Advertisement

International Journal of Fuzzy Systems

, Volume 21, Issue 7, pp 2192–2203 | Cite as

Extended ELECTRE I Method with Multi-hesitant Fuzzy Information

  • Juan-juan Peng
  • Jian-qiang WangEmail author
  • Xiao-hui Wu
Article
  • 88 Downloads

Abstract

Multi-hesitant fuzzy sets (MHFSs) are hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) with membership function, permitting the same evaluation value to be repeated several times. MHFSs can depict uncertain information more effectively than HFSs. This study defined three outranking relations of multi-hesitant fuzzy numbers (MHFNs), namely strong dominant, weak dominant and indifferent relationships, based on the elimination and choice translating reality (ELECTRE) I method. Thereafter, we discussed the corresponding properties of the three outranking relations. We also presented an extended ELECTRE I method, in which the criteria are correlated to select the optimal alternatives, by combination of outranking relations and Choquet integral. Eventually, an application example of MHFNs was presented, and a comparative analysis was performed based on the same example.

Keywords

Multi-criteria decision-making Multi-hesitant fuzzy sets ELECTRE I Choquet integral 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the editors and anonymous referees for their valuable and constructive comments and suggestions that immensely facilitated the improvement of this paper. This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71701065 and 71871228), and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2017M610511).

References

  1. 1.
    Benayoun, R., Roy, B., Sussman, B.: ELECTRE: Une méthode pour guider le choix en présence de points de vue multiples. Rev. franaise Informat. recherche Opérationnelle 3, 31–56 (1969)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roy, B.: The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods. Theor. Decis. 31(1), 49–73 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rohaninejad, M., Kheirkhah, A., Fattahi, P., Vahedi-Nouri, B.: A hybrid multi-objective genetic algorithm based on the ELECTRE method for a capacitated flexible job shop scheduling problem. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 77, 51–66 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, X., Triantaphyllou, E.: Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega 36(1), 45–63 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ermatita, S., Hartati, S., Wardoyo, R., Harjoko, A.: Electre methods in solving group decision support system bioinformatics on gene mutation detection simulation. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol. 3(1), 40–52 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hashemi, S.S., Hajiagha, S.H.R., Zavadskas, E.K., Mahdiraji, H.A.: Multicriteria group decision making with ELECTRE III method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information. Appl. Math. Model. 40(2), 1554–1564 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fahmi, A., Kahraman, C., Bilen, Ü.: ELECTRE I method using hesitant linguistic term sets: an application to supplier selection. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 9(1), 153–167 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peng, H.G., Shen, K.W., He, S.S., Zhang, H.Y., Wang, J.Q.: Investment risk evaluation for new energy resources: an integrated decision support model based on regret theory and ELECTRE III. Energy Convers. Manag. 183, 332–348 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hatami-Marbini, A., Tavana, M.: An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment. Omega 39(4), 373–386 (2011)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, N., Xu, Z.S., Xia, M.M.: The ELECTRE I multi-criteria decision-making mtheod based on hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 14(3), 621–657 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, N., Xu, Z.S.: Hesitant fuzzy ELECTRE II approach: a new way to handle multi-criteria decision making problems. Inf. Sci. 292, 175–197 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peng, J.J., Wang, J.Q., Wu, X.H.: An extension of the ELECTRE approach with multi-valued neutrosophic information. Neural Comput. Appl. 28(Suppl 1), S1011–S1022 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grabisch, M.: Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 69(3), 279–298 (1995)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Liang, R.X., Wang, J.Q., Li, L.: Multi-criteria group decision making method based on interdependent inputs of single valued trapezoidal neutrosophic information. Neural Comput. Appl. 30, 241–260 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peng, H.G., Wang, X.K., Wang, T.L., Wang, J.Q.: Multi-criteria game model based on the pairwise comparisons of strategies with Z-numbers. Appl. Soft Comput. 74, 451–465 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Choquet, G.: Theory of capacities. Ann. Inst. Fourier 5, 131–295 (1954)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yager, R.R.: Induced aggregation operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 137(1), 59–69 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meyer, P., Roubens, M.: On the use of the Choquet integral with fuzzy numbers in multiple criteria decision support. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 157(7), 927–938 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu, D.J., Wu, Y.Y., Zhou, W.: Multi-criteria decision making based on Choquet integral under hesitant fuzzy environment. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 7(12), 4506–4513 (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Deepa, J., Sanjay, K.: Interval-valued intuitionistic hesitant fuzzy Choquet integral based TOPSIS method for multi-criteria group decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 248(1), 183–191 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, L., Zhang, H.Y., Wang, J.Q.: Frank Choquet Bonferroni mean operators of bipolar neutrosophic sets and their application to multi-criteria decision-making problems. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(1), 13–28 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Peng, J.J., Wang, J.Q., Hu, J.H., Tian, C.: Multi-criteria decision-making approach based on single-valued neutrosophic hesitant fuzzy geometric weighted Choquet integral heronian mean operator. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 35(5), 1–14 (2018)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Torra, V.: Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 25(6), 529–539 (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Torra, V., Narukawa, Y.: On hesitant fuzzy sets and decision. In: The 18th IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, Jeju Island, Korea, pp. 1378–1382 (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xia, M.M., Xu, Z.S.: Hesitant fuzzy information aggregation in decision making. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 52(3), 395–407 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wei, G.W.: Hesitant fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl. Based Syst. 31(7), 176–182 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhao, H., Xu, Z., Cui, F.: Generalized hesitant fuzzy harmonic mean operators and their applications in group decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 18(4), 685–696 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zhang, Z.M., Wang, C., Tian, D.Z., Li, K.: Induced generalized hesitant fuzzy operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Comput. Ind. Eng. 67(1), 116–138 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Qin, J., Liu, X., Pedrycz, W.: Frank aggregation operators and their application to hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 41, 428–452 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zhang, Z.M.: Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Inf. Sci. 234(10), 150–181 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yu, D.J.: Some hesitant fuzzy information aggregation operators based on Einstein operational laws. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 29(4), 320–340 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Qian, G., Wang, H., Feng, X.Q.: Generalized hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision support system. Knowl. Based Syst. 37(4), 357–365 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Xu, Z.S., Xia, M.M.: Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 181(11), 2128–2138 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhang, Z.M.: Hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making with unknown weight information. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(3), 615–636 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Farhadinia, B.: Distance and similarity measures for higher order hesitant fuzzy sets. Knowl. Based Syst. 55, 43–48 (2014)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wei, C., Yan, F., Rodríguez, R.M.: Entropy measures for hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in multi-criteria decision-making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 31(1), 673–685 (2016)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang, N., Wei, G.W.: Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem based on hesitant fuzzy set. Appl. Math. Model. 37(7), 4938–4947 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Liang, R.X., Wang, J.Q., Zhang, H.Y.: Projection-based PROMETHEE methods based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(7), 2161–2174 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sun, R.X., Hu, J.H., Zhou, J.D., Chen, X.H.: A hesitant fuzzy linguistic projection-based MABAC method for patients’ prioritization. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 20(7), 2144–2160 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Zhang, X.L., Xu, Z.S.: The TODIM analysis approach based on novel measured functions under hesitant fuzzy environment. Knowl. Based Syst. 61(2), 48–58 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lin, Y., Wang, Y.M., Chen, S.Q.: Hesitant fuzzy multiattribute matching decision making based on regret theory with uncertain weights. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(4), 955–966 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hu, J.H., Yang, Y., Zhang, X.L., Chen, X.H.: Similarity and entropy measures for hesitant fuzzy sets. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 25(3), 857–886 (2018)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Liao, H.C., Xu, Z.S., Zeng, X.J.: Novel correlation coefficients between hesitant fuzzy sets and their application in decision making. Knowl. Based Syst. 82(C), 115–127 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Li, D.Q., Zeng, W.Y., Li, J.H.: New distance and similarity measures on hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications in multiple criteria decision making. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 40, 11–16 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Farhadinia, B.: Weighted hesitant fuzzy information measures in decision making. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 33(6), 1–10 (2017)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Khalid, A., Beg, I.: Incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(3), 637–645 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Zhang, Z.M.: A framework of group decision making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations based on multiplicative consistency. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 19(4), 982–996 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Peng, J.J., Wang, J.Q., Wang, J., Yang, L.J., Chen, X.H.: An extension of ELECTRE to multi-criteria decision-making problems with multi-hesitant fuzzy sets. Inf. Sci. 307(C), 113–126 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ji, P., Zhang, H.Y., Wang, J.Q.: A projection-based outranking method with multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for hotel location selection. Cogn. Comput. 10(5), 737–751 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tian, Z.P., Wang, J.Q., Zhang, H.Y., Wang, T.L.: Signed distance-based consensus in multi-criteria group decision-making with multi-granular hesitant unbalanced linguistic information. Comput. Ind. Eng. 124, 125–138 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Wang, Z., Klir, G.J.: Fuzzy measure theory. Plenum press, New York (1992)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang, J., Wang, J.Q., Tian, Z.-P., Zhao, D.Y.: A multi-hesitant fuzzy linguistic multi-criteria decision-making approach for logistics outsourcing with incomplete weight information. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 25(3), 831–856 (2018)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wan, S.P., Wang, F., Lin, L.L., Dong, J.Y.: An intuitionistic fuzzy linear programming method for logistics outsourcing provider selection. Knowl. Based Syst. 82, 80–94 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cabrerizo, F.J., Chiclana, F., Al-Hmouz, R., Morfeq, A., Balamash, A.S., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Fuzzy decision making and consensus: challenges. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 29(3), 1109–1118 (2015)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Xu, Y., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A consensus model for hesitant fuzzy preference relations and its application in water allocation management. Appl. Soft Comput. 58, 265–284 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Taiwan Fuzzy Systems Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessCentral South UniversityChangshaChina
  2. 2.School of InformationZhejiang University of Finance and EconomicsHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations