Advertisement

Eurasian Business Review

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 361–381 | Cite as

Financial constraints and productivity growth across the size spectrum: microeconomic evidence from Morocco

  • Anna M. FerraginaEmail author
  • Fernanda Mazzotta
  • Khalid Sekkat
Original Paper

Abstract

To what extent do financial constraints act as conditioning factors on firm productivity? Is this impact different across firm size classes and across sectors and in what way is it different? We explore these issues for Morocco. We use firm level data, taken from two surveys of the World Bank Enterprise Surveys (WES) for Morocco (2004, 2007), to investigate the relationship between two proxies of a firm’s financial constraint (perceived financial constraint as the most serious obstacle and credit constraint) and its productivity growth. The analytical framework assumes a Cobb–Douglas production function for firms where technical progress is not exogenous but depends on financial constraint. Two different econometric estimates are adopted: within estimators and GMM system estimates to address endogeneity and to correct for potential selection, simultaneity and omitted-variable bias (OVB). The estimations using the GMM give results that are consistent with the expectations: they show that each of the two financial constraint proxies has a significant and negative impact on small- and medium-sized firms (i.e. firms with less than 100 workers) but not on large firms (i.e. firms with more than 100 workers). To see whether the main results of the analysis persist (i.e. credit constraints harm small-sized firms more than large-sized firms) several robustness checks are performed. We change the threshold of the separation between small- and large-sized firms from 100 to 50 workers. We keep the threshold at 100 but exclude alternatively small-sized firms that are too small (less than 20 workers) and the large-sized firms that are too large (more than 500 workers). We keep the threshold to 100 and the whole sample but add a control variable which gives the legal status of the firm. Finally, we examine the sensitivity of the results to the sectoral composition of the sample. The main result holds for all sectors except “Wearing apparel”.

Keywords

Productivity Cash flow Financial constraints SMEs Morocco 

JEL Classification

O12 O53 O52 D24 G32 

References

  1. African Development Bank (2015). Morocco economic competitiveness support programme (Pacem) Appraisal Report, OSGE Department, June.Google Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., Fally, T., & Scarpetta, S. (2007). Credit constraints as a barrier to the entry and post entry growth of firms. Economic Policy, 22, 731–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelini, P., & Generale, A. (2005). Firm size distribution: do financial constraints explain it all? Evidence from survey data. Working paper no. 549, Banca D’Italia.Google Scholar
  4. Bartel, A. P., & Lichtenberg, F. R. (1987). The comparative advantage of educated workers in implementing new technology. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumol, W. J. (2010). The microtheory of innovative entrepreneurship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Becchetti, L., & Trovato, G. (2002). The determinants of growth of small and medium sized firms. The role of the availability of external finance. Small Bus Econ, 19(4), 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beck, T., & Demirgüç-Kunt, A. (2006). Small and medium-size enterprises, access to finance as growth constraint. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30, 2931–2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Laeven, L. and Levine, R. (2005). Finance, firm size, and growth, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3485, The World Bank.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, T., Büyükkarabacak, B., Rioja, F. K., & Valev, N. T. (2012). Who gets the credit? And does it matter? Household vs. firm lending across countries. B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics, 12(1), 2. doi: 10.1515/1935-1690.2262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berger, A., Miller, N., Petersen, M., Raghuram, R., & Stein, J. (2005). Does function follow organizational form? Evidence from the lending practices of large and small banks. Journal of Financial Economics, 76(2), 237–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Binks, M., & Ennew, C. (1996). Growing firms and the credit constraint. Small Business Economics, 8(1), 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter, R. E., & Peterson, B. C. (2002). Is the growth of small firms constrained by internal finance? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 298–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaffai, M., Landivar, D., and Plane, P. (2011). Financial constraints and productivity under unobserved heterogeneity of the technology: An application to the moroccan garment sector using latent class stochastic frontier models, CERDI Working Paper.Google Scholar
  14. Chen, M., & Guariglia, A. (2013). Internal financial constraints and firm productivity in China: Do liquidity and export behavior make a difference? Journal of Comparative Economics, 41, 1123–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen-Cole, E. B., Durlauf, S. N., & Rondina, G. (2012). Nonlinearities in growth: From evidence to policy. Journal of Macroeconomics, 34(1), 42–58. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coricelli, F., Driffield, N., Sarmistha, P., & Roland, I. (2012). When does leverage hurt productivity growth? A firm-level analysis. Journal of International Money and Finance, 31, 1674–1694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Durlauf, S., Johnson, P., & Temple, J. (2005). Growth econometrics. In P. Aghion, S. Durlauf (Eds.), Handbook of economic growth (pp. 555–677). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  18. Elston, J. A., Chen, S., & Weidinger, A. (2016). The role of informal capital on new venture formation and growth in China. Small Business Economics, 46(1), 79–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fafchamps, M., & El Hamine, S. (2005). The manufacturing sector in Morocco. Report submitted to the World Bank.Google Scholar
  20. Fafchamps, M., & Schündeln, M. (2013). Local financial development and firm performance: Evidence from Morocco. Journal of Development Economics, 103(C), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fazzari, S. M., Hubbard, R., Glenn, P., & Bruce, C. (1988). Financing constraints and corporate investment. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 141–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferrando, A., & Ruggieri, A. (2015). Financial constraints and productivity: evidence from Euro area companies, ECB WP, n. 1823/July.Google Scholar
  23. Gatti, R., & Love, I. (2008). Does access to credit improve productivity? Evidence from Bulgaria. Economics of Transition, 16, 445–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenaway, D., Hine, R., & Wright, P. (1999). An empirical assessment of the impact of trade on employment in the UK. European Journal of Political Economy, 15(3), 485–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guariglia, A. (2008). Internal financial constraints, external financial constraints, and investment choice: evidence from a panel of UK firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32, 1795–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. King, R., & Levine, R. (1993). Finance and growth: Schumpeter might be right. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 717–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levine, O., & Warasawitharana, M. (2014). Finance and productivity growth: Firm level evidence, finance and economics DP, Federal Reserve Board, No. 2014-17.Google Scholar
  28. Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 317–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporation finance and the theory of investment. The American Economic Review, 48(3), 261–297.Google Scholar
  30. Moreno-Badia, M., & Slootmaekers, V. (2009). The missing link between financial constraints and productivity. Working paper WP/09/72. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  31. Murray, M. P. (2006). Avoiding invalid instruments and coping with weak instruments. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(4), 111–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nickell, S., & Nicolitsas, D. (1999). How does financial pressure affect firms? European Economic Review, 43, 1435–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nucci, F., Pozzolo, A. F., & Schivardi, F. (2005). Is firm’s productivity related to its financial structure? Evidence from microeconomic data (pp. 177–298). I-II: Rivista di Politica Economica.Google Scholar
  34. Nunes, P. M., Sequeira, T. N., & Serrasqueiro, Z. (2007). Firms’ leverage and labor productivity: a quantile approach in Portuguese firms. Applied Economics, 39, 1783–1788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ogane, Y. (2016). Banking relationship numbers and new business bankruptcies. Small Business Economics, 46(2), 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olley, G. S., & Pakes, A. (1996). The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry. Econometrica, 64, 1263–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. M. (2002). Does distance still matter? The information revolution in small business lending. Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2533–2570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pushner, G. M. (1995). Equity ownership structure, leverage, and productivity: empirical evidence from Japan. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 3, 241–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Quatraro, F., & Vivarelli, M. (2015). Drivers of entrepreneurship and post-entry performance of newborn firms in developing countries. World Bank Research Observer, 30(2), 277–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Quinn, S. (2009). Moroccan Company law reform and manufacturing firms. Oxford: Department of Economics, Oxford University.Google Scholar
  41. Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (1998). Financial dependence and growth. American Economic Review, 88(3), 559–586.Google Scholar
  42. Rajesh Raj, S. N., & Sen, K. (2013). How important are credit constraints for small firm growth? Evidence from the Indian Informal Manufacturing Sector, International Growth Centre, Working paper reference number: F-35041-INC-1, 1 February 2013.Google Scholar
  43. Sargan, J. D. (1958). The estimation of economic relationships with instrumental variables. Econometrica, 26(3), 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schiantarelli, F., & Sembenelli, A. (1997). The maturity structure of debt—determinants and effects on firms’ performance: Evidence from the United Kingdom and Italy. Policy Research Working Paper WPS1699. The World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  45. Sekkat, K. (2009). Does competition improve productivity in developing countries? Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 12(2), 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sekkat, K. (2011). Firm sponsored training and productivity in Morocco. Journal of Development Studies, 47(9), 1391–1409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Staiger, D., & Stock, J. H. (1997). Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica, 65(3), 557–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.Google Scholar
  49. The World Bank Enterprise Surveys. http://www.enterprisesurveys.org.
  50. Ur Rehman, N. (2016). Network alliances and firms’ performance: a panel data analysis of Pakistani SMEs. Eurasian Business Review, 6(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vinh Vo, X., Huan Nguyen, H., & Duy Pham, K. (2016). Financial structure and economic growth: the case of Vietnam. Eurasian Business Review, 6(2), 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. World Bank. (2006). Fostering higher growth and employment in the Kingdom of Morocco: a World Bank country study. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. World Bank (2012) Progress report for the Kingdom of Morocco for the period FY1O-13, May 15, 2012. Report No. 67694-MA, International Bank For Reconstruction And Development And International Finance Corporation, Country Partnership Strategy.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Eurasia Business and Economics Society 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna M. Ferragina
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fernanda Mazzotta
    • 1
  • Khalid Sekkat
    • 2
  1. 1.DISES, CELPE, FEMISE, University of SalernoFiscianoItaly
  2. 2.Centre Emile BernheimUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations