In Situ Synthesis of Fluorescent Mesoporous Silica–Carbon Dot Nanohybrids Featuring Folate Receptor-Overexpressing Cancer Cell Targeting and Drug Delivery
- 286 Downloads
A one-pot method was developed for the preparation of fluorescent mesoporous silica nanoparticles–carbon dots (MSNs–CDs) nanohybrid.
The MSNs–CDs nanohybrid showed stable and bright yellow emission, excellent biocompatibility, and specific targeting capability toward folate receptor-overexpressing cancer cells and can be applied as fluorescence imaging-guided drug carriers for effectively delivering anticancer drugs to tumor sites.
KeywordsMesoporous silica nanoparticles Carbon dots Fluorescence imaging Targeted drug delivery Chemotherapy
Cancer has become one of the most severe public health problems globally . Currently, chemotherapy is still the major treatment of choice in most cases . However, systemic toxicity, nonspecific interactions, and multidrug resistance are unavoidable, leading to serious side effects . To depress the toxic side effects and simultaneously enhance the therapeutic efficacy, the utilization of targeted drug delivery systems (DDSs) has attracted broad attention [4, 5, 6, 7]. In the past few years, various nanomaterials, including micelles [8, 9], liposomes [10, 11], viruses [12, 13], and capsules [14, 15], with good biodegradability and facile functionalization have been designed as DDSs to target cancer cells. However, these nanomaterials tend to suffer from various biochemical attacks and bioerosion, such as enzymatic degradation, on account of their inherent instability in vivo [16, 17, 18].
Among various nanomaterial-based DDSs, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (MSNs) have been well demonstrated as excellent carriers for intracellular drug delivery owing to their unique properties, including mesoporous structure, large specific surface area, and pore volume, as well as high biochemical and physicochemical stability, facile surface functionalization, and excellent biocompatibility in particular [19, 20, 21, 22]. To further improve their therapeutic efficacy, endowing the DDSs with diagnostic and targeting capabilities has recently been an important issue [23, 24, 25, 26]. On the one hand, optical imaging has numerous advantages (e.g., noninvasiveness, high contrast, high sensitivity, and controllable targeting) in comparison with other traditional imaging techniques [27, 28, 29, 30]. In recent years, fluorescent MSNs have emerged as an important classification of MSNs, which have been fabricated as multifunctional nanoplatforms and demonstrated great potential in biosensing, bioimaging, and drug delivery [31, 32, 33]. In most cases, fluorescent MSNs were prepared by covalently linking organic dyes to the nanoparticles [15, 34]. Organic dyes, however, exhibit inherent limitations of easy photobleaching and complicated synthesis processes . Besides this, semiconductor quantum dots (QDs) and lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) have also been adopted to synthesize fluorescent MSNs [36, 37, 38]. Unfortunately, the highly toxic metal ions in these inorganic phosphor-based fluorescent MSNs are always a great concern and thus limit their further biomedical applications . Therefore, the development of new methods for the facile preparation of fluorescent MSNs that feature high photostability and low toxicity is still highly desirable. On the other hand, in order to increase the local concentration of drugs at the tumor site and reduce side effects, the direct conjugation of MSNs with targeting ligands [5, 40, 41], such as proteins, peptides, and folic acid (FA), is a common approach. However, these methods usually require specialized molecular designs, tedious synthesis steps, and complicated purification procedures . Thus, it is also significant to design novel nanocarriers with facile synthesis procedures and excellent targeting capability.
Carbon dots (CDs), new type of fluorescent carbon-based nanomaterials, have received much attention in recent years [43, 44, 45, 46]. Compared with organic dyes, semiconductor QDs, and UCNPs, CDs possess many unique properties, including facile preparation, excellent water solubility, tunable emission, high photostability, and excellent biocompatibility [47, 48, 49, 50]. Given these superior properties, CDs have been used to prepare fluorescent MSNs and applied for biosensing, bioimaging, drug delivery, and therapy [14, 51, 52]. In addition, it is well known that folate receptors (FRs) are overexpressed on the surface of certain human cancerous cells, and thus, FA has been frequently employed to conjugate with fluorescent dyes and nanoparticles for selectively imaging and targeting cancer cells [41, 53, 54]. Moreover, we noticed that FA had been used as a carbon source to prepare CDs [55, 56] that showed the capability for selectively targeting FR-overexpressing cancer cells, indicating that FA could retain its function for FR recognition even after undergoing solvothermal carbonization treatment.
Inspired by these above findings, herein, a facile in situ method for the preparation of a fluorescent MSNs–CDs nanohybrid was developed via the solvothermal reaction between FA and amino-functionalized MSNs. Hydrofluoric acid etching of the MSNs confirmed the formation of CDs under the reaction conditions. Not only were the as-prepared fluorescent MSNs–CDs observed to show strong and stable yellow emission, but the unique features of the MSNs (e.g., mesoporous structure and large specific surface area and pore volume) were also retained, indicating the capability of the nanohybrid as an imaging-guided carrier for delivering anticancer drugs (e.g., doxorubicin (DOX)). More specifically, the MSNs–CDs nanohybrid also holds specificity for selectively targeting FR-overexpressing cancer cells (e.g., HeLa cells), implying its potential to enhance the chemotherapeutic efficacy of anticancer drugs and reduce side effects.
2.1 Materials and Instrumentations
All chemicals were purchased from commercial sources and were used without further purification. Tetraethoxysilane (TEOS), ethanol, ammonium chloride (38% aqueous solution), and cetanecyl trimethyl ammonium chloride (CTAC) were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). N-[3-(Trimethoxysilyl)propyl] ethylenediamine (TMS-EDA), triethanolamine (TEA), FA, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), DOX, Hoechst 33258, and 3-(4,5-dimethyl-2-thiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-2-H-tetrazolium bromide (MTT) were purchased from Aladdin Chemistry Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Human cervical cancer cells (HeLa), human breast cancer cells (MCF-7), human lung adenocarcinoma cells (A549), and mouse fibroblast cells (L929) were purchased from the cell bank of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Shanghai Branch). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was procured from PAN-Seratech (Aidenbach, Germany). Penicillin–streptomycin and trypsin–EDTA were acquired from KeyGEN BioTECH Corp., Ltd. (Jiangsu, China). All aqueous solutions were prepared using deionized water.
The MDS-6G microwave chemical reactor (SMART, Sineo Microwave Chemistry Technology, Shanghai, China) was used to synthesize the MSNs–CDs nanohybrid. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was performed to observe the morphology of the nanoparticles, using a Tecnai F20 electron microscope with an acceleration voltage of 200 kV. Specific surface areas were calculated by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller method, and the pore size distributions were calculated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) model. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out on a Perkin-Elmer Pyris Diamond TG/DTA instrument, from room temperature to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 under N2 atmosphere. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were obtained on a Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrometer. Fluorescence spectra were measured on a Hitachi F-4600 spectrophotometer. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was performed on an Axis Ultra DLD spectrograph with Al/Kα as the source. Hydrodynamic size distributions and zeta potentials were measured through dynamic light scattering (DLS) equipment (Malvern Zetasizer Nano ZS) at room temperature. Small-angle X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns were recorded on a Rigaku D/max-2000 X-ray powder diffractometer (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) using Cu/Kα (1.5405 Å) radiation. A microplate reader (iMark 168-1130, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) was applied for the MTT assay. Cell images were taken with a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM, TSCSPS II, Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).
2.2 Synthesis of Amino-Modified MSNs (MSNs–NH2)
The MSNs were prepared by following a previously reported procedure . In brief, CTAC (0.5 g) and TEA (0.2 g) were dissolved in 20 mL of distilled water at 95 °C under a 400 rpm stirring rate for 1 h. Then, 1.5 mL of TEOS was added at a speed of 1 mL min−1. After continuous stirring for 1 h, the MSNs were collected by centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 30 min and then washed three times with ethanol and water. To remove the CTAC surfactant, the as-synthesized MSNs were dispersed under ultrasound for 20 min in an ammonium chloride–ethanol solution (4 mg mL−1) and then heated to reflux for 12 h. The pure MSNs were then obtained by centrifugation, washed three times with ethanol and water, and finally redispersed in ethanol for further use. The surface modification of amino functional groups on the MSNs was carried out according to our previous report . In brief, 50 mg of MSNs and 5 mL of TMS-EDA were dispersed in 20 mL of ethanol, and then, the mixture was heated and refluxed for 4 h. After cooling to room temperature, the mixture was centrifuged and washed three times with ethanol and water.
2.3 Synthesis of the MSNs–CDs Nanohybrid
The fluorescent MSNs–CDs nanohybrid was prepared through a one-pot solvothermal reaction using FA and MSNs–NH2. In brief, 40 mg of FA was dissolved in 40 mL of DMSO and stirred for 1 h, following which 100 mg of MSNs–NH2 was added. After ultrasonication for 30 min, the mixture was subjected to microwave heating at 180 °C for 30 min. Then, the reaction mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 30 min and the precipitates were collected. After that, the precipitates were washed three times with DMSO and ethanol, respectively, and the MSNs–CDs nanohybrid was finally harvested and redispersed in ethanol for further use.
2.4 DOX Loading Onto and Release from MSNs–CDs
In brief, 4 mg of MSNs–CDs was dispersed in 4 mL of phosphate-buffered solution (PBS) (pH 7.4, 10 mM) in which 2 mg of DOX was dissolved. The mixture was shaken for 24 h at room temperature. The precipitate of MSNs–CDs@DOX was collected by centrifugation and washed three times with PBS buffer to remove free DOX molecules. The DOX loading capacity was calculated from the UV–Vis absorption values. The amounts of DOX released from the MSNs–CDs at two pH values (5.5 and 7.4) were evaluated. In brief, 2 mg of MSNs–CDs@DOX was dispersed in 4 mL of PBS buffer (pH 5.5 and 7.4) and the suspension was shaken at 37 °C. The mixture was refreshed at each run for 2 h, and the supernatant was collected for absorbance measurement to calculate the DOX release efficiency.
2.5 Cell Culture and Cytotoxicity Assay of MSNs–CDs
HeLa, MCF-7, and A549 cells were cultured in DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. L929 cells were cultured in DMEM containing 15% FBS and 1% penicillin–streptomycin in a 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2. To evaluate the biocompatibility of the MSNs–CDs nanohybrid, a cytotoxicity test was carried out, respectively, with HeLa, MCF-7, A549, and L929 cells, using the standard MTT assay. Typically, 100 μL of cells at a density of 1 × 105 cells mL−1 was seeded into each well of a 96-well plate and allowed to adhere overnight. Five replicate wells were used for each control and tested concentrations. After culturing in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 24 h, the culture medium was discarded and the cells were then cultured with 100 μL of DMEM containing various concentrations of MSNs–CDs (0, 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 μg mL−1) for 24 h. After that, 10 μL of MTT (5.0 mg mL−1 in PBS) was added into each well and the culture was incubated for another 4 h. Then, the culture medium was removed and 100 μL of DMSO was added to the cells to dissolve the colored formazan. Finally, the absorption intensities of these samples were recorded using a microplate reader at a wavelength of 550 nm.
2.6 Cell-Targeting Study of MSNs–CDs
To evaluate the targeting capability of the MSNs–CDs nanohybrid toward different types of cells, the samples were incubated, respectively, with HeLa, MCF-7, A549, and L929 cells and then visualized by CLSM imaging. For all cell staining experiments, the cells were seeded in glass culture dishes at a density of 5 × 104 cells mL−1 and cultured in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 24 h. The live cells were then incubated with 200 μg mL−1 of MSNs–CDs (dispersed in culture medium) for 4 h and thereafter stained with 5.0 μg mL−1 of Hoechst 33258 stain for 30 min. After that, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. Finally, the samples were rinsed three times with PBS buffer before CLSM imaging. The excitation wavelength was 488 nm, and the fluorescence emission was collected from 500 to 600 nm. To quantitatively evaluate the targeting capability of the MSNs–CDs nanohybrid toward different types of cells, the fluorescence intensities of the samples were also analyzed by flow cytometry.
In order to confirm the effect of FR-mediated cell uptake on the targeting capability of the MSNs–CDs nanohybrid, the cells were treated with excess FA prior to their treatment with MSNs–CDs. HeLa cells were seeded in a glass culture dish at an initial density of 5 × 104 cells mL−1 and cultured in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 24 h. The live cells were then incubated with culture medium containing excess free FA for 2 h. Then, the culture medium was removed and the live cells were incubated with 200 μg mL−1 of MSNs–CDs for 4 h, following which they were stained with 5.0 μg mL−1 of Hoechst 33258 for 30 min. After that, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. Finally, the samples were rinsed three times with PBS buffer before CLSM imaging.
2.7 Therapeutic Efficacy of MSNs–CDs@DOX
To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the DOX-loaded MSNs–CDs against cancer cells, free DOX and MSNs–CDs@DOX were subjected to the standard MTT assay, respectively. Typically, 100 μL of HeLa cells at a density of 1 × 105 cells mL−1 was seeded into each well of a 96-well plate and allowed to adhere overnight. Five replicate wells were used for each control and tested concentration. After cell culture in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C for 24 h, the culture medium was discarded, and the cells were treated with another 100 μL of DMEM containing MSNs–CDs@DOX at a concentration range of 0–100 μg mL−1 and equivalent concentration of free DOX for 24 h. At the end of the incubation, 10 μL of MTT (5.0 mg mL−1) was added into each well and the culture was incubated for another 4 h. The culture medium was then removed and 100 μL of DMSO was added to the cells dissolve the colored formazan. Finally, the absorption intensities of these samples were recorded using a microplate reader at 550 nm. The therapeutic efficacies of the MSNs–CDs@DOX against MCF-7 and L929 cells were tested in the same way as done for the HeLa cells.
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Design and Preparation of Fluorescent MSNs–CDs Nanohybrid
3.2 Characterization of the MSNs, MSNs–NH2, and MSNs–CDs
3.3 Drug Loading and Release Properties of MSNs–CDs
3.4 Cancer Cell-Targeting Capability of MSNs–CDs
To demonstrate whether the MSNs–CDs could selectively target FR-overexpressing cancer cells, the above-mentioned four types of cells were, respectively, stained with the nanohybrid. Figure 4b shows the results of confocal fluorescence imaging, where remarkable differences among the four types of cells were observed. Specifically, the brightest fluorescence intensity was observed from the HeLa cells, which was attributed to their overexpression of the FRs and consequently effective surface binding and uptake by the cells via the close rapport between the FA and FRs . The MCF-7 cells showed relatively weaker fluorescence than that of the HeLa cells, which is in good accordance with their medium or low FR expression. The A549 cells, however, are known to be deficient in FR expression and thus exhibited almost no fluorescence . In addition, the normal L929 cells also displayed very weak fluorescence, indicating weakly expressed FRs on this kind of cell. To further confirm these results, quantitative analyses were performed using flow cytometry. The blank groups of the four types of cells showed similar and low fluorescence intensities (represented by the red dotted lines in Fig. 4c). After being, respectively, stained with the MSNs–CDs, the experimental group of HeLa cells showed the highest peak shift in fluorescence intensity, followed by the experimental groups of MCF-7 cells, L929 cells, and A549 cells (Fig. 4c). The flow cytometry data were most consistent with the confocal cellular imaging results. These studies evidenced that the efficiency of cells for MSNs–CDs uptake is FR expression dependent, that is, the MSNs–CDs were able to selectively target FR-overexpressing cancer cells.
3.5 Cancer Cell Therapeutic Efficacy of DOX-Loaded MSNs–CDs
In summary, a novel one-pot and in situ method for the preparation of fluorescent MSNs–CDs nanohybrid was developed through the solvothermal treatment of FA and amino-modified MSNs in this study. The nanohybrid not only shows stable and bright yellow emission but also retains the superior features of MSNs. Interestingly, the nanohybrid holds specific targeting capability toward FR-overexpressing cancer cells (e.g., HeLa cells) owing to the FA function-alike structure of the CDs on the MSNs, demonstrating its potential application as a nanocarrier for effectively delivering drugs to tumor sites and consequently enhancing the chemotherapeutic effects while reducing side effects. Moreover, the strong and stable emission from the CDs on the MSNs means that the nanohybrid fulfills imaging-guided drug delivery by real-time fluorescence tracking. Finally, it is worth noting that the as-prepared nanohybrid showed only superior performance for imaging-guided drug delivery to FR-overexpressing cancer cells (i.e., HeLa cells). Our ongoing work is focusing on using the developed strategy to prepare other MSNs–CDs systems that can target other kinds of cancer cells, with potential applications for cancer treatment in vivo.
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51872300 and U1832110), Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau (2016C50009), and the W.C. Wong Education Foundation (rczx0800).
- 8.L. Cheng, W.W. He, H. Gong, C. Wang, Q. Chen, Z.P. Cheng, Z. Liu, PEGylated micelle nanoparticles encapsulating a non-fluorescent near-infrared organic dye as a safe and highly-effective photothermal agent for in vivo cancer therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23(47), 5893–5902 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201301045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.J. Kim, H.R. Cho, H. Jeon, D. Kim, C. Song, N. Lee, S.H. Choi, T. Hyeon, Continuous O2-evolving MnFe2O4 nanoparticle-anchored mesoporous silica nanoparticles for efficient photodynamic therapy in hypoxic cancer. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(32), 10992–10995 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b05559 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.A. Bernardos, L. Mondragon, E. Aznar, M.D. Marcos, R. Martinez-Manez, F. Sancenon, J. Soto, J.M. Barat, E. Perez-Paya, C. Guillem, P. Amoros, Enzyme-responsive intracellular controlled release using nanometric silica mesoporous supports capped with “saccharides”. ACS Nano 4(11), 6353–6368 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn101499d CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.C.H. Lee, S.H. Cheng, I.P. Huang, J.S. Souris, C.S. Yang, C.Y. Mou, L.W. Lo, Intracellular pH-responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticles for the controlled release of anticancer chemotherapeutics. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49(44), 8214–8219 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201002639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.J. Yu, X. Diao, X. Zhang, X. Chen, X. Hao, W. Li, X. Zhang, C.S. Lee, Water-dispersible, pH-stable and highly-luminescent organic dye nanoparticles with amplified emissions for in vitro and in vivo bioimaging. Small 10(6), 1125–1132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201302230 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.J. Li, F. Liu, Q. Shao, Y. Min, M. Costa, E.K. Yeow, B. Xing, Enzyme-responsive cell-penetrating peptide conjugated mesoporous silica quantum dot nanocarriers for controlled release of nucleus-targeted drug molecules and real-time intracellular fluorescence imaging of tumor cells. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 3(8), 1230–1239 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201300613 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Y. Zhang, Y. Shen, X. Teng, M. Yan, H. Bi, P.C. Morais, Mitochondria-targeting nanoplatform with fluorescent carbon dots for long time imaging and magnetic field-enhanced cellular uptake. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7(19), 10201–10212 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b00405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 48.L. Pan, S. Sun, A. Zhang, K. Jiang, L. Zhang, C. Dong, Q. Huang, A. Wu, H. Lin, Truly fluorescent excitation-dependent carbon dots and their applications in multicolor cellular imaging and multidimensional sensing. Adv. Mater. 27(47), 7782–7787 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503821 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 51.Z. Liu, X. Chen, X. Zhang, J.J. Gooding, Y. Zhou, Carbon-quantum-dots-loaded mesoporous silica nanocarriers with pH-switchable zwitterionic surface and enzyme-responsive pore-cap for targeted imaging and drug delivery to tumor. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 5(12), 1401–1407 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201600002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 52.H. Wang, K. Wang, B. Tian, R. Revia, Q.X. Mu, M. Jeon, F.C. Chang, M.Q. Zhang, Preloading of hydrophobic anticancer drug into multifunctional nanocarrier for multimodal imaging, NIR-responsive drug release, and synergistic therapy. Small 12(46), 6388–6397 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201602263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.