231907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Omori T, Ando K, Okano M, Xu X, Tanaka Y, Ohnuma I, Kainuma R, Ishida K (2011) Superelastic effect in polycrystalline ferrous alloys. Science 333:68–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Omori T, Iwaizako H, Kainuma R (2016) Abnormal grain growth induced by cyclic heat treatment in Fe–Mn–Al–Ni superelastic alloy. Mater Des 101:263–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tseng LW, Ma J, Wang SJ, Karaman I, Kaya M, Luo ZP, Chumlyakov YI (2015) Superelastic response of a single crystalline Fe–Mn–Al–Ni shape memory alloy under tension and compression. Acta Mater 89:374–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sutou Y, Imano Y, Koeda N, Omori T, Kainuma R, Ishida K, Oikawa K (2004) Magnetic and martensitic transformations of Ni–Mn–X (X = In, Sn, Sb) ferromagnetic shape memory alloys. Appl Phys Lett 85:4358–4360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vollmer M, Segel C, Krooß P, Günther J, Tseng LW, Karaman I, Weidner A, Biermann H, Niendorf T (2015) On the effect of gamma phase formation on the pseudoelastic performance of polycrystalline Fe–Mn–Al–Ni shape memory alloys. Scr Mater 108:23–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vollmer M, Krooß P, Karaman I, Niendorf T (2017) On the effect of titanium on quenching sensitivity and pseudoelastic response in Fe–Mn–Al–Ni-base shape memory alloy. Scr Mater 126:20–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Omori T, Okano M, Kainuma R (2013) Effect of grain size on superelasticity in Fe–Mn–Al–Ni shape memory alloy wire. APL Mater 1:032103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vollmer M, Krooß P, Kriegel MJ, Klemm V, Somsen C, Ozcan H, Karaman I, Weidner A, Rafaja D, Biermann H, Niendorf T (2016) Cyclic degradation in bamboo-like Fe–Mn–Al–Ni shape memory alloys—the role of grain orientation. Scr Mater 114:156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tseng LW, Ma J, Wang SJ, Karaman I, Chumlyakov YI (2016) Effects of crystallographic orientation on the superelastic response of FeMnAlNi single crystals. Scr Mater 116:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tseng LW, Ma J, Hornbuckle BC, Karaman I, Thompson GB, Luo ZP, Chumlyakov YI (2015) The effect of precipitates on the superelastic response of [1 0 0] oriented FeMnAlNi single crystals under compression. Acta Mater 97:234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    La Roca P, Baruj A, Sobrero CE, Malarría JA, Sade M (2017) Nanoprecipitation effects on phase stability of Fe–Mn–Al–Ni alloys. J Alloys Compd 708:422–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Katakura I, Tokunaga M, Matsuo A, Kawaguchi K, Kindo K, Hitomi M, Akahoshi D, Kuwahara H (2010) Development of high-speed polarizing imaging system for operation in high pulsed magnetic field. Rev Sci Instrum 81:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kindo K (2001) 100 T magnet developed in Osaka. Physica B 294–295:585–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Delaey L, Krishnan RV, Tas H, Warlimont H (1974) Thermoelasticity, pseudoelasticity and the memory effects associated with martensitic transformations. J Mater Res 9:1521–1535Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ito W, Ito K, Umetsu RY, Kainuma R, Koyama K, Watanabe K, Fujita A, Oikawa K, Ishida K, Kanomata T (2008) Kinetic arrest of martensitic transformation in the NiCoMnIn metamagnetic shape memory alloy. Appl Phys Lett 92:2006–2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Niitsu K, Xu X, Umetsu RY, Kainuma R (2013) Stress-induced transformations at low temperatures in a Ni45Co5Mn36In14 metamagnetic shape memory alloy. Appl Phys Lett 103:242406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ozcan H, Ma J, Wang SJ, Karaman I, Chumlyakov YI, Brown J, Noebe RD (2017) Effects of cyclic heat treatment and aging on superelasticity in oligocrystalline Fe–Mn–Al–Ni shape memory alloy wires. Scr Mater 134:66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Niitsu K, Omori T, Kainuma R (2013) Stress-induced transformation behaviors at low temperatures in Ti–51.8Ni (at.%) shape memory alloy. Appl Phys Lett 102:231915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wollants P, De Bonte M, Roos JR (1979) Thermodynamic analysis of the stress-induced martensitic-transformation in a single-crystal. Z Metallk 70:113–117Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Otsuka K, Wayman CM, Nakai K, Sakamoto H, Shimizu K (1976) Superelasticity effects and stress-induced martensitic transformations in Cu–Al–Ni alloys. Acta Metall 24:207–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xia J, Xu X, Omori T, Kainuma R (2017) Entropy change during bcc/fcc martensitic transformation in Fe-Mn-Al-Ni shape memory alloy. In: International conference on martensitic transformations (ICOMAT 2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ASM International 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ji Xia
    • 1
  • Xiao Xu
    • 1
  • Atsushi Miyake
    • 2
  • Yuta Kimura
    • 1
  • Toshihiro Omori
    • 1
  • Masashi Tokunaga
    • 2
  • Ryosuke Kainuma
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science, Graduate School of EngineeringTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  2. 2.International MegaGauss Science Laboratory, Institute for Solid State PhysicsThe University of TokyoChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations