Advertisement

How economic freedom reflects on the Bitcoin transaction network

  • Piergiorgio RicciEmail author
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Based on the assumption that economic freedom facilitates the growth of traditional economic sectors, this study seeks to understand the role it plays in fintech sector. For this purpose, by adopting the social network analysis methodological approach, it considers the geographical network of Bitcoin transactions as a proxy to measure the national level of fintech development and compares it with a set of economic freedom indicators related to the top 70 world economies. The analysis revealed significant relationships between the performed network centrality measures and national levels of economic freedom. In particular, as confirmed by the implemented multilevel regression models, high levels of freedom to trade internationally combined with a restrained value of inflation and low administrative requirements can be considered as determining factors for fintech development. The study also showed a large number of Bitcoin transactions conducted in those countries characterized by fewer capital controls and restrictions, a result that feeds suspicions of illegal behavior, such as money laundering or terrorism financing, carried out through the use of cryptocurrencies. Findings of this research might be strategic for fintech entrepreneurship and policymakers interested in designing policies that aim to foster innovative sectors while ensuring the legality of financial flows.

Keywords

Bitcoin Blockchain Cryptocurrencies Social network analysis Fintech 

JEL Classification

L26 O33 

Notes

Funding

The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Adhami, S., Giudici, G., & Martinazzi, S. (2018). Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings. Journal of Economics and Business.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arvind, N., Joseph, B., Edward, F., Andrew, M., & Steven, G. (2016). Bitcoin and cryptocurrency technologies: A comprehensive introduction. Princeton University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b04-094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auty, R. M. (2005). Resource abundance and economic development. Resource Abundance and Economic Development.  https://doi.org/10.1093/0199275785.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2003). How to analyze large networks with Pajek. Networks.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bawn, K. (1997). Choosing strategies to control the bureaucracy: Statutory constraints, oversight, and the committee system. Journal of Law Economics and Organization.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a023375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berggren, N. (2009). The benefits of economic freedom: A survey. The Independent Review.Google Scholar
  7. Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. (2013). How strategic entrepreneurship and the institutional context drive economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Block, J. H., Fisch, C. O., & van Praag, M. (2017). The Schumpeterian entrepreneur: a review of the empirical evidence on the antecedents, behaviour and consequences of innovative entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1216397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buterin, V., Wiederhold, B. K., Riva, G., & Graffigna, G. (2013). A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. Etherum.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2013.02.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlsson, F., & Lundström, S. (2002). Economic freedom and growth: Decomposing the effects. Public Choice.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019968525415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cebula, R. J., & Clark, J. R. (2012). Lessons from the experience of OECD nations on macroeconomic growth and economic freedom, 2004–2008. International Review of Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-012-0162-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chawathe, S. S. (2018). Clustering blockchain data.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97864-2_3.Google Scholar
  14. Cushman, D. O. (1983). The effects of real exchange rate risk on international trade. Journal of International Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(83)90041-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drainville, D. (2012). An analysis of the Bitcoin electronic cash system. University of Waterloo.Google Scholar
  16. Dutta, S., Reynoso, R. E., Litner, J., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2017). The Global Innovation Index 2017: Innovation Feeding the World. In The Global Innovation Index 2017: Innovation Feeding the World. ISBN: 979-10-95870-04-3.Google Scholar
  17. Foley, S., Karlsen, J. R., & Putnins, T. J. (2019). Sex, drugs, and Bitcoin: How much illegal activity is financed through cryptocurrencies? Review of Financial Studies.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhz015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fronzetti Colladon, A., & Remondi, E. (2017). Using social network analysis to prevent money laundering. Expert Systems with Applications.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.09.029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gohmann, S. F., Hobbs, B. K., & Mccrickard, M. (2008). Economic freedom and service industry growth in the United States. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00259.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gohmann, F. S., Hobbs, K. B., & McCrickard, J. M. (2013). Economic freedom, entrepreneurial activity, and the service sector. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JEPP-Mar-2012-0015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jansen, M., & Nordås, H. K. (2006). Institutions, trade policy and trade flows. SSRN.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.923544.
  23. Lane, P. R. (1997). Inflation in open economies. Journal of International Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(96)01442-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lischke, M., & Fabian, B. (2016). Analyzing the bitcoin network: The first four years. Future Internet.  https://doi.org/10.3390/fi8010007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKenzie, M. D. (1999). The impact of exchange rate volatility of international trade flows. Journal of Economic Surveys.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6419.00075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mingxiao, D., Xiaofeng, M., Zhe, Z., Xiangwei, W., & Qijun, C. (2017). A review on consensus algorithm of blockchain. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2017.8123011.
  27. Nezlek, J. B. (2010). Multilevel modeling and cross-cultural research. Cross-Cultural Research Methods in Psychology.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779381.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, economic theory, and economic performance. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance..  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ober, M., Katzenbeisser, S., & Hamacher, K. (2013). Structure and anonymity of the bitcoin transaction graph. Future Internet.  https://doi.org/10.3390/fi5020237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Polasik, M., Piotrowska, A. I., Wisniewski, T. P., Kotkowski, R., & Lightfoot, G. (2015). Price fluctuations and the use of bitcoin: An empirical inquiry. International Journal of Electronic Commerce.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2016.1061413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Reid, F., & Harrigan, M. (2013). An analysis of anonymity in the bitcoin system. Security and Privacy in Social Networks.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4139-7_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ron, D., & Shamir, A. (2013). Quantitative analysis of the full Bitcoin transaction graph. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39884-1_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Satoshi, N., & Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Bitcoin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-008-9062-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Scott, B. (2016). How can cryptocurrency and blockchain technology play a role in building social and solidarity finance? United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-011-1262-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1994). Modeled variance in two-level models. Sociological Methods & Research.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124194022003004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sørensen, J. B. (2007). Bureaucracy and Entrepreneurship: Workplace effects on entrepreneurial entry. Administrative Science Quarterly.  https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.3.387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stockman, A. C. (1985). Effects of inflation on the pattern of international trade. The Canadian Journal of Economics.  https://doi.org/10.2307/135021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wasserman, S. (1994). Social network analysis in the social and behavioral sciences. In Social network analysis: Methods and applications.Google Scholar
  39. Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2010). Innovation index and the innovative capacity of nations. Futures.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zavolokina, L., Dolata, M., & Schwabe, G. (2017). FinTech transformation: How IT-enabled innovations shape the financial sector. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52764-2_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università degli studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations