Advertisement

An Analysis on the Influence of Chinese “New Four Inventions” Under the Incomplete Hybrid Probabilistic Linguistic Environment

  • Wanying Xie
  • Zeshui XuEmail author
  • Zhiliang Ren
Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

Considering the primary influence of the so-called China’s “new four inventions” on the Chinese way of life and the strengths of probabilistic linguistic preference relations (PLPRs) in addressing the decision-making problems, we start to regard the PLPRs as the decision-making instrument to appraise the impact of “new four inventions” in the paper. Generally speaking, owing to the disparate causes of decision-making environment and the decision makers, not all the decision information presented is complete and with a unified form. In consequence, we give the introduction of incomplete probabilistic linguistic preference relations and hybrid PLPRs. Concretely, either the IPLPRs or the hybrid PLPRs are divided into two categories: the additive PLPRs and the multiplicative PLPRs. In order to acquire the ultima evaluation result, the complete processes for different types of IPLPRs are first given by the corresponding algorithms, respectively. Then for the acquired complete PLPRs, on the strength of transformation functions, we define the expected transformed additive PLPRs (ETAPs) and the expected transformed multiplicative PLPRs (ETMPs) to transform hybrid PLPRs into the unformed preference relations (UPRs). After that, an algorithm is provided to check and improve the consistency of the UPRs. Then the group preference relation is calculated based on the aggregation operator, the similar consistency improving process is applied to it, and the ranking of evaluations can be gained parenthetically. Finally, a specific numeric simulation experiment concerning the previously mentioned “new four inventions” is implemented to prove the feasibility and availability of the decision-making process.

Keywords

PLPRs Expected transformed additive PLPRs Expected transformed multiplicative PLPRs Incomplete hybrid probabilistic linguistic information Multi-criteria decision making 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the editor-in-chief, the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful and constructive comments and suggestions to help improve the overall quality of the paper. This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China [Nos. 71571123, 71771155], the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University [No. YBJJ1832] and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province [No. KYCX18_0199].

References

  1. 1.
    Dong, Y.C., Li, H., Xu, Y.: On reciprocity indexes in the aggregation of fuzzy preference relations using the OWA operator. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 159, 185–192 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tang, J.W., Hsu, T.H.: A fuzzy preference relations model for evaluating key supplier relationships in TFT-LCD TV panel manufacturing industry. Manag. Decis. 53(8), 1858–1882 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dong, Y.C., Xu, Y.F., Li, H.Y.: On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 189, 430–444 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fan, Z.P., Chen, X.: Consensus measures and adjusting inconsistency of linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst. Knowl. Discov. 3613, 130–139 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Herrera-Viedma, E., Martinez, L., Mata, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multigranular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 13, 644–658 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang, G.Q., Dong, Y.C., Xu, Y.F.: Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf. Fusion 17, 46–55 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ma, J., Ruan, D., Xu, Y., Zhang, G.: A fuzzy-set approach to treat determinacy and consistency of linguistic terms in multi-criteria decision making. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 44(2), 165–181 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tang, Y., Zheng, J.: Linguistic modelling based on semantic similarity relation among linguistic labels. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 157(12), 1662–1673 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang, T.C., Chen, Y.H.: Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP. Inf. Sci. 178(19), 3755–3765 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chen, Y.H., Wang, T.C., Wu, C.Y.: Multi-criteria decision making with fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Appl. Math. Model. 35(3), 1322–1330 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tao, Z.F., Liu, X., Chen, H.Y.: Group decision making with fuzzy linguistic preference relations via cooperative games method. Comput. Ind. Eng. 83(C), 184–192 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhu, B., Xu, Z.S.: Regression methods for hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 19(sup1), S214–S227 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zhang, Z.M., Wang, C., Tian, X.D.: A decision support model for group decision making with hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Inf. Sci. 86, 77–101 (2015)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhu, B., Xu, Z.S., Xu, J.P.: Deriving a ranking from hesitant fuzzy preference relations under group decision making. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 44(8), 1328–1337 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhu, B.: Studies on consistency measure of hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Procedia Comput. Sci. 17, 457–464 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Xu, Y.J., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A consensus model for hesitant fuzzy preference relations and its application in water allocation management. Appl. Soft Comput. 58, 265–284 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu, B., Xu, Z.S.: Consistency measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 22(1), 35–45 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu, Z.B., Xu, J.P.: Managing consistency and consensus in group decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Omega 65(3), 28–40 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang, Z.M., Wu, C.: On the use of multiplicative consistency in hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Knowl.-Based Syst. 72, 13–27 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gou, X.J., Xu, Z.S., Liao, H.C.: Group decision making with compatibility measures of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Soft. Comput. 6, 1–17 (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, H.B., Jiang, L., Xu, Z.S.: Improving the additive and multiplicative consistency of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 33, 3677–3693 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li, C.C., Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L., Dong, Y.C., Herrera, F.: Consistency of hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations: an interval consistency index. Inf. Sci. 432, 347–361 (2018)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Xu, Y.J., Wen, X.W., Sun, H., Wang, H.M.: Consistency and consensus models with local adjustment strategy for hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0438-3 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xie, W.Y., Xu, Z.S., Ren, Z.L., Wang, H.: Probabilistic linguistic analytic hierarchy process and its application on the performance assessment of Xiongan new area. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622017500420 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhang, Y.X., Xu, Z.S., Wang, H., Liao, H.C.: Consistency-based risk assessment with probabilistic linguistic preference relation. Appl. Soft Comput. 49, 817–833 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhang, Y.X., Xu, Z.S., Liao, H.C.: A consensus process for group decision making with probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Inf. Sci. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.06.006 Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lin, Y., Wang, Y.M.: Group decision making with consistency of intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations under uncertainty. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 99, 1–9 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Behret, H.: Group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Knowl.-Based Syst. 70, 33–43 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wan, S.P., Wang, F., Dong, J.Y.: A three-phase method for group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26(2), 998–1010 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wan, S.P., Xu, G.L., Dong, J.Y.: A novel method for group decision making with interval-valued Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Inf. Sci. 372, 53–71 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang, Z.J., Li, K.W.: Goal programming approaches to deriving interval weights based on interval fuzzy preference relations. Inf. Sci. 193, 180–198 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wu, J., Chiclana, F., Liao, H.C.: Isomorphic multiplicative transitivity for intuitionistic and interval-valued fuzzy preference relations and its application in deriving their priority vectors. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 26(1), 193–202 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wang, Z.J.: Consistency analysis and priority derivation of triangular fuzzy preference relations based on modal value and geometric mean. Inf. Sci. 314, 169–183 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu, F., Zhang, W.G., Zhang, L.H.: Consistency analysis of triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 235(3), 718–726 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zhou, Y.Y., Cheng, L.H., Zhou, L.G., Chen, H.Y., Ge, J.Q.: A group decision making approach for trapezoidal fuzzy preference relations with compatibility measure. Soft. Comput. 21(10), 2709–2721 (2017)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Chen, T.Y.: Likelihoods of interval type-2 trapezoidal fuzzy preference relations and their application to multiple criteria decision analysis. Inf. Sci. 295, 303–322 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chen, N., Xu, Z.S., Xia, M.M.: Interval-valued hesitant preference relations and their applications to group decision making. Knowl.-Based Syst. 37, 528–540 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Dong, Y.C., Wu, Y.Z., Zhang, H.J., Zhang, G.Q.: Multi-granular unbalanced linguistic distribution assessments with interval symbolic proportions. Knowl.-Based Syst. 82, 139–151 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rodríguez, R.M., Labella, Á., Martínez, L.: An overview on fuzzy modelling of complex linguistic preferences in decision making. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 9, 81–94 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Wu, Z.B., Xu, J.P.: Possibility distribution-based approach for MAGDM with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information. IEEE Trans. Cybern. (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2015.2413894 Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Yang, J.B.: Rule and utility based evidential reasoning approach for multi-attribute decision analysis under uncertainties. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 131, 31–61 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhang, G.Q., Dong, Y.C., Xu, Y.F.: Consistency and consensus measures for linguistic preference relations based on distribution assessments. Inf. Fusion 17(1), 46–55 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pang, Q., Wang, H., Xu, Z.S.: Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Inf. Sci. 369, 128–143 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Herrera-Viedma, E., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Alonso, S.: Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B Cybern. 37(1), 176–189 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Xu, Y.J., Ma, F., Wang, H.M.: A revised procedure to estimate missing values in incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst. (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/FUZZ-IEEE.2014.6891550 Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Meng, F.Y., Chen, X.H.: A new method for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. Knowl.-Based Syst. 73, 111–123 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Xu, Z.S.: Incomplete linguistic preference relations and their fusion. Inf. Fusion 7(3), 331–337 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hsu, S.C., Wang, T.C.: Solving multi-criteria decision making with incomplete linguistic preference relations. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(9), 10882–10888 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chang, T.H., Hsu, S.C., Wang, T.C., Wu, C.Y.: Measuring the success possibility of implementing ERP by utilizing the incomplete linguistic preference relations. Appl. Soft Comput. 12(5), 1582–1591 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Xia, M.M., Xu, Z.S., Wang, Z.: Multiplicative consistency-based decision support system for incomplete linguistic preference relations. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 45(3), 625–636 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wang, H., Xu, Z.S.: Interactive algorithms for improving incomplete linguistic preference relations based on consistency measures. Appl. Soft Comput. 42, 66–79 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F.J., Chiclana, F., Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Group decision making with incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 24(2), 201–222 (2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wang, T.C., Chen, Y.H.: Incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations under uncertain environments. Inf. Fusion 11(2), 201–207 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Zhang, Z.M., Wang, C., Tian, X.D.: Multi-criteria group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations. Appl. Soft Comput. 36, 1–23 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Xu, Y.J., Chen, L., Rodríguez, R.M., Herrera, F., Wang, H.M.: Deriving the priority weights from incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations in group decision making. Knowl.-Based Syst. 99(C), 71–78 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Xu, Y.J., Li, C.Y., Wen, X.W.: Missing values estimation and consensus building for incomplete hesitant fuzzy preference relations with multiplicative consistency. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.2991/ijcis.11.1.9 Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Song, Y.M., Hu, J.: A group decision support model based on incomplete hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations for mine disaster rescue. Prog. Artif. Intell. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13748-018-0145-9 Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Xu, Y.J., Ma, F., Tao, F.F., Wang, H.M.: Some methods to deal with unacceptable incomplete 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic preference relations in group decision making. Knowl.-Based Syst. 56, 179–190 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhang, X.Y., Zhang, H.Y., Wang, J.Q.: Discussing incomplete 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic preference relations in multi-granular linguistic MCGDM with unknown weight information. Soft. Comput. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2915-x Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Gao, J., Xu, Z.S., Liao, H.C.: Consistency-based emergency decision-making with incomplete probabilistic linguistic preference relations. Technical Report (2018)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Cassone, D., Ben-Arieh, D.: Successive proportional additive numeration using fuzzy linguistic labels (Fuzzy Linguistic SPAN). Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 4(3), 155–174 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Xu, Z.S.: A method based on linguistic aggregation operators for group decision making with linguistic preference relations. Inf. Sci. 166(1–4), 19–30 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zhu, B., Xu, Z.S., Zhang, R., Hong, M.: Hesitant analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(2), 602–614 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Xu, Z.S.: A practical procedure for group decision making under incomplete multiplicative linguistic preference relations. Group Decis. Negot. 15(6), 581–591 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Chiclana, F.: Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 122(2), 277–291 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Xu, Z.S.: An integrated model-based interactive approach to FMAGDM with incomplete preference information. Fuzzy Optim. Decis. Mak. 9(3), 333–357 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Tanino, T.: Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 12(2), 117–131 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Xu, Z.S.: Linguistic preference relations. In: Linguistic decision making. Springer, Berlin, pp. 87–175 (2012)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zhou, W., Xu, Z.S.: Group consistency and group decision making under uncertain probabilistic hesitant fuzzy preference environment. Inf. Sci. 414(2), 276–288 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Yang, G.: The new inventions create the happy life of “One Belt and One Road”. China Awards Sci. Technol. 6, 26–27 (2017)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. Read. Fuzzy Sets Intell. Syst. 18, 183–190 (1988)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Taiwan Fuzzy Systems Association 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduChina
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and Artificial IntelligenceUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain

Personalised recommendations