Advertisement

Annals of PDE

, 4:6 | Cite as

Shock Formation for 2D Quasilinear Wave Systems Featuring Multiple Speeds: Blowup for the Fastest Wave, with Non-trivial Interactions up to the Singularity

  • Jared Speck
Manuscript

Abstract

We prove a stable shock formation result for a large class of systems of quasilinear wave equations in two spatial dimensions. We give a precise description of the dynamics all the way up to the singularity. Our main theorem applies to systems of two wave equations featuring two distinct wave speeds and various quasilinear and semilinear nonlinearities, while the solutions under study are (non-symmetric) perturbations of simple outgoing plane symmetric waves. The two waves are allowed to interact all the way up to the singularity. Our approach is robust and could be used to prove shock formation results for other related systems with many unknowns and multiple speeds, in various solution regimes, and in higher spatial dimensions. However, a fundamental aspect of our framework is that it applies only to solutions in which the “fastest wave” forms a shock while the remaining solution variables do not, even though they can be non-zero at the fastest wave’s singularity. Our approach is based on an extended version of the geometric vectorfield method developed by D. Christodoulou in his study of shock formation for scalar wave equations, as well as the framework that we developed in our joint work with J. Luk, in which we proved a shock formation result for a quasilinear wave-transport system featuring a single wave operator. A key new difficulty that we encounter is that the geometric vectorfields that we use to commute the equations are, by necessity, adapted to the wave operator of the (shock-forming) fast wave and therefore exhibit very poor commutation properties with the slow wave operator, much worse than their commutation properties with a transport operator. In fact, commuting the vectorfields all the way through the slow wave operator would create uncontrollable error terms. To overcome this difficulty, we rely on a first-order reformulation of the slow wave equation, which, though somewhat limiting in the precision it affords, allows us to avoid uncontrollable commutator terms.

Keywords

Characteristics Eikonal equation Eikonal function Genuinely nonlinear strictly hyperbolic systems Null condition Null hypersurface Singularity formation Strong null condition Vectorfield method Wave breaking 

Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 35L67 Secondary 35L05 35L52 35L72 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the anonymous referee for their useful comments, which helped him to clarify the exposition.

References

  1. 1.
    Alinhac, S.: Blowup for Nonlinear Hyperbolic Equations, Progress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and Their Applications, vol. 17. Birkhäuser, Boston (1995)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alinhac, S.: Blowup of small data solutions for a class of quasilinear wave equations in two space dimensions II. Acta Math. 182(1), 1–23 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alinhac, S.: Blowup of small data solutions for a quasilinear wave equation in two space dimensions. Ann. Math. (2) 149(1), 97–127 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christodoulou, D.: The shock development problem, ArXiv e-prints (May 2017). arXiv:1705.00828
  5. 5.
    Christodoulou, D.: The Formation Of Shocks in 3-Dimensional Fluids, EMS Monographs in Mathematics. European Mathematical Society (EMS), Zürich (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Christodoulou, D., Klainerman, S.: The Global Nonlinear Stability of the Minkowski Space, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 41. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1993)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Christodoulou, D., Lisibach, A.: Shock development in spherical symmetry. Ann. PDE 2(1), 1–246 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Christodoulou, D., Miao, S.: Compressible Flow and Euler’s Equations, Surveys of Modern Mathematics, vol. 9. Higher Education Press, Beijing; International Press, Somerville (2014)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christodoulou, D., Perez, D.R.: On the formation of shocks of electromagnetic plane waves in non-linear crystals. J. Math. Phys. 57(8), 081506, 56 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dafermos, C.M.: Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics, Third, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences], vol. 325. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Holzegel, G., Klainerman, S., Speck, J., Wong, W.W.-Y.: Small-data shock formation in solutions to 3d quasilinear wave equations: an overview. J. Hyperbolic Differ. Equ. 13(01), 1–105 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219891616500016 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    John, F.: Formation of singularities in one-dimensional nonlinear wave propagation. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 27, 377–405 (1974)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    John, F.: Formation of singularities in elastic waves, Trends and applications of pure mathematics to mechanics (Palaiseau, 1983). Lecture Notes in Physiscs, vol. 195, pp. 194–210. Springer, Berlin (1984)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klainerman, S., Majda, A.: Formation of singularities for wave equations including the nonlinear vibrating string. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 33(3), 241–263 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klainerman, S., Rodnianski, I.: Improved local well-posedness for quasilinear wave equations in dimension three. Duke Math. J. 117(1), 1–124 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lax, P.D.: Development of singularities of solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic partial differential equations. J. Math. Phys. 5, 611–613 (1964)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luk, J., Speck, J.: Shock formation in solutions to the \(2D\) compressible Euler equations in the presence of non-zero vorticity, ArXiv e-prints (Oct. 2016). arXiv:1610.00737
  18. 18.
    Luk, J., Speck, J.: The hidden null structure of the compressible Euler equations and a prelude to applications, ArXiv e-prints (Oct. 2016). arXiv:1610.00743
  19. 19.
    Majda, A.: The existence and stability of multidimensional shock fronts. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 4(3), 342–344 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Majda, A.: The existence of multidimensional shock fronts. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 43(281), v+93 (1983)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Majda, A.: The stability of multidimensional shock fronts. Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 41(275), iv+95 (1983)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miao, S.: On the formation of shock for quasilinear wave equations by pulse with weak intensity, ArXiv e-prints (Oct. 2016). arXiv:1610.04147
  23. 23.
    Miao, S., Yu, P.: On the formation of shocks for quasilinear wave equations. Invent. Math. 207(2), 697–831 (2017)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rauch, J.: Bv estimates fail for most quasilinear hyperbolic systems in dimensions greater than one. Commun. Math. Phys 106(3), 481–484 (1986)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rendall, A.D., Ståhl, F.: Shock waves in plane symmetric spacetimes. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 33(11), 2020–2039 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1080/03605300802421948 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Riemann, B.: Über die Fortpflanzung ebener Luftwellen von endlicher Schwingungsweite. Abh. Kön. Ges. Wiss. Gött. 8, 43–66 (1860)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sbierski, J.: On the existence of a maximal Cauchy development for the Einstein equations: a dezornification. Ann. Henri Poincaré 17(2), 301–329 (2016)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Speck, J.: Shock Formation in Small-Data Solutions to \(3D\) Quasilinear Wave Equations, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Speck, J., Holzegel, G., Luk, J., Wong, W.: Stable shock formation for nearly simple outgoing plane symmetric waves. Ann. PDE 2(2), 1–198 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shadi Tahvildar-Zadeh, A.: Relativistic and nonrelativistic elastodynamics with small shear strains. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré Phys. Théor. 69(3), 275–307 (1998)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wong, W.W.-Y.: A comment on the construction of the maximal globally hyperbolic Cauchy development. J. Math. Phys. 54(11), 113511,8 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations