Nano-Micro Letters

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 12–16 | Cite as

Rational Design of WO3 Nanostructures as the Anode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries with Enhanced Electrochemical Performance

  • Yang Liu
  • Yang Jiao
  • Haiyue Zhou
  • Xiang Yu
  • Fengyu Qu
  • Xiang Wu
Open Access


A facile, one-step hydrothermal method was employed to synthesize two kinds of WO3 nanostructures. By using different kinds of sylvine, tungsten trioxide (WO3) with different morphologies of microflowers and nanowires was obtained, respectively. The discharge capacities for microflowers and nanowires are 107 and 146 mAh g−1 after 180 cycles, and their corresponding capacity retentions after the first cycle are 72 and 85 %, respectively. Even at a high current density of 1,600 mAh g−1, the discharge capacities of WO3 microflowers and nanowires are as high as 433 and 557 mAh g−1 after 40 cycles, in which the current densities were increased stepwise. It is worth mentioned that the rate capability of the nanowires is superior to that of the microflowers. However, the cycle performance of the microflowers is better than nanowires, revealing that the morphology and structure of the as-synthesized WO3 products can exert great influence on the electrochemical performances.


WO3 nanostructures Anode materials Li-ion batteries 

1 Introduction

In the past few years, owing to the development of new type energy materials, more and more researchers devote their efforts to investigate high-performance power sources with higher power and energy densities for long time operation, i.e., lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and supercapacitors (SCs) [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Especially, the LIBs are obviously superior to the supercapacitors in aspect of energy storage due to the higher energy density [10, 11, 12]. Moreover, as one of the most important low-cost, light-weight, highly efficient, and environmentally friendly rechargeable power sources for consumer electronic products, LIBs have attracted worldwide attentions because of the increasing concerns about energy and environmental problems. Therefore, more and more efforts are devoted to develop high performance and miniaturization LIBs [13, 14, 15].

It is well known that the electrode materials correlate to the performance of lithium-ion batteries, which is strongly influenced by the sort and the structure of a material [16, 17, 18]. Hence, to rational design and synthesize semiconductor nanostructures with desired structures and shapes are a very important task. As an important n-type semiconductor, tungsten trioxide (WO3) has received a lot of attentions in recent years due to its attractive physiochemical properties and extensive potential applications [19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24].

In this paper, we developed a simple hydrothermal strategy to design and fabricate WO3 nanostructures with two different morphologies and investigated their electrochemical performance as anode materials for LIBs. The rate capability of the WO3 nanowires was found to be superior to that of the microflowers. However, the cycle performance of the microflowers is better than that of the nanoribbons, revealing the morphology and structure of the as-obtained product might exert great influence on their electrochemical performances.

2 Experimental

All chemicals used are analytical grade without further purification. In a typical procedure to prepare WO3 microflowers, 12.5 mmol Na2WO4·2H2O was added to 100 mL deionized water. After being stirred for 20 min at room temperature, 3 M HCl was added dropwise to the solution until the pH reached 12, and a yellow transparent solution was formed. Subsequently, 35 mL H2C2O4 was added in the above solution with continuous stirring, and then the solution was diluted to 250 mL.

After that 1.0 g of KCl was added into above 20 mL solution with stirring, followed by transferred into a 40 mL Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave, and the autoclave was sealed and maintained at 180 °C for 16 h. After the solution was cooled down to room temperature naturally, the as-prepared yellow precipitation was rinsed extensively with deionized water and ethanol, and finally dried in air at room temperature for further characterization. WO3 nanowires were synthesized through the same method except 1.0 g of K2SO4 was added instead of KCl.

3 Results and Discussion

The morphology and size of the as-product were first characterized by field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM). A survey view at low magnification (Fig. 1a) reveals that the sample is composed of uniform flower-like microspheres with diameters of ~5 μm. A high-magnification SEM image of a microflower (Fig. 1b) clearly presents that the flower-like nanostructures are assembled from many nanowires with average length of hundreds of nanometers.
Fig. 1

SEM images of the as-synthesized WO3 microflowers (ab) and nanowires (cd) at different magnifications

When using K2SO4 to replace KCl with other parameters constant, some nanowires were formed. From Fig. 1c, it can be observed that these nanowires possess a certain orientation, and their average lengths are more than 10 μm. Further observation (Fig. 1d) found that each nanowire has a smooth and uniform surface.

The phase and purity of the products were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD). Figure 2a illustrates the typical diffraction pattern of the microflowers assembled from many nanowires, and all the peaks can be well indexed to the hexagonal WO3 structure (JCPDS card NO. 33–1387). No characteristic peaks for other impurities are observed, revealing the high purity of the prepared WO3 microflowers. At the same time, each WO3 contains 0.33 water of crystallization, which should come from hydrothermal process and could be removed by calcination. Figure 2b shows XRD pattern of the nanowires. All diffraction peaks match well with the standard JCPDS card (no. 85–2460). XRD measurements show that there are no secondary phases or residuals of tungsten. The sharp and strong peaks indicate that WO3 nanowires have good crystal quality. The lattice parameters are calculated (a = 7.334 Å, c = 7.658 Å) and are consistent with the standard values.
Fig. 2

XRD pattern of a WO3 microflowers and b WO3 nanowires

To investigate the practical applications of the as-synthesized two WO3 nanostructures as the anode materials for the LIBs, a series of electrochemical measurements were conducted. The cycling performance of two structures at a current density of 200 mA g−1 with a voltage range of 0.01–3.00 V over 180 cycles is presented in Fig. 3. The first specific discharge capacities of WO3 microflowers and nanowires reach 718.8 and 664.3 mAh g−1, respectively. It can be identified that both WO3 microflowers and nanowires electrodes show a relatively high initial irreversible capacity loss of about 72 and 85 %, respectively, which can probably be attributed to the reduction of WO3 to W and some side reactions such as formation of the solid-electrolyte interface [25]. It is worth noting that neither microflowers nor nanowires electrodes have large loss of capacity from the second loop. It is apparent that both two samples demonstrate comparably good capacity retention upon extended cycling up to 180 charge/discharge cycles, and the discharge capacity of WO3 microflowers electrode is 549.8 mAh g−1, while the discharge capacity for the nanowires electrode is about 503.9 mAh g−1 after 180 cycles, and the values shown by the as-prepared WO3 nanostructure electrodes are higher than that of graphite (372 mAh g−1) [26, 27]. This result indicates that WO3 nanostructures are promising as anode materials for Li-ion batteries. Besides, the results also demonstrate that the reversible capacity of the microflowers is higher than that of nanowires. Furthermore, the cycle stability of the microflowers is higher than nanowires since 110th cycle, demonstrating that the morphology and the particle size of the as-prepared product have great influence on the electrode performance.
Fig. 3

Cycle performances of WO3 microflowers and nanowires at 200 mA g−1 in the voltage range of 0.01–3 V

To compare the capacitive performance of the as-synthesized WO3 microflowers and nanowires with the previous work [28], a comparsion is made, as shown in Table 1. Obviously, WO3 microflowers and nanowires electrodes exhibit the outstanding capacitive properties than that of SnO2 nanoparticles.
Table 1

A comparison of cycle performances of WO3 microflowers, nanowires with SnO2 microflowers

Electrode types

WO3 microflowers

WO3 nanowires

SnO2 nanoparticles

Initial discharge capacities

718.8 mAh g−1

664.3 mAh g−1

664.3 mAh g−1

Final discharge capacities

549.8 mAh g−1

503.9 mAh g−1

664.3 mAh g−1

Capacity retention

76.4 %

75.8 %

28.8 %

The rate performances of the as-obtained WO3 microflowers and nanowires are also studied, as shown in Fig. 4. WO3 microflowers deliver reversible capacities of 591.6, 510.9, 478.8, and 441.4 mAh g−1 at high current densities of 200, 400, 800, and 1,600 mA g−1, respectively. In addition, after the current rate returning to 200 mA g−1, the electrode delivers a specific discharge capacity of about 502.9 mAh g−1. Upon an increase in the discharge rates to 200, 400, 800, and 1,600 mA g−1, the reversible capacities of WO3 nanowires are maintained at 504.9, 464.6, 450.2, and 435.9 mAh g−1, respectively. After the current rate returns to 200 mA g−1, the nanowires electrode delivers a specific discharge capacity of ~503.4 mAh g−1. From the above results, we can see that when returning to the current density of 200 mAh g−1 the capacity of microflowers is less than the initial value, but the capacity of the nanowires almost has no change. This may be attributed to the volume change of the microflowers during the charging and discharging process at large current density. Obviously, WO3 nanowires exhibited better rate performance than the microflowers.
Fig. 4

Rate performances at various currents of WO3 microflowers and nanowires in the voltage range of 0.01–3 V

Electrochemical measurement results indicated that at least two processes occur for Li+ intercalation into WO3 nanostructures: a fast Li+ insertion between WO3 layers and a subsequent slow diffusion and residence of Li+ in the interlayer spacing. Li+ insertion process occurs in a disorder way and leads to decreased interlayer distance. The slower process causes two dimensional relaxation of the structure within WO3 layers. During lithium insertion, tungsten was reduced from high valence to lower oxidation state, resulting in an increase in its coordination number and changes in cell parameters. Significant alteration in crystal structure may be induced if large amount of lithium ions are inserted. The reaction mechanism for WO3/Li cell can be described as follows:
WO 3 + 6Li + + 6 e - W + 3Li 2 O
W + 3Li 2 O WO 3 + 6Li + + 6 e -

Such good rate capability and reversibility of WO3 microflowers and nanowires can be attributed to the superior uniform structures and small size of the products that reduce lithium ion diffusion distance and facilitate rapid lithium ion diffusion. Nanoscale particles are able to diffuse much more easily and have better accommodation of structural strain for the electrochemical reaction of lithium, resulting in improving the electrochemical performance. Similar case has also been encountered in the SnO2/α-MoO3 core–shell nanobelts and hierarchical WO3 flowers [29, 30]. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that small size effect of WO3 nanostructures, arising from an increased total number of surface atoms, can greatly increase the electrochemical reactivity and make the conversion between Li+ and Li2O reversible [31, 32].

4 Conclusion

In conclusion, WO3 microflowers and nanowires have been successfully synthesized through a facile hydrothermal process. Potassium salt plays an important role in adjusting the morphology of the products. The as-prepared two WO3 structures show significantly improved cycle lives and rate performance due to their unique structures.



This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Heilongjiang Provincial Education Department (12531179) and Program for Scientific and Technological Innovation Team Construction in Universities of Heilongjiang (No. 2011TD010).


  1. 1.
    Y. Liu, Y. Jiao, Z.L. Zhang, F.Y. Qu, A. Umar, X. Wu, Hierarchical SnO2 nanostructures made of intermingled ultrathin nanosheets for environmental remediation, smart gas sensor and supercapacitor applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6(3), 2174–2184 (2014). doi: 10.1021/am405301vCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G.H. Yu, L.B. Hu, N. Liu, H.L. Wang, M. Vosgueritchian, Y. Yang, Y. Cui, Z.N. Bao, Enhancing the supercapacitor performance of graphene/MnO2 nanostructured electrodes by conductive wrapping. Nano Lett. 11(10), 4438–4442 (2011). doi: 10.1021/nl2026635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Y.T. Han, X. Wu, Y.L. Ma, L.H. Gong, F.Y. Qu, H.J. Fan, Porous SnO2 nanowire bundles for photocatalyst and Li ion battery applications. Cryst EngComm. 13(11), 3506–3510 (2011). doi: 10.1039/c1ce05171gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. Liu, Y. Jiao, S.W. Zhang, B.S. Yin, F.Y. Qu, X. Wu, SnO2 core-shell microspheres as the superior anode materials for Li-ion batteries. Sci. Adv. Mater. 6(6), 1184–1187 (2014). doi: 10.1166/sam.2014.1910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    W.F. Wei, X.W. Cui, W.X. Chen, D.G. Ivey, Manganese oxide-based materials as electrochemical supercapacitor electrodes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40(3), 1697–1721 (2011). doi: 10.1039/c0cs00127aCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.R. Zhu, X.H. Xia, J.L. Liu, Z.X. Fan, D.L. Chao, H. Zhang, H.J. Fan, TiO2 nanotube@SnO2 nanoflake core-branch arrays for lithium-ion battery anode. Nano Energy 4, 105–112 (2014). doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.12.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.S. Luo, J.L. Liu, Z.Y. Zeng, C.F. Ng, L.J. Ma, H. Zhang, J.Y. Lin, Z.X. Shen, H.J. Fan, Three-dimensional graphene foam supported Fe3O4 lithium battery anodes with long cycle life and high rate capability. Nano Lett. 13(12), 6136–6143 (2013). doi: 10.1021/nl403461nCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.P. Liu, J. Jiang, C.W. Cheng, H.X. Li, J.X. Zhang, H. Gong, H.J. Fan, Co3O4 nanowire@MnO2 ultrathin nanosheet core-shell arrays: a new class of high-performance pseudocapacitive materials. Adv. Mater. 23(18), 2076–2081 (2011). doi: 10.1002/adma.201100058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L.N. Gao, F.Y. Qu, X. Wu, Reduced graphene oxide-BiVO4 composite for enhanced photoelectrochemical cell and photocatalyst. Sci. Adv. Mater. 5(10), 1485–1492 (2013). doi: 10.1166/sam.2013.1609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Frenzel, P. Kurzweil, H. Rönnebeck, Electromobility concept for racing cars based on lithium-ion batteries and supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 196(12), 5364–5376 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.10.057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    X.J. Hou, X.F. Wang, B. Liu, Q.F. Wang, Z.R. Wang, D. Chen, G.Z. Shen, SnO2@TiO2 heterojunction nanostructures for lithium-ion batteries and self-powered UV photodetectors with improved performances. Chem. Electro. Chem. 1(1), 108–115 (2014). doi: 10.1002/celc.201300053Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    D.S. Tan, B. Liu, D. Chen, G.Z. Shen, Si@SiO2 nanowires/carbon textilescable-type anodes for high-capacity reversible lithium-ion batteries. RSC Adv. 4(35), 18391–18396 (2014). doi: 10.1039/c4ra01363hCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Liu, X.F. Wang, H.T. Chen, Z.R. Wang, D. Chen, Y.B. Cheng, C.W. Zhou, G.Z. Shen, Hierarchical silicon nanowires-carbon textiles matrix as a binder-free anode for high-performance advanced lithium-ion batteries. Sci. Reports 3, 1622 (2013). doi: 10.1038/srep01622Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    B. Liu, X.F. Wang, Q.F. Wang, D.S. Tan, W.F. Song, X.J. Hou, D. Chen, G.Z. Shen, Advanced rechargeable lithium-ion batteries based on bendable ZnCo2O4-ruchins-on-carbon-fibers electrodes. Nano Res. 6(7), 525–534 (2013). doi: 10.1007/s12274-013-0329-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.S. Luo, X.H. Xia, Y.S. Luo, C. Guan, J.L. Liu, X.Y. Qi, C.F. Ng, T. Yu, H. Zhang, H.J. Fan, Rational designed hierarchical TiO2@Fe2O3 hollow nanostructures for improved lithium ion storage. Adv. Energy Mater. 3(6), 737–743 (2013). doi: 10.1002/aenm.201200953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Xin, L. Gu, N.H. Zhao, Y.X. Yin, L.J. Zhou, Y.G. Guo, L.J. Wan, Smaller sulfur molecules promise better lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(45), 18510–18513 (2012). doi: 10.1021/ja308170kCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    B. Wang, J.S. Chen, H.B. Wu, Z.Y. Wang, X.W. Lou, Quasiemulsion templated formation of α-Fe2O3 hollow spheres with enhanced lithium storage properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133(43), 17146–17148 (2011). doi: 10.1021/ja208346sCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    L. Zhang, H.B. Wu, S. Madhavi, H.H. Hng, X.W. Lou, Formation of Fe2O3 microboxes with hierarchical shell structures from metal organic frameworks and their lithium storage properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(42), 17388–17391 (2012). doi: 10.1021/ja307475cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    L.N. Gao, X.F. Wang, Z. Xie, W.F. Song, L.J. Wang, X. Wu, F.Y. Qu, D. Chen, G.Z. Shen, High performance energy storage devices based on WO3 nanowire arrays/carbon cloth integrated electrodes. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 7167–7173 (2013). doi: 10.1039/c3ta10831gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    L.N. Gao, F.Y. Qu, X. Wu, Hierarchical WO3@SnO2 core/shell nanowire arrays on carbon cloth: a new class of anode for high performance lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 7367–7372 (2014). doi: 10.1039/c4ta00206gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    X.Q. An, J.C. Yu, Y. Wang, Y.M. Hu, X.L. Yu, G.J. Zhang, WO3 nanorods/graphene nanocomposites for high-efficiency visible-light-driven photocatalysis and NO2 gas sensing. J. Mater. Chem. 22(17), 8525–8531 (2012). doi: 10.1039/c2jm16709cCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J.Z. Su, L.J. Guo, N.Z. Bao, C.A. Grimes, Nanostructured WO3/BiVO4 heterojunction films for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nano Lett. 11(5), 1928–1933 (2011). doi: 10.1021/nl2000743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    K. Huang, Q.T. Pan, F. Yang, S.B. Ni, X.C. Wei, D.Y. He, Controllable synthesis of hexagonal WO3 nanostructures and their application in lithium batteries. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 41(15), 155417–155422 (2008). doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/41/15/155417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    X.S. Fang, Y. Bando, U.K. Gautam, C.H. Ye, D. Golberg, Inorganic semiconductor nanostructures and their field-emission Applications. J. Mater. Chem. 18(5), 509–522 (2008). doi: 10.1039/b712874fCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J.S. Chen, L.A. Archer, X.W. Lou, SnO2 hollow structures and TiO2 nanosheets for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. 21(27), 9912–9924 (2011). doi: 10.1039/c0jm04163gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    I.A. Courtney, J.R. Dahn, Key factors controlling the reversibility of the reaction of lithium with SnO2 and Sn2 BPO6 glass. J. Electrochem. Soc. 144(9), 294–2943 (1997). doi: 10.1149/1.1837941Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    N. Li, C.R. Martin, B. Scrosati, Nanomaterial-based Li-ion battery electrodes. J. Power Sources 97–98, 240–243 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S0378-7753(01)00760-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S.H. Ng, D.I. dos Santos, S.Y. Chew, D. Wexler, J. Wang, S.X. Dou, H.K. Liu, Polyol-mediated synthesis of ultrafine tin oxide nanoparticles for reversible Li-ion storage. Electrochem. Commun. 9(5), 915–919 (2007). doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    X.Y. Xue, Z.H. Chen, L.L. Xing, S. Yuan, Y.J. Chen, SnO2/α-MoO3core-shell nanobelts and their extraordinarily high reversible capacity as lithium-ion battery anodes. Chem. Commun. 47(18), 5205–5207 (2011). doi: 10.1039/c1cc00076dCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Y.C. Qiu, G.L. Xu, Q. Kuang, S.G. Sun, S.H. Yang, Hierarchical WO3 flowers comprising porous single-crystalline nanoplates show enhanced lithium storage and photocatalysis. Nano Res. 5(11), 826–832 (2012). doi: 10.1007/s12274-012-0266-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    P. Poizot, S. Laruelle, S. Grugeon, L. Dupont, J.M. Tarescon, Nano-sized transition-metal oxides as negative-electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Nature 6803, 496–499 (2000). doi: 10.1038/35035045Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    L.A. Riley, S.H. Lee, L. Gedvilias, A.C. Dillon, Optimization of MoO3 nanoparticles as negative-electrode material in high-energy lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 195(2), 588–592 (2010). doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.08.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yang Liu
    • 1
  • Yang Jiao
    • 1
  • Haiyue Zhou
    • 1
  • Xiang Yu
    • 1
  • Fengyu Qu
    • 1
  • Xiang Wu
    • 1
  1. 1.Key Laboratory for Photonic and Electronic Bandgap Materials, Ministry of Education and College of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringHarbin Normal UniversityHarbinPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations