International Journal of Fuzzy Systems

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 190–206 | Cite as

Design and Optimization of Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Logic Controller for Delta Parallel Robot Trajectory Control

Article

Abstract

In the view of the problem of designing and optimization of interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller (IT2 FLC) for Delta robot trajectory control, a systematic design method is put forward in this paper. A type-1 fuzzy logic controller (T1 FLC) is designed and optimized. Then, three kinds of method to blur the T1 fuzzy membership functions are proposed to generate IT2 fuzzy sets from the optimized T1 fuzzy sets. A systematic analysis is carried out to study the relationship between blur methods, blur degree and output control surface of IT2 FLC. Output signal enhance coefficient is proposed to make sure the IT2 FLC to provide enough output signal. The optimized IT2 FLC is validated through a set of simulations and by comparing against its type-1 counterpart in the presence of external and internal uncertainties. The simulation results show the optimized IT2 FLC can provide better trajectory tracking performance.

Keywords

Interval type-2 fuzzy logic control Control surface Optimization Delta robot Trajectory tracking control 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the editors and unnamed reviewers for their valuable comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pathmanathan, E., Ibrahim, R.: Development and implementation of fuzzy logic controller for flow control application. In: 2010 International Conference on Intelligent and Advanced Systems (ICIAS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2010, pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kehtarnavaz, N., Nakamura, E., Griswold, N., Yen, J.: Autonomous vehicle following by a fuzzy logic controller. In: Fuzzy Information Processing Society Biannual Conference, 1994. Industrial Fuzzy Control and Intelligent Systems Conference, and the NASA Joint Technology Workshop on Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic, San Antonio, TX, 1994, pp. 333–337Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hilloowala, R.M., Sharaf, A.: A rule-based fuzzy logic controller for a PWM inverter in a stand alone wind energy conversion scheme. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 32, 57–65 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abdullah, S.R.S., Mustafa, M.M., Rahman, R.A., Imm, T.O.S., Hassan, H.A.: A fuzzy logic controller of two-position pump with time-delay in heavy metal precipitation process. In: 2011 International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Robotics (ICPAIR), Putrajaya, 2011, pp. 171–176Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ying, H., Siler, W., Buckley, J.J.: Fuzzy control theory: a nonlinear case. Automatica 26, 513–520 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yahyaei, M., Jam, J.E., Hosnavi, R.: Controlling the navigation of automatic guided vehicle (AGV) using integrated fuzzy logic controller with programmable logic controller (IFLPLC)—stage 1. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 47, 795–807 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Xia, Z., Li, J., Li, J.: Delay-dependent non-fragile H∞ filtering for uncertain fuzzy systems based on switching fuzzy model and piecewise Lyapunov function. Int. J. Autom. Comput. 7, 428–437 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Su, K., Huang, S., Yang, C.: Development of robotic grasping gripper based on smart fuzzy controller. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 17, 595–608 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nguyen, V.B., Morris, A.S.: Genetic algorithm tuned fuzzy logic controller for a robot arm with two-link flexibility and two-joint elasticity. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 49, 3–18 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mendel, J.M.: Uncertain Rule-Based Fuzzy Logic System: Introduction and New Directions. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fu, K.S., Tou, J.T., Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. In: Fu, K.S., Tou, J.T. (eds.), Learning Systems and Intelligent Robots, pp. 1–10. Springer, US (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mendel, J.M., John, R.I., Feilong, L.: Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems made simple. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 14, 808–821 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zaheer, S.A., Jong-Hwan, K.: Type-2 fuzzy airplane altitude control: a comparative study. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ), Taipei, 2011, pp. 2170–2176Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tinkir, M., Onen, U., Kalyoncu, M., Botsali, F.M.: PID and interval type-2 fuzzy logic control of double inverted pendulum system. In: 2010 The 2nd International Conference on Computer and Automation Engineering (ICCAE), Singapore, 2010, pp. 117–121Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ping-Zong, L., Chun-Fei, H., Lee, T.-T.: Type-2 fuzzy logic controller design for buck DC–DC converters. In: The 14th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2005. FUZZ’05, Reno, NV, 2005, pp. 365–370Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hagras, H.A.: A hierarchical type-2 fuzzy logic control architecture for autonomous mobile robots. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 12, 524–539 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Biglarbegian, M., Melek, W.W., Mendel, J.M.: On the stability of interval type-2 TSK fuzzy logic control systems. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. B 40, 798–818 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Qilian, L., Mendel, J.M.: Interval type-2 fuzzy logic systems: theory and design. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8, 535–550 (2000)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hsiao, M., Li, T.S., Lee, J.Z., Chao, C.H., Tsai, S.H.: Design of interval type-2 fuzzy sliding-mode controller. Inf. Sci. 178, 1696–1716 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cortes-Rios, J.C., Gomez-Ramirez, E., Ortiz-de-la-Vega, H.A., Castillo, O., Melin, P.: Optimal design of interval type 2 fuzzy controllers based on a simple tuning algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 23, 270–285 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Martínez, R., Castillo, O., Aguilar, L.T.: Optimization of interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers for a perturbed autonomous wheeled mobile robot using genetic algorithms. Inf. Sci. 179, 2158–2174 (2009)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Castillo, O., Aguilar, L., Cázarez, N., Cárdenas, S.: Systematic design of a stable type-2 fuzzy logic controller. Appl. Soft Comput. 8, 1274–1279 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martínez-Soto, R., Castillo, O., Aguilar, L.T.: Type-1 and type-2 fuzzy logic controller design using a hybrid PSO–GA optimization method. Inf. Sci. 285, 35–49 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wu, D., Wan Tan, W.: Genetic learning and performance evaluation of interval type-2 fuzzy logic controllers. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 19, 829–841 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Linda, O., Manic, M.: Uncertainty-robust design of interval type-2 fuzzy logic controller for Delta parallel robot. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 7, 661–670 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Castillo, O., Cazarez, N., Melin, P.: Design of stable type-2 fuzzy logic controllers based on a fuzzy Lyapunov approach. In: 2006 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, Vancouver, BC, 2006, pp. 2331–2336Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumbasar, T., Hagras, H.: A self-tuning zslices-based general type-2 fuzzy PI controller. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23, 991–1013 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wu, D.: On the fundamental differences between interval type-2 and type-1 fuzzy logic controllers. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 20, 832–848 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Linda, O., Manic, M.: Evaluating uncertainty resiliency of type-2 fuzzy logic controllers for parallel Delta robot. In: 2011 4th International Conference on Human System Interactions (HSI), Yokohama, 2011, pp. 91–97Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Shi, B.P., Han, S.K., Changyong, S., Kyunghwan, K.: Dynamics modeling of a Delta-type parallel robot (ISR 2013). In: 2013 44th International Symposium on Robotics (ISR), Seoul, 2013, pp. 1–5Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hirano, J., Tanaka, D., Watanabe, T., Nakamura, T.: Development of Delta robot driven by pneumatic artificial muscles. In: 2014 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), Besacon, 2014, pp. 1400–1405Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Afroun, M., Chettibi, T., Hanchi, S.: Planning optimal motions for a Delta parallel robot. In: 14th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, 2006. MED’06, Ancona, 2006, pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dongrui, W., Mendel, J.M.: Enhanced Karnik–Mendel algorithms. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 17, 923–934 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kennedy, J.: Particle swarm optimization. In: Encyclopedia of Machine Learning, pp. 760–766. Springer, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ko, C., Wu, C.: A PSO-tuning method for design of fuzzy PID controllers. J. Vib. Control 14, 375–395 (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Taiwan Fuzzy Systems Association and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Lab of Robotics and System, School of Mechatronics EngineeringHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina
  2. 2.School of AstronauticsHarbin Institute of TechnologyHarbinChina

Personalised recommendations