Journal of Industrial and Business Economics

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 609–627 | Cite as

The choice between product and logistic innovation in a spatial model with income distribution

  • Stefano ColomboEmail author
  • Luigi Filippini


We consider the strategic choice between product and logistic innovation in a spatial framework where consumers are distributed across a linear city and have different incomes depending on their location. Equilibria depend on the relative efficiency of product and logistic innovation and on the level of income inequality. In a single-plant duopoly, multiple equilibria where firms differentiate their strategy may arise. In particular, we show that, if income inequality is sufficiently low, the firm located close to poor residents might choose to increase quality (product innovation) whereas the rival might choose to reduce transportation costs (logistic innovation). We also consider a multiplant monopoly framework and a joint-venture set-up, finding the conditions for different innovation equilibria to arise. Finally, we find that a social planner should mimic the behaviour of the multi-plant monopolist.


Logistic innovation Product innovation Spatial model Income distribution 

JEL Classification

L13 R40 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. Argote, L., Beckman, S. L., & Epple, D. (1990). The persistence and transfer of learning in industrial settings. Management Science, 36, 140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacchiega, E., & Minniti, A. (2009). The Quality-Income effect and the selection of location. Journal of Urban Economics, 65, 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benassi, C., Chirco, A., & Colombo, C. (2019). Vertical differentiation beyond the uniform distribution. Journal of Economics, 126, 221–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertazzi, L., Speranza, M. G., & Ukovich, W. (1997). Minimization of logistic costs with given frequencies. Transportation Research Part B, 4, 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonanno, G., & Haworth, B. (1998). Intensity of competition and the choice between product and process innovation. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boone, J. (2000). Competitive pressure: The effects on investments in product and process innovation. RAND Journal of Economics, 31, 549–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brekke, K. R., Siciliani, L., & Straume, O. R. (2010). Price and quality in spatial competition. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40, 471–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burns, L. D., Hall, R. W., Blumenfeld, D. E., & Daganzo, C. F. (1985). Distributions strategies that minimize transportation and inventory cost. Operations Research, 33, 469–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, C. H., Ishida, J., & Mukherjee, A. (2018). An entry game with learning and market competition. Working paper.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, W. M., & Klepper, S. (1996). Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: The case of process and product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 232–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dos Santos Ferreira, R., & Thisse, J. F. (1996). Horizontal and vertical differentiation: The Launhardt model. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14, 485–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Epple, D., Argote, L., & Murphy, K. (1996). An empirical investigation of the micro-structure of knowledge acquisition and transfer through learning-by-doing. Organization Science, 2, 58–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Filippini, L., & Martini, G. (2010). Strategic choice between process and product innovation under different competitive regimes. International Game Theory Review, 12, 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gabszewicz, J. J., & Thisse, J. F. (1979). Price competition, quality and income disparities. Journal of Economic Theory, 20, 340–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hendel, I., & Neiva de Figueiredo, J. (1997). Product differentiation and endogenous disutility. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 16, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hesse, M., & Rodrigue, J. P. (2004). The transport geography of logistic and freight distribution. Journal of Transport Geography, 12, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lambertini, L., & Orsini, R. (2000). Process and product innovation in a vertically differentiated monopoly. Economics Letters, 68, 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lederer, P. J., & Hurter, A. P. (1986). Competition of firms: Discriminatory pricing and location. Econometrica, 54, 623–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin, P., & Saggi, K. (2002). Product differentiation, process R&D and the nature of market competition. European Economic Review, 46, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Porter, M. H. (1995). On competition. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  21. Rosenkranz, S. (2003). Simultaneous choice of process and product innovation when consumers have a preference for product variety. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 50, 183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shaked, A., & Sutton, J. (1982). Relaxing price competition through product differentiation. Review of Economic Studies, 49, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Terziovsky, M., & Guerrero, J.-L. (2014). ISO 9000 quality system and certification and its impact on product and process innovation performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 158, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tirole, J. (1988). The theory of industrial organization. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Wagner, S. M., & Sutter, R. (2012). A qualitative investigation of innovation between third-party logistics providers and customers. International Journal of Production Economics, 140, 944–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu, T., Shen, H., & Zhou, C. (2015). A multi-period location model with transportation economies-of-scale and perishable inventory. International Journal of Production Economics, 169, 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Associazione Amici di Economia e Politica Industriale 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Università Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations