International Journal of Fuzzy Systems

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 655–673 | Cite as

Multi-objective Fuzzy Programming of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Sustainable Measures

  • Ehsan Pourjavad
  • Rene V. MayorgaEmail author


The substantial impact of environmental and social issues on business performance highlights the significant role of sustainability in supply chain network design problems. The innate uncertainty of the problem factors such as customer demand and return rates requires an integrated approach to deal with the problem. This paper aims to design a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) network considering both sustainability and uncertainty issues. Fuzzy programming is used to address the uncertainty in this study. A fuzzy multi-objective mixed-integer linear programming is developed to simultaneously optimize a sustainable CLSC network. The objectives are considered to be the total costs and the environmental impacts minimization and social benefits maximization. Three pillars of sustainability (cost, environmental, and social) are taken into account in network design. A three-phased fuzzy solution approach is developed to solve this model. To examine the significance of the proposed model and the solution approach, a computational experiment is conducted. The results approve the applicability of the proposed approach and the feasibility of the solution methodology. Results also show that the proposed model presents a systematic framework that enables the management to obtain a satisfactory solution by adjusting the search direction.


Fuzzy mathematical programming Sustainable supply chain Closed-loop supply chain Multi-objective optimization Environmental and social impacts 



This paper research has been supported by a grant (No 155147-2013) from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).


  1. 1.
    Abd El-Wahed, W.F.: Interactive fuzzy goal programming for multi-objective transportation problems. Omega 34(2), 158–166 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alshamsi, A., Diabat, A.: A reverse logistics network design. J. Manuf. Syst. 37(3), 589–598 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amin, S.H., Zhang, G.: A multi-objective facility location model for closed-loop supply chain network under uncertain demand and return. Appl. Math. Model. 37(6), 4165–4176 (2013)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chaabane, A., Ramudhin, A., Paquet, M.: Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135(1), 37–49 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dai, Z., Li, Z.: Design of a dynamic closed-loop supply chain network using fuzzy bi-objective linear programming approach. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 34(5), 330–343 (2017)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Diabat, A., Theodorou, E.: A location–inventory supply chain problem: reformulation and piecewise linearization. Comput. Ind. Eng. 90, 381–389 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dubois, D., Prade, H.M.: Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. Academic Press, New York (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    El-Sayed, M., Afia, N., El-Kharbotly, A.: A stochastic model for forward–reverse logistics network design under risk. Comput. Ind. Eng. 58(3), 423–431 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Francas, D., Minner, S.: Manufacturing network configuration in supply chains with product recovery. Omega 37(4), 757–769 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gholamian, N., Mahdavi, I., Tavakoli-Moghaddam, R., Mahdavi-amiri, N.: Comprehensive fuzzy multi-objective multi-product multi-site aggregate production planning decisions in a supply chain under uncertainty. Appl. Soft Comput. 37, 585–607 (2015)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaur, J., Amini, M., Rao, A.K.: Closed-loop supply chain configuration for new and reconditioned products: an integrated optimization model. Omega 66, 212–223 (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Guide Jr., V.D.R., Van Wassenhove, L.N.: The evolution of closed-loop supply chain research. Oper. Res. 57(1), 10–18 (2009)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hasani, A., Zegordi, S.H., Nikbakhsh, E.: Robust closed-loop supply chain network design for perishable goods in agile manufacturing under uncertainty. Int. J. Prod. Res. 50(16), 4649–4669 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hannan, E.L.: Linear programming with multiple fuzzy goals. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 6(3), 235–248 (1981)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K.: Multiple Attribute Decision Making –Methods and Applications. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg (1981)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jamalnia, A., Soukhakian, M.A.: A hybrid fuzzy goal programming pproach with different goal priorities to aggregate production planning. Comput. Ind. Eng. 56, 1474–1486 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kannan, D., Diabat, A., Alrefaei, M., Govindan, K., Yong, G.: A carbon footprint based reverse logistics network design model. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 67, 75–79 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keramydas, C., Mallidis, I., Dekker, R., Vlachos, D., Iakovou, E.: Cost and environmental trade-offs in supply chain network design and planning: the merit of a simulation-based approach. J. Simul. 11(1), 20–29 (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kerachian, R., Karamouz, M.: A stochastic conflict resolution model for water quality management in reservoir–river systems. Adv. Water Resour. 30(4), 866–882 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Keyvanshokooh, E., Ryan, S.M., Kabir, E.: Hybrid robust and stochastic optimization for closed-loop supply chain network design using accelerated Benders decomposition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 249(1), 76–92 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kenne, J.-P., Dejax, P., Gharbi, A.: Production planning of a hybrid manufacturing–remanufacturing system under uncertainty within a closed-loop supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 135(1), 81–93 (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Klibi, W., Martel, A., Guitouni, A.: The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: a critical review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 203(2), 283–293 (2010)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee, D.H., Dong, M.: A heuristic approach to logistics network design for end-of-lease computer products recovery. Transp. Res. E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 44(3), 455–474 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lai, Y.J., Hwang, C.L.: A new approach to some possibilistic linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 49(2), 121–133 (1992)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lai, Y.J., Hwang, C.L.: Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making, Methods and Applications. Springer, Berlin (1994)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li, X.Q., Zhang, B., Li, H.: Computing efficient solutions to fuzzy multiple objective linear programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 157(11), 1328–1332 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Liang, T.F.: Distribution planning decisions using interactive fuzzy multi-objective linear programming. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 157(10), 1303–1316 (2006)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liang, T.F., Cheng, H.W.: Application of fuzzy sets to manufacturing/distribution planning decisions with multi-product and multi-time period in supply chains. Expert Syst. Appl. 36(2), 3367–3377 (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Liang, T.-F.: Fuzzy multi objective production/distribution planning decisions with multi product and multi time period in a supply chain. Comput. Ind. Eng. 55(3), 676–694 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Luhandjula, M.K.: Fuzzy optimization: an appraisal. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 30, 257–282 (1989)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Millet, D.: Designing a sustainable reverse logistics channel: the 18 generic structures framework. J. Clean. Prod. 19(6), 588–597 (2011)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mula, J., Peidro, D., Madronero, M.D., Vicens, E.: Mathematical programming models for supply chain production and transport planning. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 204(3), 377–390 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Özceylan, E., Paksoy, T.: A mixed integer programming model for a closed-loop supply-chain network. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51(3), 718–734 (2013)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Paksoy, T., Bektas, T., O¨zceylan, E.: Operational and environmental performance measures in a multi-product closed-loop supply chain. Transp. Res. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 47(4), 532–546 (2011)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Paksoy, T., Özceylan, E., Weber, G.W.: A multi objective model for optimization of a green supply chain network. In: Barsoum N., Weber G.W., Vasant, P. (eds.) AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1239, no. 1, pp. 311–320. AIP (2010)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pishvaee, M.S., Torabi, S.A.: A possibilistic programming approach for closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 161(20), 2668–2683 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pishvaee, M.S., Rabbani, M., Torabi, S.A.: A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Appl. Math. Model. 35(2), 637–649 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pishvaee, M.S., Razmi, J.: Environmental supply chain network design using multi-objective fuzzy mathematical programming. Appl. Math. Model. 36(8), 3433–3446 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pishvaee, M.S., Torabi, S.A., Razmi, J.: Credibility-based fuzzy mathematical programming model for green logistics design under uncertainty. Comput. Ind. Eng. 62(2), 624–632 (2012)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Phuc, P.N.K., Yu, V.F., Chou, S.Y.: Optimizing the fuzzy closed-loop supply chain for electrical and electronic equipments. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 15(1), 9–21 (2013)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ramezani, M., Bashiri, M., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.: A new multi-objective stochastic model for a forward/reverse logistic network design with responsiveness and quality level. Appl. Math. Model. 37(1–2), 328–344 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ramezani, M., Kimiagari, A.M., Karimiz, B.: Closed-loop supply chain network design: a financial approach. Appl. Math. Model. 38(15–16), 4099–4119 (2014)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Rommelfanger, H.: Fuzzy linear programming and applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 92(3), 512–527 (1996)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sakawa, M., Yano, H.: Interactive fuzzy satisficing method for multi-objective nonlinear programming problems with fuzzy parameters. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 30, 221–238 (1989)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Sakawa, M.: An interactive fuzzy satisficing method for multiobjective linear fractional programming problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 28(2), 129–144 (1988)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Selim, H., Ozkarahan, I.: A supply chain distribution network design model: an interactive fuzzy goal programming-based solution approach. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 36(3), 401–418 (2008)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Seuring, S.: A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis. Support Syst. 54(4), 1513–1520 (2013)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sherafati, M., Bashiri, M.: Closed loop supply chain network design with fuzzy tactical decisions. J. Ind. Eng. Int. 12(3), 255–269 (2016)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Subulan, K., Tasan, A.S., Baykaso˘glu, A.: Fuzzy mixed integer programming model for medium-term planning in a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing option. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 23(6), 345–368 (2012)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tang, C.S., Zhou, S.: Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 223(3), 585–594 (2012)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tanaka, H., Asai, K.: Fuzzy linear programming with fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 13, 1–10 (1984)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tanaka, H., Ichihashi, H., Asai, K.: A formulation of fuzzy linear programming problem based on comparison of fuzzy numbers. Control Cybern. 13(3), 185–194 (1984)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Torabi, S.A., Hassini, E.: An interactive possibilistic programming approach for multiple objective supply chain master planning. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 159(2), 193–214 (2008)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Vahdani, B., Jolai, F., Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R., Mousavi, S.M.: Two fuzzy possibilistic bi-objective zero-one programming models for outsourcing the equipment maintenance problem. Eng. Optim. 44(7), 801–820 (2012)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wang, R.C., Liang, T.F.: Applying possibilistic linear programming to aggregate production planning. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 98(3), 328–341 (2005)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Zailani, S., Jeyaraman, K., Vengadasan, G., Premkumar, R.: Sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) in Malaysia: a survey. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 140(1), 330–340 (2012)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Zeballos, L., Gomes, M., Barbosa-Povoa, A.P., Novais, A.Q.: Addressing theuncertain quality and quantity of returns in closed-loop supply chains. Comput. Chem. Eng. 47, 237–247 (2012)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Zhou, Z., Cheng, S., Hua, B.: Supply chain optimization of continuous process industries with sustainability considerations. Comput. Chem. Eng. 24(2–7), 1151–1158 (2000)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Zhang, Y.M., Huang, G.H., He, L.: An inexact reverse logistics model for municipal solid waste management systems. J. Environ. Manage. 92(3), 522–530 (2011)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Zimmermann, H.-J.: Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1(1), 45–56 (1978)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Zimmermann, H.-J.: Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications. Kluwer Academic Publications, Boston (1996)zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Taiwan Fuzzy Systems Association and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ReginaReginaCanada

Personalised recommendations