Advertisement

International Journal of Fuzzy Systems

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 452–469 | Cite as

FCPN Approach for Uncertain Nonlinear Dynamical System with Unknown Disturbance

  • Vandana Sakhre
  • Uday Pratap Singh
  • Sanjeev Jain
Article

Abstract

In this work, we have used a fuzzy counter-propagation network (FCPN) model to control different discrete-time, uncertain nonlinear dynamic systems with unknown disturbances. Fuzzy competitive learning (FCL) is used to process the weight connection and make adjustments between the instar and the outstar of the network. FCL paradigm adopts the principle of learning, used for calculation of the Best Matched Node (BMN) in the instar–outstar network. FCL provides a control of discrete-time uncertain nonlinear dynamic systems having dead zone and backlash. The errors like mean absolute error (MAE), mean square error (MSE), and best fit rate, etc. of FCPN are compared with networks like dynamic network (DN) and back propagation network (BPN). The FCL foretells that the proposed FCPN method gives better results than DN and BPN. The success and enactments of the proposed FCPN are validated through simulations on different discrete-time uncertain nonlinear dynamic systems and Mackey–Glass univariate time series data with unknown disturbances over BPN and DN.

Keywords

Fuzzy counter-propagation network Back propagation network Dynamic network Unknown disturbances Uncertain nonlinear discrete time system Mackey–Glass time series data 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author is gratefully acknowledged the financial assistance provided by the All India Council of Technical Education (AICTE) in the form of Research Promotion Scheme (RPS) project in 2012.

References

  1. 1.
    Soderstrom, T., Stoica, P.: System Identification. Prentice Hall, New York (1989)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Billings, S.A.: Nonlinear System Identification: NARMAX Methods in the Time, Frequency, and Saptio-Temporal Domains. Wiley, Chichester (2013)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu, M.: Decentralized control of robot manipulators: nonlinear and adaptive approaches. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 44, 357–366 (1999)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin, C.M., Ting, A.B., Li, M.C.: Neural network based robust adaptive control for a class of nonlinear systems. Neural Comput. Appl. 20, 557–563 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rivals, I., Personnaz, L.: Nonlinear internal model control using neural networks application to processes with delay and design issues. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11, 80–90 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    KenallaKopulas, I., Kokotovic, P.V., Morse, A.S.: Systematic design of adaptive controller for feedback linearizable system. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 36, 1241–1253 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kokotovic, P.V.: The joy feedback: nonlinear and adaptive. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 12, 7–17 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elmali, H., Olgac, N.: Robust output tracking control of nonlinear MIMO system via sliding mode technique. Automatica 28, 145–151 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sadati, N., Ghadami, R.: Adaptive multi-model sliding mode control of robotic manipulators using soft computing. Neurocomputing 17, 2702–2710 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kroll, A., Schulte, H.: Benchmark problems for nonlinear system identification and control using Soft Computing methods: need and overview. Appl. Soft Comput. 25, 496–513 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hornik, K., Stinchcombe, M., White, H.: Multiforward feed forwards networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw. 2, 359–366 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bortoletti, A., Di Flore, C., Fanelli, S., Zellini, P.: A new class of Quasi-Newtonian methods for optimal learning in MLP-networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 14, 263–273 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lera, G., Pinzolas, M.: Neighborhood based Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for neural network training. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 13, 1200–1203 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alfaro-Ponce, M., Arguelles, A., Chairez, I.: Continuous neural identifier for certain nonlinear systems with time in the input signal. Neural Netw. 60, 53–66 (2014)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wei, Q., Liu, D.: Neural-network based adaptive optimal tracking control scheme for discrete-time nonlinear system with approximation errors. Neurocomputing 149, 106–115 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gao, S., Dong, H., Ning, B., Chen, L.: Neural adaptive control for uncertain nonlinear system with input: State transformation based output feedback. Neurocomputing 159, 117–125 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peng, Z., Wang, D., Zhang, H., Lin, Y.: Coopeative output feedback adaptive control of uncertain nonlinear multi-agent systems with a dynamic leader. Neurocomputing 149, 132–141 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhang, T., Xia, X.: Decentralized adaptive fuzzy output feedback control of stochastic nonlinear large scale systems with dynamic un certainties. Inf. Sci. 315, 17–18 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Song, J., He, S.: Finite time robust passive control for a class of uncertain Lipschitz nonlinear systems with time delays. Neurocomputing 159, 275–281 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cui, G., Wang, Z., Zhuang, G., Chu, Y.: Adaptive Centralized NN control of large scale stochastic nonlinear time delay systems with unknown dead zone inputs. Neurocomputing 158, 194–203 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou, J., Er, M.J., Veluvolu, K.C.: Adaptive output control of Nonlinear Time-Delayed systems with uncertain Dead-zone input, IEEE, 2006, pp. 5312–5317Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang, T.P., Ge, S.S.: Adaptive dynamic surface control of nonlinear systems with unknown dead zone in pure feedback form. Automatica 44, 1895–1903 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu, Y.-J., Zhou, N.: Observer-based adaptive fuzzy-neural control for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems with unknown dead zone input. ISA Trans. 49, 462–469 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ibrir, S., Xie, W.F., Su, C.-Y.: Adaptive tracking of nonlinear systems with non-symmetric dead zone input. Automatica 43, 522–530 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hu, Q., Ma, G., Xie, L.: Robust and adaptive variable structure output feedback control of uncertain systems with input nonlinearity. Automatica 44, 552–559 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zhuo, J., Wen, C., Zang, Y.: Adaptive output control of Nonlinear systems with uncertain dead zone nonlinearity. Autom. Control 51, 504–511 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang, X., Pariini, T.: Adaptive fault tolerant control of nonlinear uncertain systems: a information based diagnostic approach. Autom. Control 49, 1259–1274 (2004)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhuo, S., Feng, G., feng, C.-B.: Robust Control for a class of uncertain nonlinear systems adaptive fuzzy approach based on backstepping. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 151, 1–20 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lewis, F.L., Campos, J., Selmic, R.: Neuro Fuzzy Control of Industrial Systems with Actuator Nonlinearities. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hecht-Nielsen, R.: Theory of the back propagation neural network. Neural Netw. 1, 593–605 (1989)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hagan, M.T., Demuth, H.B., Beale, M.H.: Orlando De Jesus, Neural Network Design, 2nd Edition, Cengage Learning, 2014Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chang, F.J., Chen, Y.-C.: A counter propagation fuzzy neural network modeling approach to real time stream flow prediction. J. Hydrol. 245, 153–164 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dwivedi, A., Bose, N.S.C., Kumar, A., Kandula, P., Mishra, D. and Kalra, P.K.: A novel hybrid image compression technique: wavelet-MFOCPN, in Proc. of 9th SID, 2006, pp. 492–495Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Burges, C.J.C., Simard, P., Malvar, H.S.: Improving Wavelet Image Compression with Neural Networks. Microsoft Research, Redmond (2001)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Woods, D.: Back and counter propagation aberrations, IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 1988, pp. 473–479Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Mishra, D., Chandra Bose, N., Tolambiya, A., Dwivedi, A., Kandula, P., Kumar A., and Kalra, P.K., Color image compression with modified forward-only counter propagation neural network improvement of the quality using different distance measures, ICIT’06. 9th International Conference on Information Technology, 2006, pp. 139–140Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sakhre, V., Jain, S., Sapkal, V.S., Agarwal, D.P.: Fuzzy Counter Propagation Neural Network for a class of nonlinear dynamical systems. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2015, 1–12 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sarangapani, J.: Neural Network Control of Nonlinear Discrete Time Systems with Actuator Nonlinearties, p. 265. Taylor & Francis, London (2006)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jagannathan, S., Lewis, F.L.: Discrete Time Neural net Controller for a class of nonlinear dynamical systems. IEEE Trans. Autom. Contr. 41, 1693–1699 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jaddi, N.S., Abdullah, S., Hamdan, A.R.: Optimization of neural network model using modified bat-inspired algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 37, 71–86 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Taiwan Fuzzy Systems Association and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vandana Sakhre
    • 1
  • Uday Pratap Singh
    • 1
  • Sanjeev Jain
    • 1
  1. 1.Madhav Institute of Technology & ScienceGwaliorIndia

Personalised recommendations