Motives behind voting and the perception of the motives: paradox of voting in Bosnia and Herzegovina
- 11 Downloads
The prosperity of developing countries highly depends on the voting outcomes, as they represent the key to economic and social progress. However, there is limited evidence on what motivates people to vote. Moreover, their reasons for voting go beyond material self-interest, which is the conventional assumption. As the expected benefit from voting is rather small compared to the time cost and effort, there has been a need for better understanding of the phenomenon. Thus, the theory of expressive voting provides an alternative to the rational voter hypothesis. Due to its complex political system, Bosnia and Herzegovina is an interesting example of a developing country, which is why it was chosen for this study. The latest local elections were organized in 2016 and the present paper examines the perception of voters and tries to answer the question of why people voted the way they did, and why they think others voted as they did. A convenient sample of 406 citizens from Bosnia and Herzegovina completed the survey. Although there is little chance that one vote would influence the election, the strongest reason for voting was to affect the results. The reasons “it is a democratic obligation to vote” and “to express the political view by voting” were also mostly considered as important or very important. People perceived not voting as unethical. This perception was stronger among left-wing voters. The results also showed that people generally believe that they vote less selfishly than others. The majority of the respondents considered selfish voting as unethical or very unethical. The study also describes the influence of socio-demographic variables on the reasons and motives for voting and on the perception of selfish voting and not voting. The method was replicated from a study conducted in Sweden by Carlsson and Johansson-Stenman (Kyklos 63:495–516, 2010). The results of both studies are compared.
KeywordsExpressive voting Elections Economic development
JEL ClassificationD72 F63 O12
This paper was elaborated within the framework of Masaryk University Specific Research Project MUNI/A/1021/2015.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2015). Women and men in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Thematic Bulletin. http://www.bhas.ba/tematskibilteni/TB_zene_i_muskarci_bh_2015_eng.pdf. Retrieved 20 Dec 2016.
- Agency for Statistics of Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2016). Cenzus of population households and dwellings in Bosnia and Herzegovina 2013—final results. http://www.popis2013.ba/popis2013/doc/Popis2013prvoIzdanje.pdf. Retrieved 20 Dec 2016.
- Analitika-Center for Social Research. (2014). Survey results: A high level of distrust in political parties and government institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Fact Sheet. http://www.analitika.ba/en/publications/survey-results-high-level-distrust-political-parties-and-government-institutions-bosnia. Retrieved 20 Dec 2016.
- Desilver, D. (2014). The politics of American generations: How age affects attitudes and voting behaviour. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/07/09/the-politics-of-american-generations-how-age-affects-attitudes-and-voting-behavior/. Retrieved 23 Dec 2016.
- Dickson, S. (2017). Observation of local elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina (2 October 2016). Congress of Local and Regional Authorities-Council of Europe. Retrieved from: https://rm.coe.int/16806fe048.
- Falks, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2016). The preference survey module: a validated instrument for measuring risk, time, and social preferences. Netspar Discussion Paper No. 01/2016-003. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2725874 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2725874.
- Galais, C., & Blais, S. (2015). Do people feel more of a duty to vote in some elections?. West European Politics, 39(4), 755–777. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2015.1104994.
- Global Security. (2013). BiH-political parties. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/call/call_98-18_apb.htm. Retrieved 20 Dec 2016.
- Global Security. (2017). Political parties. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/report/call/call_98-18_apb.htm. Retrieved 20 Dec 2016.
- Hooper, A. (2015). Dissatisfied voters and no alternative: The unchallenged position of political elites in Bosnia and Herzegovina. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. https://search.proquest.com/openview/44b806442b66bc8d3f66ee153a0f3b36/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y. Retrieved 23 Dec 2016.
- Huskic, A. (2014). Elections in Bosnia and Herzegovina: A revolution, evolution or stagnation? Contemporary Southeastern Europe, 1(2), 99–109.Google Scholar
- Lilyanova, V. (2015). Bosnia and Herzegovina: Political parties (At a Glance No. PE 568.324). European Parliament. Retrieved from European Parliamentary Research Service website: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/search.html?word=Bosnia+and+Herzegovina. Retrieved 20 Dec 2016.
- Minkler, A.P. (1997). The problem with utility: Towards a non-consequentialist/utility theory synthesis. Economics Working Papers. 199709. http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/econ_wpapers/199709. Retrieved 15 Nov 2016.
- Nardelli, A., Dzidic, D., & Jukic, E. (2014). Bosnia and Herzegovina: The world’s most complicated system of government? The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/oct/08/bosnia-herzegovina-elections-the-worlds-most-complicated-system-of-government. Retrieved 23 Dec 2016.
- Pasic, L. (2016). The 2016 local elections in Bosnia: A win for the major ethno-nationalist parties. Balkanalysis. http://www.balkanalysis.com/blog/2016/10/04/the-2016-local-elections-in-bosnia-a-win-for-the-major-ethno-nationalist-parties/. Retrieved 20 Dec 2016.
- Rasmussen, A. W. (2017). “As long as they are not shooting…”: Political culture and participation in Bosnia–Herzegovina. Balkan Diskurs. http://www.balkandiskurs.com/en/2017/05/27/as-long-as-they-are-not-shooting-political-culture-and-participation-in-bosnia-herzegovina/. Retrieved 20 Dec 2016.
- Somun-Krupalija, L. (2011). Gender and employment in Bosnia and Herzegovina—A country study. International Labour Organization. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—dgreports/—gender/documents/publication/wcms_170832.pdf. Retrieved 21 Dec 2016.
- United Nations. (1995). Dayton agreement: general framework agreement for peace in Bosnia and Herzegovina. http://peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/BA_951121_DaytonAgreement.pdf. Retrieved 21 Dec 2016.
- Veličković, M. (2014). Parties, elections, parliaments: Women in politics in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Human Rights Papers. http://soc.ba/site/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/marina_eng.pdf. Retrieved 21 Dec 2016.